Maybe not a big deal as far as giving a red tag for merit abuse, but I would consider a neutral because these people are obviously not trustworthy. People might want a warning if engaging in a trade.

Newbies have a hard time earning merits, and like Lucius said "it's easier to buy merit than write a good post". So many are looking for shortcuts and they're probably not going to stop even if red tagged. They just move on and try to rank up the next newbie account.

Shit like this is why I stopped helping users rank up via the count down to next rank thread. So many farms in there so I realized it's better to avoid the thread altogether and see how they do without the passive beg thread.

Going to be very hard for either of you to dispute this. If it was just merit sharing, it might get overlooked, but cheating contests is never a good idea. Curious to see more of this unfold myself now. Good job @nutildah

I really hate winning my money back if I buy a lottery ticket. I'd rather be a winner or a loser. If you get your money back, you didn't really win anything. As far as the biggest amount I have won on a ticket, $500 1 time is it. The lottery is so hard to beat.

8ombard Username: yahoo62278
Number: oh wait I cannot guess since I know the number

Just wanted to post and let everyone know I know the winning number so you can be assured of the result not being manipulated. Good luck to all the guess

If Burrow and Chase(Mostly Burrow) restructured their deals, they could open up some cap space and make it happen. It's a matter of what Minnesota wants for Jefferson at that point. I have a feeling they're gonna want a haul for JJ though. If this did happen though, Bengals would be a force to reckon with in the AFC.

If someone is inactive strictly because they couldn't get into a campaign then good riddance. Campaigns are a privilege, not a right!! Not everyone is guaranteed a spot and most people should look to contribute to this forum more than just joining a signature campaign and earning money. It's ok to earn money, but it's ok to be a part of the community as well.

If you or anyone else feels that there is a lack of campaigns, maybe it's because companies feel they are not getting enough bang for their buck. If you are in a campaign, you should be supporting the company. Helping keep their thread active, maybe playing on their site now and then, helping others get answers to questions they may have about a site, etc. This is just a part of my opinion.

You can watch a few gambling streamers and see how they're doing it. Basically, start giving away a few bucks to players who use your code and gamble on a website. Announce a 50$ raffle type giveaway each day and only allow those who prove they're playing on your code to participate. It's not the only type of affiliate marketing, but it is 1 way and probably 1 of the easiest ways to get started as long as you have a bankroll to play on.

I feel like the question you should be asking is, will a site I play on pay me if I live in a certain jurisdiction? Check the sites restricted countries and if the place you are isn't on their list, you shouldn't have any issues being paid out.

Account sales were pretty common back then, especially since most lenders accepted accounts as collateral. I wouldn't be surprised if the account has been sold multiple times since 2010.

This account looks to already be tagged and flagged from the last change of ownership, so I doubt anyone would do any sort of business with them. If they did, hopefully they use an escrow at least. The account is worthless as is regardless as well.

I can see arguments for both sides and I feel like OgNasty said it pretty good.


Players should know that their money is safe and if they win a casino has the funds to pay them out. I'm not sure casinos would agree to disclose their funds though, they might be open to disclosing to a private company or to their licensing provider and they get a seal showing they have proved they have x amount of funds.

Simple decision, scared money doesn't make money. I'm gonna make the bet and try to get 10 btc. It makes no sense to not take the gamble if its free money, yea I might lose my bet but I don't lose anything. I don't see why people wouldn't want to take a shot at big money.

Are you sure it's not your connection? I have been testing the site for the last 2-3 days and don't have any issues with the bet finishing. I faced an issue with my bets not showing up on the bets tab, but I cleared my cache and that issue was resolved. Maybe you should clear your cookies and cache as well and see if that helps.

If a casino advertises no KYC for crypto users, then it should be held to that standard IMO. You either have no KYC or you have it, if you are going to use KYC in select cases, then you cannot use the banner no KYC. Seems pretty simple. Feels like a site uses that banner to attract customers and fuck em if they win.

You are desperate is how I'm reading all this situation. Yesterday it was STAKE ARE SCAMMERS and now it's I fell for a phishing email. Unfortunately, I can not give either story any credibility.

I think its going to be the opposite. I think both are complete morons, but at least Trump is interesting. I don't think that people realize that no matter who is made president, they do not hold all the power. Their party gains a little more control and some agendas for the party are pushed, but the person themselves are not making all the laws or whatnot.

I think the USA was in better shape with the republicans in control.

I cannot say for sure, I know we had a discussion and they were going to discuss it amongst themselves as to whether its worth it for them to do so. I personally would pass on hosting a series due to the low turnout. People here are too cheap to play a 10-20$ buyin game weekly. No offense to anyone intended but it's factual info. We averaged 1 full table on average and it's not worth a big prize pool for that. Then did people actually play poker after the series? Not really. People were chasing the EV final toruney and once they didn't have a shot, they gave up.

I think it makes more sense to just do a few special tourneys and some added prize money, but if people don't support a site how do you expect them to keep wanting to host tourneys? How do you expect other sites to be interested?

Let's start with typing in caps doesn't help you. You're pissed or whatever, but you still need to conduce yourself in an adult manner. Second, if you have an issue with the company, maybe you should send their reps a message? Making a thread isn't going to get you a response from management. They have support which you say you spoke with, why didn't you ask to be connected with management there?

If you are accusing the company of something, you are doing it in the wrong board. I will post the links below that you can explore for answers.


Stunna owner or used to be, I don't know the whole story  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=81292

Symphonized marketing person for them https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1928906

Their announcment thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2072589.0

Scam accusations board https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0

All of these links are or could be helpful to you.

Just for the record, I am not on board. I am not endorsing this site at this time. I have had a conversation but that's it. I have not made an account and I don't know anything about the team behind the site. I'm not against the site either, I just don't want people signing up thinking I'm endorsing them.

Just like any other gambler I am going to like who i like and bet the way I want, but to be a smart bettor you should always be seeking out information. The more information you have, the better decision you might make when deciding to make a bet. So, it is probably a good idea to see what a few different prediction sites might be saying and look at the POV. Might give you the info needed to make a better decision.