Do the team's developers have active GitHub profiles?
Unfortunately our developers for the platform must stay anonymus at the momment, because of some contract clauses that they have... We would also rather see that they are publicly published, but we can't do that right now, we are sorry about that..  Luxcess group This is something which I did not expect. Because normally team members are published by the project and that will show the project as legit to certain extent. This kind of transparency will boost investor sentiments. We Will publish one of our other developers soon, but unfortunatelly for now we can't put others, we are hoping that we Will resolve this as soon as possible to, because as you said, transparency is the key nowadays.. Luxcess group It's really good to immediate response from the team and also honest behaviour. That's very good for the whole community. Trust level will go up if this continues like this. Ya I can respect some level of anonymity when it comes to crypto as I’ve noticed a lot of stigma between icos especially if any of the devs are from previous crypto experience it starts to begin a bunch of needless comparisons. Not saying that’s why they want to remain anon but just saying it’s one of many reasons people would want to keep their anonymity Yes, some have worked with other projects which eventually failed,not because they are incompetent but sometimes things happen that we have no control of, not saying luxcess has one or will fail either and when such individual eventually wants to start another or join another team, they may decide to stay anonymous to avoid issues from the community once he/she is spotted as part of the team If I get him right, he said their anonymity is due to contact Clauses had. Meaning an agreement they have signed restricts them from being publicly displayed. I get that but what I don't get is : was the clause with lux cess or another project entirely? It could be from them or the other party but whichever way, they have their reasons which Luxcess should adhere to in order to see the project come to life, the different portfolios involve in the project also shows the need for luxcess to get every capable hands they can find |
|
|
|
An announcement has been made on telegram that Savedroid will close the reservations latest this Sunday (token reservation) You can check it out here, post made by Tobias https://t.me/savedroid/104072Thanks for that. we are already discussing this the whole day :-) but it's good to know that we get informations from all possible channels. Even if we are not in the telegram-channel, there will be always a friend to tell us what they are talking there. i often miss telegram-informations, because there is too much to read, so sometimes i overlook something More reason why i prefer this channel, it can be hectic navigating through telegram with everyone trying to gain attention, here is different and the savedroid team is doing good so far on replying to questions, that's what it means to build a community we are the same mate, i admire the team because as much as possible, they dont want to miss answering every questions the supporters are asking. anyway, i would like to ask if ever how many contributors pledge for the whitelist or reservation? Last night we passed the 10,000th contributor.  Congratulations Savedroid, I suppose your ICO is pretty much guaranteed now! The name Savedroid is pretty clever too, you guys got the next few years pretty much paved out :-) Yeah right, Savedroid has already shown us that it is not a ordinary coin. The pre-sale lasted not even a day. I think that the Main sale will be just like this. I am currently waiting for the app, because i don't know German to use it. So do I understand correctly, that there are more than 10,000 people who registred for the ICO or reserved some tokens?  I guess the sale will be over in no time if this is true. Thats correct, over 10,000 at the moment - this is going to be a sell out. I will be surprised if it can match anything near how the pre-sale went. Went like hot cakes. I can see this being the same by how things are looking. 10 thousand contributors pledged that they are joining? Wow, thats a lot. So we will be expecting a sell out then. But what is the amount of tokens untended for the token sale? Yeah it's quite an impressive statistic from the savedroid team and also the pre-sale was crazy! The amount of tokens for sale is 6,000,000,000 from 10,000,000,000 which were created. The structure of all the coins look a bit like this to give you a perspective. Pre-Sale 5% Main Sale 55% Bounty 5% Advisors & Legal 10% Equity Investors & Team 15% Community, Business Development & Expansion 10% Might be still lots peoples not checked yet this below link of SVD reservation value. I hope this would be helpful. https://medium.com/@ico_8796/savedroid-community-bounty-program-480d3796b351hello.. i just wonder about those allocations. especially the bounty allocation. it says according to the article that ,
"5% of the tokens have been reserved for our global bounty program...."is that 5% of the total supply? or 5% of the token sold? can somebody clear this please? It's 5% of the total supply. But be aware that if the Main Sale is not sold out also bounty tokens will be burned proportionally. The way Savedroid got response in pre-sale as well as in token reservation I dont think burning of token needed. ICO will be over in flash  . Look like peoples are too much crazy to invest Savedroid ICO. That's great achievement for this project. Keep going to moon.😀 They have the team, they have the experience, they have the portfolio, so making massive sales is just the beginning, i've said to myself, i won't invest in any ICO without any good concept behind it (my personal opinion), savedroid got me the first instant i went through their whitepaper, is only a matter of time before we start seeing the full specification of the project |
|
|
|
Do the team's developers have active GitHub profiles?
