Shouldnt you call it a catsperiment? oh englightened one? or have you forgotten your true calling from god?
Now, now. Try not to be so unenlightened. Look up the Decksperiment username in Bitcointalk. Compare his writing to the way popcorn1 writes. Note, especially, the double periods at the end of sentences. Decky may try to hide who he is by the way he writes, but comparison will show you who he is.
|
|
|
He don't have any reason to quit US presidential race. It seems he have very good chance to become uS president next year. It's really interesting to follow US presidential race from abroad, listen all this crazy statements and comments from Trump and wondering what is going on in America if such person have the best chance to replace Obama in White house Here is why: Well it is easy what is the last war America won? WWII (I know they did not win it alone.) SO the people here are pretty tired of losing wars and having loved ones killed or coming home missing a hand ,leg, eye, mind etc. So how did America win WWII? By fucking people that were OF Italian, German , Japanese decent living in the USA. USA basically violated the constitutional rights of all three groups. Read up on what they did to people that were Japanese and lived here. They also restricted Italians and Germans living here. Finally they nuked Japan not once but twice. SO when Trump talks badly about Muslims restricting them banning them etc many Americans think it would work to stop terrorist attacks. Many Americans think that Muslims are not controlling their own people so we will have to control them. Trump knows business he will cut a deal with Russia , China and India to stop Muslim terror attacks. Many Americans are thinking a version of the above case. I know because I live here and hear people say stuff like the above. In fact being a native New Yorker I have quite a few immigrant friends that have been here 10 or more years. Some Russian and some Chinese that both believe the above idea could work. Please understand the above is not what is right or wrong or what I believe. It is what I have seen read and heard.The American military won the Viet Nam war. The media lost this war for the eyes of the American people. It was all part of the PR that government was doing to twist the minds of the American people. In addition, while the American military won WWII, the American people lost the big governemnt fascism takeover while that war was being won.
|
|
|
...clip... Also, please help out - how far can we sail a ship without falling off? Can we park our boat on the edge, toss a net over the edge, and catch bunches of fish?
If you plan on going sailing here's a map of the world: Download the full-size (31.4 MB) map here ---> https://i.imgur.com/O8IpMmi.jpgAs you can see the Antarctic ice ring is the limit to how far you can sail. But don't plan on going there any time soon as the Antarctic Treaty System is in place and you'll be met with military force if you try and sail anywhere near Antarctica. A religion of fear? Note the coastal length of the United States in the diagram, above. Compare it with the coastal length of Antarctica. The United States can't even protect its own boarders from individual "invaders." There is no way that such a large Antarctica coast could ever be protected. If the flat earth in the diagram were real, loads of people would have expressed it throughout past years. In addition, there is nothing like the idea of protecting those borders from invasion by anyone... except by accident. The thing that has happened over the years is that the borders of Antarctica have been proven by seafarers to be just what they would appear to be with a round earth. Now, here is the question. Are flat earth people simply a bizarre religious group, hanging onto the old ways of the Roman Catholic Church? ...or... Are they a group that is trying to become a minority group in the eyes of governments so that they can start to collect free funds? ...or... Are they really a group that is being set in place by the U.S. and/or other governments for some purpose that we are not sure of? Whatever the truth is, flat earth doesn't stand up against real scrutiny. However, we have warm, loving, "home environments" set in place for "special" people such as these.
|
|
|
And I thought he was going to say something like >>>> 1. consider the distance from the camera to the horizon; 2. the angle is showing a flat earth through distortions in the lens that are not apparent at close range; 3. this proves flat earth, not disproves it. You can't fight a religion. They have themselves a religion. And what they are looking for is government funding as a minority group. You can tell by the emotional response in many (all?) of their videos and audios. In fact, it wouldn't surprise me if their whole program wasn't set in place by government, because government needs an excuse to borrow so that they ultimately get more funds to pay the interest on their previous loans from the Federal Reserve Bank. If you absolutely proved that the earth was round, these jokers would say something to the effect that, the earth seems round because of strange physics that exists for everyone who actually offers round earth proof. Therefore the earth is always flat, but especially when it is proven to be round. People have too much time on their hands these days. When you look at some of the weird videos on the net, videos that include selfies from all kinds of people who are playing, what can you expect? Maybe war coming to Europe and America as ISIS spreads will bring some of these people down to the round earth. Of course, many of them are so far gone that they are almost to the edge of the flat earth where they will fall off. I hope some of them take high powered radios with them so they can report back what the fall is like.
