Investing in new projects is a high risk, of course, the return will be high if you find the right project that is successful, it can be said that investing in new projects is gambling because it cannot be certain even though the project has been analyzed by yourself.

If you want to be safe from this risk then it's better to avoid it, you don't need to be tempted by the benefits alone which is clear if you avoid you will be safe, anyways why not choose a regulated altcoin or choose bitcoin as a viable and safe investment? Maybe because it's too bored because of the long wait for profits?

So if you have the skills to choose the right project and are ready for the risks then this is not a problem for him.

Yes it's one of the DCA get a low average price but DCA should be consistent what you set whether it's every week/two weeks/month then you will get the best price this way.

Minimizing risk in investing for me you must be able to manage finances the amount spent on bitcoin and the amount of your needs, if you cannot manage this then other risks will become complex so it is important to manage your cash flow.

Then you say DCA utilizes the falling price, then I don't think this is right, whatever the price is when you buy it, this DCA, whether it is high or low, you will still buy because in essence you will know the overall average price.

If you buy during a decline then it's buying Dips.

Yes when he was out for a long time there was no midfielder as intelligent as Kevin De Bruyne he has accurate passing.
With his return to Premier League form perhaps Pep Guardiola doesn't have to worry about him now that he's in the right position and fit to be ready to resume taking the top spot now.

As Kevin De Bruyne is the best assist scorer I know, he continues to provide accurate passes forward.
I just want to wait for him to perform with Haaland again.

Bitcoin going to zero is impossible for me, when there are still many people buying it then the price will remain there. In theory it might be possible but in my understanding it is not possible.
There is a lot of news spreading FUD where bitcoin will reach zero price, it is said that there are no takers, this coin is said to be rubbish and that is said by people who don't like it, they prefer fiat so they say that.
Fud news will never go away, it will always appear to corner Bitcoin.

What is it about Benzema that makes it so difficult for him to stay at Al Ittihad, is there friction at the club with a player or coach making Benzema uncomfortable? It's not clear what the problem is but Benzema has been absent from training according to reports.

So according to the news report, I read that Man United will not buy Benzema but rather borrow for the rest of the season and return at the end of the season, so buying him will be difficult for Man United.

But those talks haven't started with Al Ittihad yet, only soon.
It will depend on Al Ittihad's decision, but I'm guessing it won't happen because Benzema is on a fantastic contract with his current club.

Another person said that after the approval of the ETF Bitcoin could not immediately rise even though it was positive news, of course there was a time when bitcoin rose significantly again, then the person compared after halving bitcoin did not suddenly rise again there was a fairly strong recovery process after that it could be bullish.

While during this decline there will certainly be a lot of speculation as to why bitcoin has fallen into correction while on the other hand the ETF has been approved, the reasons must be many because the news is currently linking more to bitcoin of course because of the approval.

Not buying altcoins during the dip - this is risky.
Not necessarily when halving the price is cheap, this is not certain.
Of course DCA is the best way but for bitcoin.
Observing the market without interaction is just a spectator.

Wouldn't be surprised it's the norm - sometimes relegation teams give the top teams a hard time when they want to keep their points but it's never predictable, because my guess is that Girona would have won easily with at least 3 points but the scoreless result was a disappointment.

A draw for Almeria is more than enough if they win then it's a great team to beat a tough team, but it's still unlucky and indeed Almeria's squad lacks potential players.

Now this is my question. Could this be the start of Girona's decline? Sometimes it's when the second half gets going that teams start to shake.

I don't usually make monthly deposits but weekly deposits that I get from the forum when I get paid, I always allocate about $10 - $15 for sports betting, it varies but I don't do it for most of the week sometimes when I get bored I always stop and don't deposit because I know other needs are more important than gambling.

If what you conclude from the monthly $50 for gambling for a month I'm sure I can do the discipline and will not increase it again because it is more than enough, why I say so a month's fund for gambling is not more than $50 then my discipline can be seen until there with the risk of losing money in gambling is natural sometimes it can win but can lose if the calculation for a month.

Chelsea are still leading by one goal but I think it's still not safe because Chelsea could be a little careless where Fulham can attack faster so that it becomes a goal, until now it still stands even though with a slight victory of only one goal it certainly means a lot to Chelsea.

I still doubt Chelsea can last until the end, but on the other hand I want Chelsea to win. Lol

I predicted this match... This is Man City's usual victory Newcastle there are no surprises only matches sometimes they are a little more confident but still Man City's superiority is above it.

After the approval of the Bitcoin ETF which went up instead of ETH I don't know what's behind all that because there was no increased reaction on bitcoin whereas when the news was fake bitcoin rallied even though it wasn't for long.

