Bitcoin Forum
June 29, 2024, 05:42:34 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 »
341  Other / Meta / Re: Quickseller Gave me a negative trust Without Considering any possibility on: April 29, 2015, 10:15:51 PM
Still sticking to what I said. Isn't it obvious already, that it is an exchange/gambling site/Bitcoin service address ?
The addresses have been used only once, and only for funds transfer outside to another address. It clearly follows an exchange/gambling site deposit pattern.

Even if we stick to what Quickseller said, that common owner behind them, then even with that, no one creates a brand new wallet, creates 3 addresses under it, and imports them together, and only use them for sending money out, ONLY ONCE , so his bitcointalk accounts could be neg repped 3 months later.

3-4 of these addresses which were sweeped, have only one transaction. All you need to do is follow the transactions, and it will become evident that they are from any exchange/site.

And My MAIN ARGUMENT :
If Twipple was actually a scammer, and was ditching the account, why would he request a loan to the only address that will lead to him being tracked, and that too for an amount, which is 1/3rd of the amount, he would have easily got if he sold the account ? It all clearly doesn't add up.
Even the loan amount doesn't move out until 6 days later when it is sweeped out, together with all the addresses.
342  Other / Meta / Re: Ban Appeal on: April 29, 2015, 09:57:06 PM
hello today my account got banned for no reason
admin or moderator please remove the ban from account,this is the message that show when i login

Sorry cyrusb, you are banned from posting or sending personal messages on this forum.
You have been banned by a forum moderator. You may appeal here: banappeals-********@theymos.e4ward.com


i hope staff member will help me and remove ban

Another reason I see you were banned was that you made a lot of posts only to become a full member back in January, and have mostly spam post then, and before that time.
343  Economy / Gambling / Re: Bitcoin Fortune , basic lottery game , any feedback is welcomed on: April 29, 2015, 09:55:42 PM
first thank you all, your feedback are precious ,
the most positive feedback it's about the design , now it's true that Bitcoin fortune need something more exiting to attract players maybe with this thread I will find a new idea , about bonus when I started the web app I offered a bonus for new user unfortunately some Indonesians players cheat this is way I stopped the bonus program.

Just do a giveaway like for the first 50 people to post in the giveaway section started by you for the website, that way it won't be abused.
344  Other / Archival / Re: Quickseller, trust abuse, innacurate negative ratings, unprofesional escrow... on: April 27, 2015, 05:56:49 PM
Five quickseller posts in the first meta page. Tongue

Can't be helped, I haven't gone through all the threads, but the one where he gave a negative due to someone not agreeing to the final escrow did seem his arrogancy where he wasn't paid a dollar for his escrow fees. Maybe you should have given him the dollar to avoid the negative trust.

How much should I have paid him off?  He was after me and and spent a day or two digging until he ended up using the word of a known scammer as "evidence" that I was a scammer.  Maybe I should still pay some kind of ransom (he hasn't removed his negative---and it's doubtful he will until badbear comes back and talks to him about it), how much should I offer him?

Try 10 cents to start with, if it doesn't work offer him a dollar for all his trouble. He seems to have a poor life anyways, looking at how he spends his life and all day on the forum.
345  Other / Meta / Re: Trim or eliminate "default trust" on: April 26, 2015, 08:59:45 PM


So from what I can understand, you bought an account which was marked as a loan defaulted account. Right?

So basically Quickseller is punishing you for a crime that the original owner did. It's sad if it has happened as if he was the escrow of this deal, he probably would need no proof that you bought that account. He himself sells loan defaulted accounts as well and says that the negative rating given by the loan giver will be removed after the loan is payed.

Did you use an escrow to buy this account from Ume? Or you bought the account directly from Ume?

In this case, again it's proved that account selling/buying shouldn't be allowed and basically buying an account that has a defaulted loan or belongs to a scammer can make it useless with a negative trust rating.
The account was actually the collateral the lender got in return because of the loan default.

As for the crime, I don't think the original owner did any crime, its just that the address he(twipple) posted for the loan , and another address some scammer guy posted for the loan request are somehow related(look at my trust description, left by quickseller).

