It hasn't. In most countries of the world, the State plays an important role due to the weight of the public sector. Obviously, Hong Kong is not the same as France, but if we look at the larger countries we see that they are far from being purely capitalist. The EU is quite social democratic, with nuances depending on the country, but it cannot be called purely capitalist by far. China, Russia, let us forget. USA with Biden and Canada with Trudeau are more socialist and less capitalist than before, etc.


If we were to do a reset and distribute the wealth absolutely equally, it would not be long before there would be rich and poor again, so we would continue with the same song that the rich have privileges and unfair advantages and that it is necessary to distribute.

They could, but they don't seem to be willing to, as it means losing power and control. At first they didn't like the idea of Bitcoin, but since they realized they couldn't get rid of it, they tolerated it, now what they do is try to control it as much as possible with AML/KYC laws to the max.

The way I see it, in a few years the use of Bitcoin with privacy is going to be even less than it is now.

If you do not give us more details we will not be able to help you. Do you and your boss work in something related to gambling? In digital or physical business? Just to know if he knows the sector or if he is just a businessman who wants to diversify.

As I said in another thread, the gambling industry in the crypto world is very powerful and has been since its beginnings. There is a lot of competition but if you do things half right I think you can launch a successful casino and even more if you have something new to contribute.

Here in the forum you could buy advertising, giveaways and run a signature campaign to promote it. There are many casinos that do it and it is profitable for them.

Not really. According to what I've learned, to feel non-binary, is to not feel identified as either male or female, and, in fact, at the conference I attended, one guy who asked a question introduced himself as non-binary. But that's independent of possible gender fluidity. You can feel non-binary and always feel that way, so your gender doesn't (supposedly) flow.


Not really, my point is that what you feel doesn't determine what you are. There are objective parameters to determine what you are and what you feel doesn't change what you are. That I feel I am the most handsome in the world, or the smartest in the world, does not make me the most handsome or the smartest in the world. And if it's my mother who feels it doesn't either.


I think basically the same.

As for locker rooms (which was one of the things discussed at the conference) I think the best solution is locker rooms for everyone, regardless of sex or gender. But with a common lobby and individual compartments for changing.

I frequent a mixed WC, where everyone can enter regardless of sex or gender, and I only felt a little weird the first time. Once you get used to it, it doesn't matter. The toilets are in individual compartments and the sinks for washing hands as well as the hand dryers are shared.


Yeah, well, I am OK with that distinction.


Yes, as I said above, if we were to apply it to other aspects of life it would be laughable.

I didn't say that.


For you, learning a little English grammar and punctuation would do you good.

I don't like, at all, the news lately in this regard.


I think so. Obviously, we will always have P2P, but just a year ago we were seeing how Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies were spreading without the restrictive regulations and bans like this that we are seeing in recent months. I see the future looking blacker than I did this time last year.

In your case I am not surprised that you say that because you publish a Russian know scam site, but I think you have a valid point here. I haven't seen anyone in all the time I've been on the forum raise a boycott of Jewish gambling sites (if any) or Jewish businesses. I guess after WWII it sounds pretty bad. So, that boycotting an entire nation/ethnic group/whatever doesn't seem right to me.

That is the main attraction I would say. Being able to gamble anonymously along with lower commissions or lower HE than fiat casinos, which ends up providing a better user experience. The OP was wondering about reliability, and, despite the fact that scams abound in the crypto world, a crypto casino all it needs is to attract customers. The moment customers come through the door (virtually) on a consistent basis, casinos are money making machines and don't need to tweak the algorithm or anything, as they are going to give a better experience and a better return to users than fiat casinos.

Lol, I didn't know that o_e_l_e_o beats LoyceV in terms of earned merit. It is clear that he is the best when it comes to replies. LoyceV would be the best in terms of theads created that are useful for the forum but he has fillippone on his heels. Although the important thing I think is that they all get along well with each other, even if there is a bit of competition to be the best.

Chances are that in the net of his gambling life he has lost more money than that jackpot, which indicates that he is most likely a person with a lot of money. I have a friend who works in a casino and he says that regular high rollers sometimes win big jackpots but consistently lose a lot of money. The long term net is loss, no matter how impressive big jackpots like this one might be.

There has been a lot of discussion on this topic in the forum, and, in the end, it is best that if you are really in this situation you consult a lawyer or financial advisor who specializes in these matters.

What I can tell you is that, assuming that the IRS applies a cost basis 0 for when you cannot prove the purchase price, the best thing to do is to wait until the price has risen so much that it does not matter, as long as you do not need the money.

If you bought bitcoin at $1K and sell it at $42K, you don't care if they apply a 0 cost basis because almost 100% of it is profit.

I didn't know that. How do you know that? In any case, it's one thing not to moderate scams and another thing to let them laugh at the forum like that.


Well, in my opinion, a bot like that, or whatever it is, should be nuked.


That's why I started this thread. At some point I have reported some of their posts, but the feeling is that the participants of this campaign, the only thing they do is to litter the forum with garbage. If I find more participants like the one in this thread, who look more like a bad bot than anything else, I will report them in this thread.

It's one thing if you don't want to moderate scams, it's another to allow such garbage.

Well, that's one of my points, although I wouldn't call it denying your gender or mental illness, rather choosing your gender. In the vast majority of cases we can speak of someone as male or female based on biological characteristics but there are cases (statistically few) of hermaphroditism, which today are called intersexuality.

