Stricter regulations are definitely coming, and for many shitcoins that were created and minted out of thin air, that will signal the end for them. Not all altcoins will be affected and some will adapt and survive. Others will (rightfully so) be destroyed. I don't see a good future for the stablecoins market either. But bitcoin is decentralized and will be able to cope with whatever is thrown its way, unless its underlying security and mining operation gets attacked.
So, Bitcoin won't destroy altcoins. Regulation, well-informed investors, and no reason for existence are some of the things that will end many alts.
|
|
|
we all know no one can controls the bitcoin price because bitcoin isn't like bank, stock and valas. What is valas? Is that some non-English term for fiat and traditional currencies or what are we talking about? So even if a single person held a huge chunk of Bitcoin, that wouldn't give him special powers over the protocol. I think that what OP was asking with this part is whether owning a huge chunk of Bitcoin would give that individual enough power to move prices according to their will. The short answer is no. The long answer is that collusions are certainly possible if it suits the interests of all involved parties, particularly if that interest is making even more money. But a few whales can't do much even if they had ulterior motives. You would need to create a domino effect where your actions cause a significant part of the holders to either dump or buy more if you want the market to go a certain direction. It's a bit easier If you have big media behind your back that scares the unknowing population with bitcoin bans, the death of bitcoin, strict regulation, and more harmful stories.
|
|
|
Oslobodilo se i jedno mjesto za Sr. Membere u FreeBitco.in signature kampanji kod Hhampuz-a. Moje iskustvo je da on dosta brzo popunjava otvorene pozicije u svojim kampanjama čim vidi prijavu osobe koja mu odgovara. Ko želi da se prijavi, mora to da učini brzo. Thank you all for yet another great week, keep it up! We have 1x Sr. Member position open, apply now! Uslovi i tjedne isplate su ostale iste kako je navedeno u tablici.
|
|
|
He's basically asking people to write him a 500 words article for free as a "sample". Let me get this right: So to work with this person, they ask you to write them a sample article of 500 words. That's supposed to be a test to determine your quality as a writer, right? But in reality, that sample article given on a specific topic can be exactly what OP wants, and they don't need your article writing services at all after that. To make it more believable, OP could trick you with big promises that they will throw a lot of work your way etc., etc. Be careful who you work with, especially on platforms where evidence could be easily deleted such as Telegram. I am not saying it's a scam, but it could play out exactly as I explained above. Take some time to check out OP's trust feedback as well. Although it's not from DT members, it should still be taken into consideration. Btw, what does OP want their clients to write about?
|
|
|
Ako se ne varam, FREE 500 BUSD vaučer se daje kao "trial fund". To znači da ih možete koristiti za trgovanje i možete izvući samo zaradu koju ostvarite iz probnog fonda, ali ne i samih 500 BUSD. Znači, nešto kao kredit kojeg morate naknadno vratiti nazad Binance-u, ali bez kamata i kolaterala. To je onda vrlo slično onome što kladionice znaju uraditi kada korisnicima podjele free bet-ove u određenom iznosu. Dobiješ npr. free bet od $10 i novac koji dobiješ je tvoj, a ovih $10 ne možeš uzeti. Dobitak ti onda zavisi od koeficienta kojeg si odigrao. Ako se okladiš na utakmica gdje je koeficient 2 i pogodiš, na $10 dobivaš $20. $10 je tvojih a početnik $10 kladionica vraća sebi. Ovo na prvi pogled izgleda kao veliki iznos međutim dosta velika promjena u vrijednosti jednog coina bi morala da se desi da se čovjek s ovim zaista opari. Sad je pitanje dozvoljavaju li longat i shortat sa ovim iznosom... A ako izgubim tih 500 BUSD trebam li ih svejedno vratiti ili nikom ništa? Samim gubitkom si ih vratio. Mislim da nisi dužan vraćati dodatnih 500 BUSD. Do to rade na taj način, već bi se naveliko govorilo o prevari.
|
|
|
The late Hal is a legend in these circles, but his Twitter activity doesn't really bear any significance for Bitcoin nor would the deletion of his account cause an important loss for the ecosystem. If that number on your picture is correct, he made only 41 tweets, and most of them don't even have anything to do with BTC. Some are also retweets of what other people said.
