Scientific proof that God exists?

[XinXan]

Why would anyone want to read any of your stuff, since we already have the Bible that way more accurately explains all we need to know about salvation?

By what criteria is the Bible more accurate than Phoenix Journals?

I find Journals are more logical and explicit in meaning; every attempt is made to get at the Truth.

"I would not send lesser unto my children"--I am Aton. If you know not who IS Aton, I hope that you will do enough homework to find the answer.

As with typical mankind, you ones wish to begin at the end of the story and have others assume responsibility for YOUR education. No, that will not serve in this instance--we have purposely brought you over 40 books of insight, Truth and instructions beginning with your plight, your direction, your solutions and your divine reclamation through, and by, God. We have brought you full and detailed explanations of the working details of the Cosmos, Universe and what God is and how the cycles of perceived life and death "work". We have put it in a format which you, as man in trouble, can easily understand--the rest is up to you.

Does this mean that the JOURNALS are through? No indeed, we shall continue until the play is finished; however, it means that the eight most important books of your planet are now before you--as you use this one. I am sorry to disappoint ones who either feel "another" can explain it TO YOU and/or YOU who feel so wise as to explain and foist off your opinion of the material upon another in explanation. It is a time of self-opinion and discernment and understanding, for the transition will not be made except by those who have come within the KNOWING! This does not mean that you have to understand every working detail--but you MUST comprehend within that which is the overall.

If Journals have a more logical and explicit explanation of the Bible, then this makes them more accurate.

It was fun, all this off-topic talk about all kinds of things in this thread. But since the Title of the thread has been substantially covered by OP's initial post, and by the info here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, what really is there more to discuss except for more points regarding proof for or against God's existence?

Maybe you didnt read the title because it clearly says SCIENTIFIC proof not what you wrote there.

[1714950571]

1714950571

[1714950571]

1714950571

[1714950571]

1714950571

[BADecker]

Why would anyone want to read any of your stuff, since we already have the Bible that way more accurately explains all we need to know about salvation?

By what criteria is the Bible more accurate than Phoenix Journals?

I find Journals are more logical and explicit in meaning; every attempt is made to get at the Truth.

"I would not send lesser unto my children"--I am Aton. If you know not who IS Aton, I hope that you will do enough homework to find the answer.

As with typical mankind, you ones wish to begin at the end of the story and have others assume responsibility for YOUR education. No, that will not serve in this instance--we have purposely brought you over 40 books of insight, Truth and instructions beginning with your plight, your direction, your solutions and your divine reclamation through, and by, God. We have brought you full and detailed explanations of the working details of the Cosmos, Universe and what God is and how the cycles of perceived life and death "work". We have put it in a format which you, as man in trouble, can easily understand--the rest is up to you.

Does this mean that the JOURNALS are through? No indeed, we shall continue until the play is finished; however, it means that the eight most important books of your planet are now before you--as you use this one. I am sorry to disappoint ones who either feel "another" can explain it TO YOU and/or YOU who feel so wise as to explain and foist off your opinion of the material upon another in explanation. It is a time of self-opinion and discernment and understanding, for the transition will not be made except by those who have come within the KNOWING! This does not mean that you have to understand every working detail--but you MUST comprehend within that which is the overall.

If Journals have a more logical and explicit explanation of the Bible, then this makes them more accurate.

It was fun, all this off-topic talk about all kinds of things in this thread. But since the Title of the thread has been substantially covered by OP's initial post, and by the info here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, what really is there more to discuss except for more points regarding proof for or against God's existence?

Maybe you didnt read the title because it clearly says SCIENTIFIC proof not what you wrote there.

Well, the only way scientists turn evidence into proof is through scientific measurement and examination. So the info at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 is scientific proof when they use scientific measurement and examination to prove it up. Of course, people don't absolutely need scientific measurement and examination to recognize proof when they see it, so the fact that it is scientific as well is a bonus that strengthens the proof.

[XinXan]

Why would anyone want to read any of your stuff, since we already have the Bible that way more accurately explains all we need to know about salvation?