Unfortunately our developers for the platform must stay anonymus at the momment, because of some contract clauses that they have... We would also rather see that they are publicly published, but we can't do that right now, we are sorry about that.. Luxcess group This is something which I did not expect. Because normally team members are published by the project and that will show the project as legit to certain extent. This kind of transparency will boost investor sentiments. We Will publish one of our other developers soon, but unfortunatelly for now we can't put others, we are hoping that we Will resolve this as soon as possible to, because as you said, transparency is the key nowadays.. Luxcess group It's really good to immediate response from the team and also honest behaviour. That's very good for the whole community. Trust level will go up if this continues like this. Ya I can respect some level of anonymity when it comes to crypto as I’ve noticed a lot of stigma between icos especially if any of the devs are from previous crypto experience it starts to begin a bunch of needless comparisons. Not saying that’s why they want to remain anon but just saying it’s one of many reasons people would want to keep their anonymity Yes, some have worked with other projects which eventually failed,not because they are incompetent but sometimes things happen that we have no control of, not saying luxcess has one or will fail either and when such individual eventually wants to start another or join another team, they may decide to stay anonymous to avoid issues from the community once he/she is spotted as part of the team |
|
|
|
I agree that this is an odd business model which I haven't seen anywhere else. However I assume that they have withdrawal limitation in extreme cases where too many people want to withdraw their money, otherwise this can indeed lead to bankruptcy. I guess we will have to wait and see how this turns out, maybe the fee structure will be changed in the future to allow more stable income.
I for one have no issue with the 30% sincerely when the following can be answered satisfactorily.. Is my investment safe? Even at 70% withdrawal can I still get it when I want to? I think investors will look this direction more... You will agree with me that 100% gain is good but some of the factors has to be considered too But that's the point, you can't have it all. You can't expect both instant withdrawals at any time and that the fee will be taken only from profits. This is bad business for Luxcess because in cases when many people want to withdraw their investments at a loss, they will be short of available funds and they won't be making any profits from the fees either. So in order for them to be able to run their business in a stable manner, in such extreme cases they will have to either take some fees from losses or restrict the withdrawals to some extent. But i don't think is bad, i mean, is business, lets say i invest $1000 and make 100% of my profit, 30% is taken to run the business, is fine, is trading and the fee is used for the viability of the project, my personal opinion |
|
|
|
We are very excited and proud to announce the first of many exchange listings of the savedroid Token – even before the start of our Main Sale! HitBTC is one of the most advanced crypto exchanges. This is great news, see e-mail below for those who didn't get it . "Dear Crypto Lover,
We are very excited and proud to announce the first of many exchange listings of the savedroid Token – even before the start of our Main Sale! HitBTC is one of the most advanced crypto exchanges.
What are you waiting for? Register at HitBTC today and buy your SVD Tokens in our Main Sale starting Friday, February 9th at 3:00 PM CET.
