How in the fuck, is it that CRAIG is satoshi when the claim is that multiple people did the whitepaper? 'Who is Satoshi?' story once again relate to the controversial Australian academic and entrepreneur Craig Wright, who last May claimed that he – and as many as four others – contributed to the white paper credited to bitcoin's pseudonymous inventor. How am I the only person to see how fake that is?If you are, start a thread stating your claim but don't let RawDog know about its existence, else he'll bug out his eyeballs while putting you on your paper. |
|
|
|
Had to read it twice to see how did the owner "made profit"... I guess you can understand things like Bitcoin Magazine did if you distance yourself a bit from what you know about Bitcoin  Good thing is that at least this is news on a positive tone and I guess there's no way for mainstream media to take this and diss on Bitcoin  So true! No way in hell could mainstream media diss a phantom broker and phantom buyer conducting a phantom deal involving bitcoins where a phantom amount of profit was made thanks to a meteoric rise in the exchange rate due to collusion among manipulated chinese cryptocurrency exchanges. Viva el RateCoin! |
|
|
|
Great, so if you were in that room, you would've noticed that I WASN'T wearing knee pads. They looked like kneepads to me, ya fucking dirty fag. I'll tell you this much is certain, you weren't hitting that hot piece of meat you were standing next to. Not in a million years would she consider letting you put your filthy dick in her. You caught me there. Give me a couple hours so that I can delete ALL them posts I penned about fuckin that hot piece of meat, replacing the content with how you and I have sucked each other's cocks till morn over the course of the past few years, I McLovin your clean cock more than you McLovin my filthy dick. Note to self: clean filthy dick. |
|
|
|
I'll give you a medium-sized blowjob if you can point to the knee pads that I'm supposedly wearing  You know what the irony is, I was actually in that room when that photograph was taken. Go ahead, ask me which corner Armory was in. Or, ask me where DiIorio was sitting in relation to where you were kneeling. I have first-hand eye witness knowledge of the matter. Great, so if you were in that room, you would've noticed that I WASN'T wearing knee pads. Further, that pic wasn't taken inside any room but in the corridor between where the keynote speakers spoke and the refreshment room, the ONLY two rooms allocated by the MGM Grand for that Bitcoin conference, adjacent rooms utilized by a firemen convention with a ballerina conference taking place down another corridor, where most of the its attendees where donning ... wait for it ... tutus. |
|
|
|
<with apologies if RawDog has already penned a thread on this very same subject >https://thenextweb.com/money/2017/01/27/bitcoin-buyer-house-profit/ (a rehash of https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/man-accidentally-makes-13-million-buying-house-bitcoin/ as the screenshot demonstrates)  While Bitcoin has starred in a series of horror stories about wasted retirement funds and lost fortunes due to its notorious unpredictability, one man from California lucked out big time on his recent house purchase – and all thanks to the popular cryptocurrency.
Speaking to Bloomberg Markets, Bitpay CCO Sonny Singh told an intriguing story how Bitcoin’s volatility accidentally helped the buyer in question take home a profit of approximately $1.3 million during the exchange from the cryptocurrency to American dollars.
Singh and his company were recently approached by a real estate developer that received an offer from a prospective buyer who expressed a preference to pay in Bitcoin. After walking him through the peculiarities of the transaction, the two parties eventually reached an agreement for the estate, which was valued at around $4 million at the time.
But here’s the thing: While the cryptocurrency was worth a mere $750 when the transaction was originally initiated, by the end of the transfer Bitcoin had surged up to over $1000, earning him a profit of more than a million dollars.
“The buyer actually ended up making about 25 percent in the currency exchange rate, essentially, in the appreciation,” Singh said. “He got a house for pretty much 25 percent cheaper.”