As for what the scam was or other info, why I believe its not the alt account quickseller claims it to be , read this : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1035687.0
346  Other / Meta / Re: Trim or eliminate "default trust" on: April 26, 2015, 08:29:27 PM

Not a surprise. There was another profile here pagalwana, who received a negative trust for being an alt of a scammer, he even had the exact same case like me, where the account was sold, and even after initially giving him a negative trust, Quickseller removed it after escrowing the deal to sell the account, where he was paid some fees for it.

Do you mean that cryptosplit's account was sold too?

The case you are talking about is fine IMHO as the person who bought the account does not deserve the negative trust of pagalwana. But in Cryptosplit's case, it seems odd as he is a scammer and has the negative ratings of Badbear as well but not of Quickseller. I want to know why because may be he escrowed the deal and according to him Cryptosplit is honest  Huh

I'm sorry as I don't know your case. I haven't read about it yet.

Don't know about Cryptosplit, but for my account, it was part of a loan default , and went to this guy Ume(who had given the loan) after original Twipple failed to repay loan.
I from my original account, had started a scam accusation that Ume was possibly giving out loans, only to get accounts from defaulters, and Ume had given himself a positive trust which I proved to be his alt.

Now later, I bought the account from him(from another account), and 2 months later Quickseller gave it a negative trust also saying that I am Ume, and another scammer tacoman, based on an address Twipple had posted for that loan request. I provided all proof that I bought it from Ume, and it was me because of whom Ume had got the negative trust, but Quickseller didn't believe me.
But he agreed to pagalwana owner's request to be sold and have the trust removed from his account.
I also did some recent research into the address Twipple had posted for the loan request, and found out some things, which led me to believe it was an exchange sites/gambling sites address, which usually sweeps addresses from multiple accounts.

347  Other / Archival / Re: Quickseller, trust abuse, innacurate negative ratings, unprofesional escrow... on: April 26, 2015, 07:45:16 PM
...
So you mean trying to bribe him to avoid/have removed the negative feedback? Sure that would work  Roll Eyes

You know what would work tho? Buying a trusted account from Quickseller.
Problem solved! Smiley

I doubt if even that would work. I would expect him to be the sort of person, who would keep reporting his own sold accounts so they would come back to him to buy more accounts.

I don't understand the logic here. If accounts sold by a person are reported as sold frequently, why do people come to buy more accounts from same person?

I meant, that I assume Quickseller to be a person who would sell an account "A" , which would have probably been bought for a signature campaign. Then he would repeatedly report the posts which aren't much constructive, leading to a ban , and the account buyer would resort back to buying another account from Quickseller now. Thats just what I assume him to be like, from the messages we have exchanged.
348  Other / Archival / Re: Quickseller, trust abuse, innacurate negative ratings, unprofesional escrow... on: April 26, 2015, 07:10:11 PM
...
So you mean trying to bribe him to avoid/have removed the negative feedback? Sure that would work  Roll Eyes

You know what would work tho? Buying a trusted account from Quickseller.
Problem solved! Smiley

I doubt if even that would work. I would expect him to be the sort of person, who would keep reporting his own sold accounts so they would come back to him to buy more accounts.
349  Other / Archival / Re: Quickseller, trust abuse, innacurate negative ratings, unprofesional escrow... on: April 26, 2015, 06:13:43 PM
Five quickseller posts in the first meta page. Tongue

Can't be helped, I haven't gone through all the threads, but the one where he gave a negative due to someone not agreeing to the final escrow did seem his arrogancy where he wasn't paid a dollar for his escrow fees. Maybe you should have given him the dollar to avoid the negative trust.

