Bitcoin Forum
June 20, 2024, 10:04:26 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 [168] 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 ... 225 »
3341  Other / Off-topic / Re: Practical Jokes Thread on: July 12, 2013, 03:25:22 AM
My practical joke is when guests come to my house, I say "Go ahead and use my Wifi". I promptly find that person's device, and quarantine it from the internet. Their responses are friggin' hilarious.
It's even more hilarious to do this.
3342  Other / Off-topic / Re: Signatures with bitcoin address on: July 12, 2013, 03:16:48 AM
It's not like that at all. If you're in a bar or something with a bunch of other people, nobody has to stick their hand out to send or receive donations. You just say "You know what, I like you; let me buy you a beer." and then you buy them said beer. However, since the people in this forum don't all hang out in the same bar (though I like to imagine that they do), it is not possible for us to buy each other beers. So we need some other system in place to facilitate the sending and receiving of beers. Signature addresses are that system. By having Bitcoin addresses in our signatures, other people can buy us beers without any awkward confusion of where or how to send the money. That's all there is to it.
3343  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Sometimes I get logged out for apparently no reason? on: July 12, 2013, 02:55:48 AM
Your account has not been hacked (or if it was, it's not related to this problem). You are automatically logged out after 60 minutes by default unless you ticked the box on the login page that says "Always stay logged in", in which case you will never be logged out unless you click the Logout button or clear your cookies (this is a dangerous option if you are using a computer that other people have access to, which is why this option is not the default).

To avoid losing your posts, it is wise to always do a quick Select All + Copy (Ctrl+A, Ctrl+C) immediately before posting, so that you can just Paste (Ctrl+V) it into a new window if anything goes wrong.
3344  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Obama signs executive order to allow shutdown of all US communications on: July 12, 2013, 02:10:45 AM
If true this is really worrisome.
Good thing it's not true, then. I just wasted 5 minutes of my life reading the order in question and it doesn't say a damn thing about giving the President (or anyone else) the power to shut down all (or even any) US communications. It's actually all about ensuring that government communications and emergency broadcasting systems etc. stay online during a crisis. That's all.

Where does all this bullshit news come from, anyway? Oddly enough, it doesn't come from RT (who are allegedly the source of this story); they don't say anything about the President being able to shut down US communications except for a single quote from EPIC (most likely taken out of context since it doesn't seem to refer to anything in this order, or even anything that's even news at all), though their version of the story is still sensationalistic (the President's "control" over private communications systems is limited to using them to broadcast emergency messages).
3345  Bitcoin / Press / Re: 07-10-2013 - 300 Year Old Russian Watch Factory Raketa Accepts Bitcoins on: July 12, 2013, 01:37:44 AM
DATE Format should be 2013-07-10.

Who puts the years before days ?? Lol
People who want the lexicographical order to correspond to chronological order, that's who. That's literally the only reason Press topics are supposed to start with the date at all. Putting the date in any other format is no better than omitting the date completely. It's all explained in this sticky thread, which people are expected to actually read before posting here. But that's probably expecting too much. Roll Eyes
3346  Other / Off-topic / Re: What things scares the shit out of you at night/when itīs dark? on: July 11, 2013, 12:19:16 PM
Well, I don't have to worry about that, because I know exactly what kind of monsters and serial killers are waiting in my room: the kind that can pick locks without making any noise. Who in their right mind doesn't lock their doors at night? Huh
3347  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: SatoshiDice odds wrong? on: July 11, 2013, 05:06:46 AM
SatoshiDice is not lying, you just made a simple mistake in your calculations. Specifically, you forgot that SatoshiDice pays you a small amount (0.5% of your wager) if you lose, that way you always get something back whether you win or not (unless something's gone wrong), allowing you to easily tell the difference between a loss and a failure to pay out a win due to technical problems.

In the case of lessthan 32768, you will win 1.957x your wager 50% of the time, and 0.005x your wager the other 50%, giving an expected return of (1.957x0.5 + 0.005x0.5) = 0.981 for a house edge of 1.9%.
3348  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Newbie question - the bitcoin endgame and maximum bitcoins in circulation on: July 11, 2013, 04:44:37 AM
A) 1 doesn't imply 2 if we take as a fact infinite divisibility of the bitcoin (which is apparently the case, so I do not see why awards cannot be continually halved)
It is not the case. Storing fractional numbers with infinite precision would require a computer with infinite memory, which is of course impossible (there are systems for storing numbers with "arbitrary" precision, but they still have a finite limit determined by the amount of memory available). In the case of Bitcoin, fractional units are only stored to 8 decimal places. The block reward is always rounded down (never up) when 8 decimal places aren't enough, which will first happen at the 10th block reward halving (sometime around the year 2048) when the reward drops from BTC0.09765625 to BTC0.04882812 (rounded down from BTC0.048828125). Eventually (the 33rd halving, around the year 2140), the block reward will drop from BTC0.00000001 to BTC0.00000000, no more bitcoins will ever be generated, and the currency supply will be fixed at exactly BTC20,999,999.97690000 (the series of block reward halvings theoretically converges on exactly 21 million, but it does not actually reach this number due to the aforementioned rounding errors).

