I'm flabbergasted by the amount of political extremism associated with Atlas Shrugged here. Some of the things I've been reading here are mind boggling:
Ideas like: People paying for green lights and the "free market" handling traffic.
Opinions like: If you can't pay for a private security service yt ou deserve to die.
Statements like: What have the people in Africa ever done for us?
But let's pretend for a minute Ayn Rand never existed, I think people would have a hard time coming up with such idiocy without that kind of idealistic support.
Isn't more idiotic to spend close to 60% of your posting time in the speculation sub to make bitcoin more bearable? Some of the things I've been reading over there are mind boggling...Actually, there is a direct relation between bitcoin and some of Rand's germinal ideas. Micropayments, through bitcoin, can make things like paying for green lights and the free market handling traffic, roads, etc, totally plausible. The other two opinions... Opinions like: If you can't pay for a private security service yt ou deserve to die.
Statements like: What have the people in Africa ever done for us?Have little or nothing to do with Rand's ideas. Rand accepted and encouraged a minimal degree of State responsibilities. And people in Africa have done a lot for us, so that statement doesn't even make sense. Most of anything the people of Africa did for us came about by various business people - some from the U.S. - extracting it out of Africa, often to the harm of the African people. Rand was the same way. Most of what she did was useless, and would have been detrimental if it had been applied. Among her best ideals was the idea of almost no state involvement in the lives of the people. In honor of the little good that Ayn Rand did, should we rename Bitcoin to Bitchcoin?  |
|
|
|
LOL, you can't even keep the story straight. One minute it's proof, next it's just evidence, 10 minutes later it's not evidence just points to some. Keep the comedy gold flowing BADecker.  I wouldn't expect you to get on-topic at this stage of the game, if ever. But if you did really happen to, you just might express something of importance, like the proof for God that is found in the evidences listed at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395. |
|
|
|
... I guess I don't know what the answer is. It's so funny how Decky is trying to help me find the answer. |
|
|
|
Constitutional Carry is for 14th Amendment citizens. Right to carry by the man or woman existed prior to the Constitution, and has not been diminished in any way. What has been diminished is the knowledge of the people that they are above government, and the method to force and win the issue in court. See Karl Lentz at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOkAHRzuiOA&list=PLHrkQxgz0mg6kUBciD-HIvTXByqjcIZ-D, particularly the last video of the 10. |
|
|
|
Would you like to explain how to scientificly measure your ''evidence'' because im a bit lost, thanks. To translate, because he's that brainwashed BADecker has rewritten the definition of a scientist so it fits his religion better, kind of like how religious people try to re-write history and everything else in order to make the world try and fit in their respective religions, why do you think that they always try to wipe out other cultures' and beliefs? Too bad for him the real world doesn't ever work like that, otherwise why would all these other religions and beliefe systems exist in the first place if his was so perfect? It gets better than that. On more than probably 1-2 dozen occasions now, I've had to remind BadDecker that i believe in God. And on more than probably 1-2 dozen occasions now, BadDecker has responded to my criticism of his reasoning by basically saying I'm wrong because I don't believe in God. It goes like this: Him: "Blah blah blah, BS evidence, therefore God." Me: "Um no, because blah blah." Him: "You wouldn't understand, because science blah blah." Me: "Still, no, not even close." Him: "Hey, it's your choice not to believe in God and blah blah." Me: "Um...I believe in God, remember? Him: "Well, that's a start! And blah blah, BS evidence, therefore God." Me: "Um, again, no, because blah blah." Him: "You wouldn't understand, because science blah blah." Me: "No. It's impossible. I've told you this. Everyone has told you this." Him: "Hey, it's your choice not to believe in God! Blah blah." Me: "'  " Oh, you're simply upset that someone found the proof that God exists before you did. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395EDIT: In addition to being able to stay on topic better. Why are you ignoring when im asking for scientific proof? Sorry. I simply missed your post. The proof can be found at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395. In addition, the OP's first post in this thread is more. |
|
|
|
Israel won't attack Iran because it would weaken their efforts in Syria. You can't fight on all fronts at once. Hitler tried that and it didn't end well  Yes. And in addition, it would be a disgrace to copy anything that Hitler did... like fail. |
|
|
|
No, I'm not upset. I'm amazed that you are saying "proof" = "stuff [that] isn't really the evidence [and] only points at the evidence." I'm not really surprised that you stop at only being amazed. That post was really meant only for you. I probably should have PMed, so that other readers don't get mixed up. |
|
|
|
