I was presenting simple solution. This isn't an UNSECURED method either.
Why does it need to be CentOS and not something simpler such as Ubuntu?
simple is not always secure. plus blockchain doesn't give you that much control over it. Plus their RPC settings become in more insecure as they disable a lot of there security features. Ubuntu server IS HORRIBLE *THROWS UP* Ubuntu is a desktop OS, that is it. Centos is beast for servers, while bitcoind is a pain in the ass to setup in centos, it will be worth it if you set it up correctly. |
|
|
|
|
gcc -l <path to bin of glibc>
|
|
|
|
|
you probably want to use -l when compiling and point to your glibc library
|
|
|
|
It is your compiler not seeing and linking to your glibc as it compiles. First off Looks like the compiler doesnt find the rpcnet.cpp and rcprawtransaction.cpp .. which are in the same folder like the rpcdump.cpp that is par of the bitcoin code and it is giving off the crash because, the compiler doesn't see your glibc and is tell you that, then will it compiles those parts those are the parts that need glibc and can't continue with out it. |
|
|
|
$50 bounty added ... (please make explanations understandable, im a noob when it comes to server management)
you could try making a bounty on Rugatu and see how it goes  don't put it on rugatu otherwise your bitcoins will be send with out your consent Stop trolling or accusing without proof, that's lame. Disclosure: gweedo is the owner of a competing service named bitquestion.com GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT I AM NOT THE OWNER OF BITQUESTION.COM STOP TROLLING ME AND THERE IS PROOF SEARCH THE FORUMS apt-get install glibc
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
glibc is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 removed and 1 not upgraded. its already installed ... you then need to check to make sure that the compiler can see it and it is linked correctly and ... how do i make that? You need to check your system path variables |
|
|
|
$50 bounty added ... (please make explanations understandable, im a noob when it comes to server management)
you could try making a bounty on Rugatu and see how it goes don't put it on rugatu otherwise your bitcoins will be send with out your consent apt-get install glibc
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
glibc is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 removed and 1 not upgraded. its already installed ... you then need to check to make sure that the compiler can see it and it is linked correctly |
|
|
|
Getting this :/ make -f makefile.new bitcoind
g++ -pthread -Wextra -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-char-subscripts -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wformat-security -g -DNOPCH -I/home/bitcoin/Bitcoin/Libraries/bitcoin-master/src -DUSE_SSL -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2 -I"/home/bitcoin/Bitcoin/Deps/include" -static -o bitcoind obj/checkpoints.o obj/version.o obj/addrman.o obj/netbase.o obj/crypter.o obj/key.o obj/db.o obj/init.o obj/irc.o obj/keystore.o obj/main.o obj/net.o obj/protocol.o obj/bitcoinrpc.o obj/rpcdump.o obj/script.o obj/util.o obj/wallet.o obj/walletdb.o obj/noui.o -Wl,-Bstatic -mtl /home/bitcoin/Bitcoin/Deps/lib/libboost_system.a -mtl /home/bitcoin/Bitcoin/Deps/lib/libboost_filesystem.a -mtl /home/bitcoin/Bitcoin/Deps/lib/libboost_program_options.a -mtl /home/bitcoin/Bitcoin/Deps/lib/libboost_thread.a /home/bitcoin/Bitcoin/Deps/lib/libdb_cxx.a -mtl /home/bitcoin/Bitcoin/Deps/lib/libssl.a -mtl /home/bitcoin/Bitcoin/Deps/lib/libcrypto.a -lgcc -Wl,-Bstatic -l z -l dl -l pthread
/home/bitcoin/Bitcoin/Deps/lib/libcrypto.a(dso_dlfcn.o): In function `dlfcn_globallookup':
dso_dlfcn.c:(.text+0x30): warning: Using 'dlopen' in statically linked applications requires at runtime the shared libraries from the glibc version used for linking
obj/netbase.o: In function `LookupIntern':
/home/bitcoin/Bitcoin/Libraries/bitcoin-master/src/netbase.cpp:90: warning: Using 'getaddrinfo' in statically linked applications requires at runtime the shared libraries from the glibc version used for linking
obj/bitcoinrpc.o: In function `__static_initialization_and_destruction_0':
/home/bitcoin/Bitcoin/Libraries/bitcoin-master/src/bitcoinrpc.cpp:2141: undefined reference to `getconnectioncount(std::vector<json_spirit::Value_impl<json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > >, std::allocator<json_spirit::Value_impl<json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > > > > const&, bool)'
/home/bitcoin/Bitcoin/Libraries/bitcoin-master/src/bitcoinrpc.cpp:2141: undefined reference to `getpeerinfo(std::vector<json_spirit::Value_impl<json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > >, std::allocator<json_spirit::Value_impl<json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > > > > const&, bool)'
/home/bitcoin/Bitcoin/Libraries/bitcoin-master/src/bitcoinrpc.cpp:2141: undefined reference to `listunspent(std::vector<json_spirit::Value_impl<json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > >, std::allocator<json_spirit::Value_impl<json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > > > > const&, bool)'