B) Supposing that the # of bitcoins in circulation tops out at N= 21 million,  at that time which implies enough halving periods have passed so that no new bitcoins are mined,  what incentive does anyone have at that time to verify the blockchain anymore?  Currently the reward of bitcoins is clearly the reason why transactions are verified at all.
Miners receive transaction fees in addition to the block reward. As the block reward gets smaller and smaller, these fees will make up a larger and larger proportion of the total payment received by miners, resulting in a smooth transition to the eventual "transaction fee only" model.
3349  Economy / Speculation / Re: What will the value of Bitcoin be in one year? on: July 10, 2013, 02:27:42 AM
More than $1,000. Probably much more, if the Winklevoss ETF gets off the ground.
3350  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: playstation 3 No difference in quality between Composite and RGB ? on: July 09, 2013, 07:06:02 AM
You guys do realise this is a spambot, right? But, anyway...

What is CRT?
It is an old type of TV notable for its bulk, curved screen, good contrast and refresh rate, and unique ability to produce equally fuzzy images regardless of the resolution used. Most are perfectly capable of displaying HD video; they just won't display it any clearer than SD.
3351  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Sourceforge censorship in Iran on: July 09, 2013, 01:40:14 AM
Because obviously US Army's top end GPS system does not use any reliable method of authentication whether a message comes from the actual satellite, and not from the enemy's radio.
Actually, it does. Military GPS signals are cryptographically authenticated. But Iran jammed the military GPS frequency, and the drones were programmed to automatically fall back to the civilian GPS system if the military GPS system fails. Civilian GPS signals are not authenticated, and the decision to not authenticate civilian GPS signals was a deliberate one, as back when GPS was invented, cryptography was a restricted technology (and still is to an extent, which is why SourceForge is not allowed to make cryptographic code available in Iran) and the military decided that civilians have no need for authenticated GPS signals. Whoops.
3352  Other / Politics & Society / Re: NSA Scandal bothering you? Anyone heard of GAALT? It's FAR worse! on: July 09, 2013, 01:11:57 AM
You should ignore this entire thread, foxpup, until you grow up and become an adult.
The thread must be a joke, right?
No, jokes are usually funny. You're just pathetic. I'm going to Ignore you until you start making sense (or at least stop producing nonsense).

Just like YOUR Freedom, and YOUR privacy and just like YOU, foxpup.

Here I am, posting something that alerts people to something that might be of huge significance.
Here you are, tryingto prove something is not real, when you don't know jackSHIT about it.
It's real all right, and I know quite a lot about it. For example, and this is just one instance of the things I know about it, it's just a fucking amplifier! Roll Eyes Read the patent for yourself if you don't believe me. Dismantle all your phones and verify that they don't contain hidden transmitters. That's what you would be doing if you actually believed this nonsense and had at least half a brain. But instead you just post some bullshit you read on a worthless conspiracy site and expect us to believe you without any evidence. Which we don't.

Who are you? Some government clown or something similar? That's very obvious, if you spend your time trying to diffuse conspiracies you know NOTHING about.
You're right. I really don't know anything about this conspiracy. I actually never even heard of it until you started this thread. All this time I thought it was just a boring old amplifier circuit that nobody really cares about. And now there's a crazy conspiracy theory about it. This is like the time I first found out there were people who actually believed we didn't land on the moon. Are you one of those people? I bet you are.

Your life is a joke, your opinion is a joke, and your freedom and privacy...well....you lost those a long time ago.....cause you were too busy defending shit you know nothing about, instead of actually using your brains.
Defending it? Like I said, I'm not even sure if anything even still uses it. It was invented in the late 1950s. We've got far more advanced noise-filtering techniques these days. So advanced, in fact, that in some cases line noise is actually added artificially, as periods of silence were so quiet that people would think the line was completely dead (which is why some mobile phone users keep asking "Are you still there?" every five seconds). But whatever, you can keep believing this nonsense about this obsolete technology if you want to. I won't stop you.
3353  Other / Politics & Society / Re: NSA Scandal bothering you? Anyone heard of GAALT? It's FAR worse! on: July 08, 2013, 06:16:58 AM
I've never heard of this "GAALTŪ Industries" outfit. No company by that name has ever existed as far as I can tell, and GAALT isn't even a registered trademark anymore (though it was formerly a registered trademark of International Telecommunication Systems Incorporated, who I think bought the patent at some point). GAALT was invented by the noted aviator and radio engineer Donald Croom Beatty while he working for Hayes Aircraft Coorporation, who also invented various many other kinds of improved amplifiers and other miscellaneous gadgets for the telecommunications industry. There is nothing the least bit unusual or remarkable about his career other than that he was very good at it.

