...
Mining on your pool but my hashrate is not shown at all. ;( Wo3RC8Wr7rpDDQBGGv98TJHhZJiYhmfGz7nZmCjzJX9k9YkeS6nL8LbiEzzu8q4RvdJeUSEy5V1E8A3 EcK3EdZ3X2qofmRAPg there's a space in your address here ... not the same in pools.txt is it? my speed took about 30 mins to show up but you should see submitted shares increase, also there's port 5555 higher diff if your mining with gpu's |
|
|
|
I hope there's new wallet version because this one always tell me MinGW Runtime Assertion error about some pow.cpp, line 42 with Expression: pindexLast->nTime > pindexFirst->nTime and that's some kind of bug and the last bug happened with BANQ dev that didn't pay me for the signature campaign
Hi Renegade, we published an update to fix the error which you will need to update to: https://github.com/ExvoProject/Exvo/releasesthanks just opened my wallet for the second time since starting and got this error. Thanks for posting that doktor83  We shall be able to post our own image soon! looking good, Keep it up  |
|
|
|
are you going to use any of the premine to run masternodes?
looks ok btw pointed some hash over
None of the pre-mine will be used to run masternode's and is locked in a multisig address. All expenditure will be documented and freely available for everyone to vote/suggest/discuss beforehand. good stuff may as well point my other mine at this too with talk like that |
|
|
|
|
are you going to use any of the premine to run masternodes?
looks ok btw pointed some hash over
|
|
|
|
Multiple things:
...
4 - From Bittrex my BTG is off. It is a negative number. CSV trades show I sold more than what I had??? (I submitted support ticket with Bittrex already also.)
...
did you take into account any btg you received from the fork? |
|
|
|
...
"enabled" : true,
"staking" : true,
"errors" : "",
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"pooledtx" : 115,
"difficulty" : 0.00085830,
"search-interval" : 16,
"weight" : 9100012800,
"netstakeweight" : 460495329,
"Expected PoS (seconds)" : 3
yeah we have to monitory the hashrate change.
Thanks
restarted my wallet and it started staking again, weird |
|
|
|
Has anyone noticed that PigeonCore uses 100% CPU of a single core? RavenCore uses only 1-3%. Any ideas?
Not talking about the miner here, talking about the wallet.
setgenerate false setgenerates true by default  why would any one do that Because lazy. My build disables CPU mining by default, along with other fixes: https://github.com/gradinkov/pigeoncoin/releases/tag/0.15.99.0-gradinkov3Submitted my patches long ago, no one gives any input on them, just ignore them. Wow that makes me even more sure that they have no interest in developing coin, just pump n dump. Otherwise, why wouldn't they want your fixes? I don't know. They added the DNS seed fix on their own (like 1 day later), then released binaries. But they didn't publish the source code changes for it (the new release has the old sources attached to it), so I don't know what else changed But the CPU mining part sure did not. Hmm ok, not getting a warm and fuzzy on this, I didn't realize the sources were out of sync with the binaries. Could the PGN guys please sync it up ? less than encouraging to say the least gonna switch my mines to something else |
|
|
|
Has anyone noticed that PigeonCore uses 100% CPU of a single core? RavenCore uses only 1-3%. Any ideas?
Not talking about the miner here, talking about the wallet.
setgenerate false setgenerates true by default why would any one do that |
|
|
|
We decided AndCoin will be only mineable for mobile miner and become centralisasi for the algo only. And source code algo only available for exchanges and few pools that we trusted. Plans will be implemented within 2-3 months. For those who do not agree please give your reason.
its a nice plan but there are far cleverer people than you or I and if its worth it they will find a way, perhaps by reverse engineering the apk that's assuming they don't either hack the pools or bribe someone to leak the source. your best bet would be to switch algorithm every few months or when you notice a sudden spike in overall hashrate. or ideally find an algorithm that's stupidly inefficient on 32 bit and 64 bit processors but performs amazingly on ARM processors if such a thing exists. You'd still possibly have issues with botnets but I suspect they'd jump on something like yescrypt* or the new cryptonight for profitability. I actually just came to ask why net stake weights 0, has pos been turned off? |
|
|
|
that project will be succeed. i saw a lot of project just like this before
wow you've seen that many after having an account for just 3 days!! please enlighten me I've only been using this site for a few years seriously this project does indeed have a chance to succeed. I'd assume your referring to pos & masternodes in which you are quite right there are many pos and masternode coins but none that I know of have the same objectives as SYNX and 90% of recent launches have been discord auction scams. |
|
|
|
|
managed to test the core voltage as between 0.71 & 0.72 my meter was fluctuating between the two, memory voltage is around 0.78.