So you mean trying to bribe him to avoid/have removed the negative feedback? Sure that would work  Roll Eyes

Well, I didn't do any such thing, but I see profiles of some scammers who did, and Quickseller removed the negative trust from the accounts.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1031791.msg11203884#msg11203884
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1031791.msg11203952#msg11203952
probably many more.
350  Other / Meta / Re: Trim or eliminate "default trust" on: April 26, 2015, 06:09:06 PM
Removal, no

Trim, yes
I think it is pretty clear that you just want the people who keep tagging all of your accounts and all of your HYIP's off of default trust so it will be easier for you to scam  Cheesy

The thing is that people throughout the community trust and respect me enough so that regardless of my status on default trust that they will listen when I say that I think you are running a particular scam so default trust or not, the "investments" that flow into your HYIP's will screech to a halt once I out them as being run by you  Cheesy  Grin

Isn't cryptosplit a scammer and runs a scam website? I can't see any feedback from you. Why? Is it because you worked as an escrow for him?

You worked as an escrow inspite of knowing that it was an investment/scam site? Scammers profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=503558



Not a surprise. There was another profile here pagalwana, who received a negative trust for being an alt of a scammer, he even had the exact same case like me, where the account was sold, and even after initially giving him a negative trust, Quickseller removed it after escrowing the deal to sell the account, where he was paid some fees for it.
351  Other / Meta / Re: Quickseller Gave me a negative trust Without Considering any possibility on: April 26, 2015, 06:05:44 PM
Please don't bother commenting to increase your post count for the sig you have.

I like to be part of this forum and I need to post for this to happen. Putting a paid sig helps me get some money atleast for the time I spend. If you think I am spamming, feel free to report those spammy posts or tell a mod that I am spamming & to ban me.



Then stop posting the obvious, ofcourse I know he could be using TOR/VPN , and so does Theymos or any admins , but there are other reasons I believe he was using a normal IP before based on his posts.

With your unnecessary comments you are just supporting Quickseller, without knowing all the facts.
PS: Get a life, don't just post on the forum to be paid.


As for Blazr's analysis, it was just on the exchange sites. It could perhaps be any Online bitcoin service. its almost impossible to know which one, but all the transactions happening or happened with those wallet addresses do point out that it is not one person's wallet, those addresses have been used only once, and only in that sweep together.
352  Other / Archival / Re: Quickseller, trust abuse, innacurate negative ratings, unprofesional escrow... on: April 26, 2015, 06:03:58 PM
Five quickseller posts in the first meta page. Tongue

Can't be helped, I haven't gone through all the threads, but the one where he gave a negative due to someone not agreeing to the final escrow did seem his arrogancy where he wasn't paid a dollar for his escrow fees. Maybe you should have given him the dollar to avoid the negative trust.
353  Other / Meta / Re: Quickseller Gave me a negative trust Without Considering any possibility on: April 26, 2015, 11:55:03 AM
As long as BadBear trusts him nothing can be done.

Not true. If 2 other people on the default trust list exclude him, then he will no longer be in the default trust network.

Now that you have seen this thread, can't you just look at the IP's used and everything to verify I am not the alt that he claims I am ? Kind of feeling ridiculous that even the forum doesn't do anything for such trust abuse that Quickseller is implementing.

You can easily use a Tor or VPN. Also even if a scammer account was sold, negative feedback should not be removed. Proof for this are plausibly manipulated. Many threads will popup if negative feedback are removed for these kind of things. I feel sorry for your loose but you will have to live with it. I suggest you to join a campaign which accepts users with red rating.

Please don't bother commenting to increase your post count for the sig you have.  Obviously TOR/VPN can be used, but I don't think tacoman or me were using that before the negative trust was given.

Also, Twipple had no traces of scam or anything . Its just the address that was posted by Twipple which somehow was related with the address that tacoman posted which I believe both of them were deposit address for the same site like localbitcoins or a gambling site.
354  Economy / Gambling / Re: satoshimines scammed ? on: April 26, 2015, 11:26:06 AM
Its always never a good idea to either leave balance on the site after playing or to invest in any kind of gambling site where the owner is anonymous.
355  Other / Meta / Re: Quickseller Gave me a negative trust Without Considering possibilities on: April 26, 2015, 11:21:42 AM
As long as BadBear trusts him nothing can be done.

Not true. If 2 other people on the default trust list exclude him, then he will no longer be in the default trust network.

