How about ICYNOTE2023? Yes, I'm familiar with Libbitcoin. Libbitcoin is an open-source C++ Bitcoin library that provides a variety of functionalities for developers to work with the Bitcoin protocol. It offers a set of tools, APIs, and cryptographic primitives to interact with the Bitcoin network and build Bitcoin-related applications. Libbitcoin aims to provide a flexible and modular framework for developers to create their own Bitcoin software, ranging from lightweight wallets to full nodes. It supports various features such as key management, transaction creation and validation, scripting, networking, and blockchain analysis.  This user also posts "questions" everywhere, which is a low-effort method of pretending to be interested, straight from the Newbie spammer handbook: Vanity Bitcoin Address can using VGA for processing?? or only using CPU?? is this legal visa for international? or only usa?
can you give information issued?? iPhone 14 Pro Max sale $700 USD? are you kidding? where are you shipping this iphone? need custom? how to making paypal account using your name? if your ID not know?
maybe you have paypal account with negative balance, right? what do you thing about 12 mnemonic and only remember 7 words?
is there possible to recovery? does Electrum work with Sparrow wallet? or even sparrow wallet is a subsidiary of electrum? do you have access to your bitcoin wallet? or are you just given a promise and it's not your bitcoin wallet, but the wallet that belongs to the person you invested in?  I want to ask about this software, does it use CPU or GPU? or can use both? can i contact you further?  I've left neutral feedback. |
|
|
|
Are you talking about instant exchanges? I haven't seen any traditional exchanges to provide new deposit address each time I was talking about Kraken and BL3P. |
|
|
|
According to coinmarketcap: Coinmarketcap.com is owned by Binance, which brings us back to the exchange that tries to trick gullible customers into accepting counterfeit Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
But then, take a look at people like o_e_l_e_o and LoyceV. These guys are too rooted in bitcoin things, out of experience they profer solutions to any bitcoin related questions and their posts are the most quality. I wouldn't want to question their educational qualification because it doesn't really matter. Since I'm mentioned here: I haven't had any "classic" education about Bitcoin, but I do think an academic background helps. Once you have research skills (which nowadays is not much more than using a search engine and picking the right sources), you can learn and write interesting things about anything. It takes a lot of time though. |
|
|
|
I have a ledger nano s but I don't feel secure anymore I never felt secure with any hardware wallet. To me, it's a black box and I can't possibly know what's really happening inside. So I only used it as "intermediate" wallet, for amounts somewhere between hot wallets and cold storage. I feel paranoid. Too little too late  Truely paranoid people (like me) wouldn't have trusted any third party device in the first place. Everyday I wake up and check my phone where I have a watch only installed and before the wallet loads I feel I will see an outbound transaction is just loading but it does not and my coins are there. I feel better.
What will be your suggestions? Move your funds out of there! I've been there, feeling unsecure, when I couldn't find a paper wallet years ago. I had a backup, but it didn't feel safe until I moved the funds. So move. Crypto storage is supposed to be safe enough to be able to trust your own setup. The next big scandal will be this: Breaking news! Ledger Recover data leak! Millions of users lost their coins. Followed by: " Ledger denies all blame, reminds people they said private keys can't be extracted from the secure element." |
|
|
|
Also, if they made a mistake and the funds did not come from where they thought they did then they don't have to justify it. That's why I called it a lousy excuse. If they made a mistake, the honest thing would be to admit it, apologize for it, and learn from it. |
|
|
|
Hi Just looking to build some trust. Seriously? That justification is only likely to earn you more red-tags, not a loan. What ? It's a public secret that you don't talk about taking loans to gain trust. Many users have done it, but if you mention it, you risk a tag. |
|
|
|
You can't beat a persistent troll, and responding to them only feeds them. Yes... ignoring is the best solution. But that doesn't mean I stop reading what he writes. Let me put it this way: I'm not on the internet to torture myself  |
|
|
|
Coldcard also built on many open source libraries (not just Trezor's) when they designed their product. For them to start whining about people building up their open source library is just pure hypocrisy. Are they even allowed to change from GPL to MIT license? If they're building on other GPL software, they have to keep the same license for their own software: GNU General Public License (GPL): The GPL is one of the most well-known open source licenses. It is considered a restrictive license, as it requires that any changes made to the code must be released under the same GPL license, and any software that uses the code must also be released under the same GPL license. Additionally, if a user distributes the software, they must also provide the source code and any changes they made to it. |