By what criteria is the Bible more accurate than Phoenix Journals?

I find Journals are more logical and explicit in meaning; every attempt is made to get at the Truth.

"I would not send lesser unto my children"--I am Aton. If you know not who IS Aton, I hope that you will do enough homework to find the answer.

As with typical mankind, you ones wish to begin at the end of the story and have others assume responsibility for YOUR education. No, that will not serve in this instance--we have purposely brought you over 40 books of insight, Truth and instructions beginning with your plight, your direction, your solutions and your divine reclamation through, and by, God. We have brought you full and detailed explanations of the working details of the Cosmos, Universe and what God is and how the cycles of perceived life and death "work". We have put it in a format which you, as man in trouble, can easily understand--the rest is up to you.

Does this mean that the JOURNALS are through? No indeed, we shall continue until the play is finished; however, it means that the eight most important books of your planet are now before you--as you use this one. I am sorry to disappoint ones who either feel "another" can explain it TO YOU and/or YOU who feel so wise as to explain and foist off your opinion of the material upon another in explanation. It is a time of self-opinion and discernment and understanding, for the transition will not be made except by those who have come within the KNOWING! This does not mean that you have to understand every working detail--but you MUST comprehend within that which is the overall.

If Journals have a more logical and explicit explanation of the Bible, then this makes them more accurate.

It was fun, all this off-topic talk about all kinds of things in this thread. But since the Title of the thread has been substantially covered by OP's initial post, and by the info here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, what really is there more to discuss except for more points regarding proof for or against God's existence?

Maybe you didnt read the title because it clearly says SCIENTIFIC proof not what you wrote there.

Well, the only way scientists turn evidence into proof is through scientific measurement and examination. So the info at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 is scientific proof when they use scientific measurement and examination to prove it up. Of course, people don't absolutely need scientific measurement and examination to recognize proof when they see it, so the fact that it is scientific as well is a bonus that strengthens the proof.

Would you like to explain how to scientificly measure your ''evidence'' because im a bit lost, thanks.

[BADecker]

Why would anyone want to read any of your stuff, since we already have the Bible that way more accurately explains all we need to know about salvation?

By what criteria is the Bible more accurate than Phoenix Journals?

I find Journals are more logical and explicit in meaning; every attempt is made to get at the Truth.

"I would not send lesser unto my children"--I am Aton. If you know not who IS Aton, I hope that you will do enough homework to find the answer.

As with typical mankind, you ones wish to begin at the end of the story and have others assume responsibility for YOUR education. No, that will not serve in this instance--we have purposely brought you over 40 books of insight, Truth and instructions beginning with your plight, your direction, your solutions and your divine reclamation through, and by, God. We have brought you full and detailed explanations of the working details of the Cosmos, Universe and what God is and how the cycles of perceived life and death "work". We have put it in a format which you, as man in trouble, can easily understand--the rest is up to you.

Does this mean that the JOURNALS are through? No indeed, we shall continue until the play is finished; however, it means that the eight most important books of your planet are now before you--as you use this one. I am sorry to disappoint ones who either feel "another" can explain it TO YOU and/or YOU who feel so wise as to explain and foist off your opinion of the material upon another in explanation. It is a time of self-opinion and discernment and understanding, for the transition will not be made except by those who have come within the KNOWING! This does not mean that you have to understand every working detail--but you MUST comprehend within that which is the overall.

If Journals have a more logical and explicit explanation of the Bible, then this makes them more accurate.

It was fun, all this off-topic talk about all kinds of things in this thread. But since the Title of the thread has been substantially covered by OP's initial post, and by the info here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, what really is there more to discuss except for more points regarding proof for or against God's existence?

Maybe you didnt read the title because it clearly says SCIENTIFIC proof not what you wrote there.

Well, the only way scientists turn evidence into proof is through scientific measurement and examination. So the info at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 is scientific proof when they use scientific measurement and examination to prove it up. Of course, people don't absolutely need scientific measurement and examination to recognize proof when they see it, so the fact that it is scientific as well is a bonus that strengthens the proof.