Not sure how to interpret what Elon wrote and what the requirements for an account to be deleted are. He said accounts with no tweets will be deleted. Hal's account has tweets. The other requirement is no log ins for years. Unless someone from Hal's family logs into his Twitter account from time to time, that could be a reason for account deletion. We will have to see whether both conditions must be met for a Twitter account to be deleted or if one of them is enough.
|
|
|
If I am not wrong money isn't prohibited in any religion so bitcoin itself a currency so its Islamic for sure. It's not the money that is prohibited, it's the way you use the money and how you have earned it. Islamic nations invest just like everyone else and they use fiat like all other people. What is not acceptable is to profit from interest. If you borrow 1 BTC from a Muslim who respects those principles, he isn't allowed to request that you pay him back 1.1 BTC. You give back what you borrowed with no interest. While who really cares about religion when it comes to money, when you made billions you will be accepted no matter what religion you belong so as a commoner we need to realise the religions are created by us to progress humans not to keep them under control. Since when are religions guided by progress, development, freedom, or even peace? You do what you are told and what is written in the holy books with no complaints. Independent minds are neither desirable nor welcome in religious circles. They undermine their positions of power and control. Ricky Gervais made a good tweet about religion a long time ago. He said: I see Atheists are fighting and killing each other again, over who doesn't believe in any God the most. Oh, no..wait.. that never happens." https://twitter.com/rickygervais/status/247246481185202177?lang=en
|
|
|
Ovo za Google račun nisam ni primijetio do sad. Nisam nikad probao može li se Android mobitel koristiti bez Google računa. Ako može, onda stvarno ne vidim potrebu za kreiranjem računa. Nisam čitao cijeli tutorijal ali to sa Google računom je odmah na početku. Pretpostavljam da treba preuzeti neki softver sa Play Store-a pa je zbog toga potreban i Google nalog. Možda taj softver nije dostupan kao .APK file koji bi se kablom mogao prebaciti na mobilni. Doduše i ovaj tutorijal je 5 godina star i sigurno imaju novija i bolja rješenja.
|
|
|
Ma ja mislim da ti daju tih 500 BUSD za trading fee. Nema šanse da za obavljanje KYC-a daju toliku lovu koju bi korisnici mogli trošiti kako žele. Ovako im daju 500 BUSD da troše na trading fee i time ih potaknu da još više koriste burzu. Vrlo moguće da je za transakcijske naknade. Baš ću detaljnije pogledati sljedeći put kad dođe ponuda. Nisam ni mislio da je to novac kojeg će korisnici moći tek tako povuči na svoje adrese jer gdje je tu onda Binance? Cilj je da to sve "prokockaš" ili ostaviš kod njih na neki drugi način gdje će oni imati koristi. Kao i kockarnice što nude bonuse kod registracije pa vlada mišljenje da su to besplatne pare. A ono moraš prvo deponovati svoj lični novac, pa onda vrtiti bonus 20x, 30x, ili više puta, postoji maksimalni ulog preko kojeg ne smiješ preći kad igraš, itd, itd. I tvoj besplatni novac se vrlo brzo vrati u njihove džepove...
|
|
|
Pravi hardcore bitcoin-eri će ti reć da to nije dovoljno dobro rješenje ili da ne valja uopšte. Pravi airgapped sustav se pravi na novo-instaliranom operativnom sustavu i na uređaju koji više nema mogućnost da se spoji na internet. Dakle, nema mrežne i WIFI kartice. I da želiš, nemaš mogućnosti da se konektuješ na internet. Kod telefona to ne možeš postići jer ne možeš izvaditi te određene komponente. Tu su i razonrazne antene i senzori. Odmah na početku tog tutorijala spominje se kreiranje Google naloga. Sve što oni nude špiunira i narušava privatnost korisnika. Tako da uređaj nije cold jer je bio konektovan na internet i koristi usluge koje je pravio Google gdje može doći do sinhronizacije ili komunikacije sa njihovim centralnim serverima bez obzira kako se podese postavke.