|
|
|
The big gamble: staying in bed, today, or getting up.
|
|
|
People should use Bitcoin like crazy, so the blockchain gets so bloated that it is useless, so that Bitcoin collapses before the world is drawn in, and everyone is hurt worse than fiat could ever think of hurting them. Here's how to bloat the blockchain. We need about a thousand developers to do this, and then send fake messages back and forth like crazy, while getting others to do the same. http://cryptograffiti.info/#about
|
|
|
Because Atheists believes in fact, and religion have a lot of weird things that cant be scientificaly proved. Im religious and i personally think that religion is illogical to me, but i still believes in it because there is still no prove that god exists or not, and most of religion ways is really about good things to do.
There is no Science in atheism. Science comes from Wisdom, and Wisdom come form the Fear of the Lord. " Wisdom’s instruction is to fear the Lord, and humility comes before honor." - Pro 15:33 Atheists are " just men". Best regards. Dude, if we want science to grow faster then now we should start to researching those evidences and facts who were written in the ancient sacred texts. Do you remember the quotes from the all three geniuses who lived in the new era? “I have offended God and mankind because my work didn't reach the quality it should have.” Leonardo da Vinci Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind. Albert Einstein ''The gift of mental power comes from God, Divine Being, and if we concentrate our minds on that truth, we become in tune with this great power. My Mother had taught me to seek all truth in the Bible; therefore I devoted the next few months to the study of this work.'' Nikola Tesla As you can see, all the science is set on these tree master minds, and if we continue with their tempo I am sure that in future we will be far beyond the Galaxies! DUMB SHIT "DUMB SHIT" DUMB SHIT D SDeck Speriment
|
|
|
Do atheists have faith? For example, sometimes people suggest that faith is believing in spite of proof, or at least the stronger balance of evidence, to the contrary.
If atheism is only not believing in gods yes they can have faith. But do all atheists have faith? That is believe in things there is no proof for? No. There are all types of atheists. ALL atheists have faith, even those that are complete vegetables for medical or disease reasons. Why? Simply because nobody knows anything about the future. We all have faith in our experiences that suggest that things are going to work out well today, just like they did yesterday. If we knew anything about our future, there wouldn't be any car accidents, people would take precautions so that they wouldn't get sick or get broken bones, people would be a whole lot better at predicting the stock market, etc., and etc., and etc. Think of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Many of those people were walking, with a foot in the air as they took their next step. They knew exactly where their foot was going to land. Then, mid stride, all that was left of them was a shadow on the pavement. You don't know. You live by faith. BD, I enjoyed that. Thank you. I'm glad you enjoyed. Some of the things that I post are quite radical. Some of them are probably incorrect. But I post them to get people to think. It would be a lot easier for me to do something else.
|
|
|
Trump may not quit. He'll keep on trying through the next few elections until he dies of old age. When you die, it isn't you anymore. So, he may not quit after all.
|
|
|
Yet, it just doesn't seem right. A bunch of shrewd bankers figure out a debt money system, so that NASA can borrow money to do whatever, and the people of the world are brought into the banker Ponzi, causing many nations to have big problems, while the nation where the bankers hang out receives good. We may throw a few lives, and a little equipment at Mars and beyond, but the undertaking is so huge that it will take the resources of the world to make it mean anything. Meanwhile the slaves in the 3rd world nations are in poverty, and even the States are going down... all so that the bankers can loan money for ridiculous space ventures.
|
|
|
Do atheists have faith? For example, sometimes people suggest that faith is believing in spite of proof, or at least the stronger balance of evidence, to the contrary.
If atheism is only not believing in gods yes they can have faith. But do all atheists have faith? That is believe in things there is no proof for? No. There are all types of atheists. ALL atheists have faith, even those that are complete vegetables for medical or disease reasons. Why? Simply because nobody knows anything about the future. We all have faith in our experiences that suggest that things are going to work out well today, just like they did yesterday. If we knew anything about our future, there wouldn't be any car accidents, people would take precautions so that they wouldn't get sick or get broken bones, people would be a whole lot better at predicting the stock market, etc., and etc., and etc. Think of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Many of those people were walking, with a foot in the air as they took their next step. They knew exactly where their foot was going to land. Then, mid stride, all that was left of them was a shadow on the pavement. You don't know. You live by faith.
|
|
|
If God is almighty and is the final judge then im sure he/she/it wouldnt be needing the help of man to send people they deem unworthy to him to be judged. Yet another stupid religion with stupid laws. In 2016 we shouldnt be entertaining such draconian laws.
