Bitcoin Forum
June 23, 2024, 06:30:00 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 [167] 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 ... 752 »
3321  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: OGNASTY now Guilty of trademark infringement.. When will this punk stop? on: March 19, 2018, 11:34:40 PM
I would like to see the registration of the Bitcoin NastyPenny™?
® means there is a registered trademark....TM means a trademark is claimed...
3322  Other / Meta / Re: The King Of Copy Pasting on: March 19, 2018, 11:02:04 PM
yea that is against the rules. I don't think it is technically "copy pasting" as in plagiarism though. 
3323  Economy / Lending / Re: Will give a microloan of 0.004BTC for 3 days on: March 19, 2018, 10:57:19 PM
escrow with Lauda or any other reputable member of the forum.

Probably not the best of ideas considering his extortion history.

It also looks like this statement is questionable considering the above post:
Quote
i thought in lending it in bitbond, but the verification process is pending and they say they will take several weeks[...]
3324  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: OGNASTY now Guilty of trademark infringement.. When will this punk stop? on: March 19, 2018, 08:58:47 PM
This post should not be construed as legal advice.

Based upon my review of relivant law, and the facts surrounding the sale of OgNasty’s “bitcoin NastyPenny” I would say the case for trademark infringement is far from an open and shut case.

The standard for infringement appears to be if the use of a trademark (or something very similar to a trademark) is likely to cause confusion to a consumer.  One important fact is that OgNasty was in fact selling a product named in the trademark with additional “features”.

Although not pertinent to the legal evualation of the situation, bitcoinpenny did post that OgNasty’s sale of the coins were seen positively by what is essentially a portion of his customer base. I would suggest that he at least make an evualation as to if OgNasty’s specific use of bitcoin and penny have a net positive impact on his business— if so he should consent to the limited use of his trademark, making the question of infringement moot.
3325  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: OGNASTY now Guilty of trademark infringement.. When will this punk stop? on: March 19, 2018, 06:53:50 PM
You don't have a trademark on the name NastyPenny.

Of course, I don't have a trademark on the name "NastyPenny." I never claimed to have one on the name "NastyPenny." However, I do have a trademark on "Bitcoin Penny." Inserting the word "Nasty" into the middle of "Bitcoin Penny" is the infringement.
Correct!

Trademark: "Mercedes Benz"

Trademark infringement: "Mercedes Nasty Benz"  Cheesy

What an insult!

However it doesn't work like that. First of all you can't claim to have copyrights on the word ''bitcoin'' nor the word ''penny'' They only have copyrights on  ''BitcoinPenny'' as a whole, not separate. You can't claim copyright if someone decides to use ''bitcoin'' or ''penny'' just like ''wholefoods'' would not be able to claim copyright if someone uses the word food.
Do you mean if someone uses "BtcoinPenny" = trademark infringement and if someone uses "Bitcoin Penny" = no trademark infringement?

Does he claim copyright because someone uses "bitcoin" or "penny" or does he claim copyright because someone uses both and added Nasty between it?
As far as I can tell, the only part of the trademark used was the word “penny”. (Someone can correct me if I missed something).
3326  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: OGNASTY now Guilty of trademark infringement.. When will this punk stop? on: March 19, 2018, 04:32:04 PM
You don't have a trademark on the name NastyPenny.

Of course, I don't have a trademark on the name "NastyPenny." I never claimed to have one on the name "NastyPenny." However, I do have a trademark on "Bitcoin Penny." Inserting the word "Nasty" into the middle of "Bitcoin Penny" is the infringement.
I am no expert on IP law, however I don’t think this would be an infringement. The infringement, if one exists would be from the use of “in code we trust” on the backside of the coin (he didn’t use your actual coin, did he? If so then I don’t think there is any grounds to argue infringement) where it said “in code we trust” and similar.

As I mentioned previously, additional research needs to be done on IP law to give an opinion one way or another.

Cases of trademark infringement are rarely open and shut and as such these types of disputes can result in litigation, the outcome of which is often unclear until a ruling has been made.

