I would like to see the registration of the Bitcoin NastyPenny™?
® means there is a registered trademark.... TM means a trademark is claimed...
|
|
|
yea that is against the rules. I don't think it is technically "copy pasting" as in plagiarism though.
|
|
|
escrow with Lauda or any other reputable member of the forum.
Probably not the best of ideas considering his extortion history. It also looks like this statement is questionable considering the above post: i thought in lending it in bitbond, but the verification process is pending and they say they will take several weeks[...]
|
|
|
This post should not be construed as legal advice. Based upon my review of relivant law, and the facts surrounding the sale of OgNasty’s “bitcoin NastyPenny” I would say the case for trademark infringement is far from an open and shut case. The standard for infringement appears to be if the use of a trademark (or something very similar to a trademark) is likely to cause confusion to a consumer. One important fact is that OgNasty was in fact selling a product named in the trademark with additional “features”. Although not pertinent to the legal evualation of the situation, bitcoinpenny did post that OgNasty’s sale of the coins were seen positively by what is essentially a portion of his customer base. I would suggest that he at least make an evualation as to if OgNasty’s specific use of bitcoin and penny have a net positive impact on his business— if so he should consent to the limited use of his trademark, making the question of infringement moot.
|
|
|
You don't have a trademark on the name NastyPenny.
Of course, I don't have a trademark on the name "NastyPenny." I never claimed to have one on the name "NastyPenny." However, I do have a trademark on "Bitcoin Penny." Inserting the word "Nasty" into the middle of "Bitcoin Penny" is the infringement. Correct! Trademark: "Mercedes Benz" Trademark infringement: "Mercedes Nasty Benz" ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) What an insult! However it doesn't work like that. First of all you can't claim to have copyrights on the word ''bitcoin'' nor the word ''penny'' They only have copyrights on ''BitcoinPenny'' as a whole, not separate. You can't claim copyright if someone decides to use ''bitcoin'' or ''penny'' just like ''wholefoods'' would not be able to claim copyright if someone uses the word food. Do you mean if someone uses "BtcoinPenny" = trademark infringement and if someone uses "Bitcoin Penny" = no trademark infringement? Does he claim copyright because someone uses "bitcoin" or "penny" or does he claim copyright because someone uses both and added Nasty between it? As far as I can tell, the only part of the trademark used was the word “penny”. (Someone can correct me if I missed something).
|
|
|
You don't have a trademark on the name NastyPenny.
Of course, I don't have a trademark on the name "NastyPenny." I never claimed to have one on the name "NastyPenny." However, I do have a trademark on "Bitcoin Penny." Inserting the word "Nasty" into the middle of "Bitcoin Penny" is the infringement. I am no expert on IP law, however I don’t think this would be an infringement. The infringement, if one exists would be from the use of “in code we trust” on the backside of the coin (he didn’t use your actual coin, did he? If so then I don’t think there is any grounds to argue infringement) where it said “in code we trust” and similar. As I mentioned previously, additional research needs to be done on IP law to give an opinion one way or another. Cases of trademark infringement are rarely open and shut and as such these types of disputes can result in litigation, the outcome of which is often unclear until a ruling has been made. He did use a bitcoinpenny coin - so you agree that is trademark infringement No. I am not sure how I could have been more clear in my post.. by not making it?? you provide 0 value I don’t think you understand what trademark infringement is.
|
|
|
You don't have a trademark on the name NastyPenny.
Of course, I don't have a trademark on the name "NastyPenny." I never claimed to have one on the name "NastyPenny." However, I do have a trademark on "Bitcoin Penny." Inserting the word "Nasty" into the middle of "Bitcoin Penny" is the infringement. I am no expert on IP law, however I don’t think this would be an infringement. The infringement, if one exists would be from the use of “in code we trust” on the backside of the coin (he didn’t use your actual coin, did he? If so then I don’t think there is any grounds to argue infringement) where it said “in code we trust” and similar. As I mentioned previously, additional research needs to be done on IP law to give an opinion one way or another. Cases of trademark infringement are rarely open and shut and as such these types of disputes can result in litigation, the outcome of which is often unclear until a ruling has been made. He did use a bitcoinpenny coin - so you agree that is trademark infringement No. I am not sure how I could have been more clear in my post..
|
|
|
You don't have a trademark on the name NastyPenny.