Now that you have seen this thread, can't you just look at the IP's used and everything to verify I am not the alt that he claims I am ? Kind of feeling ridiculous that even the forum doesn't do anything for such trust abuse that Quickseller is implementing.
356  Other / Archival / Re: quickseller on: April 25, 2015, 07:41:35 AM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1034655.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1023038.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1035687.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1032755.0

Well at least I'm not the only one. Quickseller seems to have really taken the role of the 'retarded policeman' up to himself. I hope that it's not going to be long before people in the default trust realise that he's acting so immaturely and take back their ratings.

He is seriously acting immaturely, He has this stupid attitude that he is always right, and if you start of by being angry towards him , which obviously everyone will be, after seeing the negative rep, then he will never remove your trust.
 
I am not saying that he doesn't spots scams or stuff, but when he does , people blindly are agreeing to him, and when someone tries to justify, he doesn't care.
357  Other / Meta / Re: Quickseller Gave me a negative trust Without Considering any possibility on: April 25, 2015, 07:34:56 AM
Your addresses are not those of an exchange. I sent you a list of addresses that are likely part of the wallet file none of which are associated with an exchange; Blazr did a much more in-depbth analysis of each of the addresses giving additional evidence that they are not exchange addresses.

Furthermore, you opened up a scam accusation against Ume at most two hours prior to contacting him to buy the account. This means one of two things, one - you faked the sale in order to attempt to protect the trust rating of your account, or more likely, two - opened the scam accusation in order to put pressure on Ume to sell any account he had in his possession cheaply, which according to your screenshots you were able to do. Regardless it is more then appropriate to let the negative trust remain on the account.

No, it might not be of an exchange, could very well be a gambling site.

I contacted him prior to 2 hours,yes, and that was after I realized he was trying to scam. I also posted about a possible alternate account. All what you are saying is speculation, and does not prove a scam, my other account has been pointing out various scams on the forum.

Read my posts above, All I am saying is what you are posting about me being a scammer is based on a possbility , and it in no way proves a scam. I am open to Badbear or any other admin and do IP checks/Tor use/etc anything to prove that.
358  Other / Meta / Re: Trim or eliminate "default trust" on: April 24, 2015, 05:13:59 AM
Can you provide an example where
  1) someone was suspected of scamming
  2) they provided information to show they were legit
  3) the negative feedback did not get removed and
  4) the person that left the negative feedback is (still) in the Default Trust list?



You can also check out my thread here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1035687.0

Where I have provided all the proof of not being a scammer, and I literally have no one caring to even look at it.
359  Other / Meta / Re: Quickseller Gave me a negative trust Without Considering possibilities on: April 24, 2015, 05:02:06 AM
not surprised, known for trust abuse (and a lot of other things)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1034655.0

this board is clogged with his bullshit
its absolutely ridiculous that he is still on default trust list, can some-one have positive trust but not be on the list?
quickseller and his alt acctseller are the only two persons excluded from my default trust list
As long as BadBear trusts him nothing can be done. This case isn't similar to the one with Vod. Remember that not so long ago Vod was being called out in meta. Vod was right in his cases; Quickseller not so much. Recently there was a thread about the selective enforcement of rules (takes a while to read through).

Even though I'm in no position to judge, I think that it is quite a possibility that you're innocent. Although I might be wrong.

The problem is he won't just listen, I have tried to explain my case to him , but he just has that arrogant attitude he won't let go of. As for others being called out in the threads like this complaining about Vod and all, on reading a conclusion can be made, but it doesn't mean people avoid reading such threads .

I have clearly shown him all the proof, and in this thread have also shown accordingly to his logic, how Baro would be Dicenow according to him. But he just won't listen.
360  Economy / Digital goods / Re: [WTS] LYNDA PREMIUM ANNUAL CODES on: April 23, 2015, 09:54:06 AM
The main problem is that since you are selling it for 1 year, and if incase its carded, then the person will be in loss, as he won't be able to do anything. An escrow wouldn't help either as its for 1 year.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!