Would you like to explain how to scientificly measure your ''evidence'' because im a bit lost, thanks. To translate, because he's that brainwashed BADecker has rewritten the definition of a scientist so it fits his religion better, kind of like how religious people try to re-write history and everything else in order to make the world try and fit in their respective religions, why do you think that they always try to wipe out other cultures' and beliefs? Too bad for him the real world doesn't ever work like that, otherwise why would all these other religions and beliefe systems exist in the first place if his was so perfect? It gets better than that. On more than probably 1-2 dozen occasions now, I've had to remind BadDecker that i believe in God. And on more than probably 1-2 dozen occasions now, BadDecker has responded to my criticism of his reasoning by basically saying I'm wrong because I don't believe in God. It goes like this: Him: "Blah blah blah, BS evidence, therefore God." Me: "Um no, because blah blah." Him: "You wouldn't understand, because science blah blah." Me: "Still, no, not even close." Him: "Hey, it's your choice not to believe in God and blah blah." Me: "Um...I believe in God, remember? Him: "Well, that's a start! And blah blah, BS evidence, therefore God." Me: "Um, again, no, because blah blah." Him: "You wouldn't understand, because science blah blah." Me: "No. It's impossible. I've told you this. Everyone has told you this." Him: "Hey, it's your choice not to believe in God! Blah blah." Me: "' " Oh, you're simply upset that someone found the proof that God exists before you did. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395EDIT: In addition to being able to stay on topic better. |
|
|
|
No offense taken, u9y42. And, Lethn. There's gotta be a way to limit a joker who types like the wind, seems to have multiple personalities, and wants to bash just about anyone because he doesn't understand even when someone else is of the same opinion as he. Sure, this is an open forum, and we can expect lots of controversy at times, but shouldn't a person who is simply out there bashing with 70 or 80% of what he says be considered some kind of a troll, just to keep the whole operation civil? On the other hand, in Decky's case, his big bashing is usually limited to the Scientific proof that God exists? thread. So, he actually limits himself sort of. I guess I don't know what the answer is. |
|
|
|
Why would anyone want to read any of your stuff, since we already have the Bible that way more accurately explains all we need to know about salvation? By what criteria is the Bible more accurate than Phoenix Journals? I find Journals are more logical and explicit in meaning; every attempt is made to get at the Truth. "I would not send lesser unto my children"--I am Aton. If you know not who IS Aton, I hope that you will do enough homework to find the answer.
As with typical mankind, you ones wish to begin at the end of the story and have others assume responsibility for YOUR education. No, that will not serve in this instance--we have purposely brought you over 40 books of insight, Truth and instructions beginning with your plight, your direction, your solutions and your divine reclamation through, and by, God. We have brought you full and detailed explanations of the working details of the Cosmos, Universe and what God is and how the cycles of perceived life and death "work". We have put it in a format which you, as man in trouble, can easily understand--the rest is up to you.
Does this mean that the JOURNALS are through? No indeed, we shall continue until the play is finished; however, it means that the eight most important books of your planet are now before you--as you use this one. I am sorry to disappoint ones who either feel "another" can explain it TO YOU and/or YOU who feel so wise as to explain and foist off your opinion of the material upon another in explanation. It is a time of self-opinion and discernment and understanding, for the transition will not be made except by those who have come within the KNOWING! This does not mean that you have to understand every working detail--but you MUST comprehend within that which is the overall. If Journals have a more logical and explicit explanation of the Bible, then this makes them more accurate. It was fun, all this off-topic talk about all kinds of things in this thread. But since the Title of the thread has been substantially covered by OP's initial post, and by the info here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, what really is there more to discuss except for more points regarding proof for or against God's existence? Maybe you didnt read the title because it clearly says SCIENTIFIC proof not what you wrote there. Well, the only way scientists turn evidence into proof is through scientific measurement and examination. So the info at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 is scientific proof when they use scientific measurement and examination to prove it up. Of course, people don't absolutely need scientific measurement and examination to recognize proof when they see it, so the fact that it is scientific as well is a bonus that strengthens the proof. Would you like to explain how to scientificly measure your ''evidence'' because im a bit lost, thanks. If you are a scientist, then you don't need my explanations. If you are not a scientist, explaining wouldn't do any good. You wouldn't understand. However, I would gladly train you in science for the right fee. But my fee would be so high that you would be better off going to school. You don't need to have scientific training to see how https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 proves the existence of God. So in other words you dont know, if scientists really knew and they didnt need your explanations they would have already measured and examined right? Show us the scientific proof then? It's beginning to look like you wouldn't know what the proof was if it walked right up and bit you in the left eyeball. All you need do is go here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 and read it. |
