Latest posts of: derrend

Quote from: Jonesd on September 01, 2014, 05:48:16 AM

There will be no exchange of coins. Only an update of the wallet will be required when we do updates.

lol

Hello, long time user first time poster. Love your work! Cheesy

Running a fresh ubuntu 14.04 and installing the dependencies as instructed in the OP I get this error when running

Code:

$ qmake-qt4 QtBitcoinTrader_Mobility.pro
WARNING: Failure to find: addrulewindow.cpp
WARNING: Failure to find: audioplayer.cpp
WARNING: Failure to find: exchange_cryptsy.cpp
WARNING: Failure to find: addrulewindow.h
WARNING: Failure to find: audioplayer.h
WARNING: Failure to find: exchange_cryptsy.h
WARNING: Failure to find: addrulewindow.ui

Then

Code:

$ make
make: *** No rule to make target `addrulewindow.ui', needed by `.ui/ui_addrulewindow.h'.  Stop.

QtBitcoinTrader_Desktop.pro compiles and installs without error but using BTC-E exchange I am unable to cancel any of my placed orders. I have tried no other exchanges.

Source obtained from git master

Code:

git clone https://github.com/JulyIGHOR/QtBitcoinTrader.git

Thanks again, very useful app

What if you scan a drive with several wallets (litecoin, bitcoin, quarkcoin), are all the keys imported into one 'wallet.dat' file which will work with all three clients or will the have to be separated somehow??

@makomk, Thanks for the tool and please post a donation address Wink

Quote from: Jonesd on August 27, 2014, 06:38:17 PM

We can however think about expanding the amount of coins for example.

Lol, quarkbar would never recover, imagine if bitcoin did that Cheesy

You cray cray Jonesd Wink

Quote from: SRBOOTH on August 26, 2014, 11:29:32 PM

are no wrong ideas or answers

Anybody contemplated starting a pulse based quarkbar fork from a fresh genesis block?
Existing Quarkbar (and possibly frycoin but prob not) holders could exchange their existing tokens for pulse based ones through a proof of burn process Undecided

Would benefit the active community, leave behind dead coins in dead wallets, not have the majority of the blockchain already mined and shortened, not have a shaky beginning as a scamcoin etc.

The coin could be called 'PULSE' after the algorythm itself so any coin based on it afterwards would be indirectly promoting the coin, just like 'Quark based' indirectly promotes Quarkcoin and identifies it as the original. This could be the case with 'PULSEcoin'?

Quote from: Jonesd on August 20, 2014, 03:17:56 PM

image.jpg

You're making me look bad at photoshop Jonesed Wink

lol

Quote from: Jonesd on August 10, 2014, 01:07:18 PM

Crazy stuff. Why do you hope it is true?

If confidence in SHA-256 was lost surely it would be the quark coins that would benefit (I would hope Wink

)

Quote from: shursight on August 06, 2014, 12:33:41 AM

May be a little setback but the way I see it is that ccex is not a big deal. QB was only listed there for a month. If they cant give QB time to get noticed then we don't want to be listed there anyway.

excellent point

Quote from: Jonesd on August 06, 2014, 05:43:37 AM

Anonymity - Very popular at the moment, but for how long? Usually the anonymity can be compromised.

i agree, with technology like dark wallet enabling the anonymous use of bitcoin what on earth would you spent your money on an anon alt for?
Only the uneducated in the crypto space are crying out for annon i think.

Quote from: tom14cat14 on August 05, 2014, 03:52:36 PM

Looks like we have been delisted from CCEX. My coins are locked in the delisted section.

The first time we have gone backwards since the CRF took over Cry

SELLING for 0.13BTC
Sr. Member since May 2013 with positive trust feedback if you click into my profile history and look so certainly not going to sacrifice my reputation over 0.13btc.
Best offer received above asking price accepted but not below.
Escrow is perfectly fine or small amount transactions.
Buyer will be expected to make first transfer especially with little reputation if escrow is forgone.
Will be back in few minutes to check PM responses. Thanks

Quote from: Obfuscode on August 01, 2014, 07:56:03 PM

I agree to promote derrend to the official QB-Forniture! Cheesy

As long as I'm something decent like a lazyboy recliner, not a crappy coffee table or footstool Sad

lol, i'm the furniture now Cheesy

HELLO AUGUST AND WELCOME TO QUARKBARRRRR!!!!!!

Quote from: Obfuscode on July 30, 2014, 08:36:34 AM

So much for the news!

Still loving the whole quarkbar experience so far

Thanks for the update, looking forward to next week Cheesy

Code:

-salvagewallet

saved me

Quote from: endlessskill on July 27, 2014, 09:52:36 PM

Any news?

We're basically on pause until August so not long now

Quote from: SRBOOTH on July 23, 2014, 10:54:34 PM

I used Windows compilation...so......??

I'm afraid my knowledge is limited only to unix, I know nothing of windows Sad

Quote from: SRBOOTH on July 23, 2014, 04:51:34 PM

Thanks for your response, yes I have tried switching rpc ports as they can be of any assignment, and have triple checked everything....still can't connect.....its probably best to stay with the P2pool anyhow, but really wanted to solve the problem seeing as I have encountered this with a few other wallets.....perhaps the actual wallet port number (31616) is no longer the same as it was prior to the wallet being repaired??

If you compiled your wallet from source I find I sometimes have problems if I don't specify not to use UPnP

Code:

USE_UPNP=-

for example, from your CinniCoin source code folder:

Code:

make -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=-

Quote from: digit on July 23, 2014, 06:53:54 PM

Why do you need anon transfer?

That is the nail on the head. Dark Wallet allows you to send BITCOINS anonymously, so all altcoins with annon are totally obsolete, it's a 100% completely useless feature because bitcoin has a maketcap of billions and the fact that this coin currently lacks it is of no consequence what so ever.
The group mentality of human beings is just baffling Embarrassed