Thanks for the update and I'm really happy about this first listing and surprised that it's getting this listed before even the Main sale!!" Very impressive, keep up the good work. I also received this email and I agree, it is brilliant news that they have announced their listing on HitBTC. It is also great that investors will be able to purchase SVD tokens on the HitBTC platform. I've seen this happen to a few projects before and it usually ends up being VERY successful! I should be excited about this Hitbc exchange listing but I can't feel the vibes.... Am not cool with Hitbc due to some of their issues especially withdrawal but it's all good to see savedroid is working actively towards listing on exchanges and since they have started already its good all the same... Is indeed a good news, yea, i know negative comments have been flying round about HITBTC but it doesn't mean is going to be savedroid's one and only exchange,is usually good to have a spread across various exchanges to boost the volume and increase the price |
|
|
|
Do the team's developers have active GitHub profiles?
Unfortunately our developers for the platform must stay anonymus at the momment, because of some contract clauses that they have... We would also rather see that they are publicly published, but we can't do that right now, we are sorry about that.. Luxcess group This is something which I did not expect. Because normally team members are published by the project and that will show the project as legit to certain extent. This kind of transparency will boost investor sentiments. We Will publish one of our other developers soon, but unfortunatelly for now we can't put others, we are hoping that we Will resolve this as soon as possible to, because as you said, transparency is the key nowadays.. Luxcess group that seems a bit strange to me. what contracts should that be? but i want to believe your words an I'm ready to wait for the presentation of the DEVs, hopefully this will be done before the ICO launch. would really like to invest, but still there are too many question marks for me When they have contracts with other companies or are part of other projects, than this is a common practice. You see parts of the team with Pictures and names. Of course they could be wrong but.. thats a possibility for nearly every project. Yes, you do have a point, most investors however don't like to be showcased on the project profile for personal reasons but is best such are settled by both parties before they go to the public because any disagreement will surely put a strain on the project |
|
|
|
We all know Michael is always up to stuffs... And announcing some of them ain't good for the deal... I was sincerely finding it hard to get information clearly due to the audio output.. Was it voise partnership Michael was talking about in 14:57? I didn't get that part clearly hard as I tried I think is a form of hype for the community to be on a positive mode, i don't see it as bad to announce such deals, people love to hear such and if you noticed, he didn't mention all of them as he stated, some are still in the pipes and will be dropped in due time They also bound to legals they can't announce unless the deal or partnership is finalized. Aside from Voise I think Titanium is more a platform rather than a service; I can see it partnering with many ICOs/businesses out there to use the platform especially you are providing a cloud service. It could use alot of insights from these partners in shaping its product. Yea but cloud service is still a service provider, maybe he's trying to give us some information on already available clients because from the video, voise has to do with the music industry, so what does music got to do with an IT firm if not to be there client, just saying |
|
|
|
Cryptossi has already asked in their Telegram channel, and the 30% is taken off every investment, also if it loses. So this leads to the obvious question: 30% of what? 30% is alot, but I guess people can live with it if it's taken off their profits. But if it's taken off losing investments aswell, then there are no profits to take 30% off of them. That leads me to believe that 30% fee will be taken off the amount invested. Now if this is the case I think this is way too much and I doubt many people will agree to invest with such fees. Hopefully the team can clarify this for us as soon as possible.
