Second chance wasted?
Can you please give me a clear definition of what post-bursting is?
Did I repeat what I did before? I guess, NO.
Still, whatever will be your final decision, I will move on with it.

Can I have the chance to join the queue?
People here think that I make posts rapidly (burst-posting) and I want to prove them wrong.
I will be makes meaningful posts with better time-gaps from now on, and seriously, it has nothing to do with my acceptance here.
I mean that even if I don't get a place in queue, I will still be contributing to the community and improve my posting from now onwards.

Whether vapid or interesting, how can you communicate my posts with others' and say that I repeat the same ideas?
Even if I do, they were not like I saw someone's posts and wrote the whole thing in a different way. I wrote what I had in my mind, and it's definitely not my problem if someone already had, or (will) determine the same ideas further. Is everyone here bound to read the whole thread, even if it consists of more than 40 - 80 pages, would you do it, or I should ask, do you? Though my 1st language isn't English, I am not here to take lessons from you or to have your opinion on whether my English was either good or "not THAT bad". As I already gave my justification here, if I were to post just for the sake of payment, why wouldn't I make the max number, i.e.; 50 posts itself and just 12 out of them? Thought opinion matters here, many people post like me (not talking about posting with speed but their English and mostly either same ideas or copy-paste), but they are never brought down into the court of these Mods, then why me specifically?

I got banned from Bitmixer by Lauda for the same reason and that's "Post Burst", all I don't get here is what do they call "burst-posting".
Please check my previous posts and let me know whether I actually "spewed out non-sense"?
Wasn't I on-topic? Didn't I comment thread-specific?
I still don't understand what would have been thought here by you, I mean why did I get into the permanent blacklist, Lauda.
If I were to make posts just for the sake of payment, then I think that I would have gone for 50 all and not just 12 posts.
I know it has nothing to do with the number of posts that I make, but still, I am not getting it. You guys have allowed users like Amph (just giving an example and no hard feeling for them), who are also posting with a 2-3 minutes difference, so are they posting something extraordinary?
Or was I off-topic there?
Please make me understand and I will improve accordingly, without asking anything more.

A new bear fish?
Do you check the price at preev yourself? It is 808 (at the time I am writing this post), and will probably go further upwards.
Reason? It is because no one wants to sell currently and you can clearly see the market sentiments that everyone is currently holding their coins to sell higher once again.

Anything from a bitcointalk account to any goods (which is equivalent to 110-120% of the required amount of loan or as asked by the lender) can be considered as a collateral here. In one word, it is a type of "security" or "guarantee" that the lender has, when you are asking for a loan and in case, you are unable to repay the loan.

Why do you think that the price will slip down to $250 level again?
We saw it because there were more weak hands who used to sell their coins and less users were there with more coins, but this time, coins have been spread to many and all are currently holding, so that level currently seems impossible. $250 needs some real strong whales with some hard courage to sell their coins for such prices.

Bitcoins' beauty is its liquidity only, and that even gives bottom level sellers a chance, at least once in a blue moon when the price incidentally falls down too much and it really does happen sometimes. This gives an opportunity to everyone, so instead of crying, we should look for it and grab it when we get it.

This was the question that was asked when BTC crashed down to $200 back from $1k when it reached there for the first time, but BTC proved itself once again and the price, even after falling back to $800 is still not too far from $1000 and as we all know, Bitcoin has always proved that nothing is impossible for it.

Those very small timeframes were the opportunities every "trader" and "investor" had been waiting for. Sold were the ones who understood the chance and bought back now when the price has been dumped enough. Currently, waiting is the only option that I see to pacify the chance and actions further.

I am holding the coins since it was $450, but that doesn't mean I am not selling them.
I sell the only part that I need in extra to add some more fun to my life, the other part that I have been saving for future, is the part that I am not going to sell until I see the best price for it.

We really need some amazing and shocking amounts still to be added to the number of users by increasing awareness as well as organizing giveaways. Even small giveaways would gather many people and increase the needs in their minds to know more about what is bitcoin. Bitcoins should not be shown ahead as a get rich quick scheme, but should instead be shown as a way of conducting finance smoothly.

Not to mention that Bitcoins are the most interesting and trending thing currently that everyone's trying to know more about.
These could be reversals that are said to be correction, or possible drain out of weaker hands who were just waiting for $1k and got out at that point.

Indian markets seems to have been involved much in Bitcoins since the demonetization took place there, the highest rates being triggered there are proof that there will definitely going to be some space that bitcoins will get and used for monetary purposes. RBI is going to involve blockchain technology which is another great news and a sign that Indian Government might take interest into allowing bitcoins as everything is going digital.
China has already been in control of bitcoins, so nothing's new. I think that the growing trend is going to continue further and will be taking bitcoins to a completely new level.

It's not the power but selling whales got out with their capital that they invested (or bought bitcoins) when the price was $1k during 2014, and are now out of the game. Weaker hands got out which means that many stronger minds are back in the game because of them and are not going to sell bitcoins below a "decided" level, and that maybe 900 usd.

Bitcoin has many reasons to get $2k hit this year, but it will not be easy just like it hit $1k. There are still many more dumps which will take place ahead in future as most (stupid) guys are going to get out of this with their capital at rates above $1k itself, without measuring the potential of bitcoins.

Seriously, your replies confuse me sometimes.
But still, if 1 - 2 alts are fine and in different signature campaigns, then this is now a clarification to all those who are trying to join same campaigns with more than 10 - 20 accounts and trying to create a fortune by cheating the forum and not following the rules.
I know that this also is not a good thing to go with an alt, but I think that if not "spewing nonsense" but contributing with a good heart, there should be a chance for real users whether same or that ^THIRD AUNT^   , in order to make well constructive posts with alts, not in same but different signature campaigns.

And who says that signature campaign should not be considered a job?
I am not encouraging spammers by saying that they "need" to make xx amount of posts in order to get paid as they will be caught eventually, but if you are saying that we should not go by the rules if in a signature campaign, better not to join it, ah?
Signature campaigns should be treated as an assigned job as you are in because you are supposed to advertise them, obviously through contributing in a better way and not through spamming.

Whether third world or first world, even people from the best countries are here to earn.
Signature campaigns are a job and a job is done to get a reward, or in other words, bonus is what you said for "contributing".
The ones who are here ^solely^ to get paid are already creating multiple accounts for the purpose already mentioned in the OP here.
But let me ask my question clearly: Alt allowed a chance to post "USEFUL" content in order to get a contribution reward in another signature campaign?

As I don't think that this would be considered cheating or spamming, if they are honestly contributing to the community and being rewarded. Still, what's your opinion on this? Can't siblings or families use the same PC and even share their wallets in order to use their accounts to contribute in their own ways? I don't think anything is wrong here, at least they are not like others who create 100s of accounts and use bots in order to boost their post count and spam the forum hard.

But if honest members share their accounts with their siblings or friends, and if they (siblings or friends) use that account to enroll in another signature campaign, will it still be considered cheating?