We were unaware about it and for security reasons we have removed all the team members
Are you trying to say you were unaware of the team which you presented to investors? Get the fuck out of here  Great, they choose me for translation.
Now, they will scam me, maybe soon.
Can you point me to their bounty topic? I am too lazy too search it. Never mind, I have found it. Besides, you shouldn't be worried about you not being payed by them, you should be worried about people you will deceive by your translated topic - the best part, you know all details. |
|
|
|
Please change topic to "crypto-home or crypto-home.info scam" to make it visible on search engines.
Or to hollycrypto.info or to whatever their next name will be  edited |
|
|
|
I checked only two people, but it's possible that the whole team is a fake
You don't have to look further than this, their vice president is fake - project is fake. It's simple as that. Nice catch, there are too many scams lately and I am happy to see more and more members are fighting back.
Just to edit post and qoute this before I tag them: Selling accounts of Junior Member. 50$ Linking only to the mail. Deeper prices for btpricer. Null reputation. Deal through the guarantor. I would like to write in LC.Thank You
http://archive.is/eDirG |
|
|
|
|
You killed my work sir.
My family suffer.
Hope you happy.
angry angry. Much angry.
|
|
|
|
~
You promoted scam which has been exposed, you ignored scam accusation thread, you ignored -ve feedbacks from 3 DT members and 2 non DT members, you ignored scam warning in that thread, you ignored their excuses in their topic in marketplace-->exchange, you ignored their lies in bounty topic, you ignored everything. And you keep following me around forum and posting lies: Warning: this project is scam
~
[/color][/size][/center]
Be careful and do not trust this person. He draws, and not everyone returns a neutral trust. Gives the conditions in the fulfillment of which he promises to return neutral trust, Then not everyone comes back. Who does not return - without explanation adds ignoring. He says one thing, but the floor is not done. I blocked your PM's after few times I've sent you what to do and after you lied couple of times. Besides, it was you who choose to promote exposed scam - so don't blame anyone else for your own actions.
Who said he shouldn't be tagged for failing to act?
Wondering why no one tagged him/her. I'm not interested in tagging people for that; talk to marlboroza. Are you guys still talking about this account https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1813710?Thank you please do join our community on telegram for quick updates
Thank you, its an idea we've brain-stormed and likely we are ahead of our planned roadmap outline currently doing the beta platform development keep in touch for more information
Regards and be sure we have a serious team and great minds behind this project! Interact with us on social platforms
WARNING - THIS IS A SCAM - FAKE TEAM
Talk to marlboroza? What's that suppose to mean? I don't think posting a disclaimer should be a get-out-of-jail-free card for any and all scams and shadiness. What if I posted an account sale with a disclaimer that said "I am only hosting this sale, am not involved in the sale, don't endorse this sale, and won't be held liable for this sale"? What if I hosted a Bitcoin Doubler with a similar disclaimer?
There is really no need to appeal to the extremes. I'm sure that you've understood what I meant. Why is this extreme?
Someone accepted to run campaign for investment fraud - and they have disclaimer. Why is this different than anything else with disclaimer?
The example was a clear appeal to extremes. Get a hold of yourself; the above conjecture is just pure silliness.  Hashkon is ponzi[BOUNTY] Hashkon- Only Staking Platform with Withdrawal Trust- 💲571k$ POOL💲This wasn't example. Why is this extreme? They accepted to run campaign for investment fraud - and they have disclaimer. Should washib be tagged for running bounty for obvious investment fraud? |
|
|
|
I didn't check other tokens, only this one SODTE2. Creator made 2 videos(both for satoshi orbit 1 and 2): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1y5AYPBlFBg and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYCIAWQRhk0There is link in description: Cryptocurrency is a global phenomenon.
Anyone can become a millionaire.
www.satoshiorbit.io Link is redirecting to this site: http://www.satoshiorbit.io
302 Found
http://splus.io
200 OK It seems satoshi plus had ICO(ito) for, if I am looking it correctly, exchange... ...which is, well, offline (" Hmm. We’re having trouble finding that site.") |
|
|
|
Hello Mr. 2014, thanks for stopping by after 4 years of inactivity  members are now considered not-trusted for trying to make money?
This is not true. Who said that? If they are getting paid by the bounty campaign, how does that make them a scammer?
It doesn't. Who said that? If you want to label people for participating in suspicious campaigns, give them neutral trust as a warning that the user is participating in that campaign.
If person A expose scam, persons B,C,D tag scam, persons E, F place warning inside bounty and person G choose to promote it after all that, person G shouldn't be trusted. Stop twisting facts. No one is tagging bounty hunters only because they are advertising ICO's. To be honest accepting to promote obvious ponzi ICO's shouldn't be different than accepting to advertise any of these sites inside Investor-based games. Why there is difference?This forum isn't a childcare centre, we don't need babysitters to sit the babies! Of course not, just don't come here to whine when someone scams you, steal your money and doesn't pay you for your work. This is my alt account, as I believe my main account would quickly be negative trusted for having an opinion against the powerful players of this forum. I guess that is what this forum has come to. This is stupid assumption. Point being: Polls are easily cheated and present a useless metric. You don't want random farmers to decide on forum policies.