|
|
|
If someone has installed the Blue Wallet app on their Android then imports it from the Trust Wallet app by entering the phrase as I explained above, that means that's not a safe step. Maybe you mean a safer step is to move coins by sending coins from the Trust Wallet address to the Blue Wallet address. Is it really like that? Ask yourself why are you are even switching wallets in the first place? Obviously, there must be something you don't like about the Trust Wallet that warrants the change you are making. If that wasn't the case, you wouldn't be making the switch, would you? But because you did, you should abandon everything that has to do with your old wallet. The seed is the most important part of your setup. Replicating it in multiple wallets weakens your security, and it doesn't solve the problem that recovery phrase originates from a client you decided to abandon to use something better. The same people who believe that the CEX you mention is something they should trust, surely believe that they should trust the Trust wallet just because it has "trust" in its name. If some kind of research were done, I have no doubt that a large percentage of those who use this wallet would probably admit that they use it because of the name, which is of course absurd in every way. I would be interested in taking a look at those results myself, but I don't think the name is the main reason. It's the connection with Binance and CZ that gives many people reassurance that the wallet is good and can be trusted in the same way they trust his exchange.
|
|
|
Da, email slabo i otvaram osim vezano za posao ako sta ima. A ovo za vaucere i ostalo preko app sve rjesavam Ja isto tako na emailu koji mi je vezan za mjenačnice s vremena na vrijeme dobijem neke ponude od Binance. Prvo su mi nudili neku siću da obavim KYC jer ga nisam radio. Izgleda da su te kampanje prestale ali zato sad često vidim i ponude tipa 500 BUSD ukoliko uradim to i to. S obzirom da me ne zanima, nisam nikad ni čitao šta tačno traže već samo brišem poruke. Ali sigurno opet žele da se obavi KYC jer bez toga ništa više i ne funkcioniše na Binanceu. A onda možda žele da deponujem neka sredstva, obavim par trade-ova ili isprobam određene značajke mjenačnice gdje su mi veće šanse da mi se pozicije likvidiraju pa će onda da me nagrade sa malo beslatnog novca.
|
|
|
If casinos were that strict about whether you and your family will have enough money to get you through the month, they would throw out or ban many of their clients. But they don't. And they don't mind you gambling your life savings on their games. The more people do it, the better it is for them. The gamble for fun slogans and the "stop when the fun stops" is just them trying to look good in the eyes of the general public and their regulators. When has a casino ever asked someone if they are sure they want to gamble, and how that will affect the financial stability of their family?
|
|
|
Ni ja ne kužim zašto imati više hardware walleta. Jedino šta mi pada na pamet je da se napravi Multisig... Opet je preskupa varijanta za multisig ako bi neko kupio dva ili više uređaja od skoro €300 po komadu samo zbog toga. Jedan 2-od-3 multisig se može napraviti sa jednim hardverskim novčanikom, jednim papirnim novčanikom, a treći može da bude ili mobilni ili softverski desktop novčanik. Najveća opasnost prijeti od ovog softverskog hot walleta. Ali čak i da taj ključ/seed procuri, potreban je još jedan da bi se bitcoin mogao pomjeriti sa adrese. Sigurnost kvalitetnog hardverskog i novčanika i paper walleta kreiranog na pravi način je veća i ne bi smjela omogučiti krađu kripta. Ako se to ipak desi, nisu su poštovale preporučene mjere opreza.
|
|
|
Jos jedan dobar nacin za provjetiti da li je ista vezano za Binance legit je Binance Verify. Slažem se ali i s tim treba biti oprezan. Binance u mailovima koje šalje svojim korisnicima ima taj anti-phishing code ali pretpostavljam da se i ti kodovi pohranjuju na nekom serveru negdje. Ti podatci bi mogli da dođu u ruke neželjenim osobama pa se ne smije ni na to osloniti. Hakeri bi također mogli napraviti lažnu Binance verify stranicu koja će njihove linkove prikazivati kao validne. Tako da ko se želi osloniti na tu stranicu onda nek je ubaci u svoje bookmarkse, nipošto pitati Google. Pogotovo ako u browseru koji se koristi nisu instalirani kvalitetni ad blockeri.
