I often make long lists of users, linking to their BPIP profile for quick review. Example: The first link works, the second doesn't, because the profile is archived. Request @Vod: Is it possible to create a link that always works, even if it's archived? I notice that some time ago but.. Just to note here, it's funny but the bug with the link to the archived users is actually a nice feature. If the newbie is banned (and archived) the link leads to the homepage, so I don't need to look more if the guy is banned ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
The parser is down. The light around the (i) is gone. I'll update if I see it up again.
|
|
|
So sad that it's outdated now. I almost forgot about it.
|
|
|
There are two admins at the moment, (I wish them a long life). In case of emergency, there is always someone to take over.
|
|
|
Hi, freak! You are doing a bad business, doing bad things to people! Because of you, bastard, I lost my account! I wish that you are dead and that all your relatives are dead! Burn in hell!
Hello fucker angry user, you lost your account because of you. Veleor is not copy/pasting right? So blaming the police for getting busted is not gonna help you. There is no place for you here. Au revoir!
|
|
|
so this project and all of its "users" need to be banned? ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) I'm lost! I have posted here and you posting this is telling me to just piss off! How are we supposes to learn about new alts. Now from my understanding is you want to do a way with alts. Has the project dev. Bitcoin.Supreme been banned? Please educate me It is very simple, if you have posted your own content without copy/pasting or replacing characters with a homograph ones ( see for reference here) then you are on the safe side. Not all users posting in a specific thread are going to be banned, just those who break the rules. Another thing, if you see your name in a list here this doesn't you are guilty for something, no. We make lists with potential spamming users for a manual review, but there were people like theymos, Welsh, LoyceV, even I was on a few lists, it's just an automatically collected raw data, which we process manually.
Look what I found in the Bounty section : ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FYc2lsEq.png&t=663&c=1p1NssturG2s0Q) sdfdhfhffhhdfdfdhdh
wjsdhfiuhdriu
... one more popped up while I was typing ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) dsjihisrlnglfnsj
Archived here > https://archive.fo/74Bid
|
|
|
Here is the worst bot bumping thread I've ever seen ... I've seen much worse than that, it has only 23 pages. ~ I mean the contents is really bad mostly automatically translated, it's not a big thread for sure. Thank for the list
|
|
|
Another case, this time is not a Legend, just a Jr. coming closer to Member I was about to give merit to but some of the posts are a bit suspicious. I really hope he wrote them based on his knowledge and not the ability to copy/spin/paste the text.
I've seen this user. Sounds genuine to me but I'll dig around. I gave him 1 merit today for one good post, better to give it away to someone that have 4-5 good posts than to keep it unspent.
Here is the worst bot bumping thread I've ever seen ... [ANN] 🎲 AZART 🎲 | Algo X11 | PoW+Masternodes | L-PoW | Governance | Funding@LoyceV I'll need a list of all the accounts, seems like many are multiposting there.
|
|
|
The original (maybe) he copy-pasted it twice himself>Hi everyone!Blocking technology will change the world more than it did the internet in its time. I love high-tech promising companies.I gladly joined EDUCATE!
The copypastafarian>Blocking technology will change the world more than it did the internet in its time. I love high-tech promising companies.
BANNED or inactive based on BPIP info Blocking technology will change the world more than it did the internet in its time. I love high-tech promising companies.
Blocking technology will change the world more than it did the internet in its time. I love high-tech promising companies.
I joined the signature company. I already participate in the companies Tweeter and Facebook. Blockchain technology will change the world more than the Internet in its time. I love high-tech promising companies. I happily joined CyberTrust.
Blocking technology will change the world more than it did the internet in its time. I love high-tech promising companies.
Blocking technology will change the world more than it did the internet in its time. I love high-tech promising companies.
Blocking technology will change the world more than it did the internet in its time. I love high-tech promising companies.
Blocking technology will change the world more than it did the internet in its time. I love high-tech promising companies.
Blocking technology will change the world more than it did the internet in its time. I love high-tech promising companies.
Blocking technology will change the world more than it did the internet in its time. I love high-tech promising companies.
Blocking technology will change the world more than it did the internet in its time. I love high-tech promising companies.
Blocking technology will change the world more than it did the internet in its time. I love high-tech promising companies.
