120 votes earns $3.62 on Steemit now. Be lucky if I can even get $1 of that actually out.
So that should most likely be my last post ever on Steemit.
Exactly as I predicted, it played out. Irrevocably destroyed by the whale concept.
I think it's more to do with the problem that Larimer designed the native Steem token to be a toxic asset that you don't want to hold onto due to inflation by design, which is further compounded by the problem that the SBD isn't holding it's peg, and the fact that most people are into cryptocurrency due to seeking "uncorrelated assets" that have no relation to the USD in the first place. It doesn't fix much, but might as well add a gold and silver peg to address part of that equation. I agree the use-case is very limited to nearly non-existent. They designed just about every facet incorrectly (although they did generate some interesting design insights from which a new project could draw on and combine in more optimum ways), except from the standpoint of creating a bubble for the initial whales to cash out and profit from. I am still planning to introduce a crypto project doing it correctly. And you are very much astute to challenge with there must be a use case that can't be satiated with Bitcoin or gold. I did see your post about being able to fund your Bitpay Visa card linked with BTC. Lastly please be aware I am also working on a new programming language named Boost, designed to supercede JavaScript, Java, Swift, and the other mainstream high-level programming languages. Recently we had Ceylon's @gavinking stop by to discuss at our Github project. Note that is part of my strategy, so it may seem very roundabout zig-zag, but it will all make sense in the end. Note I've been in an intense daily (hour-by-hour) battle to cure my chronic health problem which has been holding back my productivity. That is why I've been silent past weeks. |
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/LogicalCampaign/status/787317602347544576Note the "Bible shoved in the face of a Secret Service agent", was actually according to insiders an ashtray thrown at the agent for walking in on Hillary having lesbian sex. From 2014: If you really want to know what was said about her behind the curtain, let’s see if you are ready for this one. When she and Bill entered the White House, within months the story that circulated was that the Secret Service was patrolling the second floor and walked in on Hillary and another woman in bed. She threw an ashtray or some object at him and struck him in the head. When I heard this story I did not believe it and asked, Is this what we are going to be doing for the next 4 years? I was told this was RELIABLE info directly from the Secret Service. My contact was partisan, but he was well-connected. So I took it as just rumor rather than a conspiracy theory.Then the Wall Street journal reported a small story that because a Secret Service agent was injured while patrolling the second floor, they will no longer be allowed to do so.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/13/the-most-explosive-wikileaks-clinton-revelations-so-far/
|
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/LogicalCampaign/status/787317602347544576Note the "Bible shoved in the face of a Secret Service agent", was actually according to insiders an ashtray thrown at the agent for walking in on Hillary having lesbian sex. From 2014: If you really want to know what was said about her behind the curtain, let’s see if you are ready for this one. When she and Bill entered the White House, within months the story that circulated was that the Secret Service was patrolling the second floor and walked in on Hillary and another woman in bed. She threw an ashtray or some object at him and struck him in the head. When I heard this story I did not believe it and asked, Is this what we are going to be doing for the next 4 years? I was told this was RELIABLE info directly from the Secret Service. My contact was partisan, but he was well-connected. So I took it as just rumor rather than a conspiracy theory.Then the Wall Street journal reported a small story that because a Secret Service agent was injured while patrolling the second floor, they will no longer be allowed to do so.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/10/13/the-most-explosive-wikileaks-clinton-revelations-so-far/
|
|
|
|
More Trump accusers have been revealed to be liars. Seems everyone that supports Clinton is lying to someone (even if that is just themselves ... swallow the blue pill). |
|
|
|
More Trump accusers have been revealed to be liars. Seems everyone that supports Clinton is lying to someone (even if that is just themselves ... swallow the blue pill). |
|
|
|
Hellary is being (perhaps intentionally) destroyed by her handlers: Julian Assange alleges (documents and exposes) that Clinton took money from, and was board member of, company doing deals with ISIS.