Would you like to explain how to scientificly measure your ''evidence'' because im a bit lost, thanks.

If you are a scientist, then you don't need my explanations. If you are not a scientist, explaining wouldn't do any good. You wouldn't understand. However, I would gladly train you in science for the right fee. But my fee would be so high that you would be better off going to school.

You don't need to have scientific training to see how https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 proves the existence of God.

[Lethn]

Would you like to explain how to scientificly measure your ''evidence'' because im a bit lost, thanks.

To translate, because he's that brainwashed BADecker has rewritten the definition of a scientist so it fits his religion better, kind of like how religious people try to re-write history and everything else in order to make the world try and fit in their respective religions, why do you think that they always try to wipe out other cultures' and beliefs? Too bad for him the real world doesn't ever work like that, otherwise why would all these other religions and beliefe systems exist in the first place if his was so perfect?

[Buffer Overflow]

Your end simply ends yourself, or ultimately will, if you don't change.

BADecker still bullying people into believing his religion I see.

Is that the only way they can recruit new members now? Sad.

[BADecker]

Would you like to explain how to scientificly measure your ''evidence'' because im a bit lost, thanks.

To translate, because he's that brainwashed BADecker has rewritten the definition of a scientist so it fits his religion better, kind of like how religious people try to re-write history and everything else in order to make the world try and fit in their respective religions, why do you think that they always try to wipe out other cultures' and beliefs? Too bad for him the real world doesn't ever work like that, otherwise why would all these other religions and beliefe systems exist in the first place if his was so perfect?

It's mostly that standard modern scientists don't WANT to explain that they are proving God exists, more and more all the time in the things of science that they prove. The ones who DO express how science proves the existence of God, are ignored by the universities, or worse, ostracized. It's all a political ploy to tear down the strength of our religious nation, so that the politicians can more easily control the wealth of the people, and take over the world.

Yet the proof for the existence of God is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg8331233#msg8331233.

[BADecker]

Your end simply ends yourself, or ultimately will, if you don't change.

BADecker still bullying people into believing his religion I see.

Is that the only way they can recruit new members now? Sad.

If you won't at least let the scientific evidence for the existence of God found here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg8331233#msg8331233 and here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 coax you into believing in God, you will feel the wrath of God when He comes to visit you in the time of the resurrection, at the last day.

[XinXan]

Why would anyone want to read any of your stuff, since we already have the Bible that way more accurately explains all we need to know about salvation?

By what criteria is the Bible more accurate than Phoenix Journals?

I find Journals are more logical and explicit in meaning; every attempt is made to get at the Truth.

"I would not send lesser unto my children"--I am Aton. If you know not who IS Aton, I hope that you will do enough homework to find the answer.

As with typical mankind, you ones wish to begin at the end of the story and have others assume responsibility for YOUR education. No, that will not serve in this instance--we have purposely brought you over 40 books of insight, Truth and instructions beginning with your plight, your direction, your solutions and your divine reclamation through, and by, God. We have brought you full and detailed explanations of the working details of the Cosmos, Universe and what God is and how the cycles of perceived life and death "work". We have put it in a format which you, as man in trouble, can easily understand--the rest is up to you.

Does this mean that the JOURNALS are through? No indeed, we shall continue until the play is finished; however, it means that the eight most important books of your planet are now before you--as you use this one. I am sorry to disappoint ones who either feel "another" can explain it TO YOU and/or YOU who feel so wise as to explain and foist off your opinion of the material upon another in explanation. It is a time of self-opinion and discernment and understanding, for the transition will not be made except by those who have come within the KNOWING! This does not mean that you have to understand every working detail--but you MUST comprehend within that which is the overall.

If Journals have a more logical and explicit explanation of the Bible, then this makes them more accurate.

It was fun, all this off-topic talk about all kinds of things in this thread. But since the Title of the thread has been substantially covered by OP's initial post, and by the info here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, what really is there more to discuss except for more points regarding proof for or against God's existence?