I believe that no religion teach hatred, cruelty, fighting with any human being whether he is Muslim, Hindu,christian or budhessim. There are some leaders of any religion who makes mistakes due to that all the community of that religion suffers. But the nature of religion is to harden and unify the participants' belief systems. Therefore, it does not matter nor does it make one bit of difference "what you believe." Of course it matters. Even more if he practices any religion. How he chooses to believe in it determines what that religion will be like. Religion doesn't come from above. Or is immutable. It's made by the people. Maybe religions and their leaders want to control their followers one way. But its the people that must participate for it to happen. And not everyone follows their religion the same way. Or their holy books to the letter or the words of their leaders. I used this example before: compare indonesia and saudi arabia for example. Both majority muslim countries. But very different. One is an authoritarian hell. The other is a secular democracy. You make a good point. However the point you make is the ability of people to overcome injustice and hardship forced on them by the religion of their culture. Not the enhancement of their life by that religion. Not a religious person. So that isn't a point I care about. Though many believe religion can improve their lives. Just saying that like some christian countries or muslim countries can find a way for religion to exist without causing problems so can the rest. Religion doesn't need to be about hardship or injustice. It is many times used that way to control desperate people. But that isn't the only way people use it. Religious enough to religiously reply to some of these posts. How religious? Religious enough to give you an Activity rating of 546 with 791 posts in 40 pages... as of this writing.
|
|
|
I see your point. Wouldn't it be wonderful if we developed all that technology for the practical purposes? Think of how much money and time we could save if we didn't waste any of the money on stupid space stuff. Columbus should have burn his ships too so there would not be USA in existence now From https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20091020131529AAoowc3 (Who discovered America before Columbus?): Best Answer: Well, Columbus never actually found America. He did find Caribbean islands, Puerto Rico, Cuba and South America. Leif Ericson discovered Greenland and Newfoundland in 1003. In 1497, John Cabot also landed in Newfoundland. Ponce de Leon was the first in Mainland USA (Florida) where in 1513 he discovered what would become St. Augustine, Florida. The Spanish were the first to legitimately colonize in North America in St. Augustine, founded by Admiral Pedro Menéndez de Avilés in 1565. There were prior settlements that failed, mainly Pensacola which was founded by Tristán de Luna y Arellano in 1559, but was destroyed by a hurricane in 1561. The first English Speaking settlement was Jamestown, founded by Captain Edward Maria Wingfield in 1607. This is where Capt. John Smith and Pocahontas became legend. Jamestown is also the first place that Freemasons met on the North American Continent. From http://www.history.com/news/the-viking-explorer-who-beat-columbus-to-america (The Viking Explorer Who Beat Columbus to America): Nearly 500 years before the birth of Christopher Columbus, a band of European sailors left their homeland behind in search of a new world. Their high-prowed Viking ship sliced through the cobalt waters of the Atlantic Ocean as winds billowed the boat’s enormous single sail. After traversing unfamiliar waters, the Norsemen aboard the wooden ship spied a new land, dropped anchor and went ashore. Half a millennium before Columbus “discovered” America, those Viking feet may have been the first European ones to ever have touched North American soil.
...
After crossing the Atlantic, the Vikings encountered a rocky, barren land in present-day Canada. Eriksson bestowed upon the land a name as boring as the surroundings—Helluland, Norwegian for “Stone Slab Land.” Researchers believe this location could possibly have been Baffin Island. The Norsemen then voyaged south to a timber-rich location they called Markland (Forestland), most likely in present-day Labrador, before finally setting up a base camp likely on the northern tip of the island of Newfoundland.