Please note we have discussed that Assange is apparently being protected by a former Rothschild's attorney. But I have a new perspective on this. The elite may be trying to force the USA political establishment into provoking a war with Russia: I have a new perspective now, given Julian Assange's video: https://twitter.com/LogicalCampaign/status/784171749164224512And this: https://twitter.com/LogicalCampaign/status/787373770738536448The-powers-that-be appear to be trying to force the USA political establishment to escalate in Syria against Putin, in order to futilely attempt to defeat Trump. And the elite want to lay the entire coming economic collapse and escalation of Middle East proxy war in Trump's lap, so he and the patriotic, conservative "obstructionists" can be blamed for the misdeeds of the banksters and establishment that set up all this failure over the past decades. |
|
|
|
Hellary is being (perhaps intentionally) destroyed by her handlers: Julian Assange alleges (documents and exposes) that Clinton took money from, and was board member of, company doing deals with ISIS.
Please note we have discussed that Assange is apparently being protected by a former Rothschild's attorney. But I have a new perspective on this. The elite may be trying to force the USA political establishment into provoking a war with Russia: I have a new perspective now, given Julian Assange's video: https://twitter.com/LogicalCampaign/status/784171749164224512And this: https://twitter.com/LogicalCampaign/status/787373770738536448The-powers-that-be appear to be trying to force the USA political establishment to escalate in Syria against Putin, in order to futilely attempt to defeat Trump. And the elite want to lay the entire coming economic collapse and escalation of Middle East proxy war in Trump's lap, so he and the patriotic, conservative "obstructionists" can be blamed for the misdeeds of the banksters and establishment that set up all this failure over the past decades.
Digging and finding ... Arkancide with a Julian Assange Wikileaks connection:  |
|
|
|
Hellary is being (perhaps intentionally) destroyed by her handlers: Julian Assange alleges (documents and exposes) that Clinton took money from, and was board member of, company doing deals with ISIS.
Please note we have discussed that Assange is apparently being protected by a former Rothschild's attorney. But I have a new perspective on this. The elite may be trying to force the USA political establishment into provoking a war with Russia: I have a new perspective now, given Julian Assange's video: https://twitter.com/LogicalCampaign/status/784171749164224512And this: https://twitter.com/LogicalCampaign/status/787373770738536448The-powers-that-be appear to be trying to force the USA political establishment to escalate in Syria against Putin, in order to futilely attempt to defeat Trump. And the elite want to lay the entire coming economic collapse and escalation of Middle East proxy war in Trump's lap, so he and the patriotic, conservative "obstructionists" can be blamed for the misdeeds of the banksters and establishment that set up all this failure over the past decades.
Digging and finding ... Arkancide with a Julian Assange Wikileaks connection: |
|
|
|
Hellary is being (perhaps intentionally) destroyed by her handlers: Julian Assange alleges (documents and exposes) that Clinton took money from, and was board member of, company doing deals with ISIS.
Please note we have discussed that Assange is apparently being protected by a former Rothschild's attorney. But I have a new perspective on this. The elite may be trying to force the USA political establishment into provoking a war with Russia: |
|
|
|
Sad state of affairs in Philippines.
If you were here with us in the Philippines, maybe you wouldn't be so sad. What is sad are the 1000s of women and children having their limbs hacked off by ISIS which was created by your Liberal, politically correct government authorities. |
|
|
|
I'll add a related quote I read recently that has very similar conclusions:
Elite memes and the manipulation of directed history are growing more to difficult to implement and sustain. The fallback is chaos and general destruction. If one is made to doubt everything, then allegiance to one’s society is lessened. It is easier to substitute and expand internationalism.
The media is playing its part in this larger unveiling, and this also informs us that the current chaotic truth-telling is deliberate.
The process of globalization must continue and the tearing down of what’s been built up throughout the West – including, science, art and technology – is taking place because it is the way free-market trends are counteracted.
Out of chaos … order. The idea now seems to be to tear down foundational elements of American society that have been painstakingly erected over the past century and more. The US as a society – and then as a culture – is to be destroyed to make way for something else.