I'll start tweaking when this new hub turns up. £3.98 import tax to pay before they'll deliver it, my governments so petty still it could be worse.
|
|
|
|
something incomprehensible happens. the road map is painted for a long time, do you think what will happen next with the course? I do not believe in this coin
I'm not sure what you are on about as the dev has so far completed everything that was on the roadmap for the start of the year. Now the wallet update for the final APR has been completed which is another check off the roadmap. Next the dev can concentrate on the gaming side of the project. On another note, I'll be glad once the network stabilises as I have been getting many orphan blocks in the last couple of days. I'm on the right chain and have the latest wallet but I guess there is still a lot on the old wallet/chain which could be causing this? /Satoshi:1.9.0.1/ 60019 80 40.4 % 40.4 %
/Satoshi:2.0.0/ 60020 70 35.4 % 75.8 %
/Satoshi:1.9.0/ 60019 45 22.7 % 98.5 %
/Satoshi:1.8.0/ 60018 1 0.5 % 100.0 %
only about a third of us have updated so far  a lot of people don't seem to want to keep up with the news |
|
|
|
Is anyone else's Tax Report not catching all Deposits and Transfers between exchanges? (Specifically Bittrex).
I have all the API jobs running and tried uploading the Full Order History .CSV from Bittrex, however I am getting 13 "Warnings" when I generate a Tax Report, even though when I got back to my transactions list it shows both the Withdrawal from an exchange (ex. Bitfinex) and a Deposit (Bittrex).
I've also tried deleting those transactions and reuploading them with the same timestamps, however I still get those errors when generating the report. Everything else is relatively balanced in my portfolio.
If anyone has any expertise, or if you @Dario3000 have any insights, that would be greatly appreciated. I have a ticket open #13473 if that makes anything easier.
Thank you in advance for your help!
there needs to be a payment history for how you originaly obtained/bought the coins, I had major headaches with this. lets say you bought a btc at bitstamp but you didn't enter the cash deposit as the correct type (income i believe) you will get a tax warning for the cash if you traded say some ltc to btc on bitfinex but had the deposit type for the ltc as deposit(IN) rather than mining/income/gift it'll flag the ltc as a warning |
|
|
|
...
On the subject of difficulty, what is the most profitable difficulty to run these miners at? I have one MLD2 mining in the LiteCoin pool.
my rule of thumb for scrypt 256*mh so I set difficulty on these to either 768 or 512 depending on the pool. I set the lower difficulty on multipools that switch a lot |
|
|
|
... Yeah the hub is fine, works great with the other sticks as well just not that one stick. I've contacted bitshopper.de and they will replace it for me, send it back to them today. At maximum at drew just over 3.8 amps at 600mhz!! The hub i used for separate testing has a 5v 3.5amp power supply but voltage would drop to 4.4v! With a different stick amp draw would be 2.3-2.45 at 900mhz and voltage would stay at 5.05-5.1v. Like i said, probably bad luck with the asic or something but it's getting resolved quickly and correctly by bitshopper.de so a big thumbsup to them! UID is indeed the serial number, you should be able to match the last couple digits to the actual serial number sticker on each device. I'm curious to see your hashrates with the new hub. Are you able to check the voltages of your memory and chip? Would like to know those too I've been having issues matching the serial numbers to the stickers on the devices I thought that too about the last few digits however some of my serial numbers share the last few digits and none match the stickers at all : /dev/ttyUSB0 - FutureBit_FutureBit_Moonlander_2_3e8f26157a48e71189f626920d6e317d
/dev/ttyUSB1 - FutureBit_FutureBit_Moonlander_2_c6c19e18505fe711ada0600a3f3d1008
/dev/ttyUSB3 - FutureBit_FutureBit_Moonlander_2_22c4d13f4c5fe711977d5f0a3f3d1008
/dev/ttyUSB4 - FutureBit_FutureBit_Moonlander_2_ce1d16ae8c48e71195a826920d6e317d
/dev/ttyUSB2 - FutureBit_FutureBit_Moonlander_2_f20ededd7f48e7119f5b1b920d6e317d
 yea I can do that, probably not till tomorrow though. I'm really hoping the new hub turns up sooner rather than later |
|
|
|
Another project with masternode and selling those in discord channel. Sometimes you will feel that every project that sells mn thru discord has something to hide and just to grab easy money. Even if the premine is only 1% but selling about 25MNs will give you money that an average employee earns for maybe one year already. To add the remaining coins -about 3.1875M that they can sell once it hit the exchanges. Not bad, right? And promising you high ROI, something fishy here. They will have large sum of money after just selling those MNs.