Blocking technology will change the world more than it did the internet in its time. I love high-tech promising companies.
Blocking technology will change the world more than it did the internet in its time. I love high-tech promising companies.
|
|
|
Interesting story for sure, but there's something fishy. To many weird stuff here, buying newbie account only to post this is ringing the bell... Why???
|
|
|
I lost count how many are coming here every day to appeal. We have pushed people to report and now this is the result. Great work.
@OP things are changing in good direction, but you missed the chance to be part of the good forum.
|
|
|
Move this thread to the Altcoin Section or the Beginners and Help. There is no place for ICO/tokens in the Bitcoin section. Just find the "move" button in the bottom left corner, and choose the right section.
|
|
|
I have been F5 the page constantly, but no drop down box at all ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) Check the address you sent the coins to, be sure it's the same as on the purchase page. It can take a while, I never purchased Copper Membership but I can guess that it takes some time. I just want to know how to get merits. Many posts but no merits. That's me.
You are totally off-topic here..
|
|
|
Hi, I paid for the Copper Membership 20 mins ago, when will it be activated?
You have to activate it yourself > Is “copper member” displayed when someone pays the fee? If so do they retain he title after they have sufficient activity to become a “member”?
Once you have it, you get the choice: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FuE22CHZ.png&t=663&c=_pN7WLRGbo-chQ)
|
|
|
Now it's OK, the weird thing is that I got 3 notifications for the same (your) post, The first was with OK formatting the other two were a bit off. https://imgur.com/adX8XggNote> I received notification for my own post, I remember that there were some discussions sometime ago about this but don't remember the final conclusion, that's why I mentioned it here for info.
|
|
|
Goood Morning ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) c - iasenko
|
|
|
Great news ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Just a small note: The formatting of the notification messages is a bit wrong.
|
|
|
We already have bots who post for merit, copy-pasting content from internet and spin it trough article snipers, those a almost impossible to proof but easy to detect for a human. I'm not really sure that a bot/AI could be a good idea for those posts.
The quality content is so subjective matter that is impossible to create something like this and it's not needed, it's fine like this and it's getting better.
|
|
|
I don't see the need for this, quick look at the user stats gives you enough overview of the profile. It gives you no new information that the one you can find yourself by observing. If you have the post count enabled for all the users with just a quick view you know what type of poster you are looking on.
|
|
|
Anyone have more insight on this topic. Would be interested to see if there is any 'liberated' AI able to post on different message boards,etc.
Yeah, we have pretty sophisticated AI you can almost mistake for a human. Just look for LoyceV. You want proof, OK. Try to beat his score > The question that come to my mind is how much smerit a source could give in a row/repetitively without receiving (silly) remarks? My record is 4 in a second: October 13, 2018, 10:18:22 AM: 1 to Indamuck for Re: Universal Basic Income Is Silicon Valley’s Latest Scam October 13, 2018, 10:18:22 AM: 1 to audaciousbeing for Re: Universal Basic Income Is Silicon Valley’s Latest Scam October 13, 2018, 10:18:22 AM: 1 to figmentofmyass for Re: Universal Basic Income Is Silicon Valley’s Latest Scam October 13, 2018, 10:18:22 AM: 1 to KonstantinosM for Re: Universal Basic Income Is Silicon Valley’s Latest Scam Serious answer: I don't think there's a limit. As long as the posts are worth it, who cares about silly remarks?
|
|
|
The question that come to my mind is how much smerit a source could give in a row/repetitively without receiving (silly) remarks? My record is 4 in a second: October 13, 2018, 10:18:22 AM: 1 to Indamuck for Re: Universal Basic Income Is Silicon Valley’s Latest Scam October 13, 2018, 10:18:22 AM: 1 to audaciousbeing for Re: Universal Basic Income Is Silicon Valley’s Latest Scam October 13, 2018, 10:18:22 AM: 1 to figmentofmyass for Re: Universal Basic Income Is Silicon Valley’s Latest Scam October 13, 2018, 10:18:22 AM: 1 to KonstantinosM for Re: Universal Basic Income Is Silicon Valley’s Latest Scam Serious answer: I don't think there's a limit. As long as the posts are worth it, who cares about silly remarks? Another proof that you are an AI . No human can give merit to 4 different users in one second. Just curious how did you manage all this in one second??
|
|
|
|