Very well articulated. Thanks. I had written numerous times that the plan of the elite was to destroy and discredit the nation-state governance and central bank concept, such as quoted as follows from the " One-world reserve currency is inevitable" thread: As I warned you, the countries will be pushed towards cooperating against financial crime: http://www.theguardian.com/news/2016/apr/03/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-panama-papersThe globalists are destroying the nation-states on purpose and inciting the masses to clamor for a global discipline on malfeasance. I've known for a long time this would be coming. One thing you will learn about me by observing me over time is my ability to predict the future. For example was my 2011 prediction that the nations would not exit the EU and instead would double-down for more sloppy seconds. Below I am beginning to see that the elite factions are only coordinated philosophically (and their even subconscious selfish aims thereof), and that is the concept of top-down control and secrecy. The order-out-of-chaos aspect might be deliberate and/or it might just be the natural evolution of a species. The following is a collection of links to some of my past writings.It all distills down to top-down centralized control is inferior to decentralized accretion of outcomes and fitness.Besides the lust for money, power, and subconscious Satanic absolute control, what pragmatically drives these globalists is they have too much stored monetary capital and need to deploy it with great economies-of-scale, because the larger one's stored monetary capital becomes, the more difficult it is to manage a good return-on-investment. This is simply the rule of Second Law of Thermodynamics that small things grow faster, e.g. saplings grow very fast eventually slowing to mature trees, but they can't grow to the moon:First of all, I want to explain why the Second Law of Thermodynamics dictates that energy must always disperse from a hot to a cold body, and not the reverse of a colder body giving up energy becoming colder and making the hot body hotter. This is because the equation for entropy of any system is maximized by having as many equiprobable possible states, i.e. the probability is very high that a hot body with its very highly probable collision of moving particles due to high kinetic energy will transfer some kinetic energy to the slower moving particles in the cold body because it maximizes the entropy of the combined system of hot and cold bodies together. But that is sort of a tautology. The point is that random events are unlikely to be able to keep a system highly ordered and concentrated, just as random twists on a Rubik's cube are unlikely to solve it. Since there can't exist any top-down omniscience in the universe, the probability of maintaining ordered systems trends towards zero on a large enough scale. This is why one can keep small things in order for a while, but large endeavors unravel more quickly. For the same reason, small things grow faster, such as a saplings grow to trees, but trees don't grow to the moon. This is of course in addition to the Iron Law of Political Economics, which insures that flies are attracted to honey, i.e. that those who can charge rents to the collective will be drawn in by the power vacuum of awarding authority to a process. I had even elaborated on the fact that the special interest groups include the voters themselves. I had commented recently in the context of the Philippines' recent decision to instill vigilante killing of suspected drug dealers, about how authority is always corruptible but my comment was not advocating what you the brain washed Westerner reader has been indoctrinated to think is correct.
I had tied this numerous times (such as on May 06, 2014) into my essays about the death of passive capital and the rise of a Knowledge Age that I think will be more immune to financialization. I even wrote a sequel as my prior blog The Golden Knowledge Age is Rising. I even related why usury must exist in order to attain growth within a stored monetary capital paradigm and yet must be a boom-and-bust, power vacuum phenomenon. Even centralized economy-of-scale driven industrial production requires financialization because it is not anti-fragile w.r.t. to force majure, long-tail distributions, and natural variance.
And there was my proclamation in 2014 that the solution would be decentralization. And again I reiterated that collectivized voting is the problem, with the implication that the only robust, resilient solution is decentralization.
I even nailed the homerun point that crypto-currency doesn't depend on ubiquitous confidence to become a global unit-of-exchange, because it doesn't rely on collectivized force to attain a precarious debt-based value. Even gold has to be stamped and assayed by a collective authority, which Proof-of-Work doesn't suffer, yet the remaining challenge is that neither Proof-of-Work nor (even Distributed) Proof-of-Stake are immune to economies-of-scale which enable centralized control (which is the remaining challenge of crypto-currency which I intend to solve!).