|
|
|
But i expect some pool and cryptocurrency company have their own full node implementation or at least use different publicly available full node implementation (such as bcoin[1] or libbitcoin[2]). That way, some pool would ignore invalid block and simply continue build longest valid chain which prevent the need of reorg. Still, in this scenario, that only applies to the pool that rejected the blocks. It would basically be a fork, and anyone on the wrong end would still need a reorg. |
|
|
|
According to what I read, the coin is not just pegged in price, but collateralized, they bought bitcoin for it and they have it in their reserve. Prove it. It doesn't matter. Even if you have absolute proof that Binance owns all the Bitcoins they claim to have "wrapped", you're still completely at their mercy when it comes to getting real Bitcoin for their home-made substitute. ~ Binance are in complete control at all times and can simply seize coins from any address they want. Exactly. So proven or unproven, their made-up token works as long as they let you. It is a centralized, printed-out-of-thin-air, scam. It's worse than fiat money. At least fiat is controlled by your own government, Binance's made-up counterfeit Bitcoins are controlled by a billionaire hiding in the Cayman Islands. |
|
|
|
How do you figure out the appropriate amount of BTC to cover transaction fees accurately over a specified period of time? You can't predict that. One solution could be to create multiple timelocked transactions, and later pick the one that fits best. |
|
|
|
The problem is not just trust. If everyone is running the same software then there is a risk of a serious bug that could take down the entire network. With multiple implementations, that risk is limited. You mean bugs like back in 2010, when someone created 184 Bitcoins? Different implementations might indeed reject those blocks instantly, but if any of the implementations would have a share >50%, it still wouldn't stop it. One way or another, it would need to be fixed and trigger a chain reorganization for anyone who's on the faulty chain, and don't think it's an improvement if different people see different blocks as the most recent ones. |
|
|
|
Almost every centralized exchange is providing users with one address only for each coins for a while now so you can't use any exchange if you have that criteria. I only use 2 exchanges, and both expire addresses all the time. I wouldn't want it any other way. |
|
|
|
Continue reading what someone, who doesn't like me, can help me in situations where he is defaming me. You can't beat a persistent troll, and responding to them only feeds them. But, as I like and try to get along with everyone, trying to create conflicts, I hardly feel the need to "ignore". Lauda called me Switzerland for being (too) neutral, but it doesn't help against trolls. A thick skin combined with the Ignore button works like a charm  |
|
|
|
|
Didn't they get the memo on address reuse? I can't imagine using an exchange that doesn't give me a new deposit address each time!
|
|
|
|
Imagine being able to make payments using cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Dogecoin right from your Twitter account! Imagine I can make Bitcoin payments without a third party earning a percentage This move towards enabling payments aligns with Elon Musk's vision of diversifying revenue streams for Twitter. Why would anyone think that a billionaire who wants more revenue streams aligns with their own interests? If he was a true Bitcoin fan he woulnd't remove it as a mean so payment for Tesla due those bs enviromental concerns. That's rich, coming from the guy who shot a car into space! To me he is more of an opportunist when it comes to Bitcoin. He's an opportunist when it comes to anything. |
|
|
|
|
Here, in the Netherlands, the equivalent of the SSN is called "BSN". It started as a fiscal number a long time ago, but nowadays it's used almost anywhere, from driving license and passport to banks, hospitals, insurances, schools and company registrations. You're supposed to keep it a secret, but that's impossible considering how widely used it is. I've never had a foreign website ask for it though.
|
|
|
|
I would even go step further to improve it and add super-ignore option to totally remove (from sight) some members and/or parts of the forum, but this is hard core for some people  That can probably be done from a user-script. It would stop me from clicking "Show" on Ignored users. |
|
|
|
|
Prediction 1: $31,543.70 (copied from the previous 2 months)
bech32 address: bc1qhc24xdzg58m066jc69v7cyg4kp33tlnsed49hk
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
