If I'm not mistaken USDT (TRC-20) will charge you $1 for a single transaction. I think you are better off using another alternative like MAAManda said. You are requesting another payment address that will have a much lower transaction fee. In addition, for USDT (TRC-20) 50 addresses delivery is not too long. It depends on the wallet you use.
My recent commission was 7-8 TRON coins. It's 50-60 cents. To reduce the fee, you can block TRON coins and get energy and bandwidth to have cheap transactions in the ecosystem. ____ I have not seen such wallets, you may have to use the services of a programmer so that you can enter 50 addresses and amounts and the software automates this task.
|
|
|
Ethereum preparing a 'bear trap' ahead of the Merge — ETH price to $4K next?
An ascending triangle setup promises a significant rebound in the Ethereum price in 2022. Ethereum's native token, Ether (ETH), faces downside risks in a higher interest rate environment. But one analyst believes that the token's next selloff move could turn into a bear trap as the market factors in the possible release of the Merge this coming August. Continue reading here... The current reward of miners is approximately 12,000 coins per day. After the merger, the issuance will decrease by 4.4 million coins per year, this should have a good effect on the price, because miners will not sell coins. The price of ethereum could drop below $2,000 now.
|
|
|
NFT Assets grow in price very quickly and fall very quickly. There is a lot of manipulation in this market when the owners of NFT tokens buy their assets from another wallet. It's also a very convenient way to understate taxes when you buy your NFT for $100,000 and then sell it to yourself for $50,000. You have a loss of $50,000.
|
|
|
This plan is complete crap. Most of the participants proposed to burn the Terra coins in order to recover the value of the stablecoin and keep the applications that need UST working. If the vote ends positively, then the old ecosystem will die.
|
|
|
Except with https://www.kucoin.com/ as the exchange without use KYC what about other list and looks still new and first time I see several exchange list your recommended, still not any trader or investor use than exchange market and could I know how reputation there. I worry if still promote with not popular exchange market because looks not familiar exchange listed name you give to OP. Although the OP looking for with exchange market without KYC, I think we need give trusted and popular exchange market for his alternative option and have bigger transaction volume. I wrote those services with which I work. All risks belong to the user. This is not an advertisement. Do more transactions for smaller amounts. Another exchange with a good trading limit without KYC. https://www.hotbit.io/
|
|
|
Changing conditions during the voting process https://agora.terra.money/t/terra-ecosystem-revival-plan-2-amended/18498"==== Amendment #1 ==== Some details of the token allocation have been modified in the proposal to accommodate community feedback - changes and reasoning outlined here. The proposal body has also been edited to reflect the changes in the amendment. If you’ve already voted and disagree with the changes, please vote “No” - you have 5 more days to do so. Pre-attack Luna holders distribution - for all holders with a snapshot balance of 10k Luna or less, 30% unlocked at genesis; 70% vested over 2 years thereafter with 6 mnth cliff. This is to ensure that small Luna holders have similar initial liquidity profiles. This would cover 99.81% of Luna wallets while only representing 6.45% of total Luna at the Pre-attack snapshot. Post-attack UST holders distribution - 20% → 15%. This is to ensure that depeg related allocation is on par with the original stakeholder (pre-attack Luna) allocation. The 5% saved goes to the community pool. Increase initial float: all initial float allocations modified from 15% → 30% to increase initial token float."
|
|
|
Binance could potentially repeat the fate of Terra. If binance is hacked, liquidity will quickly leave this ecosystem and there will be a repetition of the situation. Binance is a very fast ecosystem, but it runs on 21 validators that are affiliated with binance.
|
|
|
https://station.terra.money/proposal/1623This vote keeps all owners of coins in suspense. If the proposal is accepted, then you will receive new Terra coins with vesting for 2-4 years, and the old coins will be worthless.
|
|
|
At this point nothing... I guess we can see Ethereum committing suicide, to continue with insanely high fees, and slowness... but if they do something about it, and they go back to "low cost and fast transaction fees" I think there's no project that can come close to Ethereum! And this comes from me who doesn't like Ethereum! But the current state of things is like that! Other competitors are just far behind! Only Binance smart chain came closer to Ethereum! All others are still far behind, and I believe they will stay there!