...
|
|
|
Colloidal silver works, but it is not all created equal. Find a small nutrition store that has been around for a long time. They usually know what they are talking about. Another thing that handles a lot of symptoms is taking acidophilus.
|
|
|
... Btw, where it happened? every religion must have rules, just as every country must have the rules of each the picture above is called the sentence 'rajam' Such punishment is given to a person who has committed fornication outside marriage That Islamic law Islam will not punish someone if someone is innocent Islamic rules not made by human, but Islamic rules made by the Lord Sorry if my language a little messed up, I am still in the learning phase Your English isn't very good yet, but we can understand what you're saying. Your bigger problem is that...we can understand what you're saying. You're saying (1) " Islam will not punish someone if someone is innocent" and (2) " Islamic rules not made by human, but Islamic rules made by the Lord". (1) makes me seriously question if you have a reasonable grasp of the term "innocent" vs. "guilty" and reasonable ways to determine the difference. (2) implies you believe insane "Islamic rules" were actually determined by a "Lord" -- presumably the nonexistent Allah -- as described by a delusional violent illiterate 7th century pedophile. If I had a religion, one of its rules would be to cane the piss out of anyone dumb enough to believe in Islam. If they continued to believe in Islam, they would get the shit caned out of them. As a final step if they continued to believe in Islam, President Garrison would fuck them till they're dead. I mean, every religion has to have rules. Those would be the rules of my religion. But don't worry. The innocent would never be punished. Only those guilty of being so goddamn stupid as to believe in Islam. image My question was left unanswered here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=888757.msg13221503#msg13221503Post #2510 We need to be patient with our Islamic brothers and sisters. Everyone needs religion to feel comfortable in life. Even if that religion is the religion of atheism. When Muslims finally determine that their religion is false and is destroying them (like many have over the years) what will they have left? They need a viable religion to grab hold of. They can't just jump off the religion bandwagon entirely. While modern science and atheism are the popular religions of today, Christianity is probably the most stable one, which makes the greatest sense when it is studied in detail. But it flies in the face of Islam. So, it will be hard for Muslims to accept it... at least without some work being done by the Holy Spirit. Poor Muslims. So lost in the dark.
|
|
|
I say decrease aid to africa and increase space budget
Really can't do this. Should increase funds to Africa and to the space program. Here's why. We need all the funds spending we can get, within certain parameters. We have a debt money system. All important funds are borrowed from the banks. Even (especially?) government funds. Then, one way or another, after they have done their job, the funds are used to pay the interest on all the loans the banks have lent over the years. If we didn't have any borrowing for things like Africa, the space program, the wars, medical BS, etc., then we wouldn't have enough money to pay back the loans to the banks, and the banks would foreclose on the world. At the very least, borrowing for all those programs so that we have funds to pay the interest, keeps the nations stable for the moment. At some point the banking Ponzi will collapse. Are we ready for it? Is Bitcoin strong enough to take over?
|
|
|
His whole point is the society thing. He is right. If someone is going to participate in a society that has welfare in it, he needs to contribute something that produces what society needs, or die out of the society. The wealthy get their money to do what they do from the people who support them by buying their products and services, or by buying into their political ideals. If the people didn't do this, individually, perhaps out of stupidity, the rich would fade away... at least with regard to the people. Kim Kardashian isn't a welfare recipient. She produces nothing society needs. But is rich and can take care of her needs. And according to him she should die. And others like her too. According to you society can just ignore her. But like I said I don't believe that works. Perceived value. Someone thinks she is worth it. If they didn't, she wouldn't get paid. With the concentration of wealth as it is the rich have too much impact in society. Even if they don't contribute anything useful. Or if others could do better if given the chance. And they won't have it most of the time. Again 20 americans have the same wealth the bottom 50% of americans have. 20 to 170000000 or something. Who controls the politicians, laws that get passed, most candidates you can vote for, corporations, etc?
Nobody has to use the money system. People who don't like it and still use it are ignorant. If it wasn't a good system this way, people would stop using it. People are simply ignorant. Learn how to ride the wave, and you won't want to stop the wave either.
|
|
|
If you want to run and win, all you need to do is to figure out ways that support the banking system the most. You need to find ways to borrow more money from the Federal Reserve Bank than the next candidate. Rand Paul will never win, because he is in favor of decreasing spending. Decreased spending reduces loan borrowing requirements. If the money isn't loaned, there is less money to come around and make payments to the bank with... payments on previous loans. The banks will foreclose on America because of the fake national debt. Government will have to shut the FED down just for its (governments) own protection. The money system will collapse. Who knows what the mess will look like then? We need a president who will borrow, borrow, borrow. That's the way the banking system and the economy are set up to work. If there ever is a president that shows us how to bypass paying income taxes, he will be immediately impeached by Congress. If the IRS is shut down, no more income taxes, no more potential for the government to borrow money, no more banks, crash goes the whole economy of America and the world. The candidate who can offer the most viable method for borrowing more money from the FED and the World Bank will become president.
|
|
|
...clip...