Maybe you didnt read the title because it clearly says SCIENTIFIC proof not what you wrote there.

Well, the only way scientists turn evidence into proof is through scientific measurement and examination. So the info at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 is scientific proof when they use scientific measurement and examination to prove it up. Of course, people don't absolutely need scientific measurement and examination to recognize proof when they see it, so the fact that it is scientific as well is a bonus that strengthens the proof.

Would you like to explain how to scientificly measure your ''evidence'' because im a bit lost, thanks.

If you are a scientist, then you don't need my explanations. If you are not a scientist, explaining wouldn't do any good. You wouldn't understand. However, I would gladly train you in science for the right fee. But my fee would be so high that you would be better off going to school.

You don't need to have scientific training to see how https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 proves the existence of God.

So in other words you dont know, if scientists really knew and they didnt need your explanations they would have already measured and examined right? Show us the scientific proof then?

[Buffer Overflow]

Your end simply ends yourself, or ultimately will, if you don't change.

BADecker still bullying people into believing his religion I see.

Is that the only way they can recruit new members now? Sad.

If you won't at least let the scientific evidence for the existence of God found here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg8331233#msg8331233 and here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 coax you into believing in God, you will feel the wrath of God when He comes to visit you in the time of the resurrection, at the last day.

I already told you, I lean towards believing in a god.
What are you talking about?

[BADecker]

Your end simply ends yourself, or ultimately will, if you don't change.

BADecker still bullying people into believing his religion I see.

Is that the only way they can recruit new members now? Sad.

If you won't at least let the scientific evidence for the existence of God found here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg8331233#msg8331233 and here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 coax you into believing in God, you will feel the wrath of God when He comes to visit you in the time of the resurrection, at the last day.

I already told you, I lean towards believing in a god.
What are you talking about?

No. What are you talking about? Nobody bullies anyone into anything on the forum. The only people who might do a little bullying are the moderators, because they can insist that people obey the rules, etc.

If you feel that you are being bullied, you can always take yourself to a peaceful thread. Other than that, if you are bullied, it is your own doing to yourself. Don't you think that it is time that you grew up?

[BADecker]

Why would anyone want to read any of your stuff, since we already have the Bible that way more accurately explains all we need to know about salvation?

By what criteria is the Bible more accurate than Phoenix Journals?

I find Journals are more logical and explicit in meaning; every attempt is made to get at the Truth.

"I would not send lesser unto my children"--I am Aton. If you know not who IS Aton, I hope that you will do enough homework to find the answer.

As with typical mankind, you ones wish to begin at the end of the story and have others assume responsibility for YOUR education. No, that will not serve in this instance--we have purposely brought you over 40 books of insight, Truth and instructions beginning with your plight, your direction, your solutions and your divine reclamation through, and by, God. We have brought you full and detailed explanations of the working details of the Cosmos, Universe and what God is and how the cycles of perceived life and death "work". We have put it in a format which you, as man in trouble, can easily understand--the rest is up to you.

Does this mean that the JOURNALS are through? No indeed, we shall continue until the play is finished; however, it means that the eight most important books of your planet are now before you--as you use this one. I am sorry to disappoint ones who either feel "another" can explain it TO YOU and/or YOU who feel so wise as to explain and foist off your opinion of the material upon another in explanation. It is a time of self-opinion and discernment and understanding, for the transition will not be made except by those who have come within the KNOWING! This does not mean that you have to understand every working detail--but you MUST comprehend within that which is the overall.

If Journals have a more logical and explicit explanation of the Bible, then this makes them more accurate.

It was fun, all this off-topic talk about all kinds of things in this thread. But since the Title of the thread has been substantially covered by OP's initial post, and by the info here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, what really is there more to discuss except for more points regarding proof for or against God's existence?

Maybe you didnt read the title because it clearly says SCIENTIFIC proof not what you wrote there.