|
|
|
Maybe the ECB knows or plans something on a large scale we don't yet know about. Corporations and institutions don't fight clean. We already know what their opinion of Bitcoin is and that they will do everything in their power to have it destroyed. One way to do that is attacking the security infrastructure that preserves the network. They are not going to do it like that because they would look like the bad guys. But if you wrap your plans up in a colorful package explaining how a bitcoin mining ban stops climate change, makes life on earth more sustainable, cleaner, and safer for everyone, you will get enough idiots on your side. Getting their corrupt friends to accept their plans of a EU-wide mining ban coupled with the same thing in the US would create devastating consequences. Self preservation. As soon as they lose the ability to control your money, they lose all the power and relevance they ever had. I would love to live in that world one day. I just don't see that happening in my lifetime. A worldwide revolution is required against centralized institutions of power. But this terrified population isn't going to do anything. A small minority will and does from time to time, but they get dealt with quickly.
|
|
|
Ledger is the only hardware wallet ho has this certification (I don't know how much good is it anyway) That's probably because Ledger is the only hardware wallet vendor that operates out of France. ANSSI is the French National Cybersecurity Agency. Other countries may or may not have their own laws, requirements, and standards that companies in those jurisdictions need to adhere to. When an ANSSI certified laboratory checks a product, they issue it a security visa. It's like a stamp or guarantee that is supposed to give customers and all other parties confidence that a national authority has inspected and verified the product. You can find more information about it here: https://www.ssi.gouv.fr/en/actualite/the-anssi-security-visa-by-the-french-national-cybersecurity-agency/
|
|
|
Bez obzira kakav voucher dobili preko maila ili bilo kakve druge specijalne pogodnosti ili pare, nikad ne otvarajte to direktno preko maila i ne klikajte te linkove koje vam neko pošalje. Uvijek idite direktno na zvaničnu stranicu i tamo se ulogujte sa svojom korisničkim podacima nakon što provjerite da ste na pravom mjestu naravno. Bez obzira koliko čovjek vodi računa, pažnja nekad popusti. A kod kripta je dovoljno da se to jednom dogodi i posljedice mogu biti katastrofalne.
|
|
|
Ono sto mi nije jasno je koja je tocno svrja te mogucnost stackanja novcanika jednog na drugi, koja je tocno prednost toga, ako mi netko mozda moze objasniti? Prednost je ta da kad kupiš više komada, Ledger zaradi više para. To će oni vjerovatno reklamirati kao kupi jedan da ti stoji kod kuće, drugi kojeg ćeš koristiti kad putuješ, daj jedan curi, jedan roditeljima... A onda kad bude porodično okupljanje, natakarite jedan na drugi, gledajte tko kakav NFT ima i uživajte u životu sa svojim preskupim Ledger novčanicima. Sad zamisli u glavi jednu veselu i nasmijanu porodicu kao i u svakoj drugoj TV reklami bez obzira šta se reklamira.
|
|
|
Is it normal for such display types to have a ghosting effect when it goes to another page or " this" is another one of Ledger's masterpieces? That's normal for E Ink displays, and you can see that on some Kindles as well. You guessed correctly: the effect is known as "ghosting". The way it's explained, is that E Ink displays are made up of black and white particles. Every time the screen changes, those particles get rearranged to create the next elements on screen. Unfortunately, it also happens that the previous elements don't change completely, so it looks like you can still see what was there before. Those that are new to E Ink ebook readers like Kindles, Kobos and Nooks often ask if it’s normal to see faint text from previous pages on the background of the screen.
The effect is entirely normal with E Ink screens, to a certain extent, and it is often referred to as ghosting. E Ink displays are composed of tiny capsules of black and white particles that get rearranged every time the screen changes, and sometimes they don’t fully change.
Over the years E Ink has made an effort to speed up the refresh rate and minimize full screen flashes, but this results in more ghosting.
Ghosting is an afterimage that remains on the screen after the page has turned or anytime the screen changes.
The ghosting effect appears as a faintly visible grayed-out version of the previous page or image. https://blog.the-ebook-reader.com/2019/10/28/seeing-faint-background-text-on-ebook-readers-is-normal/
|
|
|
|