Did God give the Bible to the Egyptians? Nope. How about the Japs? Well, no. The Chinese? Ah, no.
Therefore, the Bible has no authority anymore.
Lots of Egyptians, Nipponese, Chinese, and others have gone out and bought a Bible at the store. Therefore the Bible does have authority for them.  A book doesn't have authority over any other human being. Humans have the illusion that books dictate their lives True. But the difference with the Bible is, it is through reading the Bible, or listening to it on Bible CDs, the Holy Spirit of God makes inroads into peoples' lives. Thus the authority of God will appear through the people who are one God's side because they have read the Bible. Not everyone listens to the calling of the Holy Spirit when they read the Bible. It is doubly sad for them, because they came so close, yet lost it all.  |
|
|
|
If fiat crashes within the near future, Bitcoin will also crash. Why? Because the power grids and Internet communications will crash at least in part right along with Bitcoin. At best we will have multitudes of forks from people using Bitcoin while being disconnected from other people using Bitcoin. But probably Bitcoin will be lost because of how impractical it is. People will be too busy trying to live to mess with something like Bitcoin any longer. |
|
|
|
Did God give the Bible to the Egyptians? Nope. How about the Japs? Well, no. The Chinese? Ah, no.
Therefore, the Bible has no authority anymore.
Lots of Egyptians, Nipponese, Chinese, and others have gone out and bought a Bible at the store. Therefore the Bible does have authority for them. |
|
|
|
Yes. Be your own God. Make yourself to be able to live for a thousand years in good health. And we are expecting your time-machine appearance from then, so write today's date in your brain, so that you can come back from a thousand years in the future to visit us, right now, today, and prove to us that you are your own God. |
|
|
|
Terrorism emanates from hate and going by your posts I can say you harbour lot of hate towards muslims.Thank god people like you are confined to express their hatred online only
I don't hate Muslims. In my experience most Muslims are like most Christians -- they don't know jack shit about their religion. The problem with Muslims is only if they start learning about their religion and taking it seriously. I suspect most Muslims who get to the point that they start learning about their religion either (1) stop learning about it because of the consequences or (2) stop believing in Islam but pretend to in order to stay alive. It's the third category -- those that learn about it and believe more fervently -- that form groups like ISIS. Yes! This is the thing that I have been trying to get people to understand for a long time, now. People just can't get it through their thick skulls that Islam is that violent... at least not until they become full fledged Muslims, and then it is too late to back out easily. Leviticus 20:27 "And as for a man or woman in whom there proves to be a mediumistic spirit or spirit of prediction, they should be put to death without fail. They should pelt them to death with stones. Their own blood is upon them." It's the word of God, follow your religion, then get arrested People in glass houses should not pelt stones. The Christian religion says that the Torah laws were given to the nation of Israel, and those who say that they are part of the nation of Israel. Since I am not of that nation of Israel, those laws don't apply to me in the sense that I can be arrested for not obeying. Besides, I have not been accused of breaking this law even if it could be applied to me. No accusation, no arrest. On top of that, I am part of the spiritual Israel. There is complete forgiveness there. God has not accused me, nor has any man. What are you blabbing about? Are you going to make false accusations against me? However, thank you for this opportunity to respond. It gives me practice responding, in the event I ever need to go to court. "Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets. I have come not to abolish but to fulfill. Amen, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest part or the smallest part of a letter will pass from the law, until all things have taken place." (Matthew 5:17 NAB) For truly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass the law until all is accomplished. Whoever then relaxes one of the least of these commandments and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but he who does them and teaches them shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven (Matthew 5:18-19 RSV) Clearly the Old Testament is to be abided by until the end of human existence itself. None other then Jesus said so. "It is easier for Heaven and Earth to pass away than for the smallest part of the letter of the law to become invalid." (Luke 16:17 NAB) If you ever did go to court, you'd get sued for being a shitty lawyer Did God give