Of course, I don't have a trademark on the name "NastyPenny." I never claimed to have one on the name "NastyPenny." However, I do have a trademark on "Bitcoin Penny." Inserting the word "Nasty" into the middle of "Bitcoin Penny" is the infringement. I am no expert on IP law, however I don’t think this would be an infringement. The infringement, if one exists would be from the use of “in code we trust” on the backside of the coin (he didn’t use your actual coin, did he? If so then I don’t think there is any grounds to argue infringement) where it said “in code we trust” and similar. As I mentioned previously, additional research needs to be done on IP law to give an opinion one way or another. Cases of trademark infringement are rarely open and shut and as such these types of disputes can result in litigation, the outcome of which is often unclear until a ruling has been made.
|
|
|
Theymos’ libertarian believes do not give a lot of weight to IP.
I don’t think it is clear that a trademark was infringed upon anyway. I would need to research IP laws to get a make a more authoritative statement on this.
|
|
|
OG throwing out baseless accusations like that is more up your street QS - the pair of you are becoming more alike every day I'm sorry, what is the baseless accusation that I "threw out". I will be sure to quickly back it up with facts and un-refutable proof. bore off - this is about OG being bang out of fucking order and telling some newbie who was recently scammed that it was Owlcatz... totally untrue and a real scumbag move. So for clarification, you have no specific accusation that you would consider "baseless". Is this correct? If not, please point to the specific accusation. Thanks. can you stop derailing the thread? This is about OG and his baseless accusation of Owlcatz being the "Telegram Scammer" It would be a benefit to the community if you shut up for once as I am sure 99% of us would like to catch the real scammer Thank you. That was exactly what I needed to know ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
OG throwing out baseless accusations like that is more up your street QS - the pair of you are becoming more alike every day I'm sorry, what is the baseless accusation that I "threw out". I will be sure to quickly back it up with facts and un-refutable proof. bore off - this is about OG being bang out of fucking order and telling some newbie who was recently scammed that it was Owlcatz... totally untrue and a real scumbag move. So for clarification, you have no specific accusation that you would consider "baseless". Is this correct? If not, please point to the specific accusation. Thanks.
|
|
|
a very simple solution to this would be to disallow these types of symbols throughout the forum. Or at the very least in the english sections, in which there is absolutely no reason to need to use them.
|
|
|
OG throwing out baseless accusations like that is more up your street QS - the pair of you are becoming more alike every day I'm sorry, what is the baseless accusation that I "threw out". I will be sure to quickly back it up with facts and un-refutable proof.
|
|
|
Let me know if any of these facts are wrong.
Owl [...] don't use telegram.
Owlcatz has said in the past that he uses telegram, including today. I highly doubt this OGNasty scam account is controlled by [...] owl, can we all agree that OGNasty's account would be a pretty common target for scammers to impersonate because of his trust status on here? I understand that OgNasty was saying that owlcatz was one of a small number of people that 'have it out for' OgNasty that use telegram. Also, owlcatz was part of an extortion conspiracy, which IMO shows he is willing to break the law for financial benefits. It appears as if other third parties (assuming owlcatz is not lying about the whole ideal) are making the conclusions themselves that owlcatz was the one attempting to impersonate OgNasty attempting a MITM escrow scam. Also, OgNasty never threatened to call the police on owlcatz, he encouraged telegram to forward information about the actual MITM escrow scammer to the police. Owlcatz later said that he was threatened with police action. [mod note: removed personal information]
|
|
|
You have no idea what's coming.... seriously.
What, are you going to try to extort me too? Or are you going to leave that to lauda? I don't pay extortion demands, sorry.
|
|
|
Oh wow, it looks like owlcatz might be a serial scammer. First conspiring to extort people with lauda, TMAN and others, and now he is trying to impersonate extremely trusted escrow agents on Telegram. Maybe it wasn't him directly, maybe it was someone in his close group.
This certainly does not look good for him.
|
|
|
Your behavior and interactions with him clearly shows you were conspiring with lauda (and others) to attempt to extort at least one person.
|
|
|
Well to be fair, you were part of an extortion conspiracy, so it would probably be a good idea to avoid doing any kind of business with you.
Wrong as usual I am not wrong. If anyone has any questions about if there is truth to this, see the below screenshot:
|
|
|
Well to be fair, you were part of an extortion conspiracy, so it would probably be a good idea to avoid doing any kind of business with you.
|
|
|
Where’s the part I’m telling people you’re scamming? Guilty conscience much?
Hey asshole - Read the telegram chat - this guy keeps accusing me of scamming. I ask who told him that, he says it was you... Learn to read. You are crossing the line with your little fucking persecution complex. I have no guilty conscious, I'm just pissed you are trying to blame me. Fuck you, asshole. Learn some respect and stop fucking with me. I don't give 2 shits about anyone here or you, and I'm no scammer, ask anyone I know.. Let's do the owlcatz vs. Ognasty rep thread then, eh? You still up for it? Hmmm.... I am... Considering how many shill accounts one of your extortion parters have, I would expect a lot of shills backing you ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
|