So what are we to do, trust your power-hungry judgement? Why are you trolling? Instead, fix that problem, set a ranking limit for polls that determine forum policy. Make a specific board accessible to those who earnt their rank.
Who will vote? Farming accounts who become senior/hero/legendary before merit was introduced[1]? Hacked S/H/L accounts[2]? How will you determine who earned rank? I highly doubt that your farming dilema will not be solved or you could continue using that excuse if you set a working ranking limit and beta tested with wide-member feedback over time.
I would go with KYC for AVC (anti-vote-cheating) because of MFA[1] and MHA[2] |
|
|
|
If I say he is involved with both project how you will prove me wrong in fact he/she have own ICO LAUNCH SERVICES. Can you prove me wrong ? Even though we know he/she isn't involved but question is why he/she posting ANN continuously with fake team and still never locked thread even exposed. How do we know? Of course they are involved, it is their "project": I think the idea behind this project is new when it comes to many blockchain projects out there, it's success will depend on the team
Regards and be sure we have a serious team and great minds behind this project! Interact with us on social platforms Not sure about second project
Who said he shouldn't be tagged for failing to act?
Wondering why no one tagged him/her. I don't think anyone here is robot. You don't want random farmers to decide on forum policies
Obviously I didn't. But trust isn't moderate by forum or forum policies. Bad idea. Stay on topic. |
|
|
|
I posted a reply asking for spreadsheet. This is only partially true. I was shocked to see the bounty reward and with a doubt in my mind Tell me more about your doubt. |
|
|
|
200% annual its normal profit that we can get from GPU.
How much money will you earn if you invest 10000$, compound interest and buy equipment every day in next 6 years? Provide me full calculation. You claim 200% is normal profit. So is this a scam or is the team fake? They are two very different allegations. A fake team sure, can show big signs of a scam, but until the penny is taken, there is no scam. You should put "potential" before "scam" if nothing has been stolen, yet.
Of course it is not scam, they only have fake team and lying to investors |
|
|
|
This project has stolen identities of other people and presented them as their team members.
Read more about it https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5024548.0
Member of this forum who choose to advertise it after this message will be tagged with
negative feedback. |
|
|
|
We do not want to show widely our team, we fulfil all our obligations and will fulfill them.
we are not a scam.
So you lied to potential investors that persons on your site are part of your team. Cloud mining? Check. Fake team? Check. 200% annual? Check. |
|
|
|
~
https://www.silvermillerlaw.com/current-investigations/bitconnect/https://www.silvermillerlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/2018-7-3-DE-48-THIRD-AMENDED-CLASS-ACTION-COMPLAINT.pdfYou will get to youtube part in second link(and people who advertised it on youtube) According to youtube's ToS: 7.1 As a YouTube account holder you may submit Content. You understand that whether or not Content is published, YouTube does not guarantee any confidentiality with respect to Content.
7.2 You retain all of your ownership rights in your Content, but you are required to grant limited licence rights to YouTube and other users of the Service. These are described in paragraph 8 of these Terms (Rights you licence).
7.3 You understand and agree that you are solely responsible for your own Content and the consequences of posting or publishing it. YouTube does not endorse any Content or any opinion, recommendation, or advice expressed therein, and YouTube expressly disclaims any and all liability in connection with Content.
The same can apply to twitter promoters, facebook promoters - that is why social media is banning crypto advertising, they don't want to face law suit because of actions of other people. You see, when it comes to trial, disclaimer really means nothing.
Ok, I see your point about bounty managers don't have to do due diligence - you are right about this, they don't. |
|
|
|
I don't think posting a disclaimer should be a get-out-of-jail-free card for any and all scams and shadiness. What if I posted an account sale with a disclaimer that said "I am only hosting this sale, am not involved in the sale, don't endorse this sale, and won't be held liable for this sale"? What if I hosted a Bitcoin Doubler with a similar disclaimer?
There is really no need to appeal to the extremes. I'm sure that you've understood what I meant. I don't. Why is this extreme? Someone accepted to run campaign for investment fraud - and they have disclaimer. Why is this different than anything else with disclaimer? Crossposting: A BM has nothing to do with investors, nor is he/she required to do their due diligence. Accepting a project =/= endorsement =/= guaranteed/expected high returns. We aren't going to censor projects based on potential returns now, are we?
Are they required to do due diligence or not? |
|
|
|
Satoshi must have many reasons to be disappointed, the amount of scam ICOs is just increasing and the number of hard fork made in bitcoin with ridiculous names are many. he really has reason to be disappointed
Not at all, Vitalik should be disappointed. I really like idea behind ethereum and other smart contract platforms but unfortunately in most cases they are used only to scam people. Bitcoin-protocol isn't hard fork, it is just another erc20 token. Satoshi doesn't have any reason to be disappointed they should be proud of what they created. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
