Has started to defend scammers and abusing the trust system by trying to derail threads that bring attention to their clear double standards. How does one abuse the trust system by derailing a thread? Observable instance, please. He believes that if you start a thread and present observable instances for open debate that that is cause to give out red trust. How can you be so certain what "he believes?" Observable instance, please. He confesses constantly that he has a long history of mental illness and is completely unstable and unsound of mind. Bob is a legend, and one of the most sincere people on the forum. Sharing his personal struggles is a sign of stability and maturity. You should try it some time. We believe he should be removed from the DT system as quickly as possible. You're entitled to your opinion, and others are entitled to disagree. He's not wrong. You do show signs of mental disorder. And, despite your constant calls for debating "observable instances" you make it impossible to debate you. You're never wrong, everyone else on the planet is. You need professional help, dude. You take it way to seriously when people on the internet are mean to you. That's not healthy. Then claims we should have red trust? How many times have you heard it before? Trust isn't moderated. A review left is an opinion, and nothing else. Anyone reading that opinion is entitled to ignore it. If the opinions left by an individual are often wrong or suspect, then the community will likely resolve that matter in time. Those people don't last on DT for long. Maybe Bob will get kicked off of DT for leaving you that review, but I wouldn't hold my breath.
|
|
|
Hi Direwolf, this is my first loan request in your lending service. Here is a signed message -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- Username: Krislaw Loan Amount: 0.005 Loan Reason: Personal Collateral: None Repayment Date: 9th of December 2019 Repayment Amount: 0.005125 Funding Address: 3MyQcwd2s1g8hbFfiBfskCcyXJG17GEepz -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNATURE----- Version: Bitcoin-qt (1.0) Address: 3NuuM9HTbhFAh97zXfxAu2DT1JkppJfVaC
H7xCqTHCDw/LzEkEAEkXFFxIuxvFp/Nikbepu2PvYVBeFxeunu6WJhTh1jtLhWhbmmSbJ0/Yo4eUtbIeq33CFn4= -----END BITCOIN SIGNATURE----- Hello Krislaw, Thank you for the loan request, it's been approved and funded. Please pay back to this address: 348XXjbpXwg37JYd8knLnHRSMajLbteSbJTxId: de927727ca9aaf7a393885cda7cd7b993e1435aaba5d02e3248bfccf962340e4
|
|
|
Where is the BCH/BSV/BTG I should have received for the payments for my treasury services I didn't receive until months/years later? Seems odd that the forum didn't pay me the forked coins after the fact, even though I paid them to the forum. If it's one thing I've noticed in my year and a half hanging out here is that Theymos is a pretty laid back, easy going character. If you feel like percentage of the forkcoins should be added to your commission you should have spoken up about it. I doubt anyone would have denied you the request. I returned what theymos asked for, even though I had no obligation to do so with the forks and I did it quickly with a positive attitude. It was a good deed and I feel I went above and beyond by never complaining for missed back pay, and always doing whatever I was asked. I must admit I find this a curious philosophy. It's my opinion that since the bitcoin belongs to the forum, and any forks also belong to the forum. A practical analogy would be a stock split or a company spin-off. When HP spun-off Agilent, Fidelity Investment Group didn't get to keep my Agilent shares. Why would anyone believe they have a claim to them?
|
|
|
26 DT1 members were replaced this month. I don't know if that's a normal amount, it seems a bit high to me. Theymos mentioned that 124 members qualified for DT1 votes, which is higher than I remember from previous months, so that may be the reason. Member removed from DT1 this month: dooglus Foxpup babo Flying Hellfish TookDk by rallier dbshck arulbero mindrust redsn0w suchmoon yahoo62278 DarkStar_ bob123 finaleshot2016 bobita krogothmanhattan Blacknavy Silent26 tvplus006 gospodin DdmrDdmr fillippone taikuri13 madnessteat 1miau
|
|
|
Elmanchez contacted me on Telegram several days ago, offering his services. He wasn't begging or asking for a handout, and I sincerely believe he wants the earn his way. I didn't have any work for him, so I declined his offer.
@Elmanchez, if I were you I would consider this a turning point in life. If you do spend your money on gambling and cigarettes I suggest you stop. I also noticed the same thing TMAN mentioned in his first reply, that you listed cigarettes as a "need," your first need. I don't often feel the need to tell people how to live their lives or spend their money, but get your priorities straightened out, dude.
@TMAN, right on bro, very noble of you to help him out.
|
|
|
Strange, you should be able to import private keys in batch... Which error message do you get? In recent versions of Electrum that option will only be available in a non-HD wallet. If you created your wallet with a seed phrase you will only be able to sweep keys, not import them. @OP, have tried to sweep the keys?
|
|
|
It has been a sad season for Watford. There's still plenty of soccer to play, but they have quite a climb ahead of them just to avoid being relegated. That would be a sad end to a tough season.
