People already report them without the promise of merit, but sometimes people already do give them merit for those finding them. I don't think it should be given out automatically or as standard practice, but I have no issue with people dishing it out for finding them. People would likely just exploit your idea by just using the bots that copy and pasted themselves so that they could report them just to get the merit credit as well.
|
|
|
Hi, I'm completely new on the forum, I do not really good to write quality and useful posts I would like to help monitor the forum, then maybe you will have for me what kind of work ? I know Russian and English, I can clean the Russian section of spam Report posts with a decent accuracy if you want to help out and have a chance of being asked to be a mod. That's the only way. Sounds legit. Good luck.
|
|
|
My guess is that you were PMing people saying something like: ~snip~ Dude, I never pm someone I just following airdrop & bonty, and make posting in local my country and I don't know how to pm someone. My last post I be waiting for bonty & airdrop project REDPILLS and a few hours later I see my account banned. Mprep isn't going to leave that feedback for nothing, Check your sent messages and see what is in there. You might not have personally sent the spam messages but if you were infected with malware your account might have been spreading them without you knowing.
|
|
|
How about you give it to a post that deserves it and stop with this silly games. This thread belongs nowhere but the trash. All this thread would be is a desperate spam fest and how do we know you're not just going to give the merit to your alt?
|
|
|
I just want to add one further note to that. The practice of having undisclosed alts is likely to attract negative trust. The only way to avoid it is to openly declare the alts as many high ranking individuals have done. Leave trust to your other account stating 'this is my alt' and post in Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q1) thread to declare it there. This isn't true and the only real time people usually tag alt accounts is if they've been used for shenanigans or to bypass regulations in sig campaigns or something else. People should be free to have any amount of anonymous alts if they so wish. The whole point of theymos even allowing alts is for privacy and anonymity sake and whether you want to expose them or not is up to you but people shouldn't be forced or even suggested to self-out them and there shouldn't be repercussions for those who are doing nothing wrong with them.
|
|
|
Child boards are just like sweeping the shit into a different room and more boards = more time mods have to waste moving pointless threads in there. Besides, I really think we should prohibit Alt Coin sections in Local boards or at the very least limit them to the larger ones. Do we really even need an Alt Coin section in the Croatian board? There's not even that many Croatian users here and that board has never been that active. All it is is another place for Bounty Hunters to post their (usually badly) translated Ann threads. See here: Just look inside those threads. As far as I can tell nobody other than the op has posted in them. Example: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3071906.0He just spam bumps them every day to nobody. Utterly pointless. The Croatian board really doesn't need an Alt coin section.
|
|
|
Wow Bitcoin Supremo - 210 points that’s amazing. Congrats, very impressive. Maybe somebody else can confirm but that’s the best score I’ve seen this season.
It is as far as I recall. Think the highest I've gotten was 170. Next season I'll do a smaller consolation prize for the highest score in a round during the season. At least those who have little to no chance of winning the top five prizes still have something to play for.
|
|
|
You'll need to contact an admin about that and see if they accept any other evidence, but the chances of you getting this account back are very, very slim. Even accounts with valid signed messages are seemingly not getting restored right now so you've got next to zero chance.
|
|
|
As expected a lot of people did very good this week. I marginally keep my lead but still pretty close at the top:
1 hilarious 150 2810 2 StephenCurry333 170 2780 3 Supremo1 210 2710 4 Cicciobtc 90 2690 5 LFC_Bitcoin 90 2610 6 marlboroza 100 2520 7 CarlesPuyol 0 2470 8 hahay 150 2430 9 Wendigo 90 2380 10 buwaytress 50 2310 11 BetAdviser 90 2300 12 G-spot 90 2270 13 rickbig41 190 2150 14 unyil 160 1990 15 ajaxmoor 0 192
CarlesPuyol and ajaxmoor on zero points. What happened there? Forget to play?
|
|
|
This isn't going to happen. Staff are already swamped and I think it should be left up to the community to police just like scams are. Merit abuse is probably just going to cause more hassle than it's worth and sadly farmers and "friends" are just trading it or swapping it between themselves and it's regular users who are left feeling the pinch whilst those with a lot of accounts and/or "friends" will just continue to bend the rules to their advantage.