|
|
|
I already told you, I lean towards believing in a god. What are you talking about? No. What are you talking about? Nobody bullies anyone into anything on the forum. The only people who might do a little bullying are the moderators, because they can insist that people obey the rules, etc. If you feel that you are being bullied, you can always take yourself to a peaceful thread. Other than that, if you are bullied, it is your own doing to yourself. Don't you think that it is time that you grew up? |
|
|
|
Would you like to explain how to scientificly measure your ''evidence'' because im a bit lost, thanks. To translate, because he's that brainwashed BADecker has rewritten the definition of a scientist so it fits his religion better, kind of like how religious people try to re-write history and everything else in order to make the world try and fit in their respective religions, why do you think that they always try to wipe out other cultures' and beliefs? Too bad for him the real world doesn't ever work like that, otherwise why would all these other religions and beliefe systems exist in the first place if his was so perfect? It's mostly that standard modern scientists don't WANT to explain that they are proving God exists, more and more all the time in the things of science that they prove. The ones who DO express how science proves the existence of God, are ignored by the universities, or worse, ostracized. It's all a political ploy to tear down the strength of our religious nation, so that the politicians can more easily control the wealth of the people, and take over the world. Yet the proof for the existence of God is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg8331233#msg8331233. |
|
|
|
Why would anyone want to read any of your stuff, since we already have the Bible that way more accurately explains all we need to know about salvation? By what criteria is the Bible more accurate than Phoenix Journals? I find Journals are more logical and explicit in meaning; every attempt is made to get at the Truth. "I would not send lesser unto my children"--I am Aton. If you know not who IS Aton, I hope that you will do enough homework to find the answer.
As with typical mankind, you ones wish to begin at the end of the story and have others assume responsibility for YOUR education. No, that will not serve in this instance--we have purposely brought you over 40 books of insight, Truth and instructions beginning with your plight, your direction, your solutions and your divine reclamation through, and by, God. We have brought you full and detailed explanations of the working details of the Cosmos, Universe and what God is and how the cycles of perceived life and death "work". We have put it in a format which you, as man in trouble, can easily understand--the rest is up to you.
Does this mean that the JOURNALS are through? No indeed, we shall continue until the play is finished; however, it means that the eight most important books of your planet are now before you--as you use this one. I am sorry to disappoint ones who either feel "another" can explain it TO YOU and/or YOU who feel so wise as to explain and foist off your opinion of the material upon another in explanation. It is a time of self-opinion and discernment and understanding, for the transition will not be made except by those who have come within the KNOWING! This does not mean that you have to understand every working detail--but you MUST comprehend within that which is the overall. If Journals have a more logical and explicit explanation of the Bible, then this makes them more accurate. It was fun, all this off-topic talk about all kinds of things in this thread. But since the Title of the thread has been substantially covered by OP's initial post, and by the info here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, what really is there more to discuss except for more points regarding proof for or against God's existence? Maybe you didnt read the title because it clearly says SCIENTIFIC proof not what you wrote there. Well, the only way scientists turn evidence into proof is through scientific measurement and examination. So the info at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 is scientific proof when they use scientific measurement and examination to prove it up. Of course, people don't absolutely need scientific measurement and examination to recognize proof when they see it, so the fact that it is scientific as well is a bonus that strengthens the proof. Would you like to explain how to scientificly measure your ''evidence'' because im a bit lost, thanks. If you are a scientist, then you don't need my explanations. If you are not a scientist, explaining wouldn't do any good. You wouldn't understand. However, I would gladly train you in science for the right fee. But my fee would be so high that you would be better off going to school. You don't need to have scientific training to see how https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 proves the existence of God. |
|
|
|
Why would anyone want to read any of your stuff, since we already have the Bible that way more accurately explains all we need to know about salvation? By what criteria is the Bible more accurate than Phoenix Journals? I find Journals are more logical and explicit in meaning; every attempt is made to get at the Truth. "I would not send lesser unto my children"--I am Aton. If you know not who IS Aton, I hope that you will do enough homework to find the answer.
