I'm a 'member' but don't see where to add an avatar. Am I permitted?
No.
I see a gold border (only on the right) on the picture that is on the OP, but this is missing from your avatar. I don't think it is fixed So basically it was fixed for a while. Both had gold border on the right. Now it's unfixed. No gold border. Spooky  Maybe he changed it back just to mess with us.  It'll be funny when he changes it to something completely different 6 months from now and some idiot replies to this thread saying, "It looks different."  @OP, lock this thread when you're done. |
|
|
|
damn, so it looks pretty bad? What's it supposed to be? it's an inverted and darkened photo of someone. *cough* let's change the subject, shall we? Yeah, why don't we? Should I keep my coconuts or swap them for some juicy melons?  Doesn't this depend on your...orientation? Are you implying they aren't synonymous with one another? Maybe just the word 'nuts' makes me think of testicles? But that can't be right? I couldn't help but noticed that you penned two statements ending in question marks when none where needed? You saw what I did there then did you? Couldn't your first statement actually be read as a question, and did you notice his own grammatical error while attempting to correct yours? |
|
|
|
damn, so it looks pretty bad? What's it supposed to be? it's an inverted and darkened photo of someone. *cough* let's change the subject, shall we? Yeah, why don't we? Should I keep my coconuts or swap them for some juicy melons? Doesn't this depend on your...orientation? Are you implying they aren't synonymous with one another? |
|
|
|
The rule is you are allowed to post topics as long as they are legal in your own country. If you can distill and sell liquor in your country, you are welcome to make a post about it.
Where I'm from, it's legal if you're making it for personal consumption but it's not legal to sell. You still need to apply for a license and pay taxes if you want to do that. Since discussions tend to involve multiple people, wouldn't IPs need to be checked to insure that all participants are posting from countries where the activity being discussed is legal? So if three New Zealanders are participating in a discussion about methods of making moonshine then I assume that's OK from reading your post but what would happen if an American entered the thread? Would their posts get deleted? EDIT: Also, it seems to contradict mrprep's post which suggests that any discussion about home distilling would not be allowed: OP of the unnoficial rule thread here. If I'm not mistaken, the server is hosted in US. As such, you'd probably should avoid in-depth discussion of illegal activities in the US. For example, discussion of how illegal drugs affect people physically or mentally in the Off-topic board I guess is OK as it isn't prohibited by law to speak about illegal activities (documentaries on TV and youtube channels, etc. do it, hell, even wikipedia explains it sometimes), however, asking how meth is made would be deleted, if not noticed first by the authorities.
I'm quite certain Americans are permitted to discuss methods of making moonshine. They are just not allowed to actually make it IRL. |
|
|
|
|
Both images look identical to me. I assume it's fixed?
|
|
|
|
I don't think I have. anyway, does my new avatar looks good?  Do you really think it's significantly distinguishable from this image?   damn, so it looks pretty bad? What's it supposed to be? it's an inverted and darkened photo of someone. *cough* let's change the subject, shall we? Yeah, why don't we? Should I keep my coconuts or swap them for some juicy melons? |
|
|
|
Hopelessly in love with another man's wife
This reminded me of a great tiger meme.  |
|
|
|
I don't think I have. anyway, does my new avatar looks good? Do you really think it's significantly distinguishable from this image? damn, so it looks pretty bad? What's it supposed to be? |
|
|
|
I don't think I have. anyway, does my new avatar looks good? Do you really think it's significantly distinguishable from this image? |
|
|
|
So guys what do you think I think you should consider moving this thread to the Politics & Society section of the forum. |
|
|
|
I'm still waiting for the compliment
First you have to fulfill your end of the bargain. My inbox is empty. What's the point, you've already seen my pics. *waiting* I haven't seen any pic(s) of you, unless you mean this one. (Which I, myself, found and suggested is you.) If so, then let me just say, you have a wonderful sense of humor. Thaaaanks that's a nice enough compliment, I'll take it Sorry, you're right, I was mistaken, it was your *newbestfriend* Vod who saw my pics. Vod has boob pics from you?! I'm jealous.  Regardless, feel free to send them my way and I guarantee I'll give you even nicer compliments. |
|
|
|
|
Woot! The avatars are working now! Thank you theymos!
