Use Primary Order for placing your buy order and Conditional Close for placing your sell order. Assume that you want to buy 1 bitcoin once the price reaches 18,500 dollar and sell it at 20,000 dollar. You must set the limit price in primary order section at 18,500 dollar and the limit price in conditional close section at 20,000 dollar. Once the price reaches 18,500, your buy order is executed and a sell order at 20,000 dollar will be created. Visit the link below for more information. Kraken - Other order options |
|
|
|
Since you have the option when restoring from a seed to create a new wallet, or import it into an existing one you may have created a new wallet, and Electrum is using the default wallet that you haven't imported your seed into.
For importing a seed phrase into electrum, you have to create a new wallet. Its' impossible to import a seed phrase into an existing wallet, unless I am missing something here. In very old versions of electrum, users were only allowed to import a private key into an existing HD wallet. Now, even that feature has been removed. |
|
|
|
|
1. Aston Villa FC vs. Brighton & Hove Albion FC - 1
2. Tottenham Hotspur FC vs. Manchester City FC - 2
3. Leeds United vs. Arsenal FC - 2
4. Liverpool FC vs. Leicester City FC - 1
5. Villarreal CF vs. Real Madrid - 2
6. Atletico Madrid vs. FC Barcelona - X
7. Cadiz CF vs. Real Sociedad - 2
8. Deportivo Alaves vs. Valencia CF - 2
9. Schalke 04 vs. VfL Wolfsburg - 2
10. TSG Hoffenheim vs. VfB Stuttgart - X
11. Eintracht Frankfurt vs. RB Leipzig - 2
12. Hellas Verona vs. Sassuolo Calcio - X
13. Sampdoria Genoa vs. Bologna FC - 2
14. SSC Napoli vs. AC Milan - 2
15. AS Monaco FC vs. Paris Saint-Germain FC - 2
Betnomi username: hosseinimr93
|
|
|
|
Sorry I meant 14 inputs are mine and the 1 output is green. However I went to console and did the ismine function and returned false. The address is not being shown in my addresses tab. No idea how Electrum is identifying this as green but not showing in my addresses.
Go to console tab and use the code below to generate more addresses. [wallet.create_new_address(False) for i in range(50)] The number 50 in the code above is number of addresses generated by Electrum. You can change it to any other number. |
|
|
|
So I got back onto the PC version. Its definitely a change address transaction because all the outputs are yellow with the receiving address green. I went to console to check if the address is mine and it return false. Is there any hope to get funds?
What do you mean by all the outputs? The transaction you posted has only 1 output. I think you meant inputs. right? If that's the case, it means that all 14 inputs of the transaction had been used as change addresses before. Also, the address highlighted in green is yours. If that's the receiving address , you should have access to the fund. |
|
|
|
Walletexplorer collect all addresses that have been spent together into a same wallet. Assuming address A and address B are inputs of a transaction, walletexplorer put both of them in a same wallet. Also, if address C is spent with each of addresses A and B in any other transaction, address C will go to a same wallet too. This is exactly why all those 14 addresses are in a same wallet. Bitcoin core does have a command to check whether an address belongs to the wallet in use; but I'm unaware of Electrum having a similar feature
In Electrum you need to use the command below. |
|
|
|
Actually I know there is an issue with 50 merits sent by theymos to GazetaBitcoin; possibly some other discrepancies; but the total is definitely a lot more than 2787 merits and there is no huge decrease in that week.
Since DdmrDdmr updates the merit dashboard every Friday after theymos publishes the merit data, I think that we should wait until the next update on November 20 to see the correct data for the week ending on November 15. The last update was made on November 13. So, the number shown for week November 9-15 is actually number of merits distributed between November 9 and November 13. Also, the decline at the end of charts shown above is because the November has not ended yet. |
|
|
|
Jb1986, haven't you upgraded your macOS to macOS Big Sur 11.0.1? A few minutes ago, someone made a topic reporting problem with opening Electrum after upgrading to macOS Big Sur 11.0.1. Visit the link below. can not open the app on macOS Big Sur 11.0.1If you are using that new verison of macOS, seems that it's a known issue. Many users of Mac have a same problem with Electrum. |
|
|
|
All these accounts are part of a group advertising two certain websites. In the past 24 hours, I've reported more than 100 similar posts including links to two certain websites. Click here to see one of them. Account below are only a few of them. Almost all of these accounts have already been nuked. hira6464fgf, hira654646, hira68442, hira32547, hira6565, hira9656, hira69645, hira36214, hira8788, hira8989, abdulhamidkhanvasani, bolbolalom, motinali, hamidolvai, valloo22, shilpiakhter, rohanr15, miliakhtervabi, drzdpy6656, ddrks, rohan65665, hira36214, rohan65665, shirinaakhter, mahabubalom, rofikolislam, jarry5454, amenabegum, shafiulislam, iamrocky, mojiborrahman, sakibolhasan, mehedimiraj, rakibolhasan, sakibolhasanThanks to moderators, every time I report such posts, they get deleted very quickly. But the problem is they continue to spam using several accounts and seems that nothing can stop them. Look at this post which has been made by one of the accounts mentioned in the OP. It's similar to posts made by accounts I posted above. So all accounts shown in the OP belong to a same group and they will probably start to spam by making huge number of posts soon. |
|
|
|
------
Since Investigations board isn't visible to guests, I guess that some merits given in this board aren't shown because BPIP has scrapped some merits without logging in and missed them. |
|
|
|
|
After you deposit some fund into a exchange, your fund will be moved from your deposit address to the exchange's wallet.