maybe he got some wrong information. what if they lose all my money, do i have to pay then 30%. For example i lose 100$, i have also to pay 30$? or did i understand something wrong? Hello, the 30% profit share is deducted only from profit that we make, it has absolutely no connection to your initial investment, and lets say that we do not make any profit on ceratain month, you won't have to pay anything. So as said 30% will only be split from profit making Luxcess group I apologise, I must have misunderstood Luka's response, I do not want to be portrayed as spreading lies about this project. I asked one of your team members this question on telegram last night and they told me 30% will be taken on all transactions, it turns out this is incorrect and I'm happy about this because that fee seemed incredibly high! I really think Luxcess should re-evaluate its marketing & communications team, you are not giving out clear information to investors and this causes confusion and FUD, maybe look at taking on some English speakers to help with queries. Maybe you misunderstood each other.. But great that you asked that here so we clarified the issue So yes, once again, 30% Will only be shared from profit that we make, you initial investment stays intact and if there is no plus, you don't pay anything. Luxcess group Yes me too, I did think 30% was a very high fee, however I am a little bit concerned as to why you are only charging fees on profits. Not every investment you recommend is going to make a profit and this will put a massive strain on your business, if you suffer a big loss one month and everyone wants to withdraw their funds then you will be in a vulnerable position. If you don't have the income from commissions coming in every month for successful investments then you will go out of business and face closure. That one of the reason they charge 30% fees instead of 3-5% like most investing institutions. I agree that this might create liquidity issues if they are having some bad investments in a row, but if they have enough backup funds that shouldn't be a problem. Well, since the 30% is from profit generated and has been clarified and not from losses, i think is not that bad, it would've been an issue if it were on both profit and losses, is like a trading system, so expect charges as they will be doing the job for you |
|
|
|
Only 2 more days to go until the main sale, is anyone as excited as me?
oh man, i'm an idiot. i put all my eth i wanted to spend in the ico in another token last night. Now i have to hope it will double within 2 days, so i can spend the profit it in savedroid:-) thanks for the reminder. Due to the turbulence on the market and the emerging FOMO fever, I have completely forgotten about my SVD reservation Lol, you better hope you make the sell  but it seems the market is picking up, so hopefully, you will make it in time, i already got mine and patiently waiting for the short time left, is been a long journey and i'm glad the ship is about hitting its destination |
|
|
|
Hello, can someone really invest now has the price is low and high. Pls, what are the cause of all this low and high price. How much can someone really now invest to be on a save side?
You can invest now, the high and low price is caused by the fluctuation of bitcoin price which has drastically reduced, investing is also a personal thing as only you can determine whether to invest or not but to be on a safe side, always invest what you can afford to loose, that's the rule of crypto I plan to invest as normal fiat is fiat still and the projects are still the projects of you think a project is worth investing in then btc price dois ant change that fact people are sad because they bought btc high and it’s now low but that doesn’t somehow make investments in things like luxcess less worthy of investing if u believe in them Luxcess is accepting fiat currencies? I have not seen this information anywhere? it would be nice to include such aspects as well as credit or paypal payments. Then more and more investors will come on-board. yes I completely agree on that part. FIAT currency ICOs are highly successful in the recent past than just crypto based ICOs. Hope Luxcess will also have that option for the benefit of many small investors. Espicallay when the market is down for example now, no one will want to sell there ETH / BTC at these kind of prices, which is why accepting FIAT will increase sales and more money into the project. The market seems to be picking up and positive news have been piling up in the media about the US senate making good remarks about bitcoin, which is a relief , so hopefully, things will pick up sooner than we expected, best one joins the train before it blows to a new level |
|
|
|