Conversely Wolverhampton has had quite the impressive season for a team that just got promoted.
|
|
|
128 dannybrown - bitcointalk flash game 101 Yatsan - oil paintings 99 Corrosive - corrosion art 65 Kalemder - interactive gallery & videos 61 taufik123 - madura carving
Congratulations to the winners, very much a deserved crowd. I'm not going to disclose my votes, but I will say I voted for all of you, except (ashamedly) taufik123, which was gross oversight on my part. Happy 10 anniversary to all!
|
|
|
W0w, that was one of the coolest interceptions i've seen batted back to the QB who bats it back to the D !!!
Almost on par with Wilforks Tipped to himself interceptions.
I have nothing other than respect and praise to bestow on Russel Wilson, but I loved seeing that! Go Vikings! Sorry to all of you have money on the line, but I have a home team with the potential to get Home Field Advantage.
|
|
|
@ralle14. No, a Seahawks win will only be tied on both the division and the conference. However, the 49ers will play on the road versus the Saints next hehehe. But if 49ers win it, the Seahawks will have another opportunity on the last game of the regular season, assuming that both win all their games left. Check their schedule hehehe.
Also, you use sportsbet.io?
Actually a win tonight would give the Seahawks the division lead by virtue of having beaten the Niners in their first meeting this year. Niners go to Seattle in week 17 for a rematch.
|
|
|
1 for me, you sneaky ninja, you.
|
|
|
I also received 11. Why?Today at 12:14:23: 10 from (Bitcoin Forum) for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored) Today at 11:46:30: 1 from (Bitcoin Forum) for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored) ETA: I missed LoyceV's edit, this is why: Thanks to everyone who participated! If you voted in this event, you received 1 merit; if your caption appeared in the first table above, you also received 10, and if your caption appeared only in the second table above, you also received 2.
|
|
|
This reminds me of a conflict in a movie I saw, I Love You Philip Morris. The protagonist got a job as a settlement officer for an insurance company. When he took the job he was paying out millions in settlements out of a standard checking account. He then got the bright idea to move the majority of the funds to an investment account, and transfer what he needed to the checking account to cover the disbursements. The end result was a lot of money was made in the investment fund, that the protagonist kept for himself. By today's standards we can all agree that was illegal embezzlement, but there was a time when such actions were unprecedented, their legality was vague.
In the fiat world we don't have air-drops and forks (at least none that I know of,) so this is a new paradigm for financial wealth that I believe is also unprecedented.
My opinion is that OG should have included theymos in the decision, or at least offered to share the reward reaped by the 1Eog8 address. But I also believe my opinion is irrelevant. Theymos has indicated he wasn't concerned, and OG has chosen to stay silent. I can't fault OG for taking advantage of free money, other than to say that he earned some of it by holding Other People's Money. Like others have mentioned, banks do that shit all the time.
Is it right or wrong? I would say that depends on the amount of risk OG subjected the OPM. In this case I think it's safe to say there was no risk.
This type of situation can easily be avoided by future contracts; making it clear how such events are to be handled, and who owns the rights to any proceeds earned by air-drops and forks. It's a vague and unexpected event that left no one hurt. At least theymos doesn't seem hurt by it, and his is the only opinion that really matters in this case.
|
|
|
Did it occur to you that I was trying to help you? That's exactly what you deserve for that. No good deed goes unpunished.
|
|
|
fucking dumb. asslicking dreg idiot. servile assfeltching mind burger flipper scum bag. Did you even bother reading what I wrote? Not just glancing over it, actually reading it? Did it occur to you that I was trying to help you?
|
|
|
@cryptohunter, No one wants to debate someone who can't adhere to reality. You continue to beat these dead horses with the only stick you own; the "DT did this to MEEEE" stick. The thing is, if you had any rational arguments people might actually listen, but all you do is attack people to satisfy your own personal vendetta. A vendetta that stems from you initially attacking people, and their subsequent retaliation. If you ever had an argument that could have been used to gain support for your cause, you've squandered it by your continued slander, ad hominem attacks, and an inability to see the other side of the story. Sometimes our perception of the facts causes us to mistake the reality of a particular situation. If you want a debate you must be willing to allow your mind to be changed, and accept that you may be mistaken. That's how debates work. I'm not immune from misinterpreting facts myself, but the difference is that I'm willing to acknowledge when I'm wrong. You have demonstrated your inability to step away from the situation and take a look at it without bias, without making it personal. You've been on this crusade for well over a year a now, and haven't accomplished anything other than having your accounts painted red by those you continue to attack. Don't you think it may be time for another strategy?
|
|
|
Hello coupable, payment received, thank you. And thanks for the kind words. I look forward to working with you again.
|
|
|
Damn it where were you a day or so ago, I could have handled it in 1 go. At least I found 3 new trading partners I guess so still a win. I'm guessing this is a USD transaction?
I know, right. I saw your thread just a few minutes before I posted this, and thought the same thing. Yeah, USD. Sorry for not specifying, it's fixed now.
|
|
|
I'm looking to buy $200 USD worth of BTC. I can send payment through PayPal (F&F,) or Zelle. 1:1 rates @ Preev price. If you're a trusted user I'll go first. Any PayPal fees are to be covered by the seller. Send me a PM to iron out details.
|
|
|
Focusing on the members with enough activity for legendary rank, there are some good candidates there. DaveF is a good one to help out, he makes some good posts in the technical sections.
|
|
|
|