Let's say I deposit some fund to address A and you deposit to address B. All the fund from addresses A and B will be moved to address C.
So, I can know that address B is deposit address of a user of the exchange and address C is the exchange's wallet.
|
|
|
|
Recently, I've reported more than 30 posts including links below. Their posts get deleted. They make new accounts and spam again and again. spam:247sports.com
spam:game.tv
spam:deviantart
spam:gitlab
spam:raftingsort
spam:ec.europa.eu
spam:battlefy
spam:residentadvisor
|
|
|
|
The password could have been changed before BPIP started tracking changes.
Correct. The password was changed on December 26, 2017. Click here to see the reference. |
|
|
|
.........Portugal wouldn't mind a draw since they're ahead by goal diff......
France have the chance to be higher than Portugal even with a draw. If two teams end the group stage with equal points, the first tie-breaking criteria is their head-to-head matches. Since their first match ended in a goalless draw, if their coming match ends in a goalless draw too, they will be ranked based on their goal difference and Portugal will be higher than France. If their coming match ends in a 1-1 draw or 2-2, ...., France will have higher number of goals scored away from home in head-to-head matches and will be ranked higher than Portugal. |
|
|
|
I have a little run too, I'm currently on 3 winning streak but it's too late for this, I'm not sure which is harder to achieve, a win streak or a losing streak?
The probability of a having 7x losing streak is much higher than probability of having a 7x winning streak. According to rules stated in this thread, for having a valid 7x winning streak, the odds for all events must be greater than 1.5 and for having a valid 7x losing streak the odds for all events must be lower than 4. Assuming the odds for all 7 events you bet on are exactly 1.5 and the house edge is 1%, your chance to having a valid 7x winning streak would be (0.99/1.5)7 = 5.46%Assuming the odds for all 7 events you bet on are exactly 4 and the house edge is 1%, your chance to having a valid 7x losing streak would be (1 - 0.99/4)7 = 13.66% |
|
|
|
............then it just shows 0 balence
Is your wallet synced? Look at the circle at bottom of the window. It must be green. It is also possible that you are importing a wrong wallet. Go to "addresses" tab and check addresses of your wallet. Do you see your address there? (If Addresses tab is not available, click on "View" at top of the window and select "Show Addresses".) |
|
|
|
|
1. Azerbaijan - Montenegro 2
2. Germany - Ukraine 1
3. Portugal - France 1
4. Sweden - Croatia 2
5. Switzerland - Spain 2
6. Slovakia - Scotland 1
7. Bulgaria - Finland X
8. Turkey - Russia 1
9. Wales - Ireland 1
10. Belgium - England 1
11. Czech Republic - Israel 1
12. Hungary - Serbia 1
13. Italy - Poland 1
14. Romania - Norway X
15. Slovenia - Kosovo 1
Betnomi username: hosseinimr93
|
|
|
|
As stated by Rath_, there is nothing to worry about. I think I know where your concern is coming from. You are mixing up two different commands. createrawtransaction and sendtoaddress commands. You will lose the remaining balance if you make a transaction using createrawtransaction command and don't specify the change address. In this case, all the remaining balance will go to miners. Since you are going to make the transaction using sendtoaddress, the remaining balance will go to you change address automatically. So will a new private key and a new address get added to my wallet.dat automatically?
If yes then this is not good, I like to label my addresses in a pattern.
You can use sendmany command instead and send the fund to multiple addresses. Send the remaining balance to change address. You can also use createrawtransaction and specify a change address. (Don't forget to specify the change address or you will lose the remaining balance) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
