ok, now we know that you still read discussions on this forum, so then it makes sense to ask you to stop spamming the forum promoting your shady service. stay within your ANN, and don't impose on us everywhere any praises about your helios...

aaand?!
how exactly did you conclude that bestchange should return the money kept by openchange?
at this moment we are talking about your conclusion, not about whether the rating system on the site is good or not.

yes, you are all right. the Openchange site and everything I found on it does not inspire confidence in me, in my personal assessment, there are many more parameters to treat them as a scam, than as a trustworthy exchanger.
I am of the opinion that they must be removed from BestChange monitoring, if nothing, due to the 10% retention. that is theft.

My previous comment is a reply to @aew, who reaches into someone else's pocket and decides how the money will be distributed.

Who says that BestChange referred them to this exchanger?
Is not possible that he reached that exchanger directly and not using Bestchange service, in the end, I didn't see in the first post that he stressed something like that.

To be honest, we are also here whenever we see a new accusation against 1xbit really can't understand why is this still happening? after so much time, and various discussions, there are those who ignored all that and deposited in 1xbit fraudsters?

Since your case is positively solved, I suggest you log out from 1xbit and forget about them. Also, you don't need to open two identical threads about the same case, so you can lock one of them.

this is an obvious fraud, a randomly generated template with stock photos.
although I would say that it is just a coincidence in the Minexcoin name, I doubt that the same people are behind this.

as the wearer of their signature, it is obviously necessary for me to write my position on this whole matter. So here is.

I personally do not see Best_Change's deliberate participation in any kind of fraud here. they do monitoring, they don't pressure anyone to use any service or even they can't guarantee that all trades will go perfectly. there are many third parties that are not under the control of BestChange. I saw in several places where they clearly indicated that they are not financially responsible for any transaction.
looking at it this way, BestChange has almost no responsibility for any transaction that takes place at the exchangers on their list. (maybe this way of seeing the situation is not the best)

Someone mentioned that this is not the first case against BestChange and one of their partners, that's true but as far as I know, most of them are solved positively mostly thanks to the authority that has BC at exchangers.

I definitely agree that the current user rating system on their service is more than bad. In a way, it is completely centralized to the detriment of ordinary users and to protect exchangers. negative experiences with some exchangers are still experiences and it is necessary that other potential users see them. even if a problem is solved, I may want to avoid that service after reading about all other experiences.
this is a big lack of the BestChange platform and over time it can cost them their hard-earned authority.

Regarding the active Openchange case, I would like to see what possible sanctions will be taken against them.
I followed the Janyiah201 case, management by Openchange commenting on the BestChange site, and it is an understatement to say that it was unprofessional and impudent (unfortunately, everything has been deleted   )
Now they declared the case solved, but they kept 10% of the value? For what? a transaction that never happened?
so do they still deserve to stay on this monitoring or even without any negative(true) comment?

So, JollyGood this is my short statement and for now, I still haven't considered leaving the signature campaign, at least not for the reasons that you state as sufficient.

otherwise, if all the members of the BestChange signature campaign would report here, and if the majority would give them support, how would it be interpreted? Paid and biased support on the forum?
 

---

wasn't there already a discussion about this in the BestChange ANN thread about these exchanges? They gave a clear indication that it was only an informative listing.
and it is clearly indicated on the site itself. For example https://www.bestchange.com/binance-exchanger.html




as mediators, you are trying to make a compromise between your clients and their users, but it seems that it does not provide the same quality to both parties. Your rating system looks more like solved or unsolved, but the user experience cannot be considered black or white. you have to provide more.

you say exactly what Poker Player wrote, I absolutely agree with him.
now if the two of us already understood your words like that, maybe you should think about whether you expressed yourself well.
I also came to the conclusion that leaving the campaign is a "must" because there are criticisms of the owner. whether the participants of the signature campaign are the most important part of the whole business?

I haven't had enough time for the forum in the last 2-3 days, although I followed a famous case. due to the lack of time, and there are already certain positions that I agree with. I did not consider my participation (as the bearer of the Best Change signature) in the discussion to be urgent, just didn't want to repeat things over and over again.
now I will do it anyway, to make an official note.

What are you talking about?
Greenwood and Christiano are Manchester United players, not City. Plus, Mason Greenwood is probably done with his professional football career in PL, at least at the highest level, due to a private rambunctious scandal. it's been like this for more than half a year.

34 - examplens

thanks

Send me this image, or post somewhere what you want to have in the background of the BestChange logo, I'll do it for you. I am not a design master, but I know that much 

he is obviously just too naive and believes everything he reads. I believe that after the 10th scam he will be much more careful.

OP, I suggest you create a flag on Dadan profile, so it will be visible on all its threads and everyone (even guests) will be warmed. it could significantly ruin his business here.
I leave them a red tag, now I guess it's much more visible.

that was always a dilemma. if some proven forum user has stopped coming here (no matter what is the reason) whether that is a reason to be excluded from the DT list?
For example, should we distrust TMAN because it has been offline for a long time thus hiding all the negative tags he left?
He ^TMAN is left some inappropriate red feedback (in my opinion) in the Best_Change case ^{he might as well change his mind if he is active}, but I believe he should stay in DT because he did a lot of the work marking risky accounts.

You can mark them as spammer, or as much as you can if there is evidence anywhere that the site which they promote is a scam. this is already the better basis for the red tag and potential flag.
He is a Newbie, his account is not worth much nor will the red tag cause him significant damage.

I have been in this campaign since the 3rd week (2 and half years), and as far as I remember there was no payment delay even once. indeed maximally responsible.

About your avatar, I would enlarge the BestChange logo a bit, just to be clearer. however, it is best to wait for approval from the campaign manager.

why would anyone deal with the old version if a new one already exists? it is logical that this is an improved version and that some bugs have been fixed. the old goes down in history.
As I say, dkbit98 explained why is important to use the latest WasabiWallet version.

I would say you didn't follow the discussion just a couple of posts earlier in this thread. there is a new version (2.0.1.) of the wallet, and it is desirable that it be used for further testing
Also, dkbit98 explained why https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5402090.msg60464906#msg60464906

even if there wasn’t that conversation about the importance of the wallet version, while you were taking the screenshots, you might have noticed a message that there is a newer version than yours available.
it is to be expected that the owner wants to test the current condition, not something from the past.

Exactly. If one person can promote in a good way, the manager may not complain that it is one person behind multiple accounts.

I believe KYC in bounty is likely to turn down real users because they don’t want to just share personal information, while hunters with bot accounts will already find a way to pass KYC. it seems that it will only lower the quality of the campaign participants.

for you OP, escrow is more than mandatory. you don’t want to go out with the extra possible delivery costs.
I certainly believe you are both aware that for escrow you need to find some established and reliable member, it can't be a newbie member for sure.

good luck with your business.

I would like to see where markvin saw those positive experiences?
I did a little research and didn't find any true review about this service. if a published personal experience about Intelfin exists somewhere, maybe the OP could share it with us to make sure the rest of us.