Well, the only way scientists turn evidence into proof is through scientific measurement and examination. So the info at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 is scientific proof when they use scientific measurement and examination to prove it up. Of course, people don't absolutely need scientific measurement and examination to recognize proof when they see it, so the fact that it is scientific as well is a bonus that strengthens the proof.

Would you like to explain how to scientificly measure your ''evidence'' because im a bit lost, thanks.

If you are a scientist, then you don't need my explanations. If you are not a scientist, explaining wouldn't do any good. You wouldn't understand. However, I would gladly train you in science for the right fee. But my fee would be so high that you would be better off going to school.

You don't need to have scientific training to see how https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 proves the existence of God.

So in other words you dont know, if scientists really knew and they didnt need your explanations they would have already measured and examined right? Show us the scientific proof then?

It's beginning to look like you wouldn't know what the proof was if it walked right up and bit you in the left eyeball. All you need do is go here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 and read it.

[XinXan]

Why would anyone want to read any of your stuff, since we already have the Bible that way more accurately explains all we need to know about salvation?

By what criteria is the Bible more accurate than Phoenix Journals?

I find Journals are more logical and explicit in meaning; every attempt is made to get at the Truth.

"I would not send lesser unto my children"--I am Aton. If you know not who IS Aton, I hope that you will do enough homework to find the answer.

As with typical mankind, you ones wish to begin at the end of the story and have others assume responsibility for YOUR education. No, that will not serve in this instance--we have purposely brought you over 40 books of insight, Truth and instructions beginning with your plight, your direction, your solutions and your divine reclamation through, and by, God. We have brought you full and detailed explanations of the working details of the Cosmos, Universe and what God is and how the cycles of perceived life and death "work". We have put it in a format which you, as man in trouble, can easily understand--the rest is up to you.

Does this mean that the JOURNALS are through? No indeed, we shall continue until the play is finished; however, it means that the eight most important books of your planet are now before you--as you use this one. I am sorry to disappoint ones who either feel "another" can explain it TO YOU and/or YOU who feel so wise as to explain and foist off your opinion of the material upon another in explanation. It is a time of self-opinion and discernment and understanding, for the transition will not be made except by those who have come within the KNOWING! This does not mean that you have to understand every working detail--but you MUST comprehend within that which is the overall.

If Journals have a more logical and explicit explanation of the Bible, then this makes them more accurate.

It was fun, all this off-topic talk about all kinds of things in this thread. But since the Title of the thread has been substantially covered by OP's initial post, and by the info here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, what really is there more to discuss except for more points regarding proof for or against God's existence?

Maybe you didnt read the title because it clearly says SCIENTIFIC proof not what you wrote there.

Well, the only way scientists turn evidence into proof is through scientific measurement and examination. So the info at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 is scientific proof when they use scientific measurement and examination to prove it up. Of course, people don't absolutely need scientific measurement and examination to recognize proof when they see it, so the fact that it is scientific as well is a bonus that strengthens the proof.

Would you like to explain how to scientificly measure your ''evidence'' because im a bit lost, thanks.

If you are a scientist, then you don't need my explanations. If you are not a scientist, explaining wouldn't do any good. You wouldn't understand. However, I would gladly train you in science for the right fee. But my fee would be so high that you would be better off going to school.

You don't need to have scientific training to see how https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 proves the existence of God.

So in other words you dont know, if scientists really knew and they didnt need your explanations they would have already measured and examined right? Show us the scientific proof then?

It's beginning to look like you wouldn't know what the proof was if it walked right up and bit you in the left eyeball. All you need do is go here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 and read it.

'If you are a scientist, then you don't need my explanations. If you are not a scientist, explaining wouldn't do any good. You wouldn't understand'

Why dont you try to make us understand, as i previously said this thread says 'SCIENTIFIC' explanation, what you wrote there is not scientific just philosophical

[Buffer Overflow]

Your end simply ends yourself, or ultimately will, if you don't change.

BADecker still bullying people into believing his religion I see.

Is that the only way they can recruit new members now? Sad.