He did use a bitcoinpenny coin - so you agree that is trademark infringement
No. I am not sure how I could have been more clear in my post..

by not making it?? you provide 0 value
I don’t think you understand what trademark infringement is.
3327  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: OGNASTY now Guilty of trademark infringement.. When will this punk stop? on: March 19, 2018, 04:16:07 PM
You don't have a trademark on the name NastyPenny.

Of course, I don't have a trademark on the name "NastyPenny." I never claimed to have one on the name "NastyPenny." However, I do have a trademark on "Bitcoin Penny." Inserting the word "Nasty" into the middle of "Bitcoin Penny" is the infringement.
I am no expert on IP law, however I don’t think this would be an infringement. The infringement, if one exists would be from the use of “in code we trust” on the backside of the coin (he didn’t use your actual coin, did he? If so then I don’t think there is any grounds to argue infringement) where it said “in code we trust” and similar.

As I mentioned previously, additional research needs to be done on IP law to give an opinion one way or another.

Cases of trademark infringement are rarely open and shut and as such these types of disputes can result in litigation, the outcome of which is often unclear until a ruling has been made.

He did use a bitcoinpenny coin - so you agree that is trademark infringement
No. I am not sure how I could have been more clear in my post..
3328  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: OGNASTY now Guilty of trademark infringement.. When will this punk stop? on: March 19, 2018, 04:05:29 PM
You don't have a trademark on the name NastyPenny.

Of course, I don't have a trademark on the name "NastyPenny." I never claimed to have one on the name "NastyPenny." However, I do have a trademark on "Bitcoin Penny." Inserting the word "Nasty" into the middle of "Bitcoin Penny" is the infringement.
I am no expert on IP law, however I don’t think this would be an infringement. The infringement, if one exists would be from the use of “in code we trust” on the backside of the coin (he didn’t use your actual coin, did he? If so then I don’t think there is any grounds to argue infringement) where it said “in code we trust” and similar.

As I mentioned previously, additional research needs to be done on IP law to give an opinion one way or another.

Cases of trademark infringement are rarely open and shut and as such these types of disputes can result in litigation, the outcome of which is often unclear until a ruling has been made.
3329  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: OGNASTY now Guilty of trademark infringement.. When will this punk stop? on: March 19, 2018, 02:02:32 PM
Theymos’ libertarian believes do not give a lot of weight to IP.

I don’t think it is clear that a trademark was infringed upon anyway. I would need to research IP laws to get a make a more authoritative statement on this.
3330  Economy / Reputation / Re: owlcatz scamming users by posing as an escrow agent on Telegram? on: March 19, 2018, 07:21:01 AM
OG throwing out baseless accusations like that is more up your street QS - the pair of you are becoming more alike every day
I'm sorry, what is the baseless accusation that I "threw out". I will be sure to quickly back it up with facts and un-refutable  proof.

bore off - this is about OG being bang out of fucking order and telling some newbie who was recently scammed that it was Owlcatz... totally untrue and a real scumbag move.
So for clarification, you have no specific accusation that you would consider "baseless". Is this correct? If not, please point to the specific accusation. Thanks.

can you stop derailing the thread?  This is about OG and his baseless accusation of Owlcatz being the "Telegram Scammer"

It would be a benefit to the community if you shut up for once as I am sure 99% of us would like to catch the real scammer
Thank you. That was exactly what I needed to know Cheesy
3331  Economy / Reputation / Re: owlcatz scamming users by posing as an escrow agent on Telegram? on: March 19, 2018, 07:13:43 AM
OG throwing out baseless accusations like that is more up your street QS - the pair of you are becoming more alike every day
I'm sorry, what is the baseless accusation that I "threw out". I will be sure to quickly back it up with facts and un-refutable  proof.