As with typical mankind, you ones wish to begin at the end of the story and have others assume responsibility for YOUR education. No, that will not serve in this instance--we have purposely brought you over 40 books of insight, Truth and instructions beginning with your plight, your direction, your solutions and your divine reclamation through, and by, God. We have brought you full and detailed explanations of the working details of the Cosmos, Universe and what God is and how the cycles of perceived life and death "work". We have put it in a format which you, as man in trouble, can easily understand--the rest is up to you.
Does this mean that the JOURNALS are through? No indeed, we shall continue until the play is finished; however, it means that the eight most important books of your planet are now before you--as you use this one. I am sorry to disappoint ones who either feel "another" can explain it TO YOU and/or YOU who feel so wise as to explain and foist off your opinion of the material upon another in explanation. It is a time of self-opinion and discernment and understanding, for the transition will not be made except by those who have come within the KNOWING! This does not mean that you have to understand every working detail--but you MUST comprehend within that which is the overall. If Journals have a more logical and explicit explanation of the Bible, then this makes them more accurate. It was fun, all this off-topic talk about all kinds of things in this thread. But since the Title of the thread has been substantially covered by OP's initial post, and by the info here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, what really is there more to discuss except for more points regarding proof for or against God's existence? Maybe you didnt read the title because it clearly says SCIENTIFIC proof not what you wrote there. Well, the only way scientists turn evidence into proof is through scientific measurement and examination. So the info at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 is scientific proof when they use scientific measurement and examination to prove it up. Of course, people don't absolutely need scientific measurement and examination to recognize proof when they see it, so the fact that it is scientific as well is a bonus that strengthens the proof. |
|
|
|
All this is because the U.S. big oil people are using the U.S. government to push combining the Middle East with the U.S. in kinds of trade agreements that allow the U.S. to take over the oil. Probably the only two reasons that Obama made it to the presidency were that he is a Muslim and looks the part, and that he knows how to hand out welfare to the people. This endears the American people to him at the same time that it makes for an attractive arrangement for ME Muslims. Obama isn't going to let Israel ruin all this work for taking over the ME oilfields, so that the petrodollar can remain strong. Keep an eye on the Iraqi dinar. The price of the Iraqi dinar with relation to the U.S. dollar is about 1165 dinars to 1 dollar, the way it has been for the last decade or so, even though it is jumping around a bit right now. If you see the dinar going near 1 to 1 with the dollar, you can expect that we have finally taken over Iraq in a meaningful way. Then watch out for new wars with all kinds of other ME nations. This would also mean that we think we have enough strength to hold Russia off. |
|
|
|
Why would anyone want to read any of your stuff, since we already have the Bible that way more accurately explains all we need to know about salvation? By what criteria is the Bible more accurate than Phoenix Journals? I find Journals are more logical and explicit in meaning; every attempt is made to get at the Truth. "I would not send lesser unto my children"--I am Aton. If you know not who IS Aton, I hope that you will do enough homework to find the answer.
As with typical mankind, you ones wish to begin at the end of the story and have others assume responsibility for YOUR education. No, that will not serve in this instance--we have purposely brought you over 40 books of insight, Truth and instructions beginning with your plight, your direction, your solutions and your divine reclamation through, and by, God. We have brought you full and detailed explanations of the working details of the Cosmos, Universe and what God is and how the cycles of perceived life and death "work". We have put it in a format which you, as man in trouble, can easily understand--the rest is up to you.
Does this mean that the JOURNALS are through? No indeed, we shall continue until the play is finished; however, it means that the eight most important books of your planet are now before you--as you use this one. I am sorry to disappoint ones who either feel "another" can explain it TO YOU and/or YOU who feel so wise as to explain and foist off your opinion of the material upon another in explanation. It is a time of self-opinion and discernment and understanding, for the transition will not be made except by those who have come within the KNOWING! This does not mean that you have to understand every working detail--but you MUST comprehend within that which is the overall. If Journals have a more logical and explicit explanation of the Bible, then this makes them more accurate. It was fun, all this off-topic talk about all kinds of things in this thread. But since the Title of the thread has been substantially covered by OP's initial post, and by the info here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, what really is there more to discuss except for more points regarding proof for or against God's existence? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