the law of Israel to the Egyptians? NO. How about to the Japs? Well, no. The Chinese? Ah, no. Well then who did He give it to. The people of Israel, right? Israel that exists today is not the Israel of God. They were set in place by the U.S. to make inroads into the Middle East for oil purposes. However, God holds Israel in His heart, so that all those who profess to be part of the physical Israel must obey the laws of physical Israel. The part of the Bible that is for the Gentiles and everybody is the part about faith in Jesus, Jesus salvation. If I happen to have some Jewish blood in me, I don't really know it for sure. But even then, I am not professing to be part of the physical nation of Israel. I am part of the spiritual Israel, the one that believes in Jesus salvation. Even the early church didn't impose the Law given to Israel onto the gentiles. Acts 16:19-21: “It is my judgment, therefore, that we should not make it difficult for the Gentiles who are turning to God. 20Instead we should write to them, telling them to abstain from food polluted by idols, from sexual immorality, from the meat of strangled animals and from blood. For Moses has been preached in every city from the earliest times and is read in the synagogues on every Sabbath.” You want to be under the law like Israel was? Go ahead. |
|
|
|
Scholars agree that the ending of Mark was added to the gospel of Mark long after the gospel of Mark was written, it was added by man, so this alone proves that part of the bible was written by man, therefore it cannot be an impossible book, i.e. one written entirely by GOD.
Scholars didn't get into God's mind to see that He wanted that ending in there, so He had it added later. |
|
|
|
The problem with Larken Rose and most other Americans is this. They can't get it through their heads that stepping into the legal system is not the way to do it. The Preamble, and the 6th, 7th, and 9th Amendments show government that it cannot keep people from moving in the ways that they did before government was around, to get relief from someone who has wronged them. What. Are. You. Talking. About? Do you listen to anyone or anything other than your own thoughts? (Or are you high? LOL) Now you see. Someone shows you the black and white paperwork of foundational law in America, and all you can say is, What are you talking about? I know it might be hard for you, a slave, to comprehend freedom, but try, if you want to know what I am talking about. Alright, so please walk me through it again... how does a piece of paper somewhere, written by some slave-owning men some centuries ago, somehow have anything at all to do with the idea of "foundational law" (which, btw, is Natural Law)? You are right. It doesn't have anything to do with anything. However, if some government people adhere to it, then it does for them. It is your job, should they think that you are also a member of that paperwork, show them that you are not. It is so much easier to do when you can show them that their paperwork even says that you don't have to be a member of their paperwork. Here is the trick why Larken lost. Larken told them that he wasn't a member of their paperwork. But he told them from what appeared to be a position of membership within their paperwork. And he didn't rebut that membership when they presumed it against him. So, even though he may not have been a member of their paperwork, he lost, because he looked and acted like he was a member even though he was saying that he wasn't a member. It will be work, but if you are serious about this, make Karl's stuff your way of life. http://www.myprivateaudio.com/Karl-Lentz.html = Angela Stark's Talkshoe. http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5duR4OvEHHxOSdEZhANETw = TrustInAllLaw snippets of Karl's audios. http://www.broadmind.org/ = Karl's main page. http://www.unkommonlaw.co.uk/ = Karl's United Kingdom page. http://www.youtube.com/user/765736/videos?view=0&live_view=500&flow=grid&sort=da = Craig Lynch's snippets page. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOkAHRzuiOA&list=PLHrkQxgz0mg6kUBciD-HIvTXByqjcIZ-D = Ten great Youtube videos, might be the best introduction to Karl. http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=127469&cmd=tc = Karl's Talkshoe site. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iua56K4Mysk = Karl Lentz - The Brian Bonar Incident - YouTube. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdHLHWS4gPE = Lentz-Sense - don't be a More~On - YouTube. Other Info http://voidjudgments.com/ = The Secret is most judgments are Void on their face and not merely voidable. http://educationcenter2000.com/Trinsey-v-Paglario.htm = Trinsey v. Pagliaro - Attorneys cannot "speak" in common law trials if the one who is bringing the suit orders it. Holding from Trinsey v. Pagliaro: "An attorney for the plaintiff cannot admit evidence into the court. He is either an attorney or a witness." |
|
|
|
What is the question?