Bitcoin ETF approved being good news now moving on to ETH news will this be approved by SEC? I don't think it will be so fast then I see the news in May how the continuation about Ethereum ETF will be discussed as though.

I will wait for this moment to happen.

They have to catch up with the points that are quite behind even though there is one game but that is not a guarantee as long as they can win I think it will be Pep Guardiola's focus to get 3 points in this match, even though you say playing at St. James Park is a plus for Newcastle I think it is still low because their performance is still not good at the moment.

Despite playing away Man City odds are small @1.55 if you look at the betting market now while Newcastle are at odds @5.50 the difference is very far, the bookies know Newcastle will not be able to win.

I'm not too sure even though playing at St. James' Park because the decline experienced by Newcastle is quite significant, it has lost 3 times in a row if losing again will be its 4th defeat in the Premier League.

Man City is always the favorite team when Haaland is absent Alvarez is in charge of the front line but he always does a good job so I say this victory can be on paper for Man CIty.
The midfielders have recovered enough I think the ability to supply the ball forward will be better especially there is Kevin De Bruyne who can appear even though I don't think it will be full time to play.

Was it Graham Potter whose first coach made a lot of mistakes? After that Prank Lampard became an interim coach while then now Pochettino, who equally cannot make Chelsea perform better.

This is hard to imagine because after changing to ownership from Abramovic to Toed Bodhly Chelsea's development is still not good, in fact there is no improvement at all despite spending a lot of money to buy expensive players but not according to expectations.

So we can only observe how Chelsea's process is now, Pochettino was given the task of making Chelsea more developed including buying several players and existing players must be maximized but he is still unable to do it, coaches and other coaching staff play an important role but this has not yet made Chelsea a formidable team.

If I'm not mistaken Pochettino's track record in the premier league is still not good, has he ever won with another team?

We finally saw the news approved.

It's a little strange on the price reaction, maybe when the fake news was announced by the SEC twitter but in the end it will be hacked, but this time it's different even though it was approved but it's not the SEC who announced on their twitter so there's no price reaction, I just think maybe it's not the time yet.

Yes a little more cautious, although many say tomorrow there will be a bigger price reaction.

It was an exciting match with lots of goals in normal time plus extra time with 2 goals from Real Madrid for the final victory, obviously not bored at all as I enjoyed the match.

At the start, Atletico Madrid had the better of the goals but Real Madrid's attack was so tight, in the end Real Madrid got the equalizer in the 85th minute from Carvajal and it was a great attack despite several collisions with the opposing players.

The Real Madrid players did well, I liked how Vinicus and Rodrygo did despite not scoring.

Not sure there is a long-term profitable strategy in gambling even if it's just on sports betting or other people often call poker a strategy game.

I myself am more often profitable in sports betting but this is not certain sometimes I also do not bet on 1 or 2 leagues but more so if for example only focus on a certain league it will be boring and betting is no longer fun.

But what I feel is certainly profitable sports betting even if it's not in the long run I don't expect gambling to be like an investment but rather for the fun of liking football hence the frequent betting on this sport.

I think this is not a deliberate defeat but the completion of their attack is still less than optimal, so this defeat is very unnatural actually because their opponent is a championship team that should be able to win, but unfortunately they lost even though I was confident with the bet. Lol

The busy schedule I feel Chelsea is not sure to win, this team still lacks a lot for the attack line especially their defense is still quite weak that's what I see.
Well the same, I won't be surprised if Chelsea lose because with Middlesbrough they can lose how about a tough team.

I still remember when Cointelegraph said that the Bitcoin ETF approved the price soaring high, but not long after that it was a technical error because the news was not true.

Now the SEC's own account announced it then jumped and after 10 minutes confirmed its account had been compromised, what's more drama than this, even though Gary Gensler said the statement was not true.

Obviously this will be bad news after the news is not true, it makes the price of Bitcoin fall again, although not significantly, still many people hope there is something positive but this is a different fact.

You never know when the altcoin season will come, but is your portfolio up 29% because of the altcoin season? I don't think this is not the time yet, of course I said because bitcoin has not been ATH and has not been halving either, so there is no need to worry if the market has started bullish, usually the season will come together.

There is still no clear news at the moment about Conte and Napoli, but I read in the past that Conte rejected Napoli not because of salary but because he wanted to take a break with his family and he has no intention of returning in the near future, this was news a few months ago, of course it will change if the situation is now in the transfer window.

Indeed, the previous salary at Tottenham Conte got 15 million per season this is much bigger and Napoli bid smaller, but there is a link maybe from the session offered by Napoli it's just that Conte refused subtly and wanted to be with family.

If he returns to Serie A it might be better, I'm sure Conte is a genius coach.