seems to be the current trend  funny how people used to get annoyed by a premine because the dev may dump but if it's premined to sell on discord that's just fine with em sad thing is half of these are actually people trying to launch a coin the other half are scams gonna mine for a bit put these MLD's to the test |
|
|
|
like a discord bounty by any chance, by following the link you too can support this guys effort of claiming a bounty nothing particularly wrong with that but don't dress it up as a coin ann ffs the actual ann https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3167196.0 |
|
|
|
All sticks are stated in the logfile as 63 cores, so that should be fine. I've noticed on my hub that on 2 ports the output is a bit less and this causes amp draw to increase and voltage to drop to 4.95-4.99v All other ports are between 5.05 and 5.18v. However, the problem remains with 1 stick that it just slows down gradually and pulls well over 3 amps. Switching ports with other MLD's gave the same results, separate hub & power supply still is a problem with this stick. I've been adjusting core and memory voltages but it just won't work like the others and heats up quicker and hotter than my other MLD's. Not much more i can test/adjust my self as far as i know  Also, I noticed that when the sticks are plugged in directly to my computer i can see their UID's etc. Not when connected to my hub. Is this a hub issue or possibly something that can be fixed with the software? 3 amps!!! is the hub ok? UID == Serial? Block: ...ab1bdf661a9f3370 Diff:60 (431.8M) Started: [11:44:04] I:?
ST:7 F:0 NB:626 AS:0 BW:[ 49/ 60 B/s] E:0.09 BS:347
5 | 21.71/21.25/20.99Mh/s | A:13410 R:73+0(.73%) HW:1996/.76%
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MLD 0: | 4.96/ 4.25/ 4.24Mh/s | A: 2696 R:13+0(.68%) HW: 632/1.2%
MLD 1: | 3.87/ 4.30/ 4.25Mh/s | A: 2714 R:13+0(.39%) HW: 212/.40%
MLD 2: | 4.06/ 4.22/ 4.17Mh/s | A: 2633 R:17+0(1.1%) HW: 218/.42%
MLD 3: | 4.53/ 4.23/ 4.21Mh/s | A: 2693 R:11+0(.34%) HW: 244/.47%
MLD 4: | 4.57/ 4.25/ 4.12Mh/s | A: 2685 R:19+0(1.1%) HW: 691/1.3%
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Select processor to manage using up/down arrow keys
MLD 0: | 4.31/ 4.25/ 4.24Mh/s | A: 2685 R:13+0(.68%) HW: 630/1.2%
FutureBit Moonlander 2 from FutureBit
Serial: ce1d16ae8c48e71195a826920d6e317d
[D]isable
[Slash] Find processor [Plus] Add device(s) [Enter] Close device manager
my devices output when connected through hubs got em up to 744/756. guess which 2 are in the 36w  changing the ports has helped a bit now they're hashing over 700 without loads of errors. the hub I ordered got dispatched yesterday est 7-14 days delivery time so it'll be a little while before I can check the converters. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