I also have no idea who this Lewis Cass Peyseur character is or how he fits into the picture. Who is he and why should I care?

You know, it really saddens me that nutjobs like you go on about crazy theories that don't make any sense when there are so many real threats to our liberty that we need to focus on.
3354  Other / Off-topic / Re: Why does AMD want to lock cores in CPUs. on: July 07, 2013, 12:11:11 PM
It's so that they don't have to throw out the entire chip (and the resulting profit) if one of the cores fails a stress test. Instead they just disable the faulty core and sell the chip at a discount. They keep some of the profit, and consumers get low-quality chips at correspondingly low prices. It's win-win. Sure, you can always unlock the bad cores, but if you actually try to use it at 100% load for any length of time, you're going to run into problems.

This is standard practice in the semiconductor industry. Some people say they're actually disabling perfectly good cores, but that makes no sense as that would mean they're selling perfectly good products for less than full-price. Where's the profit in that?
3355  Other / Politics & Society / Re: NSA Scandal bothering you? Anyone heard of GAALT? It's FAR worse! on: July 07, 2013, 08:16:16 AM
I've heard of it. Fortunately, it's far less sinister than the conspiracy nutters would have you believe.

It's supposed to be the most ultra secret telecommunications spy network set up worldwide, embedded in all phone equipment since the 1950's or so.
Actually, it's supposed to be a noise-filtering amplifier (GAALT stands for Gain-Adjusting Audio Level Terminator), embedded in almost all telecommunication equipment since the early 1960s to reduce the impact of line noise. Though I think these days it's been mostly replaced by digital signal processing.

It's a secret device in all phones and communication technology that can hear sounds EVERYWHERE. It's supposed to be implemented on the streets to be able to hear ALL communications EVERYWHERE!
The device is not secret at all, and as a noise-filter, hearing sounds and communications that would otherwise be lost in noise is kind of the whole point. Of course, it does not transmit those communications to anyone other than the person on the other end of the line, and does not assist in wiretapping in any way other than merely improving the clarity of the communication.

Are people familiar with this? I remember reading about it on ATS several years ago.
A reliable source if there ever was one. Roll Eyes

Lots of people responded to the post, some investigated , some investigated very deep.
People came up with one major realization. It was real, and it was unheard of, pretty much until it was posted online.
Worst investigation ever. Pretty much everyone in the telecommunications industry knows exactly what it is and what it does. Did nobody on ATS think to actually ask someone in the industry about it?

I honestly don't know where the conspiracy theories came from, as it's hard to imagine a more benign device. Maybe some spy agency praised it for its ability to clean up poorly intercepted transmissions (that would otherwise be too garbled to provide useful intelligence) and someone got the wrong idea about its capabilities. Who knows?
3356  Other / Meta / Re: Bitcoin Forums should eliminate 'Scammer' ratings and 'Trust' ratings on: July 07, 2013, 07:21:09 AM
One of the reasons people use bitcoin or any crypto currency is to eliminate the need to trust the other party.
No, silly, we use it to eliminate the need to trust a central bank or government. You still have to trust the person you're actually doing business with; anyone who says otherwise is an idiot.
3357  Economy / Speculation / Re: When will Bitcoin hit 1000$ ? on: July 07, 2013, 03:39:01 AM
Also some stability would be preferable to massive growth.

IMO a Bitcoin that is traded at $1 put provides a true alternative to existing payment providers and currency as well as a save heaven for value is "worth" more than an overinflated Bitcoin at $10,000 that could collapse any second.
Can't have one without the other. Bitcoin can't possibly be stable at $1, since that would imply a market cap of at most $21M. All it takes is for some eccentric millionaire to think "Hey, this Bitcoin thing seems like a good place to dump my millions!" and the price skyrockets overnight. But at $10,000, with a $210B market cap, the price will not affected so easily.

Random Valdamir quote:

Before long 100$ will be a typical daily price increase. Yea you can call me a nut if you want to.


Yeah, that didn't exactly pan out now, did it?

I put exactly as much faith into your current prediction.
He said "before long", and it hasn't yet been long. Unless you consider 3 months to be a long time. Roll Eyes
3358  Other / Off-topic / Re: How to become a video games tester ? on: July 06, 2013, 01:09:40 PM
3359  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: We should start using BTc on: July 04, 2013, 09:58:48 AM
For reference, the accepted abbreviation is cBTC, not BTc, as the latter is far too easily confused with BTC. Millibitcoin (mBTC) is more widely used anyway.
3360  Economy / Speculation / Re: What's the reason for the recent prize dump? on: July 04, 2013, 07:29:59 AM
People are dumping prizes now? How do I get in on this? I want a prize too! Where can we get these prizes? Huh
Pages: « 1 ... 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 [168] 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 ... 225 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!