Bitcoin Forum
May 27, 2024, 09:58:23 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 »
341  Economy / Digital goods / Re: Steam Deposit 30% sale on: January 18, 2016, 02:02:27 AM
Can you get me this?
342  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Classic discussion on: January 17, 2016, 02:51:41 AM
Why is this in the altcoin section?
Any fork proposal is arguably not bitcoin and therefore an altcoin, discussion is this forum is better suited here imo anyway.


Intro:
Gavin Andresen's latest attempt to promote a blocksize cap increase consists of a to-be-developed bitcoin Core fork called Bitcoin Classic. According to the official website The software would increase the blocksize cap to 2Mb immediately and allow miners and users say they what they want.

Useful links:
Official Bitcoin Classic website
Bitcoin Consensus graphs in consider.it
Bitcoin Classic Consensus graphs in consider.it
Blocktrail bitcoin pool stats, including blocksize votes by miners

I disagree pretty hard here. What "Bitcoin" is ain't what the Bitcoin Core devs say it is - it's what the PEOPLE using it say it is. If aforementioned people support something that the Core devs don't, and it's implemented and they use it, then it IS Bitcoin.

I don't make the rules, a thread like this would probably end up being moved here if I didn't do it myself. That's also the reason why I believe this is better suited here, because I've seen threads about other fork attempts being moved in the altcoin section.

But anyways, aside of this disclaimer on top of the OP, I hope I'm doing a good job at keeping this thread informative and neutral.
343  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Classic discussion on: January 16, 2016, 11:36:39 PM
The hashrate behind those said to be supporting "Bitcoin Classic"



Source:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/418sza/promotion_of_client_software_which_attempts_to/
344  Economy / Speculation / Re: (Almost) Foolproof plan: Sell above 400$, rebuy on holidays on: January 15, 2016, 06:50:14 PM
Historically, bitcoin's price goes down during Christmas celebratory season or after. The holiday is followed by new year's eve and Chinese new year on Feb 8 and celebrations. Play it safe, sell some of your coins now only to re-buy as the price goes down.

December 9th.

We've still got plenty of time till Feb 8 for the price to fall even further, but my prediction was correct. I'd like to know what all the wannabe moon men in this topic think now that the bubble has popped and the price keeps falling.

345  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][FAI]ΦFree Anonymous Internet --Decentralized Blog, Messenger,Market,Dapps on: January 15, 2016, 08:41:00 AM
Code was supposedely released before they went  AWOL. Would it be possible for a fork to happen with the code that is already out?
346  Economy / Speculation / Re: (Almost) Foolproof plan: Sell above 400$, rebuy on holidays on: January 15, 2016, 08:20:11 AM
Bubble popping in action

347  Economy / Speculation / Re: 2016 will be a boring year for bitcoin on: January 15, 2016, 08:18:37 AM
It's only January and we experienced the MtGox of altcoins.

http://blog.cryptsy.com/

This is good for bitcoin amirite?
348  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Cryptsy could be working on fractional reserve. on: January 15, 2016, 08:13:32 AM
I was right.

https://archive.is/jQCBM
349  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Terrorists use Western Union, not Bitcoin on: January 13, 2016, 03:19:09 PM
We likely wouldn't even know if they used bitcoin.
350  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Analysis and list of top big blocks shills (XT #REKT ignorers) on: January 13, 2016, 03:03:08 PM
BTW I made a "Bitcoin Classic" discussion topic.
351  Other / Meta / Re: base64 images on: January 13, 2016, 02:42:52 PM
There are better ways to solve the problem than getting the forum to host the image for you via a hack. How about tor hidden services? Magnet links?

Tor hidden services aren't ideal for hosting and sharing content. I'm not sure about what you have in mind for image hosting, but from personal experience I'd say that .onion sites have a hard time competing with clearnet ones in terms of uptime and general reliability. Wouldn't it also require a "hack" to display images hosted using "hidden services" here?

As of magnet links, I could think of some issues but first of all, has a way to host and embed images using magnet links been developed yet?
352  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Bitcoin Classic discussion on: January 13, 2016, 02:22:32 PM
Why is this in the altcoin section?
Any fork proposal is arguably not bitcoin and therefore an altcoin, discussion is this forum is better suited here imo anyway.


Intro:
Gavin Andresen's latest attempt to promote a blocksize cap increase consists of a to-be-developed bitcoin Core fork called Bitcoin Classic. According to the official website The software would increase the blocksize cap to 2Mb immediately and allow miners and users say they what they want.

Useful links:
Official Bitcoin Classic website
Bitcoin Consensus graphs in consider.it
Bitcoin Classic Consensus graphs in consider.it
Blocktrail bitcoin pool stats, including blocksize votes by miners
353  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Analysis and list of top big blocks shills (XT #REKT ignorers) on: January 13, 2016, 02:10:27 PM
After the failure of XT Gavin moved to "Bitcoin Classic" and he calls it the vision of Satoshi.  Roll Eyes

https://bitcoinclassic.com/

"The data shows consensus amongst miners for an immediate 2 MB increase, and demand amongst users for 8 MB or more."

Are they wrong??

https://bitcoin.consider.it/
https://bitcoinclassic.consider.it/
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Cg9Qo9Vl5PdJYD4EiHnIGMV3G48pWmcWI3NFoKKfIzU/edit#gid=0

Who has edit access to this google document?
354  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Analysis and list of top big blocks shills (XT #REKT ignorers) on: January 12, 2016, 11:36:59 PM
After the failure of XT Gavin moved to "Bitcoin Classic" and he calls it the vision of Satoshi.  Roll Eyes

https://bitcoinclassic.com/
355  Other / Meta / Re: base64 images on: January 12, 2016, 08:04:54 PM
If base64 was used it wouldn't matter if any website went down due to the image being hosted on here.
Wouldn't that take up more resources (i.e. storage) for the forum?

That's true. Base64 increases the size of images nearly 30%, and if we wanted to cut off middlemen to take advantage of the pros I mention it should be hosted on the forum as text. Thing is, the forum is already storing quite a lot of text, base64 would likely end up being used by advanced users which imo wouldn't be a big percentage. The main advantage would be that images using base64 would stay up as long as the forum does, plus there's not going to be any need for proxying (which has proven to be unreliable).
356  Other / Meta / Re: base64 images on: January 12, 2016, 04:28:51 PM
bump, I guess.
357  Economy / Speculation / Re: 2016 will be a boring year for bitcoin on: January 12, 2016, 04:03:26 AM
"Bitcoin Boulevard" no longer booming


http://www.marketplace.org/2016/01/07/business/shine-digital-currency-bitcoin-boulevard
358  Economy / Services / Will pay you to create twitter accounts on: January 09, 2016, 06:11:48 AM
I'll need twitter accounts able to post tweets. Hit me UP through a PM, 1.5$ per account



DONE FOR NOW! Thanks.
359  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Need bitcoin game beta testers on: January 08, 2016, 12:55:36 AM
I'd be interested to help. I haven't had the chance to play many bitcoin games but I've tried the few well known ones. Back from when bitvegas was a thing. Smiley
360  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Analysis and list of top big blocks shills (XT #REKT ignorers) on: January 08, 2016, 12:54:02 AM
I'd say that the most reasonable branch has been Core. Somehow, the fact that so many prominent developers are involved, helps it satisfy the needs of the community mutually while being a solid piece of software. I don't see how people see a future for bitcoin in anything aside of a single core client.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!