|
|
|
|
|
Something has been troubling me ever since this anti-greenhouse gas campaign began. I've never thought of carbon dioxide as being the real menace, particularly since that's exactly what plants breathe. Instead, my concerns have always been with the amount of carbon monoxide and other extremely dangerous pollutants industries introduce into the environment, which is hardly ever mentioned. I believe this omission is made on purpose to protect industries from receiving legitimate criticism in regards to their dirty and secretive pollutive practices.
[Now, obviously too much CO2 is indeed a problem, since we don't breathe it. Nevertheless, as long as we didn't destroy all the trees and plant life (in the name of progress) and kept enough of them around, it wouldn't have ever been such a big problem. Yet, as it turns out, that is exactly what is happening. Consequently, the reduction in trees and other plant life through clear-cut logging practices and ever expanding parking lots is indeed exacerbating the (otherwise inappreciable) carbon dioxide problem.]
|
|
|
|
I'm still waiting for the compliment
First you have to fulfill your end of the bargain. My inbox is empty. What's the point, you've already seen my pics. *waiting* I haven't seen any pic(s) of you, unless you mean this one. (Which I, myself, found and suggested is you.)If so, then let me just say, you have a wonderful sense of humor. |
|
|
|
Another fantastic recommendation from you, my friend. "Every human being is an invaluable masterpiece from the moment they're born and we as a species are meant for great things. Greater than we can even conceive, right now... and compulsory work for the sake of survival is an obstacle to achieving these goals." |
|
|
|
PHEW! All my girls are still here.  Not being able to see them for 9 or so hrs during the DDOS attack was almost unbearable. |
|
|
|
Found three more articles this morning.  State Legislators Pushing Bills To Shield Police Officers From Their Own Body Camera RecordingsMore and more police departments are equipping body cameras on their officers in hopes of trimming down the number of complaints and lawsuits filed against them.
Meanwhile, the public has taken police accountability into its own hands, thanks to the steady march of technology -- which has put a portable phone in almost every person's hands, and put a camera inside most of those phones.
So, we have two entities viewing accountability from seemingly opposite directions. Over the years, many officers have made it clear through their actions that being filmed isn't something they're comfortable with. This has resulted in additional misconduct and abuse of existing laws to shut down recordings. But what are these officers going to do when a city council -- or worse, a Memorandum of Understanding with the Justice Department -- directs them to start generating their own recordings?
One answer has already been presented by the Denver Police Department. They simply won't activate the cameras. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cop Forced Woman To Manufacture Meth Under Threat Of ArrestSheriff's deputy Grady Keith Concord was just sentenced after pleading guilty to extorting a woman to manufacture methamphetamine using pseudoephedrine he stole from the sheriff's office evidence room. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This statistic is astounding! American police killed more people in March (111) than the entire UK police have killed since 1900Don't bother adjusting for population differences, or poverty, or mental illness, or anything else. The sheer fact that American police kill TWICE as many people per month as police have killed in the modern history of the United Kingdom is sick, preposterous, and alarming. |
|
|
|
Nope, but it would make a good Halloween decoration in the front yard don't you think?? Are you secretly wishing you had some of that? What the hell is that in that picture???!?!!?!?Didn't her pants give away her true profession?
You mean prostitutes get free pants Isn't it free for everyone?  "Did you really have to go there?" Isn't it a bit early for Halloween? What was your first clue that she's into hollow weenies? why the are hollow weenies the in thing right now? What do you think the odds are in someone choosing it as an avatar?  Do you think you could have increased the chance of it happening just by asking? And that I've just added to that increase?  asking questions about increases always increases the chances? Haven't you heard of self-fulfilling prophecies? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