why dosent GOD comes to earth and explains it  cant make it more clear... Thank You.
saying thank you dosent makes you a good nor peaceful guy...if you think so ,if this was not what u meant then ignore it . The bible and the teachings of the one labeled "jesus" are explained in the phoenix journals, these books contain the truth that we were promised for the end times. BADecker and MMH both say that these writings are demonic, but how can they say this if they have not even read a single Journal? Like I said, they condemn these writings in ignorance because they fear to lose control. In the journals, three big lies are exposed including 1) "jesus"="savior", 2) Darwin's theory, 3) integrity of the bible. There are three easy ways to prove that the Journals are at least a fraud, but may be demonic. 1. They deny the Bible as the Word of God; 2. They deny Jesus as the Son of God, thereby being God, Himself; 3. They profess that mankind can save themselves without any outside help. Again this all can not be proven or dis proven. It is said that the Bible is the word of god. But this may or may not be true. People believe in it. But doesn't make it true. It could be just simply stories as some people call them. Like a living journal of the times or just a book full of stories picked. Not saying it isn't true but. No one knows for sure. and this goes same for 2. and 3. You can deny or not deny. But either way doesnt make any of it true. There is no proof that jesus is son of god or that even a god creator exists. And depending on what you mean by mankind can save themselves without outside help. This could be true as well. Someone stated that we were given free will and the ability to choose our outcome. If this is so. We would be able to save ourselves. Depends on outlook. How someone preceives this. It would depend on the choices we make and how we as a society work together. Unless you mean that outside help being god. All depends on what you believe in and how you want to see things. There are the Bible witnesses about Jesus. Evidence and witness to the miracles that no man could do without being in partnership with God. It might take a while for you to understand how the 3 laws of science show that God exists, and it might take some study to show that the Bible can't exist because of the way that it came about. But this is an important topic in life. It is a life and death thing... eternal life and death. So, it would be to your benefit to double check things in detail. |
|
|
|
Terrorism emanates from hate and going by your posts I can say you harbour lot of hate towards muslims.Thank god people like you are confined to express their hatred online only
I don't hate Muslims. In my experience most Muslims are like most Christians -- they don't know jack shit about their religion. The problem with Muslims is only if they start learning about their religion and taking it seriously. I suspect most Muslims who get to the point that they start learning about their religion either (1) stop learning about it because of the consequences or (2) stop believing in Islam but pretend to in order to stay alive. It's the third category -- those that learn about it and believe more fervently -- that form groups like ISIS. Yes! This is the thing that I have been trying to get people to understand for a long time, now. People just can't get it through their thick skulls that Islam is that violent... at least not until they become full fledged Muslims, and then it is too late to back out easily. Leviticus 20:27 "And as for a man or woman in whom there proves to be a mediumistic spirit or spirit of prediction, they should be put to death without fail. They should pelt them to death with stones. Their own blood is upon them." It's the word of God, follow your religion, then get arrested People in glass houses should not pelt stones. The Christian religion says that the Torah laws were given to the nation of Israel, and those who say that they are part of the nation of Israel. Since I am not of that nation of Israel, those laws don't apply to me in the sense that I can be arrested for not obeying. Besides, I have not been accused of breaking this law even if it could be applied to me. No accusation, no arrest. On top of that, I am part of the spiritual Israel. There is complete forgiveness there. God has not accused me, nor has any man. What are you blabbing about? Are you going to make false accusations against me? However, thank you for this opportunity to respond. It gives me practice responding, in the event I ever need to go to court. |
|
|
|
