I would accept the argument that elliptic curve multiplication could be considered a complex process, but again, that doesn't really factor in here. The reason we don't have public key collisions is because we don't have private key collisions. The reason we don't have private key collisions is as simple as because we have almost 2256 private keys to choose from, which is an unfathomably large number.
Oh, well, that explains it! I finally realized that I've been looking at this the wrong way.  I concentrated on the fact that we cannot have public key collisions, that is, that two different private keys result in the same public key. Your argument is far more logical. |
|
|
|
|
Ako nista drugo, mislim da mozete dobiti od MUP-a da izda bar "sluzbeno" upozorenje o potencijalnoj prevari, pa to mozete da upotrebite da biste uverili ljude u telegram grupi. Mislim da sam takva upozorenja vec video na stranicama MUPa i HANFAe.
Samo treba doci do osobe koja ce biti voljna da to istrazi...
|
|
|
|
|
Being a member of bitcointalk forum is a great way to engage with other passionate and enterprising cryptocurrency enthusiasts and be involved in all the open discussion platforms and discussions on Bitcoin, blockchain technology and crypto currency. You can post comments, ask questions, and forward information to other members.
But @Minajx, bear in mind that all posts should be of good quality for your reading colleagues. As a result, the quality of your posting, along with a proper understanding of the rules, will help you to uphold the forum's standards and make your stay enjoyable.
This is not to say that everyone in the forum adheres to this policy, but that they are strongly encouraged to do so.
|
|
|
|
As previously stated, the process of creating a private/public key is so complex that the theoretical possibility of collision exists only as a mathematical probability and is practically equal to zero. That's not quite right. The process of creating a private/public key pair is not that complex and is actually pretty straightforward. I understand what you mean, but I believe that complexity can be expressed in a variety of ways. As it turns out, a collision resistant hash function that can map data of arbitrary size to data of fixed size is extremely difficult to achieve in mathematics. Therefore, I regard the mathematical function underlying the SHA-256 hash algorithm to be highly complex, despite being computationally incredibly fast. |
|
|
|
What mechanism for proof unique public key when creating a wallet happen with several sources(such as "wallet.btc.com" ,"wallet.bitcoin.com", " www.blockchain.com/wallet" and... )? There is no 'mechanism' behind it because no mechanism is needed, imho. As previously stated, the process of creating a private/public key is so complex that the theoretical possibility of collision exists only as a mathematical probability and is practically equal to zero. However, I agree with Coolcryptovator. A much greater risk is the credibility of the service and/or software you use to generate bitcoin addresses. If the software is open-source, you can be confident that hundreds or thousands of developers and programmers have already tested it, while with closed-source services, you have no idea what's going on under the hood. |
|
|
|
As everyone has said, yes you will lose in the long run. But the biggest mistake people make is bet size. If you control size and you stick with levels you are comfortable with, gambling can stay fun and you increase the chance of profit.
Not at all when the game is based on luck even if there's a bet size you do care, even if you have control over the size of bet you don't have the control of the outcome. It's indeed fun but for those who make it as living it could be a little dramatic on their end. He does not mean to say that controlling bet size = controlling the outcome. What he want to say is that we as gambler should have our own limit by controlling our bet so no matter what will be the result then it wont affect us financially. In other words, it is the same as the most popular quote "gamble what you can afford to lose only". Yes, that's how I understood it. It's known as the Golden Rule of gambling. Whatever game you pick, it is important to always follow this golden rule to avoid leaving the casino in total despair and with a financial hole larger than you can handle. It's fun to mess around and have fun for a couple of hours, but never lose sight of the fact that your whole life could change in an instant. |
|
|
|
|
Sports betting has become more and more common around the world, and as such, many people are beginning to get more and more comfortable with it.
All of these suggestions are excellent and important to all newcomers, but I'd like to highlight one more that I believe is crucial:
Choose your bookie wisely. Finding the right gambling site should always be your highest priority.
|
|
|
|
Thank you so much for your honest answers.
Excuse me, in your opinion could ETH reach 26K?
Not in the foreseeable future. For ETH to reach $26k, it would require a market cap of more than $3 trillion, and that is with the current circulating supply of coins; but, we know that supply will continue to increase, so that number should be much higher. It's worth noting that the current global crypto market cap is just over $2 trillion, and this includes all current coins on the market. We all know about BTC's bull run in 2017 and now in 2020/2021, but it is important to remember that the number of coins in the market for BTC is more than six times less than ETH. Which wallet is good?
