BillyJoeAllen are you taking payments from any other people, organisations or entities to shill/push various positions, opinions on these boards?
|
|
|
looks good ... not so much for the shorts.
|
|
|
so all the usual trolls and bears have taken to swimming in the swamp of endlessly discussing big block politics (not technicals) now that the price is rising?
Nope, just being realistic about the happy case of us receiving what we wish for. reviving the corpse of Hearn's abortion XT for some necrophiliac loving is just sick and embarassing ... but if that is what you wish? Go for it, just do not expect to be taken seriously by the technical knowledgeable people in bitcoin. I didn't say a word about XT, if you want my opinion, his added "features" and change of leadership killed it upon birth. I'm fine with adam's 2-4-8. Fact is, 1MB4EVA needs to be rektd on the shores of romania. We need to seize our moment, or perish via paralysis or capture. 1MB4EVA is not being proposed as a serious technical solution. On h/ware improvements alone capacity will grow but how to implement that in a secure algorithm is the challenge, given the myriad of parameters and delicate balance of the existing competing incentive structure. It would not surprise me that after all the work that is going on now for secure transactions anchored in main chain, but off-chain, that it turns out blocks wont be demanded by the market to be much bigger at all. Highly distributed networks scale securely best self-similarly, not monolithically (simply bigger blocks is a monolithic approach, so likely wrong) and "big" is a temporally-relative term that is near to impossible to encode in network rules that need to persist for decades. Believe it when I see it. For now, give me 2MB for some coasting and measuring. Noone is going to "give you" anything. Run a node, spin up a new client with the rules you want implemented or contribute civilly to a technical group that is producing a client. Kind of off-putting to see all this "demanding" by the users ... if you want something build it. This is not the customer-supplier relationship that has been sold to you by Gavin, Hearn and the data-mining crowd. They want something from you for providing "convenient solutions, easy answers and goodies", your financial privacy. It is the same thing Google and Facebook and etc did to the web. Provide the goodies for free and meanwhile they pipe your humanity out the back-door.
|
|
|
so all the usual trolls and bears have taken to swimming in the swamp of endlessly discussing big block politics (not technicals) now that the price is rising?
Nope, just being realistic about the happy case of us receiving what we wish for. reviving the corpse of Hearn's abortion XT for some necrophiliac loving is just sick and embarassing ... but if that is what you wish? Go for it, just do not expect to be taken seriously by the technical knowledgeable people in bitcoin. I didn't say a word about XT, if you want my opinion, his added "features" and change of leadership killed it upon birth. I'm fine with adam's 2-4-8. Fact is, 1MB4EVA needs to be rektd on the shores of romania. We need to seize our moment, or perish via paralysis or capture. 1MB4EVA is not being proposed as a serious technical solution. On h/ware improvements alone capacity will grow but how to implement that in a secure algorithm is the challenge, given the myriad of parameters and delicate balance of the existing competing incentive structure. It would not surprise me that after all the work that is going on now for secure transactions anchored in main chain, but off-chain, that it turns out blocks wont be demanded by the market to be much bigger at all. Highly distributed networks scale securely best self-similarly, not monolithically (simply bigger blocks is a monolithic approach, so likely wrong) and "big" is a temporally-relative term that is near to impossible to encode in network rules that need to persist for decades.
|
|
|
so all the usual trolls and bears have taken to swimming in the swamp of endlessly discussing big block politics (not technicals) now that the price is rising?
Nope, just being realistic about the happy case of us receiving what we wish for. reviving the corpse of Hearn's abortion XT for some necrophiliac loving is just sick and embarassing ... but if that is what you wish? Go for it, just do not expect to be taken seriously by the technical knowledgeable people in bitcoin.
|
|
|
It seems to me that there is a new round of Bitcoin XT debate coming to us as the end of the year is nearing. I am sure that propaganda will do its job!
definitely seems to be a coordinated ramp-up in the big-block agit propaganda ... just like near the beginning of the year. I suppose when all you have is mouthpieces, but not brains, you have to use your mouthpieces.
|
|
|
so all the usual trolls and bears have taken to swimming in the swamp of endlessly discussing big block politics (not technicals) now that the price is rising?
|
|
|
wait, dont tell me ... up?
|
|
|
... slow and late to the party were we?
Before I lost interest towards BTC in 2013Dec, I had made around +2000%. The past two years I have made around +250% by mostly trading alts. With this this pump alone, I made +43,2% with the help of some alts that are strongly tied to BTC value. Now I'm out of BTC dependent alts until Willy pops it's head out again. I could of made more when I would have been one of those 1$ early adopters, but well, I'm not one of those guys who buys drugs or trades childporn through darkweb, so, I'm not exactly surprised that I didn't notice BTC back then. And I'm not especially sad about it also, because trading crypto isn't a job to be taken seriously, but just a fun form of entertainment, like going to the casino. Luckily the chances are better then in a casino, because the house is quite predictable. Little greedy pigs like you increase the entertainment value of this game a lot also. so, in one word, yes. Very slow and very late to the party. Bitcoin and you would both be better off if you stayed away until it is ready for the densest ones to use. There's something serious happening here you haven't quite grasped (god knows how you missed it being as you hang around so much like a sad little groupie trying to figure what the cool kidz are talking about).
|
|
|
... halfwits like you sniping around for a few pennies when the Jamie Dimons of the world are shitting themselves over an existential threat to their hegemonic powers are just pitiful nothings in the big scheme. A poor lost soul if there ever was one.