Dump some jet fuel into a coffee can, and try to get it to ignite. If you can, it burns with a smoky, heat well under 1000 degrees F. You need some form of air blast to make the fuel burn hot enough to do any damage. This kind of thing just doesn't happen automatically. You need to work at it. There wasn't enough heat in the buildings to do any structural damage whatsoever. You are correct. I do have to say that it would have burned over 1000 degrees. Even if these buildings are totally square and have equal sides. Elevator shafts placed in identical areas on all sides of the building making every side of the towers identical. The fuel would have not been distributed evenly. One side would have received more fuel then the other. Therefor theoretically you would of had one side hotter then another and a longer burn. Which you would think would in turn make one side weaker then the other causing the building to topple. Ever play Jenga? You ever make it drop straight down? No it always fall to one side or the other. Anyone who has seen or delt with demolition would have to agree that these towers were in one way or another controlled. You may have been lucky and had one drop in a fashion that looks like it dropped straight down like a controlled demolition but the likeness of both doing so is extremely slim. With the reports of secondary explosions and what was witnessed and reported. There is no way it was not at least semi controlled. In addition, the third building didn't have any problems whatsoever. But it came down in the same way. The whole 9/11 official story is full of so many holes that it is by itself proving that 9/11 was an inside job, just by the holes in it. |
|
|
|
Terrorism emanates from hate and going by your posts I can say you harbour lot of hate towards muslims.Thank god people like you are confined to express their hatred online only
I don't hate Muslims. In my experience most Muslims are like most Christians -- they don't know jack shit about their religion. The problem with Muslims is only if they start learning about their religion and taking it seriously. I suspect most Muslims who get to the point that they start learning about their religion either (1) stop learning about it because of the consequences or (2) stop believing in Islam but pretend to in order to stay alive. It's the third category -- those that learn about it and believe more fervently -- that form groups like ISIS. Yes! This is the thing that I have been trying to get people to understand for a long time, now. People just can't get it through their thick skulls that Islam is that violent... at least not until they become full fledged Muslims, and then it is too late to back out easily. |
|
|
|
What is the question?
why dosent GOD comes to earth and explains it cant make it more clear... Thank You.
saying thank you dosent makes you a good nor peaceful guy...if you think so ,if this was not what u meant then ignore it . The bible and the teachings of the one labeled "jesus" are explained in the phoenix journals, these books contain the truth that we were promised for the end times. BADecker and MMH both say that these writings are demonic, but how can they say this if they have not even read a single Journal? Like I said, they condemn these writings in ignorance because they fear to lose control. In the journals, three big lies are exposed including 1) "jesus"="savior", 2) Darwin's theory, 3) integrity of the bible. There are three easy ways to prove that the Journals are at least a fraud, but may be demonic. 1. They deny the Bible as the Word of God; 2. They deny Jesus as the Son of God, thereby being God, Himself; 3. They profess that mankind can save themselves without any outside help. |
|
|
|
Again, the 3 laws of science prove that God exists. They are: 1. cause and effect; 2. universal complexity; 3. universal entropy. These three laws along with the fact that the universe exists, show that a Creator made the whole thing. The creator matches the definition of the word God. God didn't mess up on anything. He made people perfect. He gave freedom to mankind. He instructed mankind as to how and how not to use his freedom if he wanted to live successfully. Mankind decided to use his freedom in destructive ways. Then God through much pain and grief, figured out a way to give mankind salvation from man's own self-destruction. Now, we have some people accepting the salvation, while others are denying it. Doesn't sound like a bad or messed up God to me. Keep on rejecting His salvation for you if you want. But realize that it is you who is doing the rejecting, not God. God is constantly offering. So what is your stance on the whole religion thing, then? I understand that you believe in a god, but which one? Rather, which one do you think exists? This is what I was thinking. Do you believe in god or do you believe in god the science guy. You must have posted just before I did. This is your belief. Doesnt mean it is true. This is the whole point that I am trying to make. All of this is all based on belief. What you believe and other believe. Its perfectly fine to believe in something. Everyone does. But because someone believes in something doesn't make it true. And there is no proof that it is or it isnt. Strong evidence makes for a strong case. If it were spelled out for us, it would be fact and we would not have to believe. We would know. Nobody knows for a fact that the 3 laws I science that I mentioned are absolute laws in the universe. But they are so strong that they are held as laws. Strong evidence. Very strong evidence. |