The premise that we can protect all the people is fundamentally implausible, which is what leads these Liberals astray into evil outcomes.
It is ironic that Liberals view themselves as selfless people focused on the good of the collective.
Another aspect we can note about Hillary Clinton and the globalists, is they prefer secrecy instead of decentralized open source. But decentralized open source is the only positive scaling law of engineering because the sharing doesn't violate the maximum-divison-of-expertise and the decentralization doesn't incur the rigor mortis of the Mythical Man Month. |
|
|
|
I'll add a related quote I read recently that has very similar conclusions:
Elite memes and the manipulation of directed history are growing more to difficult to implement and sustain. The fallback is chaos and general destruction. If one is made to doubt everything, then allegiance to one’s society is lessened. It is easier to substitute and expand internationalism.
The media is playing its part in this larger unveiling, and this also informs us that the current chaotic truth-telling is deliberate.
The process of globalization must continue and the tearing down of what’s been built up throughout the West – including, science, art and technology – is taking place because it is the way free-market trends are counteracted.
Out of chaos … order. The idea now seems to be to tear down foundational elements of American society that have been painstakingly erected over the past century and more. The US as a society – and then as a culture – is to be destroyed to make way for something else.
Very well articulated. Thanks. I had written numerous times that the plan of the elite was to destroy and discredit the nation-state governance and central bank concept, such as quoted as follows from the " One-world reserve currency is inevitable" thread: As I warned you, the countries will be pushed towards cooperating against financial crime: http://www.theguardian.com/news/2016/apr/03/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-panama-papersThe globalists are destroying the nation-states on purpose and inciting the masses to clamor for a global discipline on malfeasance. I've known for a long time this would be coming. One thing you will learn about me by observing me over time is my ability to predict the future. For example was my 2011 prediction that the nations would not exit the EU and instead would double-down for more sloppy seconds. Below I am beginning to see that the elite factions are only coordinated philosophically (and their even subconscious selfish aims thereof), and that is the concept of top-down control and secrecy. The order-out-of-chaos aspect might be deliberate and/or it might just be the natural evolution of a species. The following is a collection of links to some of my past writings.It all distills down to top-down centralized control is inferior to decentralized accretion of outcomes and fitness.Besides the lust for money, power, and subconscious Satanic absolute control, what pragmatically drives these globalists is they have too much stored monetary capital and need to deploy it with great economies-of-scale, because the larger one's stored monetary capital becomes, the more difficult it is to manage a good return-on-investment. This is simply the rule of Second Law of Thermodynamics that small things grow faster, e.g. saplings grow very fast eventually slowing to mature trees, but they can't grow to the moon:First of all, I want to explain why the Second Law of Thermodynamics dictates that energy must always disperse from a hot to a cold body, and not the reverse of a colder body giving up energy becoming colder and making the hot body hotter. This is because the equation for entropy of any system is maximized by having as many equiprobable possible states, i.e. the probability is very high that a hot body with its very highly probable collision of moving particles due to high kinetic energy will transfer some kinetic energy to the slower moving particles in the cold body because it maximizes the entropy of the combined system of hot and cold bodies together. But that is sort of a tautology. The point is that random events are unlikely to be able to keep a system highly ordered and concentrated, just as random twists on a Rubik's cube are unlikely to solve it. Since there can't exist any top-down omniscience in the universe, the probability of maintaining ordered systems trends towards zero on a large enough scale. This is why one can keep small things in order for a while, but large endeavors unravel more quickly. For the same reason, small things grow faster, such as a saplings grow to trees, but trees don't grow to the moon. This is of course in addition to the Iron Law of Political Economics, which insures that flies are attracted to honey, i.e. that those who can charge rents to the collective will be drawn in by the power vacuum of awarding authority to a process. I had even elaborated on the fact that the special interest groups include the voters themselves. I had commented recently in the context of the Philippines' recent decision to instill vigilante killing of suspected drug dealers, about how authority is always corruptible but my comment was not advocating what you the brain washed Westerner reader has been indoctrinated to think is correct.