If you won't at least let the scientific evidence for the existence of God found here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg8331233#msg8331233 and here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 coax you into believing in God, you will feel the wrath of God when He comes to visit you in the time of the resurrection, at the last day.

I already told you, I lean towards believing in a god.
What are you talking about?

No. What are you talking about? Nobody bullies anyone into anything on the forum. The only people who might do a little bullying are the moderators, because they can insist that people obey the rules, etc.

If you feel that you are being bullied, you can always take yourself to a peaceful thread. Other than that, if you are bullied, it is your own doing to yourself. Don't you think that it is time that you grew up?

Lying to people threatening them they should "believe in your religion or else bad things will happen" is a form of bullying. Oh wait, don't tell me, you've changed the definition of the word "bullying" today.
Obviously it won't work on me. Much to your annoyance.

All a bit sad when you sit down and think about it.

[jerol31]

I don't believe scientists can prove that God exists. We just have to have faith.

I think no one can prove God exist. That is my opinion.

[coric]

I don't believe scientists can prove that God exists. We just have to have faith.

I think no one can prove God exist. That is my opinion.

Yes, and that is the only sensible answer, and in the first pages of this thread has been thourougjly explained. All the other pages have been BADecker stubbornly trying to argue, that my redefining the words "scientific", "proof", "religion" etc to some totally different meaning accepted by no one in the world but him, he could prove his crazy fundamentalist cult. If you don't buy his bull, and now no one does anymore, he will threaten you with his god's "wrath". And then there's Decksperinent rambling, beating Badecker at his own mad game, ultimately calling random people pedophile. On summary, welcome to bitcointalk.

[the joint]

Would you like to explain how to scientificly measure your ''evidence'' because im a bit lost, thanks.

To translate, because he's that brainwashed BADecker has rewritten the definition of a scientist so it fits his religion better, kind of like how religious people try to re-write history and everything else in order to make the world try and fit in their respective religions, why do you think that they always try to wipe out other cultures' and beliefs? Too bad for him the real world doesn't ever work like that, otherwise why would all these other religions and beliefe systems exist in the first place if his was so perfect?

It gets better than that.   On more than probably 1-2 dozen occasions now,  I've had to remind BadDecker that i believe in God.

And on more than probably 1-2 dozen occasions now, BadDecker has responded to my criticism of his reasoning by basically saying I'm wrong because I don't believe in God.

It goes like this:

Him:  "Blah blah blah, BS evidence, therefore God."

Me:  "Um no, because blah blah."

Him:  "You wouldn't understand, because science blah blah."

Me:  "Still, no, not even close."

Him:  "Hey, it's your choice not to believe in God and blah blah."

Me:   "Um...I believe in God, remember?

Him:  "Well, that's a start!  And blah blah, BS evidence, therefore God."

Me:   "Um, again, no, because blah blah."

Him:  "You wouldn't understand, because science blah blah."

Me:    "No.  It's impossible.  I've told you this.  Everyone has told you this."

Him:   "Hey, it's your choice not to believe in God!  Blah blah."

Me:     "' "

[Decksperiment]

The point of the OP's thread is EXACTLY 'scientific proof that god exist's.. '

So far, There has only been one single peice of proof, albeit, discovered by myself (incidently, I'm not bragging here, just stating a fact), that can at least prove those LYING catholic abuser's perception of the bible is 100% wrong. All BADecker is doing now is regurgitating his puke for him and his followers to swallow over and over again, stuck in the same loop I created for them, as their church leader's try to blag the dude examining and counting the ring's on the oldest peice of dead Sequoia, to get him to say, oh, look, an unusually wide ring near the center of this tree, which proves the flood did take place.. They're still trying..

Me personally, I use a cb with a fax machine as my internet access.. I transfer at teraplop speed's, and am faster than the speed of light when spotting unusual 'anomalie'' in the bull spread by the church.. As an electronics engineer, I know electricity better than most.. I know aurora borealis is the spirit of the sun feeding it's child, planet Earth, which was created when a commet the size of BADeckers plook on his shoulder, shot through the sun, taking a portion of the sun, and hence, a part of it's spirit with it. What you see above in the northern light's, is the ether, and it is this, the soul sails on as it travels through one's mind, contained within the ETHERIC Vehicle, known to us as the human body.