Guys, look below link and rating. Its seems to be good going... Savedroid Team is working hardly.... https://cryptogo.de/en/savedroid-cryptocurrencies-for-everyone/5.9 SCORE Product6.5 Market5.6 Use of Blockchain3.6 Whitepaper6.4 Roadmap7.6 Business Modell5.9 Team6.8 Token Sale4.6 Status Quo 200k Downloads 10 Million € in Transactions 25k+ Telegram 3000+ Twitter 8100+ Facebook 3 Million € Funding This is quite low for a project like savedroid and this might push off potential investors from participating in the main sale I think you are right but if the investor does a bit research, the person will notice that the review itself contains some errors and should not believe it as absolute truth I always say DYOR, do your OWN research, information shown on external websites can always have other motives Yes, i don't base my decision on one review or rating, everyone has their own personal interest , some maybe obscured, how do we even ascertain the credibility of such site, i'm not been biased, just speaking from experience The rating doesn't reflect well on Savedroid, like you guys mentioned just a single review doesn't define a project, i will love to commend supports, investors and well wishes of Savedroid in here for your positivity i wont't dispute the fact that you guys are right tho.. but we should heed to the fact that there are a lot of lazy people out there who dont like looking for informations on their own but want to be spoonfed by others and those kind solely rely on site like this to determine what to do and not to? Yea, you're right and such may cause FUD but that's why we have such channels as this to help disseminate the right information, there are also other rating sites and they differ, so i don't think is wise for anyone to base his/her decision on one site like the above, as an investor is best i do the necessary research before investing, no good investor will use just one source to judge |
|
|
|
We all know Michael is always up to stuffs... And announcing some of them ain't good for the deal... I was sincerely finding it hard to get information clearly due to the audio output.. Was it voise partnership Michael was talking about in 14:57? I didn't get that part clearly hard as I tried I think is a form of hype for the community to be on a positive mode, i don't see it as bad to announce such deals, people love to hear such and if you noticed, he didn't mention all of them as he stated, some are still in the pipes and will be dropped in due time |
|
|
|
I was going through the whitepaper and read this:
"If you invest your tokens at the index value 1.00 and it increases to 2.00, you made a 100% yield. In case of withdrawal, the platform automatically deducts PROFIT SHARE (30% of the yield) whereas the rest of the money is transferred to Royal Luxcess Hold"
If I understand correctly any withdrawal is subject to 30% deduction of the profit; if there weren't any profits no deduction would take place?
Yeah but they’re investing on your behalf, they have to make money, all banks/asset managers do it therefore it makes sense that the Luxcess collective investment fund would also do this. I presume their cut of the profit they gain from is tiered based on % return of investment, would be great if a dev or team member could confirm this? What happens to profits below 100% what cut will Luxcess take? Probably there won't be any cut as there is no profit to take a cut from? It's an interesting question and I am curious how Luxcess will handle this, would be nice if there is a response to this question Yeah it would be good to get a response from the Luxcess team, I might post the question in their Telegram and find out the answer from one of their moderators. I think they're a bit more active on telegram compared to BCTTalk! Oh that's a good idea, I think on telegram they are more responsive since it is an active chat system Would be nice if you could address that question in telegram, perhaps post here the answer so that other people can find out how it works as well Thanks Personally i'd hope the 30% take is actually from profit not from overall amount, if its 30% from profit it would make sense and be very reasonable as far as investment funds go but its definitly something they need to clarify asap to keep investors minds clear and in the right place for investing further funds. Cryptossi has already asked in their Telegram channel, and the 30% is taken off every investment, also if it loses. So this leads to the obvious question: 30% of what? 30% is alot, but I guess people can live with it if it's taken off their profits. But if it's taken off losing investments aswell, then there are no profits to take 30% off of them. That leads me to believe that 30% fee will be taken off the amount invested. Now if this is the case I think this is way too much and I doubt many people will agree to invest with such fees. Hopefully the team can clarify this for us as soon as possible. maybe he got some wrong information. what if they lose all my money, do i have to pay then 30%. For example i lose 100$, i have also to pay 30$? or did i understand something wrong? Hello, the 30% profit share is deducted only from profit that we make, it has absolutely no connection to your initial investment, and lets say that we do not make any profit on ceratain month, you won't have to pay anything. So as said 30% will only be split from profit making Luxcess group Thanks for the clarification, as i read on the whitepaper that it will be from the profit, good you came out to give the valid information, probably the telegram communication channel needs to be looked into or changed as to avoid such in the future, some damages can't be reversed |
|
|
|
Hello, can someone really invest now has the price is low and high. Pls, what are the cause of all this low and high price. How much can someone really now invest to be on a save side?
You can invest now, the high and low price is caused by the fluctuation of bitcoin price which has drastically reduced, investing is also a personal thing as only you can determine whether to invest or not but to be on a safe side, always invest what you can afford to loose, that's the rule of crypto |
|
|
|
So the ICO is over?