You, sir, are a pig with no sense of timing. So eager to earn, but also too inadequate play the game. ... slow and late to the party were we?
|
|
|
looks like the resistance holds up...looks very bullish atm...i think we will go up now
wow some of the posters here are seriously trying to delude others. Things do not look good, price does not look stable, yes it may go up but thats not because "things look good" if anything things look bad, really bad.... loads of people are in the red and want to get out, who exactly is going to buy ? the fake volume bot in china? How much they pay you to write this 0 quality bullshit? If you are doing it for free, oh god you are such a fudding bullshiter...you will remain poor, but with time you will learn kid, all noobs like you did...and if not, well you will remain poor forever Nice rant. People who see the current situation as unstable and don't see high chances for a rise must be poor and will remain poor. Seems legit. It's always fun when bagholders are releasing tension through written nonsense. ... halfwits like you sniping around for a few pennies when the Jamie Dimons of the world are shitting themselves over an existential threat to their hegemonic powers are just pitiful nothings in the big scheme. A poor lost soul if there ever was one.
|
|
|
yay! bitcoin is climbing!
DO NOT GO FOMO IF THE PRICE RISES BY $5-20 AND THINK YOU WILL SEE $500 TODAY OR THAT YOU WILL MISS THE TRAIN. CHINA HAS STOPPED PUMPING SO BEFORE YOU PLACE YOUR BETS/LEVERAGE WAIT FOR THE MARKET TO SETTLE... YOU WILL NOT MISS THE TRAIN, AND THE SMALL RISES ARE CALLED BULL-TRAPS: DEFINITION of 'Bull Trap' A false signal indicating that a declining trend in a stock or index has reversed and is heading upwards when, in fact, the security will continue to decline. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bull_trapsounds like you are in a permanent state of fiat beartrap of your own making.
|
|
|
dumpster divers are back?
|
|
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.thetechjournal.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F05%2Fdinosaur.jpg&t=663&c=SqCHPtAzUCCg0A) ... methinks thou doth protest too much, who will not survive? Projecting much bankster?
|
|
|
Interesting that Marshall selected 5th of November for the date of the last Silk Road coin sale: And, according to reddit's darknetmarkets forum, various markets are either under attack or there are exit scams going on. Maybe something else is planned for November 5th, 2015, after the Silk Road auction is finalized... PS - Blake Benthall (Defcon of SR2.0) remains a ghost in government databases. Nothing on Pacer since March, which was a 30 day continuance dated 12/22/14. And nothing on http://www.bop.gov/inmateloc/ except an 11/21/14 release that appears due to transfer from CA to NY. Presumably he must be cooperating with various agencies... Nov. 5 might be the day a bounty was placed on CEO JPMorgan's head on an assassination market when the overt facism bares it's ugly teeth again.
|
|
|
Lol you guys all sold or something ?
China is showing no signs of slowing down, this isnt over soon.
It appears that way... bulls turning to bears and talking down in hopes of buying in at lower prices. That's how tarmi's and kwukducks are created. Sure, we may have some dips here and there, but why would this end now? A day before the auction? Mid-week? Why not a weekend dump? The way I look at it, I have held this long, why sell now? I'm not thinking about selling until we're past the old ATH. This rise has been violent, but that 2 year down trend wasn't pretty either. We're heading to a new ath by the halving, and I wouldn't be surprised if we tested the old one before 2016. the auction is tomorrow? its all making sense now. I wonder if this guy: Marc Andreessen who just sold 15% of his stake in Facebook for $31.9 million may be playing the market - pushing up the price a little so he can make a successful bid before pumping bitcoin with a limited supply. Marc Andreessen holding 31.9Million in fiat? its making even more sense now. fuck man you guys are in the know! this lines up with VCs Andresen Horowitz known to be pushing behind the scenes for big blocks (Hearn is on their payroll and they are anchor investor for Coinbases financial data-mining operation) ... pump the price to put some 'real' transactional pressure on, pump it up for big blocks by pushing Gavin and Hearn to put out 'timely articles, and rally the usual paid shills on the forums (hi guise ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) ) ... making money and changing the world (in their image)
|
|
|
just think it is kind of ironic he titles his blog post "Designing for Success" when his P2SH BIP was found to be buggy and bitcoin now has to live with it (forever?)
|
|
|
I decline to analze this. The multi year Great 3 has been started.
Masterluc has given up his analysis. In his eyes the third Elliot wave has kicked off. This ends somewhere around the 100k mark. I sneakily hope he decides he's a bit wrong so he'll come back and share more. ok, that's the highest target i've read for this wave ... let's play with that one a bit for the lulz
|
|
|
no one believes in the rally and it's up 100% in a month ... we got a long way to go.
|
|
|
|