While the cryptocurrency continues to remain on the verge of mainstream adoption due to its highly unstable rates, the technology is gradually starting to make its way to the masses. Not too long ago, Japan became one of the first countries to introduce a service that allows users to pay their utility bills in Bitcoin. TO BE CLEAR, the buyer DID NOT make a profit off the purchase for his $4M home. He merely had to allocate less bitcoins that he owned for the purchase, retaining more bitcoins in his coffer than if purchasing at an earlier timeframe. Same true if he had expressed to the phantom broker that he desired to pay with gold valued at $750 per ounce, but once the papers were all signed for the accepted transaction, gold climbed to $1,000 per ounce, thus allowing him to spend less gold than originally planned. THAT IS ALL! Otherwise WE ALL can say that at some time we, too. incurred a lost of X% when bitcoins were trading for less after we ordered our cups of java, having to dole out $4.25 per cup oppose to only $3.99 when we first considering ordering the damn thing thanks to waiting in the long line of people willing to make and pay for purchases with their worthless fiat. In essence, this is non-story by Bitcoin Magazine designed to garner eyeballs, then picked up by The Next Web, both of which should know a sensationalized story when they read it - unless ... https://www.linkedin.com/in/kyle-torpey-59687442/Moved to Inside Bitcoins in August 2014, and eventually became the Editor-in-Chief on two separate occasions (Bitcoinist took over an editorial role there for a bit through a media partnership with Inside Bitcoins). My bad! Looks like Kyle was ONLY an Editor-in-Chief a couple times, hence now giving him a pass for publishing a sensationalized story that MAY HAVE slipped by Bitcoin Magazine's Editor-in-Chief because he was stuck in some coffee line with bitcoins in hand when the article's deadline for submission came to pass. Bruno
|
|
|
|
Gleb, is that really you in that tutu? I thought you were some 25 yr old college kid. Hahaha, you're really out there.
Yep! I'll be 57 come March 4th. For my birthday I desire MFC tokens.  |
|
|
|
It looks like the ICO will start on March 1st. Has there been any information posted regarding the ICO details? With the attention the Qtum project is receiving, there is no doubt the ICO will be very successful. Time to gather up some bitcoins for the ICO.
What made you say that ICO will start on 1st March?As a matter of fact there is no official information regarding date of ICO.Everyone is waiting for ICO to invest in this crypto revolution I saw it on the Qtum reddit. Here is the link: https://www.reddit.com/r/Qtum/ Look on the top of the page. It says "Crowdsale starts on March 1st" I'll take that as an official information on the ICO. However, the date can surely change if the devs feel they need more time to organize things. "We raised the money to prove that our approach is right. We used the money to do the minimum viable product. The testnet is live now, but it is private, it is already working”, he said, adding that the Qtum Foundation could seek to raise up to $10m in the token offering.
The project kicked off in March 2016 as a proof-of-concept, and so far it has completed the design of the Qtum model – the world’s first digital currency that can execute smart contracts with a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism based on an Unspent Transaction Output (UTXO) model, as reported by Bitcoin Magazine. How do we truly know for certain that a minimum viable product ONLY available on a private testnet is real, or that VC funding was really distributed, and if so (the latter), the money isn't going to be immediately paid back plus a standard vig from the expected $10M raise with the token offering thanks to the prominent support so to futurely for-real build what's envisioned? Full disclosure: No horse in this race nor my post was meant as a diss toward Qtum, sincerely wishing them all the best. |
|
|
|
issues with flaming fags which I am not, but would gladly declare such if were the case. Pink tutu, knee pads, your own admission: Dude, you should know that anytime somebody alludes to dripping jeez, my cock gets harder than the doorknob denials aren't going to help against this backdrop. Facts are facts. There are no 'alternative facts'. I'll give you a medium-sized blowjob if you can point to the knee pads that I'm supposedly wearing OR have stated donning such by my own admission (speaking of There are no 'alternative facts'.): 'your own admission' was with specific regard to 'dripping jeez' - not kneepads. I prepared the quote accurately. The kneepads were in the original photo - not in the one you posted. But I must say, your alleging the knee pads aren't present is a pretty thin denial. As for the blowjob, no thanks I have a girlfriend for such things. Blowjobs from fags don't appeal to me. What a retard! The two images in question were taken within in a minute apart and there were no knee pads worn by myself prior to or during either snaps, including during the entire conference. But I must say, your alleging the knee pads were present is a pretty thin accusation. Your case of me being a flaming fag is a much stronger accusation, albeit false, although I do smoke [fags]. |
|
|
|
Oh, what a tangled web thou weaves ...
have you seen how many pies barry silbert has his finger in.. I'm versed. Speaking of pie, here's RawDog's favorite movie scene:  The apple pie was baked by this dude:  |
|
|
|
issues with flaming fags which I am not, but would gladly declare such if were the case. Pink tutu, knee pads, your own admission: Dude, you should know that anytime somebody alludes to dripping jeez, my cock gets harder than the doorknob denials aren't going to help against this backdrop. Facts are facts. There are no 'alternative facts'. I'll give you a medium-sized blowjob if you can point to the knee pads that I'm supposedly wearing OR have stated donning such by my own admission (speaking of There are no 'alternative facts'.): |
|
|
|
Could you please look into those senseless translation bounty posts? In the meanwhile every third or fourth post is folks asking for any kind of bounty... Translation bounty, logo bounty, or simply `bounty? `
Those people should also msg the topic starter himself and post several times in the thread... IMHO
Echo! Or, as they say in Hawaiian - Küpinaʻi! |
|
|
|
have a couple high-paid competent dudes in the space do his bidding,
jon matonis - coindesk contributor gavin andresen, working on Bloq... Bloq funded by........ barry silbert. Oh, what a tangled web thou weaves ...  |
|
|
|
Sixly, have you seen my doorknob? My bad! I already asked that, not sure as to why I asked it again.