Hi wleslie, yes the ICO is over, Titanium reached their hard cap a few weeks ago. It sold out a lot quicker than the team expected. You can now purchase BAR tokens on HitBTC and FatBTC and a couple of smaller exchanges. Check the price here: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/titanium-blockchain/(On sale for a lot lower than ICO price, good time to buy). Yes, really good time to buy BARs. There is no issue with BAR, its just whole crypto market is going through minor correction and soon it will start moving up. By end of this year we will see new high in Bitcoin and I expect that BAR will be trading above $10. They are actually right now below ICO price. I wouldn't miss this chance to buy more Bars. The whole market is a little bit down, but I am sure that it will recover soon. I know that this coin has a good potential it was a week ago at 4 dollars. I know the ICO-price per BAR was $1 so it's trading now blow ICO-price when we look at the fiat value. Does anyone remember the price per token in ETH or BTC at the ICO? That would be really interesting to know. Thats good point, basically Bitcoin also corrected from 20K USD to below 7K USD now. Almost all currencies are going down due to some regulation related clarification/issues from 1-2 countries. But this correction will be over soon. So many of these final problems that make bitcoin should drop nearly 60%, it takes a long time to reach the price again. The fact that most currencies are pegged to BTC not USD means that when BTC fall so do the cryptos attached to it. So thats one of the reasons BAR is trading below 1$ right now because it's pegged against a crypto thats down a lot. Hopefully btc stabilizes soon and finds it's floor, in all honesty i don't have an issue with BTC at this level its much more reasonable place to be and realistic, but the issue seems to be the size of the swings +1000% -60% are whats really rocking the crypto world right now, if btc had stable small changes of 5-10% a week it would be a lot easier to deal with across trading and at the same time altcoins/tokens would be healthier as well. As for BTC taking a long time to reach that level again thats debatable every year bitcoin seems to go through a crash and rebuild cycle, if it happens like 2015/2016 we'll see new ATH relatively soon, if it goes like 2014 it will be 1yr+ before we get back to ATH I usually follow your comments because your analysis are pretty solid and the above comment just gave reasons why they say cryptos are unpredictable and anything can happen, i was curious if you've made your analysis on the youtube video of Larry and Joe's interview with Michael Stollaire, i really need some answers to some puzzling questions |
|
|
|
I was going through the whitepaper and read this:
"If you invest your tokens at the index value 1.00 and it increases to 2.00, you made a 100% yield. In case of withdrawal, the platform automatically deducts PROFIT SHARE (30% of the yield) whereas the rest of the money is transferred to Royal Luxcess Hold"
If I understand correctly any withdrawal is subject to 30% deduction of the profit; if there weren't any profits no deduction would take place?
Yeah but they’re investing on your behalf, they have to make money, all banks/asset managers do it therefore it makes sense that the Luxcess collective investment fund would also do this. I presume their cut of the profit they gain from is tiered based on % return of investment, would be great if a dev or team member could confirm this? What happens to profits below 100% what cut will Luxcess take? Probably there won't be any cut as there is no profit to take a cut from? It's an interesting question and I am curious how Luxcess will handle this, would be nice if there is a response to this question Yeah it would be good to get a response from the Luxcess team, I might post the question in their Telegram and find out the answer from one of their moderators. I think they're a bit more active on telegram compared to BCTTalk! Oh that's a good idea, I think on telegram they are more responsive since it is an active chat system Would be nice if you could address that question in telegram, perhaps post here the answer so that other people can find out how it works as well Thanks Okay I have asked Luka Lah on Luxess Official Telegram and he has confirmed that there is a 30% fee, on all investments, win or lose. It makes sense, they're not going to chalk off their fees if you lose money and they still need to cover administration costs, payment fees for moving money and paying traders to manage their positions. The only thing is 30% is a hell of a lot, even the most prestigious hedge funds in the world do not charge those kinds of fees!!!! Yea, i think that should be looked into, is on the high side but is stated on their whitepaper that is profit that will be shared, 70% for the client and 30% for Luxcess, i will suggest that deduction shouldn't be made on losses because is not the fault of the client, the client only invested into a trusted body |