I had tied this numerous times (such as on May 06, 2014) into my essays about the death of passive capital and the rise of a Knowledge Age that I think will be more immune to financialization. I even wrote a sequel as my prior blog The Golden Knowledge Age is Rising. I even related why usury must exist in order to attain growth within a stored monetary capital paradigm and yet must be a boom-and-bust, power vacuum phenomenon. Even centralized economy-of-scale driven industrial production requires financialization because it is not anti-fragile w.r.t. to force majure, long-tail distributions, and natural variance.
And there was my proclamation in 2014 that the solution would be decentralization. And again I reiterated that collectivized voting is the problem, with the implication that the only robust, resilient solution is decentralization.
I even nailed the homerun point that crypto-currency doesn't depend on ubiquitous confidence to become a global unit-of-exchange, because it doesn't rely on collectivized force to attain a precarious debt-based value. Even gold has to be stamped and assayed by a collective authority, which Proof-of-Work doesn't suffer, yet the remaining challenge is that neither Proof-of-Work nor (even Distributed) Proof-of-Stake are immune to economies-of-scale which enable centralized control (which is the remaining challenge of crypto-currency which I intend to solve!).
The premise that we can protect all the people is fundamentally implausible, which is what leads these Liberals astray into evil outcomes.
It is ironic that Liberals view themselves as selfless people focused on the good of the collective.
Another aspect we can note about Hillary Clinton and the globalists, is they prefer secrecy instead of decentralized open source. But decentralized open source is the only positive scaling law of engineering because the sharing doesn't violate the maximum-divison-of-expertise and the decentralization doesn't incur the rigor mortis of the Mythical Man Month. |
|
|
|
FYI either r0ach or mprep is deleting my posts. If he does this again, I will duplicate the censored posts to another thread (perhaps outside of Altcoin Discussion, i.e. shouldn't we move this discussion to Economics or Politics & Society?): A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted. Your gold outlook looks like it has a 5-15 year time horizon. One will need a very strong conviction to ride that one out.
Lol, the people in this thread. We're looking at a timespan of something like between anytime now and 2 years before the debt markets + banks inevitably implode and you have martial law with the national guard standing in the streets. I highly doubt we will even make it past 2017... Yup: The Red pill, Blue pill Election — NYC slumlord vs. Globalists
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted. Yeah but, who wants to live in a world you see? fck it, give me one bullet.
Just swallow the blue pill then. Roach, if what you say is true, it's much better to buy food, ammo and fuel. Things like gold and bitcoin won't matter in a world you are foreseeing.
That would presume the entire globe falls into a Dark Age. Rather it is quite likely that Asia bottoms 2020 and starts rising, while the West falls into the abyss of entitlements and bankster stranglehold. You'll perhaps be able to transition your assets to functioning areas of the global economy. |
|
|
|
The fundamental goal is maximizing degrees-of-freedom.
Question, does an object standing still, for all practical purposes, have greater degrees of freedom than an object in motion? All else being equal the object moving at a constant velocity would have greater degrees of freedom in the direction of motion and less in the opposing direction. Thus overall degrees of freedom would be unchanged. The correct way to answer this is to note that the stationary object is moving and the moving objects are stationary. Special relativity applies. |
|
|
|
If both are corruptible it's still better, because it protects to innocent from abuse of an authority.