|
|
|
The problem with Larken Rose and most other Americans is this. They can't get it through their heads that stepping into the legal system is not the way to do it. The Preamble, and the 6th, 7th, and 9th Amendments show government that it cannot keep people from moving in the ways that they did before government was around, to get relief from someone who has wronged them. What. Are. You. Talking. About? Do you listen to anyone or anything other than your own thoughts? (Or are you high? LOL) Now you see. Someone shows you the black and white paperwork of foundational law in America, and all you can say is, What are you talking about? I know it might be hard for you, a slave, to comprehend freedom, but try, if you want to know what I am talking about. |
|
|
|
Again, the 3 laws of science prove that God exists. They are: 1. cause and effect; 2. universal complexity; 3. universal entropy. These three laws along with the fact that the universe exists, show that a Creator made the whole thing. The creator matches the definition of the word God. God didn't mess up on anything. He made people perfect. He gave freedom to mankind. He instructed mankind as to how and how not to use his freedom if he wanted to live successfully. Mankind decided to use his freedom in destructive ways. Then God through much pain and grief, figured out a way to give mankind salvation from man's own self-destruction. Now, we have some people accepting the salvation, while others are denying it. Doesn't sound like a bad or messed up God to me. Keep on rejecting His salvation for you if you want. But realize that it is you who is doing the rejecting, not God. God is constantly offering. So what is your stance on the whole religion thing, then? I understand that you believe in a god, but which one? Rather, which one do you think exists? First of all, there is ONE God over all. That's the one I believe in. Why do I believe when I know? I believe because there is a lot I don't understand about Him. We have gone all over the place in this thread. So, I will state that I believe the Christian perspective, that is the Bible perspective, on God. I believe that the Bible is a miracle as to how it came into existence. The way the Bible came into existence, and the other facts about it, just couldn't have happened without Divine guidance. |
|
|
|
The problem with Larken Rose and most other Americans is this. They can't get it through their heads that stepping into the legal system is not the way to do it. The Preamble, and the 6th, 7th, and 9th Amendments show government that it cannot keep people from moving in the ways that they did before government was around, to get relief from someone who has wronged them. The paperwork of government, no matter what it is, does nothing other than to warm a person if it is burned. It can't jump up and do anything. Paper simply isn't like that. We are having a hard time making AI robots that can sort of do something on their own. Government paper can't. When people read government paperwork, and decide to do what the paperwork says, it is people acting, not paperwork. In the foundational government paperwork, as I mentioned above, government people are not allowed to harm any man. If they do, the man is allowed to use all the remedies that he had before the government paperwork came into being. And he is allowed to do it by using government paperwork to limit government people if he wants. The answer to Larken Rose saying that he is allowed to rob you is, no he is not allowed to rob me. If he does it anyway, I require return of my property, and just and fair compensation for the time that it was forcefully removed from me. If it is damaged, I require more compensation. I go straight to the man who did it to me. Forget the government office he might hold. I am not part of that. The man did me wrong. The man must pay. |
|
|
|
All the questions that science could not answer, throw it to God  God always have a place since you can never solve all the problems in the world. God does not solve it either, but at least it gives you a hope so that you don't become desperate You are right. However it would depend on the person. Some people have hope. But not in god but in themselves. Some do however put all there hope and faith in god. I live day to day and take what I see i need. Everything else is earned. But I can not say that it came from god. Because I really don't know if it did. As far as I know it came from an alien 3 solar systems away. You just really do not know. Having reasonable hope in one's self IS having hope in God. After all, it is God Who has made everything. He has given people their abilities. When they use their abilites hoping to produce some result, they are using what God has placed them. Hope in God, and hope in the things that God has placed into existence. However, do not hope beyond the abilities that God has placed in you. The problem is where