/home/bitcoin/Bitcoin/Libraries/bitcoin-master/src/bitcoinrpc.cpp:2141: undefined reference to `getrawtransaction(std::vector<json_spirit::Value_impl<json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > >, std::allocator<json_spirit::Value_impl<json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > > > > const&, bool)'
/home/bitcoin/Bitcoin/Libraries/bitcoin-master/src/bitcoinrpc.cpp:2141: undefined reference to `createrawtransaction(std::vector<json_spirit::Value_impl<json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > >, std::allocator<json_spirit::Value_impl<json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > > > > const&, bool)'
/home/bitcoin/Bitcoin/Libraries/bitcoin-master/src/bitcoinrpc.cpp:2141: undefined reference to `decoderawtransaction(std::vector<json_spirit::Value_impl<json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > >, std::allocator<json_spirit::Value_impl<json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > > > > const&, bool)'
/home/bitcoin/Bitcoin/Libraries/bitcoin-master/src/bitcoinrpc.cpp:2141: undefined reference to `signrawtransaction(std::vector<json_spirit::Value_impl<json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > >, std::allocator<json_spirit::Value_impl<json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > > > > const&, bool)'
/home/bitcoin/Bitcoin/Libraries/bitcoin-master/src/bitcoinrpc.cpp:2141: undefined reference to `sendrawtransaction(std::vector<json_spirit::Value_impl<json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > >, std::allocator<json_spirit::Value_impl<json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > > > > const&, bool)'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [bitcoind] Error 1 you don't have all the dependencies installed, you need to install glibc and try again My suggestion is to not run bitcoind and to rely on a web wallet that has API calls similar to bitcoind such as blockchain.info https://blockchain.info/json_rpc_api1MANTisca9kS6t4bngzuU4GBgE1S1L7q2UTHAT IS EVEN WORST THAN RUNNING AN UNSECURED BITCOIND |
|
|
|
$50 bounty added ... (please make explanations understandable, im a noob when it comes to server management)
If your a noob then running a bitcoind isn't for you. I think people running bitcoind should know linux security. Cause you are the same people that complain when your wallet gets hacked and it could have been prevented if you just knew about linux security and how to protect your bitcoind. btw here is the script that will install it https://github.com/weex/bitcoind-centos |
|
|
|
|
anyone know if the lion instructions work on mountain lion?
|
|
|
|
|
In php json_decode will turn any json string into an array for easy parsing js
|
|
|
|
Yeah, let's all install Lynx.
wait you guys are using Lynx? now this is awkward  |
|
|
|
You are admitting to a scam ? You need to report this to the site involved and hand back the coins or get a scammer label.
I agree with that, that are abuse of the system and if I was running the site I would probably give you a reward anyway for reporting of the bug. So Please on behalf of the devs report it to them otherwise or face being labeled a scammer. |
|
|
|
|
cgminer can be compiled to run on the mac, you just need to get ports or homebrew to get the dependancies
|
|
|
|
fopen is insecure and not correct when trying to communicating with remote sites. I just rewrote the http post part of the code so just in case anyone was wanted it http://pastebin.com/vREuHVr5 |
|
|
|
You should keep removing elements of the forum until it's down to an SSH session!!  Get a BBS running and lets have some real fun! |
|
|
|
I know i would do it for like BTC200 that right now is like $2,000 and that is fair for a site like that
This estimate is out by at least one order of magnitude. Remember I am going off what a free lancer would get paid and that is a pretty big site, but what would think would be a fair price? |
|
|
|
It is like watching a family member just die slowly, I remember when digg was pioneering in web 2.0 arena back in the day, but now it is just dying soooooooooooo slowly, and trying to play catch. I think it is a dead site, i hope i am wrong.
I go on it once a week, You've been reading too many propaganda articles much?  LOL no 2005- 2007 was digg's greatest years digg v3 was horrible and digg v4 just ended it and then the founder left the project completely and that is how you know it is dead. I guess i gauge a companies success a little bit differently, I find a service dead when that said service is not making any money(net-profit) or not assisting with anyone but if you want to look at it that way we can do that Well right not it is making no money. but if we are gauging digg by money, then I would say when they injected ads and if they got digged up the ad paid less and if it was buried the ad company paid more, then i would say that was genius. Actually making an ad content, and all services try to do that right now. Digg was the first one to have a button that linked back to digg, no site had that, at that time. So digg at certain points was amazing and really molded the web we see today. But in the last couple years, a big chunk of the hardcore community like me, has left cause of some decisions that would go against how the site was being censored, ran, and disrupting the internet with iframes. That is why I am salty on digg. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