This actually means BADecker is 100% unqualified to provide SCIENTIFIC evidence for proof of god, and should be asked to leave the room, or more particularly, this thread, and wait outside until we have finished this discussion, for he is doing nothing more than intentionally distracting the rest of the class, with nothing more than attention seeking.

The fact he knows nothing of science due his religion, is why he is attention seeking, 'look at me, look at me, or i'll cry and smoke the joint (of beef)'

This thread is NOT about biblical proof of god, it request's SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF, proving that BADecker no longer has ANY relevance in this thread, and should be ignored by all.

If he can ignore the evidence, we can ALL ignore him.

Keep in mind, I believe he, and the joint, are also the scammer VODOYO, and the reason I think this, is if you look at the different character trait's, and patterns of their timing of their posting, and most importantly, the cardinal point's, you will find that when peicing VOD, OYO, BADecker, and THE JOINT together, you have a single conversation held by someone clearly suffering from a split/multiple personality disorder, for all they are actually doing is conversating with themselve's, even going as far as to answer themselve's.. appearing at times as to oppose the other personalitie's point's of view.. in nature, they would be the four elements. I now present god's proof I am correct..

This is VOD:

This is OYO:

This is the sum total of these split personalitie's in one, VOD, THE JOINT, OYO, and BADecker..

The only thing we need to do now, is keep in mind VODThe JOINTOYOBADECKER refuse's to acknowledge the truth of science in that the evidence has been provided proving the biblical timeline is a scam created by the like's of this brown ring of scammer's denial of the actual scientific proof requested.

How can they accept it if they dont believe in science?

When I do find SCIENTIFIC proof of god, it will be the end o of all their very sad and lonely life.

Why do you think they dont want to hear the truth?

Because Sequoia help's us breath more easily..

Notice how these four have always ignored everyone else, yet spoke to each other, in order to fill this thread with their spam? They are all as intelligent as each other?

What do the rest think?

[bl4kjaguar]

Why would anyone want to read any of your stuff, since we already have the Bible that way more accurately explains all we need to know about salvation?

By what criteria is the Bible more accurate than Phoenix Journals?

I find Journals are more logical and explicit in meaning; every attempt is made to get at the Truth.

"I would not send lesser unto my children"--I am Aton. If you know not who IS Aton, I hope that you will do enough homework to find the answer.

As with typical mankind, you ones wish to begin at the end of the story and have others assume responsibility for YOUR education. No, that will not serve in this instance--we have purposely brought you over 40 books of insight, Truth and instructions beginning with your plight, your direction, your solutions and your divine reclamation through, and by, God. We have brought you full and detailed explanations of the working details of the Cosmos, Universe and what God is and how the cycles of perceived life and death "work". We have put it in a format which you, as man in trouble, can easily understand--the rest is up to you.

Does this mean that the JOURNALS are through? No indeed, we shall continue until the play is finished; however, it means that the eight most important books of your planet are now before you--as you use this one. I am sorry to disappoint ones who either feel "another" can explain it TO YOU and/or YOU who feel so wise as to explain and foist off your opinion of the material upon another in explanation. It is a time of self-opinion and discernment and understanding, for the transition will not be made except by those who have come within the KNOWING! This does not mean that you have to understand every working detail--but you MUST comprehend within that which is the overall.

If Journals have a more logical and explicit explanation of the Bible, then this makes them more accurate.

It was fun, all this off-topic talk about all kinds of things in this thread. But since the Title of the thread has been substantially covered by OP's initial post, and by the info here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, what really is there more to discuss except for more points regarding proof for or against God's existence?

Maybe you didnt read the title because it clearly says SCIENTIFIC proof not what you wrote there.

Sir, where is the reply to the scientific evidence I have posted in this thread?

[Decksperiment]

A hint, profile, show posts, seek an ye shall find..