Haha, yeah like in the USA which has a 99% conviction rate and 10 times higher incarceration rate than any other developed country, frankly much higher than any other country including China and Africa. Which basically means lots and lots of blacks wrongly in prison for crimes they didn't commit, with their lives scarred and destroyed by being fucked in the ass by other hard core prisoners. It doesn't matter who you give the authority to, it can always be corrupted. At least the filipinos can shoot the erring vigilantes should they wish to, or elect a different President. Just try to go shoot those who are running our corrupt kangeroo courts and legal system. I am not saying I 100% agree with the vigilantism, but as I said, it is not my choice to make as even though I've lived here since 1994 (and continuously since 2006), I am not a citizen. I must respect the collective will of the filipino people else I am free to leave this place. |
|
|
|
Getting inside the minds of the elite: It is interesting to read more of what Hillary said in the private speech to bankers and their ilk on page 93: And what I really resent most about the
obstructionists is they have such a narrow view of
America. They see America in a way that is no
longer reflective of the reality of who we are.
They're against immigration for reasons that have to
do with the past, not the future. They can't figure
out how to invest in the future, so they cut
everything. You know, laying off, you know, young
researchers, closing labs instead of saying, we're
better at this than anybody in the world, that's
where our money should go. They just have a
backward-looking view of America. And they play on
people's fears, not on people's hopes, and they have
to be rejected. I don't care what they call
themselves. I don't care where they're from. They
have to be rejected because they are fundamentally
unAmerican. And every effort they make to undermine
and obstruct the functioning of the government is
meant to send a signal that we can't do anything
collectively. You know, that we aren't a community,
a nation that shares values.
I mean, American was an invention. It
was an intellectual invention, and we have done
pretty well for all these years. And these people
want to just undermine that very profound sense of
who we are. And we can't let them do that. What Hillary fails to comprehend in her idealistic quest for the perfect harmonious global village, is that when you hand out welfare checks to everyone that shows up at the border, the pre-existing citizenry don't want to pay for it while losing their jobs to these parasites. The banksters are quite happy for us to run up our debt to finance it until it collapses, because they privatize the profits and socialize the cost of the losses. America was built from immigration where everyone had to pull themselves up by their own bootstraps. The problem with these globalists is they make it all sound great and idealistic even to fool themselves, whilst as long as they can always profit and steal in the guise of idealism, then it is the " obstructionists" that are at fault in their view! Just before the above quote, Hillary was preaching the idealism of three pillars of society: free market, governance, and community (civil sector). That was an excellent look into the illogical mindset of idealistic bullshit Liberals. |
|
|
|
A theme Armstrong has also often stated: It is interesting to read more of what Hillary said in the private speech to bankers and their ilk on page 93: And what I really resent most about the
obstructionists is they have such a narrow view of
America. They see America in a way that is no
longer reflective of the reality of who we are.
They're against immigration for reasons that have to
do with the past, not the future. They can't figure
out how to invest in the future, so they cut
everything. You know, laying off, you know, young
researchers, closing labs instead of saying, we're
better at this than anybody in the world, that's
where our money should go. They just have a
backward-looking view of America. And they play on
people's fears, not on people's hopes, and they have
to be rejected. I don't care what they call
themselves. I don't care where they're from. They
have to be rejected because they are fundamentally
unAmerican. And every effort they make to undermine
and obstruct the functioning of the government is
meant to send a signal that we can't do anything
collectively. You know, that we aren't a community,
a nation that shares values.
I mean, American was an invention. It
was an intellectual invention, and we have done
pretty well for all these years. And these people
want to just undermine that very profound sense of
who we are. And we can't let them do that. What Hillary fails to comprehend in her idealistic quest for the perfect harmonious global village, is that when you hand out welfare checks to everyone that shows up at the border, the pre-existing citizenry don't want to pay for it while losing their jobs to these parasites. The banksters are quite happy for us to run up our debt to finance it until it collapses, because they privatize the profits and socialize the cost of the losses. America was built from immigration where everyone had to pull themselves up by their own bootstraps. The problem with these globalists is they make it all sound great and idealistic even to fool themselves, whilst as long as they can always profit and steal in the guise of idealism, then it is the " obstructionists" that are at fault in their view! Just before the above quote, Hillary was preaching the idealism of three pillars of society: free market, governance, and community (civil sector). That was an excellent look into the illogical mindset of idealistic bullshit Liberals. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