What I don't agree with is: here you have 86 types of gender, choose the one you like the most, and if you get tired tomorrow you can choose another one.

When I say that someone is a man or a woman, I am referring to objective biological characteristics, not to a feeling.

If we do not limit what I have put in bold to gender, we reach obvious absurdities as in the example of the diets below.


No, we are not talking about sexual preferences. Gender may or may not be linked to sexual preference. You can feel non-binary today and like women, tomorrow you can feel male and like men, and the day after you can feel female and only like male-female transsexuals. That's the theory, and I'm giving you simple examples, it can get much more complicated.

I think it's fine for you to have the sexual preferences you want as long as what you do is between consenting adults, but the issue of gender, especially in the case of fluid, is a mental masturbation .

If we were to apply it to other areas, we would think that the person is not right in the head. If I tell you that today I feel 70% vegan and 30% carnivore, it is normal that you would think that I am an idiot and if you see me the next day and I tell you I'm doing the keto diet, you see me again the day afer and I tell you I'm only eating fast food that day, etc. you'd think I was crazy.


I do not agree with this. When I say that someone is a man or a woman, I am referring to objective parameters. Maybe you were biologically born a man and you feel like a woman. I can understand that. You may be born a man and like men. It is normal, there have always been, even in the animal kingdom and there will always be. But come on, the 86 genres and changing them as I feel like it is a joke that passes for cool nowadays.

@Chato1977, don't listen to this guy. Even though after last year's ATHs, there has been a slight downturn in the overall market, buying fun tokens sucks compared to simply having bought Bitcoin and holding it. When I bought fun tokens they were worth relative to Bitcoin triple what they are worth now. Just look at the graph I posted above, which is typical of a shitcoin, and that of the Bitcoin.


No, I only invest in Bitcoin and do not do staking. So I can not recommend any site. What I do recommend is that you think very carefully about staking.

User: ajochems

So, I was about to report a post by this guy, when it occurred to me to look at his post history, and I see it's all the same crap. It seems to be written by a simple robot from the first AIs that existed, answering something that sounds like it has something to do with the thread under discussion but is pure garbage.

On top of that, I see on bpip.org that he only has 9 posts deleted by moderators. I don't know if people see that he is part of the 1xBit scam campaign with the red tags and don't report him or what.

If anyone has the time and inclination, you may find a few posts worth reporting in the thread: Wall of fame / shame. Shit posts so bad that they are actually funny.

Since scams on the forum are not moderated, I think we could report all the garbage posters from the 1xBit campaign into one thread to see if the moderators will ban them for littering the forum with garbage. I don't care if it's in this thread or another one.

The future in the vast majority of cases is a great loss for whoever invests in them. As a picture is worth a thousand words, let's look at an example from another thread:


Auto staking and auto compounding to lose 95% of your investment does not sound very smart. In some cases you may hit the lottery and in addition to the staking and compounding gains, the shitcoin will have risen a lot and you will be able to sell with a lot of profit but this does not make the strategy an optimal way of investing.

And you still wonder? A communist country where producing goods and services is not exactly what characterizes them, has to end up stealing in order to maintain itself, because in the end such systems all end up the same: with economic collapse due to a decreasing production and a fictitious price control.

Read this thread: Enjoy communism (III) rats eating dead people and people eating rats in NK

Yes, as dimonstration says, it would be strange for a casino owner to come here and give you advice on how to successfully lauch a new casino, since you are after all a competitor. Just look at what the other casinos on the forum are doing.

What you will clearly see is that the gambling industry is heavily represented on Bitcointalk.org in the form of signature campaigns and ads. It looks like it is profitable for them.

That was it. I had not thought about it. I remember this thread also that although it was not exactly the same, it was for the same reason:

What could it be? Mistake? (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)

So, a few weeks ago I attended two conferences on diversity. One was on ethnic and socio-cultural diversity, which I found interesting, and the other on sexual and affective diversity, which I found less interesting and in some cases, such as the one I am going to comment on, pure ideological garbage.

I had heard the term fluid gender before but didn't know exactly what it referred to, just as I don't know exactly what the supposed dozens of genres that exist, it seems as many as 68 or more, refer to:

68 Terms That Describe Gender Identity and Expression

So, according to the supposed man and the supposed woman who were giving the conference (I say supposed because I don't know how they would define themselves in terms of gender, I simply want to emphasize that one seemed to have mostly masculine physical characteristics and the other feminine), gender is not a defined and static thing, but it is fluid and one can feel man today and woman tomorrow. But what's more: one can feel like 80% man today and 30% man tomorrow.

Here we would have to include other genders and tastes in the equation, that is, I could feel 30% male today, 20% non-binary, 25% female and the other 25% who knows what gender, but I could also feel attracted only to men today. If tomorrow I were to feel 100% female and I liked only women, then tomorrow I would be, in addition to being gender fluid, a trans-gender lesbian woman.

I think there is no need to explain too much why this is garbage. To begin with, if we were to apply this to any other aspect of life we would think that the fluid person is sick in the head.

These theories come out in societies where people have a full belly and because they have a lot of time to think they come up with things like this, which are nonsense.

Another thing is that what is statistically irrelevant is being passed off as normal. People who are not clear about their supposed gender and change it as they please are, by mathematical approximation, 0% of society.

I don't know if this has become trendy now and cool but it doesn't stand up to serious rational analysis.