I am sure. It is because you are a flaming fag with shit dick which you boldly admit on public interwebs. Now go flit around the neighborhood in your pink to try to attract another of your type.Dude needs to get up to speed as to why I donned the pink tutu at a Bitcoin conference in Las Vegas: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zml5OMTPak Dude also seems to have issues with flaming fags which I am not, but would gladly declare such if were the case. Dude plays the racist card in 5 ..... 4 .... 3 ... |
|
|
|
kinda regret posting the old pic of gleb.. kinda sidetracked the topic a bit too much.
thought it would have put a few smiles on faces.. not the opposite
It's cool, bud. Don't fret it. Bruno
Might be the funniest post ever. Satoshi and Bitcoin are all about scams, lies, and cheating. The community is filthy with dirty fags wearing pink tutus among many other things. This place is a filth-pit.
I think this guy might be officially crazier than me.Maybe it takes crazy to see that Wright is Satoshi. Forgive me for asking, if such is the case, then what title am I after by posting the following?: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1766876.msg17645132#new |
|
|
|
<no, this is not another thread like that other thread - this thread is about something much more> Why did you think you needed to start a new thread on the very same topic? What a dumbass. Firstly, it's Mr. Dumb Ass to you. Secondly, the following is your ENTIRE OP (compare it to mine above) from the other thread you incorrectly claimed is on the same topic: Thirdly, have you seen my doorknob? You'll recognize it because it smells differently than ALL other doorknobs. Fourthly, why you so butthurt? First time inserting a doorknob? Fifthly, I've never had a qualm against you, yet you seem to have serious issues with me, sentiments 100% saved for nefarious actors in this space when they wish to discredit my scammy Dumb-ass, 100% to no avail in spite of my traffic convictions disallowing me to participate on this forum in re weeding out nefarious actors. That said, please share with us your real name so that you, too, can be vetted (read: FUCKIN DOXXED), exposing which nefarious actor you are in this space. Sixly, have you seen my doorknob? My bad! I already asked that, not sure as to why I asked it again. |
|
|
|
Tell me if I m wrong, but to me Satoshi and Bitcoin is all about facts, consensus and united community Might be the funniest post ever. Satoshi and Bitcoin are all about scams, lies, and cheating. The community is filthy with dirty fags wearing pink tutus among many other things. This place is a filth-pit. Proclaims our fearless leader shedding light on the subject:  |
|
|
|
So..... Nothing at all to support this? Satoshi would know how to prove his claim in 1 min. Craig has had half a year and does not even seem to know how to sign a transaction.
Why would Craig Steven Wright need to sign a transaction when he could - AND DID - have a couple high-paid competent dudes in the space do his bidding, with them going to the press to reveal the pseudo truth? If the ploy fails - WHICH IT DID - wait a few months to rinse and repeat, starting anew - WHICH WE ARE. |
|
|
|
After a while, you forget to eat and start resembling Lindsay Lohan
love the comedy you bring gleb, as for resembling lindsay lohan mixed with a dog wanting to be fed crumbs  this post is meant as respect to your comedic personality. not an attack this post is meant as respect to your comedic personality. not an attack Look, any faggot who puts on a pink tutu and knee pads is only getting down there for one thing: to suck dick. This Gleb guy is a poof of the highest order. I can tell you that. Dude, you should know that anytime somebody alludes to dripping jeez, my cock gets harder than the doorknob that's permanently stuck up my ass. Speaking of getting hard, take [more than] a gander at this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1766876.0 |
|
|
|
<no, this is not another thread like that other thread - this thread is about something much more>http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-new-satoshi-nakamoto-rumors/Bitcoin is Abuzz With New Satoshi Nakamoto Rumors
Pete Rizzo (@pete_rizzo_) | Published on January 26, 2017 at 15:40 GMT
If the gossip at a recent invite-only bitcoin conference is any indication, news may be forthcoming in the long-simmering Satoshi Nakamoto saga.
On the sidelines of the two-day Satoshi Roundtable conference in Cancun, rumors were swirling that new developments in the 'Who is Satoshi?' story once again relate to the controversial Australian academic and entrepreneur Craig Wright, who last May claimed that he – and as many as four others – contributed to the white paper credited to bitcoin's pseudonymous inventor.
