Wouldn't it be more fair if [insert whatever you want] were shared equally?
between all the people?

Yes and No.

Yes, if everyone insert the same amount of risk, work, money, time, ...

Otherwise just no.

With 51% attack it is But 51% attack is... well, back to topic.


Adding more and more to get something work isn't a good idea. KISS - otherwise you will run into very big problems later.

Overall, later (years) there will be no need for firstbits. It will be an artefact for geeks later The more popular bitcoin becomes, the more solutions and layer will be developed and added to hide the mess with the addresses for endusers. A coredeveloper already gave a hint leading into this direction, can't find post yet Dont forget bitcoin is still beta and under developing.

Oh... and 1paypal is funny

Let's throw cryptocoins like confetti!

1LdE3f4FnZL8qeUVRVtW7Bw1nKZfSFVF4M

Thank you.

1LdE3f4FnZL8qeUVRVtW7Bw1nKZfSFVF4M

Thanks.

17ETD58sKxgafJ9VYtTX3ofnYvKTewWv2S

Thank you

Years ago i stopped using ebay for good reasons. I like how u try to make btcjam more trustworthy, but this is !#@&ing bull%§!" in my eyes.


Totally agree.

First you banned ratingwhoring, now you insert ratingwhoring via ebay.

I dont know about ebay today, but in my case, ebay is synonymous with high fees, fraudsters and ratingwhoring. May the image changed today, but the old image of ebay is burnt into my head. Avoid ebay, no exception.

Maybe i just overreact cuz i noticed the word ebay 

25 @ 0.42

25 @ 0.35

25 @ 0.33

25 @ 0.31

'I want to link my Bitcointalk name with BTCJam's. Verification code: 7f149137-35cb-4b6a-8cfe-a87ede3fe025'

17ETD58sKxgafJ9VYtTX3ofnYvKTewWv2S

Thank you! 

You're fast as lightning! 

Thank you 

I like giveaways

17YmLtUDYwy795aSExDDPrBAXdfZUdg4sW

Thank you 

Hi, my address:

LVD4XjEwVwcxNuHH6gPDoq37CuUtHwXr62