Binance smart chain works thanks to the support of one of the major exchanges Binance. If something unpleasant happens to the Binance exchange or the exchange falls under sanctions, then their Binance smart chain will be empty very quickly.
|
|
|
Bitcoin became popular because it had a team of people who actively promoted it. Another opinion says that Silk Road helped Bitcoin become famous. And then most of these people were expelled from the team and bitcoin became not a means of payment for cypherpunks, but a world currency.
|
|
|
Перевод буквально не точный Speculative controversial take: we should legitimize price gouging by top stake pool providers. Like, if a stake pool controls > 15%, it should be accepted and even *expected* for the pool to keep increasing its fee rate until it goes back below 15%. "мы должны узаконить взвинчивание цен", не разрешить, а именно узаконить, что бы это не значило. Как это сделать Виталик, видимо, еще не придумал. Смартконтракты тут вряд ли помогут. Или помогут? Перевод я взял со статьи, но сам не проверил. Речь не о пулах а о провайдеров для пулов. Не POW майнинг. https://pro.nansen.ai/eth2-deposit-contractПока все отлично, лидеры Кракен и Коинбейз по 10%. Но лучше будет, если участники будут запускать ноду самостоятельно
|
|
|
BURN is, in my opinion, the best proposal for LUNA. What are your thoughts on it? What will happen next, and which proposal will be approved?
There is currently no better proposa for Terra (LUNA).Whatever decision is made, it will still result in big losses for users. And the ecosystem will lose the trust of new users for many years. So far, there is no agreement between the participants on who to save: the holders of the LUNA coins or the owners of the former stablecoin UST.
|
|
|
It would be better for them to put their money in a new project instead of such behavior, easy solutions will not build a good project and claim that the reason for failure is the stability algorithm is just burying heads in the sand. According to proposal/1623 ---> https://station.terra.money/proposal/1623 they still have Total voted 153,855,456 (40.84%) with No with veto 19.65% Based on the amount of money that was printed, new users have the right to vote and their voting power is much higher than the power of the old users due to the random printing that occurred. If this is true then such a vote will not be approved, or am I missing something? This is a vote for validators and each of them has their own percentage of the vote. Users have already expressed their opinion, but no one takes into account their opinion. Another 6 days to wait for the results of the vote. Possibly the proposal will be blocked.
|
|
|
30% per year is quite large, and it is bigger than UST. that's why I started doubting this, since yesterday's UST issue I had a bad view on algorithmic stablecoins. plus Justin Sun's poor track record in the crypto space. made me think twice about trusting USDD. it is possible that what happened to UST will be repeated to USDD.
20% of UST seemed very high, then we saw 30% per annum for USDD, but KuCoin surpassed everyone and announced a promotion of 60% per annum for 7 days for USDD stake holders: https://www.kucoin.com/news/en-usdd-high-profit-staking-enjoy-an-apr-of-60 In this case, the profit received in 7 days will be higher than what you will receive in 1 year in a traditional bank. Do you know where the profit comes from? UST is printed when the Terra coin is burned. Therefore, in order to get more UST tokens, you need to burn more Terra coins. You can buy UST, but then someone else will buy Terra and burn it. Now the most interesting thing: look at how many times the price of the terra coin has increased and what is the annual yield on staking the UST token. It was possible to make a 100% profit, but then it would look like a scam.
|
|
|
https://en.ethereumworldnews.com/ethereums-active-addresses-decrease-by-7-despite-eths-56-drop-from-ath/"Summary: The number of active Ethereum addresses has remained stable relative to the ongoing crypto-market pullback. Active addresses on Ethereum have only dropped by 7% despite the value of ETH plummeting by 56% since its most recent all-time high of $4,868. Ethereum daily users are estimated to be at 551k and are constantly involved in DeFi, NFTs, DAO, and GameFi projects. According to a recent report by A16z, there are somewhat between 7 to 50 million active users on Ethereum, a number similar to internet users in 1995."
|
|
|
Хоть на форуме терры многие были против форка, тем не менее Квон все-таки решил запустить голосование по поводу предстоящего разделения сети. Голосование продлится 7 дней и на данный момент ситуация такая: 67,5% поддерживают данную идею, а 32,5% - нет. Однако стоит отметить, что многие валидаторы еще не проголосовали, т.ч. пока рано делать какие-либо выводы. Голосовать можно всем, но голоса валидаторов учитываются. Если это так, то это голосование между своими. __ Все что я вижу сейчас, только на руку крупным фондам. Что луна что ЮСТ с долгим вестингом обычным юзерам не нужны. Когда объявят дату второго снимка, будет небольшой рост, а потом на дно.
|
|
|
|