Please explain to us, then, what exactly those huge moon rockets DID.
What did Apollo 8 do? Where did it go? Did Apollo 13 actually have three guys in it? What actually happened to Grissom and his companions? What was the actual path of the Apollo 16 vehicle? Start with low earth orbit, and then the transfer to lunar orbit, and the supposed landing and return. Where did the "Moon rocks" come from, if guys did not go to the Moon and bring them back?
Sorry dude but the rockets travel in an arc and go into the ocean and the moon rocks are just petrified wood. Sure, and the little cones that came ploughing into the air on parachutes, that had guys in them, that were picked up by helicopters and taken to ships, those guys were from..... ? ... wouldn't have been there if we hadn't wasted all that time and money on stupid moon shots, that didn't go anywhere, but were designed to deceive the people, just so NASA could get some more money. It worked well the first time, let's do it again with the new generation that was never told all that stuff that the old generation must have forgotten by now. After all, we need to get our money. So....now where did the Moon Rocks come from? You know, rocks that any geologist can look at, or which you and I can look at under a high power microscope, and immediately recognize features that are not possible for a rock made on Earth to have? Where exactly did those rocks come from, and how? Did the Apollo astronauts stay in LEO, and robot probes go to the Moon and bring them back? If nobody went to the moon, how would we know what moon rocks were supposed to look like? Ever heard of metorites? In addition, not every geological formation on earth has been discovered. Earth is that large. I think if you want to believe in the conspiracy theory, you have the responsibility of working it all out so that it makes sense. To do this you'd have to learn a great deal about space science and the Apollo program instead of just wallowing in ignorance. The Apollo program is one of the most detailed things in the modern era. Every transcript, film photograph, audio, everything is available and on the web. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqUXdpbtLCsAnd lots of them have been shown to have been faked. What's to figure? You never heard of bouncing radio signals off the atmosphere? The set-up for this would be easy for someone with NASA funds.
|
|
|
Doesn't surprise me much. Anyway.. it is just $70 million. Compared to the massive increase in federal debt added during his term, this amount appears to be minuscule. When Obama became the POTUS in 2008, the federal debt was measured at $10,626 billion. Right now, the federal debt stands at $19,000 billion. Obama has managed top increase the federal debt by as much as 85%!!!!
BC has it right once again but the appropriate title here is that Obama is spending $70 mill again on his vacation; nice and thoughtful guy for his dwindling middle class and the poor. OB is flaunting at this point and saying go "f yourself" to the rest of those that are losing out in a large way when this gov is spending into oblivion. The important thing about the national debt is, its increase is required! Why is it required? To get the money necessary to make payments on previous debt. The whole debt money system may have never been intended to be something that would go on this long. When the Federal Reserve Bank was started, the idea may have been that something else would be figured out in the future. At this stage of the game, if somebody doesn't borrow more money from the FED, there is nowhere else to get enough money to make the payments on the so-called national debt. If payments stop, or are not sufficient, the banking system might start to foreclose on America. If that happens, the U.S. Government might have to shut the FED down for its own protection. If that happens, the money system of the world will be all messed up, and who knows what the result would be. If the borrowing goes on, the debt is increased. Over the years, more and more countries have been brought under the thumb of the FED banking scam via the International Monetary Fund. This is necessary because the amounts of money borrowed by the U.S. government are limited to the amounts of potential income taxes that will be paid. If taxes stopped suddenly, the U.S. government could borrow no more money, and wouldn't have enough money to make payments. The debt payments of other countries make up for the present shortfall in the repayment. We (the world) need more wars, because wars give us a reason to borrow more money, which winds up as part of the payments made to the banking system. We need more disease for the same reason (so that the medical can borrow), but we have to limit the disease to just the right amount, because if too many people die, there won't be enough to pay the income taxes in the various countries, more loans won't be able to be given, the payments won't be made, and the banks will foreclose. Of course, when the time comes, this debt system will fail. It is, as you can see, all fake anyway. Let's hope that Bitcoin is ready to step in and keep up the trading among people, both nationally and worldwide. Of course, Bitcoin may have been designed as the next alternative method for raping the people somehow, for a time when the banks fail. Does anyone have an idea how Bitcoin could be used like this?
|
|
|
|