|
|
|
Yeah, lots of people probably did good this week. I got three correct scores and two correct outcomes. I should keep my lead I reckon but I'd be surprised if the top five didn't get similar results.
|
|
|
A bitcoin address you posted somewhere.
|
|
|
Sure, if you can find someone who wants to waste their time with it. I know what a shitshow the entire forum is. I've told theymos numerous times about the various issues the board has and how they're continual exploited and it's the same thing every time: nothing gets done. All you can do is keep bringing it up but there's only so long you can keep banging your head against a brick wall. I also subscribe to Einstein's theory of insanity:
|
|
|
I'm not against this system and the system of ranks that was. I also love history, and your system of ranks and the addition that you made with merit began to resemble a bourgeois system.
Jesus Christ. Stop being a drama queen. Do you people even have any idea how ridiculous you sound? Oh, merit is for the bourgeois. Merit is like Hitler. Merit is like Stalin. Merit is fascism. Merit is Animal Farm. Merit broke my life. Stop crying. Merit is to reward quality posts and to try curb the thousands of shitposters that sign up here purely to spam their way through ranks by writing nothingness. What does having to acquire merit have to do with capitalism or anything else? All it is is shitposters crying that they now can't easily earn money straight away by posting barely coherent guff.
|
|
|
You need to sign a message from a staked address as is explained how to do in the link jhenfelipe posted above. If you can't do that you may as well forget about your accounts because even with valid messages they're just not getting restored right now.
|
|
|
Good evening. I'm sorry, I caught the Trojan horse on the computer and the two accounts were "stolen." One of my personal accounts, the second working account that I was given to lead the Bounty. -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- My account <https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=301417> has been hacked/lost. Please reset the email to < vitaly@allabout.me>. The current date is <31.03.2018>. -----BEGIN SIGNATURE----- <1KkAU8Wn6DvubVbvVnw521byJHPZRndWnk> < > -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- Here is the unedited post where I posted that address: ... OR I sent that address to someone in a PM with PM ID#... Lol. Why is there a signature ad in your message? If you can't sign a message from a staked address you're never going to get your account back. Even if you can sign a message you still likely won't get it back.
|
|
|
Terrible idea for reasons already stated. merit ˈmɛrɪt/ noun noun: merit
1. the quality of being particularly good or worthy, especially so as to deserve praise or reward. Merit is meant to reward quality posts, and it shouldn't be able to be achieved just by gaming the system by creating crappy threads. Your suggestion would just make the forum infinitely worse than it already is as people will just spam threads for views and it's already the trash threads that get the most views and comments. Hello friends, I am just looking around in this meta as newbie like me needs to lot of reading specially in beginners thread. I do not know what is meta thread meaning, but as I understood from first posting and the comments, there are many questions in my mind. 1. What is definition of constructive and high quality post? 2. For whom is it constructive and high quality? 3. Who will judge a posting is constructive or high quality and how he judge constructive and high quality? 4. so on....many questions in my mind, do not understand at all for this kind of high quality.
I agree with the first posting, there should be clear parameter of high quality not only decided by each person.
I am sorry if my posting looks silly, just curious.
This is like asking what is good art or music. There is no definition of what is constructive or high quality. Surely you are able to determine this yourself when you see a post.
|
|
|
All this will do is create yet another market for abuse and Services popping up offering to take the merit test for you or supply you with all the answers. Just earn the merit like everyone else does by making quality contributions.
To do this, you need to do on the forum itself, so that the user passes this test in the profile, this way not everyone comes to provide information account For new users it to be interesting, and merit are not so big, so much to think of them admins You don't at all. People will just offer the Services off site anyway. In fact, people will probably just put all the answers on a website or blog so they can easily be found by googling and that at least will get them some free traffic. This isn't going to work and almost certainly won't be implemented. It seems like people are thinking of every other method of getting merits to jump-start their new accounts (read farming account rings, shhhhh).
I know. If these people spent more time putting effort into their posts than dreaming up harebrained schemes for alternative ways to acquire merit they'd probably already have the merit by now.
|
|
|
What does it really matter if they decay or not? If they don't send them and they decay then they're useless anyway so there's no real use in hoarding them. Forcing people to give them out likely just means they'll go to accounts/posts that probably don't really deserve it.
|
|
|
|