bore off - this is about OG being bang out of fucking order and telling some newbie who was recently scammed that it was Owlcatz... totally untrue and a real scumbag move.
So for clarification, you have no specific accusation that you would consider "baseless". Is this correct? If not, please point to the specific accusation. Thanks.
3332  Other / Meta / Re: Plagiarism: the difference between "wаllеt" and "wallet" on: March 19, 2018, 07:10:43 AM
a very simple solution to this would be to disallow these types of symbols throughout the forum. Or at the very least in the english sections, in which there is absolutely no reason to need to use them. 
3333  Economy / Reputation / Re: owlcatz scamming users by posing as an escrow agent on Telegram? on: March 19, 2018, 07:04:39 AM
OG throwing out baseless accusations like that is more up your street QS - the pair of you are becoming more alike every day
I'm sorry, what is the baseless accusation that I "threw out". I will be sure to quickly back it up with facts and un-refutable  proof.
3334  Economy / Reputation / Re: owlcatz scamming users by posing as an escrow agent on Telegram? on: March 19, 2018, 06:51:47 AM
Let me know if any of these facts are wrong.

Owl [...] don't use telegram.
Owlcatz has said in the past that he uses telegram, including today.

I highly doubt this OGNasty scam account is controlled by [...] owl, can we all agree that OGNasty's account would be a pretty common target for scammers to impersonate because of his trust status on here?
I understand that OgNasty was saying that owlcatz was one of a small number of people that 'have it out for' OgNasty that use telegram.

Also, owlcatz was part of an extortion conspiracy, which IMO shows he is willing to break the law for financial benefits.

It appears as if other third parties (assuming owlcatz is not lying about the whole ideal) are making the conclusions themselves that owlcatz was the one attempting to impersonate OgNasty attempting a MITM escrow scam.

Also, OgNasty never threatened to call the police on owlcatz, he encouraged telegram to forward information about the actual MITM escrow scammer to the police. Owlcatz later said that he was threatened with police action.


[mod note: removed personal information]
3335  Economy / Reputation / Re: owlcatz scamming users by posing as an escrow agent on Telegram? on: March 19, 2018, 02:36:49 AM
You have no idea what's coming.... seriously. 
What, are you going to try to extort me too? Or are you going to leave that to lauda?

I don't pay extortion demands, sorry.
3336  Economy / Reputation / Re: owlcatz scamming users by posing as an escrow agent on Telegram? on: March 19, 2018, 02:28:09 AM
Oh wow, it looks like owlcatz might be a serial scammer. First conspiring to extort people with lauda, TMAN and others, and now he is trying to impersonate extremely trusted escrow agents on Telegram. Maybe it wasn't him directly, maybe it was someone in his close group.

This certainly does not look good for him.
3337  Other / Archival / Re: OgNasty is telling scammed newbies on his Escrow thread it was me without proof? on: March 19, 2018, 12:58:40 AM
Your behavior and interactions with him clearly shows you were conspiring with lauda (and others) to attempt to extort at least one person.
3338  Other / Archival / Re: OgNasty is telling scammed newbies on his Escrow thread it was me without proof? on: March 19, 2018, 12:38:46 AM
Well to be fair, you were part of an extortion conspiracy, so it would probably be a good idea to avoid doing any kind of business with you.

Wrong as usual
I am not wrong. If anyone has any questions about if there is truth to this, see the below screenshot:



3339  Other / Archival / Re: OgNasty is telling scammed newbies on his Escrow thread it was me without proof? on: March 19, 2018, 12:07:14 AM
Well to be fair, you were part of an extortion conspiracy, so it would probably be a good idea to avoid doing any kind of business with you.
3340  Economy / Services / Re: LEGENDARY BITCOIN ESCROW SERVICE (More than 19K BTC transferred) - alts too! on: March 18, 2018, 10:31:19 PM
Where’s the part I’m telling people you’re scamming?  Guilty conscience much?

Hey asshole - Read the telegram chat - this guy keeps accusing me of scamming. I ask who told him that, he says it was you... Learn to read.

You are crossing the line with your little fucking persecution complex. I have no guilty conscious, I'm just pissed you are trying to blame me. Fuck you, asshole.

Learn some respect and stop fucking with me. I don't give 2 shits about anyone here or you, and I'm no scammer, ask anyone I know..

Let's do the owlcatz vs. Ognasty rep thread then, eh? You still up for it? Hmmm.... I am... Grin
Considering how many shill accounts one of your extortion parters have, I would expect a lot of shills backing you Cheesy
Pages: « 1 ... 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 [167] 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 ... 752 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!