You can find some recommended wallets on the bitcoin.org website: https://bitcoin.org/en/choose-your-walletor check out this topic: [General] Bitcoin Wallets - Which, what, why? |
|
|
|
Is there any solution for recovering my deleted blockchain public address?
If by "blockchain" you mean the Blockchain.com wallet service, then you can easily see all your "retired" addresses by going to Settings > Wallets and Addresses.  This section of the wallet, found under Settings, is home to all your wallet’s sub-wallets and addresses for bitcoin and bitcoin cash. You can organize your funds, create sub-wallets, and manage your addresses here. https://support.blockchain.com/hc/en-us/articles/207746403-Wallets-Addresses |
|
|
|
You seem to understand everything that you will lose, but you go to play again. How to get rid of gambling addiction?
If you have this thinking then you are considered a compulsive gambler, and you are out of your control and there is a big risk that your vice will lead you to dangerous activities if you are run out of money, now you've realize how hard this can be, you've done the right thing asking the right question and you can start by telling this to your loved ones and seeking professional help, there's a cure on this, just don't lose hope and become open minded. Following that line of thinking, I don't believe there is a cure for gambling addiction. When you're a gambler, you're a gambler for life. I believe that all gamblers (regular or occasional) enjoy the thrill of winning just as much as athletes and other adrenaline junkies. Of course, there are those who have effectively abstained from their gambling urges, but this does not mean that they have been cured of addiction. There is a way to manage your bad habits and impulses. It wasn't until I stopped playing every few days that I was able to pursue hobbies and interests other than gambling. |
|
|
|
Important Note : If you're jobless don't get into gambling, I'm an example. I don't have a job, and that's the reason I wasn't able to keep me deviated from gambling. Hope this helps someone.
People who have a bad luck, always have good luck in the future. That's what I want to share from my case also. Just make your ways as far as possible from any negative behaviour to be close with good luck and that will have a follow through on your habituation. Everytime you have a negative behavior in your life, see it as a gift, because every negative action will put you closer to a better opportunity. Becoming a success means becoming a better version of yourself. Every action you do, you're going to get a better result and it means you'll attract better outcomes into your life. |
|
|
|
How about these: 1- One of the users said something thoughtful: An investor might wanna wait for it to calm down first before investing to BNB yet. It had really jump quickly and this is all because of the ETH high gas fee but when ETH updates and gas fees are lowered, the investors may fly back to ETH leaving BNB to dip. What is your opinion about it? 2- Are BTC, ETH and BNB coins worth buying at current price? For example, some website said about $130,000 for BTC in the future. 3- How about the Sovryn price? 4- Any free website like https://tradesanta.com/en?5- I use https://freewallet.org/, is it a good wallet? 1. I don't think the BNB is overvalued at all. Most projects are in high demand due to their development and use cases. BNB, on the other hand, acts as a gateway leading people to other promising projects, despite being just a utility coin that can reduce the Binance platform's fee. To be honest, I believe it has the potential to get even closer to Ethereum and to be worth more than $1,000. 2. Yes. If you are thinking long term, any of these currencies is a good investment in my opinion. 3. I don't have enough details to make an informed decision about the Sovryn project. 4. I'm not sure. What services does tradesanta.com provide? 5. Definitely not! |
|
|
|
Don't bet on games with house edge if you want to be a successful gambler, that's the main recipe to success. Slots, roulette and even dice with a house edge of 1% , you will still lose, lower house edge better chance to stay longer in gambling but in the long run you will still loss.
Reality is necessary, we will only know it if we understand what our real chances, that's why I focus on sports betting now as I think there's no house edge in this kind of game, some may say there is but I say there's none.
How do you explain your point that there is no house edge in sports betting? That means that if you bet on two completely opposite outcomes at the same time, as long as there is no third choice, you do not risk anything? That, however, is not the case. I think every bookie has to have a house edge. Otherwise, they would lose their liquid assets very quickly. |
|
|
|
And about XRP, What is your estimate about its price in the next weeks? Can I trust to some websites like https://cointobuy.io/? It's difficult to tell. The SEC case against XRP remains, and significant growth will be difficult to achieve as long as that threat exists. The recent rally of XRP's price is largely due to a favorable news in the media. When the dust settles, the price is likely to remain sideways or even start to fall again. At this time, I will not consider investing in XRP. |
|
|
|
|
Other crypto coins, such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, have not only passed their all-time highs, but have more than doubled, while XRP has struggled to reach the $1 mark, which is 75% less than its ATH value of $ 3.84. After the price fell from its all-time high, XRP has not seen its golden days, so there is no doubt that XRP holders have been awaiting this moment and momentum for quite some time.