is the proof that God was the creator? That is just written and believed. But it isn't necessarily true. Its just a belief. But if he is the creator. He has, as I said before, a wicked sense of humor. Obliviously he messed up on humans. We are way to twisted and like to destroy things. The way people look at him and talk about him. You woudl have thunk (haha) he would have made us perfect. Well He was WAY off. Again, the 3 laws of science prove that God exists. They are: 1. cause and effect; 2. universal complexity; 3. universal entropy. These three laws along with the fact that the universe exists, show that a Creator made the whole thing. The creator matches the definition of the word God. God didn't mess up on anything. He made people perfect. He gave freedom to mankind. He instructed mankind as to how and how not to use his freedom if he wanted to live successfully. Mankind decided to use his freedom in destructive ways. Then God through much pain and grief, figured out a way to give mankind salvation from man's own self-destruction. Now, we have some people accepting the salvation, while others are denying it. Doesn't sound like a bad or messed up God to me. Keep on rejecting His salvation for you if you want. But realize that it is you who is doing the rejecting, not God. God is constantly offering. |
|
|
|
From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preamble_to_the_United_States_Constitution, the Preamble to the Constitution: We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. There is nothing within the Preamble, nor withing the Constitution that suggests that the people are placing themselves under the Constitution or the government. In fact, the words say that the Constitution is set in place to "... secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity ... ." The Constitution and government are for US, not we for them. In addition, the 9th Amendment in the Bill of Rights says ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution): The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. In other words, we have all the rights that we always did. The Cosntitution does NOT deny any rights to the people. The people are over the Constitution individually, and therefore, above all the laws that flow out of it, in every way that they want to be. However, if individuals do not exercise their right to be above the Constitution and laws, then they are accepting a position under it and them. However, the people can always pick up and use their rights to get out from under the laws and government whenever they want. |
|
|
|
All the questions that science could not answer, throw it to God God always have a place since you can never solve all the problems in the world. God does not solve it either, but at least it gives you a hope so that you don't become desperate You are right. However it would depend on the person. Some people have hope. But not in god but in themselves. Some do however put all there hope and faith in god. I live day to day and take what I see i need. Everything else is earned. But I can not say that it came from god. Because I really don't know if it did. As far as I know it came from an alien 3 solar systems away. You just really do not know. Having reasonable hope in one's self IS having hope in God. After all, it is God Who has made everything. He has given people their abilities. When they use their abilites hoping to produce some result, they are using what God has placed them. Hope in God, and hope in the things that God has placed into existence. However, do not hope beyond the abilities that God has placed in you. |
|
|
|
- He didn't want his disciples to get into a fight and get hurt.
True ,every religion BEGINNER is a karismtic guy and he also didnt wanted them to get themselves killed and eventually left with handful of people in his ARMY - There were a lot of people to bring the Gospel message to, so they didn't have time to get into long-winded arguments.
LONG - WINDED? answering 1 question is long-winded ? - God doesn't take freedom from anyone; preach, but let the people make up their own minds.
yes of course that is GOD ,but jesus does not agree with that. - This was a training time for the disciples. So, they needed to get a variety of different people and their responds so that they could bring the points back to Jesus and He could explain it all to them.
Yes ,he wanted to see people's reaction on his made up plan ,or else people might just kill him for asking someones wife ... They didn't ask questions. They preached the Gospel - the good news about salvation. Jesus and God are One. They agree. Jesus never used force except when he cleared the temple. He spoke in parables so that the people would have to think about it, so they could make up their own minds. Jesus was teaching His disciples. They came back to Him, and He explained about the various receptions they had received from the people. The plan was something that God made up to save people. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