|
|
|
savedroid ICO: What the tokens will be used forA key question that everyone should ask before buying into an ICO is: what will the tokens be used for? In the case of savedroid, the token will become the key payment in the new crypto ecosystem of the company — and therefore has good chances to show a strong performance if savedroid’s crypto simplification strategy works.  Read more at our latest blog post https://medium.com/@ico_8796/savedroid-ico-what-the-tokens-will-be-used-for-d88011554638 Nice infographics, an enabling environment to allow SVD flow through the community, is not just to buy and hodl but to use the tokens effectively across the community making it a perfect means of exchange and opening that avenue for people to actually want SVD, thereby increasing the value |
|
|
|
I'm a bit curious about the royal platform where you invest your tokens after the purchase, two options are available HOLD and LXC index, it is stated that the Royal Luxcess Hold is an option where you safely store and keep your tokens, it also states that you also make profit or loose it depending on whether the tokens rise or fall, is it not similar to storing tokens on our mew or btc wallet or is there any difference
If you choose to hold LXCs on our platform you can only lose in case that price of the coins drops, on the other side there will be some rewards for holding our tokens. Luxcess group Alright because i was a bit skeptical on that aspect as to know if there will be a leverage on that aspect, good to know you have something for holders, that will surely help boost the holding plan but is there also a certain percentage of reward for the holders? |
|
|
|
Guys, look below link and rating. Its seems to be good going... Savedroid Team is working hardly.... https://cryptogo.de/en/savedroid-cryptocurrencies-for-everyone/5.9 SCORE Product6.5 Market5.6 Use of Blockchain3.6 Whitepaper6.4 Roadmap7.6 Business Modell5.9 Team6.8 Token Sale4.6 Status Quo 200k Downloads 10 Million € in Transactions 25k+ Telegram 3000+ Twitter 8100+ Facebook 3 Million € Funding This is quite low for a project like savedroid and this might push off potential investors from participating in the main sale I think you are right but if the investor does a bit research, the person will notice that the review itself contains some errors and should not believe it as absolute truth I always say DYOR, do your OWN research, information shown on external websites can always have other motives Yes, i don't base my decision on one review or rating, everyone has their own personal interest , some maybe obscured, how do we even ascertain the credibility of such site, i'm not been biased, just speaking from experience |
|
|
|
my first thought: good, an interview with michael stollaire. then I listened to a few minutes of the interview and read through the comments. Most give back what I thought: what a bad sound. I really did not understand a lot and then it was too exhausting for me to listen to everything. It may be that I missed a lot of information, but the sound makes it impossible for me to listen any longer. I read in the comments that the two guys are friends and supporters of him. that explains why he gives an interview to a youtube channel with 4500 subscribers (a very long interview) Of course it's good to promote his project in many ways, but that seems to have been more of help to them both than titanium helped himself. I think that an interview with this sound quality should not be published on the official pages of Titanium, the project is too professionally raised and the interview unfortunately not. Do not get me wrong, I think it's good that Larry and Joe are so enthusiastic, but maybe they should invest a few dollars in the equipment Aside from the sound clarity issue which I think was mostly because they have used the mobile phone's speaker; It would have been better if it was through skype but nevertheless I felt he stressed much on centralization issue; I understand it can cause what we may call a monopoly but I think it also has its perks like holding someone accountable if anything goes wrong. i understand decentralization is one of the core features to titanium and I think it is great; am just wondering if decentralization is that bad for cloud providers? Yea, i'm also curious about that, i mean, decentralization is about user-user or peer-peer without a third party and cloud computing is all about granting access to a large community like a public kinda system, i will love to know how the decentralized and cloud computing process works hand in hand, maybe i'm mistaken but i just need clarification on that |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