However, the SEC case against XRP remains, and a serious rally will be difficult to see as long as that challenge exists. The recent rise in the value of XRP is primarily due to positive news flow. As that dissipates, the XRP price will likely continue sideways or even decline.
|
|
|
|
If someone gambles, it's already attached that losing is always be one of the results. Well, there's not that much result but only two exists, to win and to lose.
But most of the results that would happen to us is losing, this happens very often whether you're good and discipline. It's inevitable and whether it's your fate, you must come up with a plan and I agree with what you've said about knowing when you should stop. Whether you win a lot or lose a lot, you should know how to stop.
It is not about most results being losing. If you gamble on a 50% chance game that means you will win 50% of the time and lose 50% of the time, and on a long enough period of time it will reach there and stay there and you will not end up losing more than you win. However the reward payments are if you wager 100 bucks, you win 99 bucks when you win and you lose 100 bucks when you lose, that 1 dollar difference is called the house edge and that is why people do not gamble and win, not in the long run. House edge makes sure that the regular odds of what should happen in the long run helps the casino to profit and that is why there is a low chance that you will make some money on gambling. Obviously anyone can get lucky and win a huge amount, I can go to any website, bet on the lowest chance to win, usually 9999x in many places, and win that if I am lucky, but that doesn't change the fact that in the long run I will lose that too. Yeah. The house edge is an extremely important factor for successful gambling. The cash win is probably the most important reason for playing casino games. The one who says he doesn't like winning is undoubtedly lying, because when it comes to being able to win money quickly and while having fun, there's hardly greater pleasure. However, if you've ever played a game of chance, you'll know that the odds are almost always stacked in favor of the house or casino. As a result, one thing should be understood: losing is an unavoidable aspect of gambling. In games with a low house edge, the player's skill can make a difference, making success less reliant on pure luck. |
|
|
|
I had similar experience with DOGE. Bought 50e years ago and in mean time we can see what happened. Beside that I have a lot shit tokens I hope some of them make me some buks.
The ridiculous thing you're saying is on buying 50 years ago,  is the crypto space 50 years old now? or has DOGE existed in the previous 50 years? it really looks ridiculous when you say so.  It's ridiculous to comment on someone's reply without first reading it properly. How did you come to the conclusion that JooBra bought the DOGE 50 years ago? He most likely meant to say that he bought 50 euros worth of DOGE a few years ago. |
|
|
|
Čini mi se da već sada ima onih koji će ti i odbiti transakciju ako u tvojem lancu transakcija otkrije da si koristio neki mikser, zar ne!?
Prenaivno je vjerovati da postoji apsolutna anonimnost na Internetu ali da bi te netko baš išao istraživati i provjeravati, mora se tu ipak raditi o nekim većim iznosima novca koje prebacuješ.
Postoje i web sajtovi i usluge koje ce vam uskratiti vezu ako primete da koristite VPN, a to ipak nije zaustavilo popularnost VPN usluga i jos uvek su bar jedan korak ispred. Mislim da ce tako biti i sa mikserima, nikada necce postojati sto posto efikasan nacin da se oni izbace iz lanca. A CBDC možda nije direktna konkurencija BTC i ostalim cryptovalutama ali sigurno će im oduzeti dio potencijalnih korisnika, onih koji preferiraju pravnu regulaciju i zaštitu države.
Mozda. Mislim da je to kao sa politikom. Kada se pojavi neka nova stranka, ona ce uvek "zagrabiti" iz birackog tela koje deli iste politicke percepcije i stavove. Koliko god neko bio razocaran SDP-om, sumnjam da ce ikada glasati za, recimo, Skoru ili Hasanbegovica. Tako ce i drzavne digitalne valute privuci deo korisnika koji su vec sada skepticni prema klasicnim kripto valutama. |
|
|
|
Quite a few people in this thread have missed a key point about the Acadamy Awards (Oscars) in that it has become a very topical platform for political statements to be made. Look to the winners of the recent Emmy Awards and you will see strong voter preferences for performances in very relevant to today stories.
The Oscars will be no different.
That's nothing new really, that Oscar has been used by both actors and Academy for political statements. From Marlon Brando and his refusal to pick up Oscar given for his role in The Godfather due portrayal of Native Americans in the movies, 2004 when Crash won the Oscar (undeservingly ) and up until now. So in my opinion, no much point wasting time on that. The Academy Awards have been more than just about movies since their inception. Actors and filmmakers have a long tradition of taking action and speaking out about what they believe is right at the ceremony. And they have no plans to abandon the tradition anytime soon. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