This time, however, there is said to be a potential twist to the story relating to an unknown entity that may have a claim to the intellectual property created by that group.
Major news outlets are once again said to be conducting an investigation into the story, with releases coming out as early as next month.
While interesting, the speculation is notable given that Wright's claims were later attacked by cryptographers, with even those who initially vouched on his behalf later attempting to distance themselves from their previous support.
Wright later publicly apologized for what he claimed is his inability to provide more proof defending his claims, stating at the time:"I believed that I could do this. I believed that I could put the years of anonymity and hiding behind me. But, as the events of this week unfolded and I prepared to publish the proof of access to the earliest keys, I broke. I do not have the courage. I cannot." https://about.me/peterizzo https://www.linkedin.com/in/rizzopete/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EditingEditing is the process of selecting and preparing written, visual, audible, and film media used to convey information. The editing process can involve correction, condensation, organization, and many other modifications performed with an intention of producing a correct, consistent, accurate and complete work. The above was presented to engrain the notion that an EDITOR (more than simply a writer) of an acclaimed periodical WOULD NOT put their reputation on the line by allowing or publishing theirself any content deemed inaccurate or sensationalized, especially for the sake of garnering readers (read: clickbait) of an exponentially growing niche still rife with ongoing controversies, not to mention nation-states looking for any excuse to stifle its further expansion out of fear of disrupting the status quo in re their respective fiat-based financial systems. As for an EDITOR, same true for the prominent person who owns the periodical, among other ventures (some connected) in said space, in this example, Barry Silbert, graceful enough to afford its EDITOR a living overseeing other writers in making sure that nothing less than correct, consistent, accurate and complete work grace the pages of the ofttimes cited news site - CoinDesk - else he would be putting his reputation or, moreover, it and his other brands, which have several employees with families to feed, on the more than proverbial line. Barry Silbert in no way would hire, let alone retain the likes of Pete Rizzo if they demonstrated incompetence, especially if a hire's words published on CoinDeck strongly resonates across borders influencing an exponentially growing niche still rife with ... To cement the notion that Barry Silbert DID indeed hire a competent EDITOR, consider what other prominent colleagues are on record in stating about Pete Rizzo's competence et al.: https://www.linkedin.com/in/barrysilbert/"Pete's a reporter's reporter. His shoe-leather reporting led to many of CoinDesk's biggest stories. He is consistent, determined and immerses himself in his beat incredibly quickly."
~Joon Ian Wong
Technology reporter at Quartz
September 23, 2015, Joon Ian worked with Pete in different groups
"Pete's work is insightful and high-quality. He always asks the right questions, and never backs down on his opinions, which makes his views extremely valuable."
~Daniel Cawrey
Marketing & Strategy - Communications @ Velocity
September 23, 2015, Daniel worked with Pete in different groups
"During the year that Pete worked as my editor at CoinDesk, he consistently impressed me with his general intelligence, keen editorial and business judgment and his effective leadership skills. Pete knows all of the nuances of a well-written story and can juggle between news reporting and feature writing with ease."
~Tom Sharkey
Data Analyst at Text100
June 23, 2015, Tom reported directly to Pete
"I worked alongside Pete in the editorial team at PYMNTS.com. Pete was 100 percent punctual, professional and determined. He was always eager to contribute ideas and pitches during our content meetings. His work was always a pleasure to read and he never missed a deadline despite last minute requests being frequently thrown our way. Pete was one of the best writers I have ever worked with, and has an excellent knowledge of the marketing and communication industry. Additionally, Pete has a great sense of humor which is an appreciated sense of relief when working in such serious work environments."
~Chanel Smith
Enterprise Product Merchandiser at Dell
December 3, 2013, Pete worked with Chanel in the same group
"I managed Pete during my time at PYMNTS.com and was impressed by the speed with which he developed a significant understanding of a very complex industry. He has an innate ability to take complex material and transform it into bite-sized nuggets of useful information, and was a huge help in revamping our SEO and social media practices as well.
While I only managed Pete for about half a year, I quickly came to view him as my right-hand man when it came to the editorial process. Pete is a hard worker, versatile editor and excellent writer and any team would be lucky to have him."
~Ben Carsley
Editorial Director at C-4 Analytics, LLC
October 3, 2013, Ben managed Pete directly
"As an editor for ContentLEAD, Pete offers the creative vision and drive that should be valued in any frontline manager. He's been able to foster a culture of accountability and success within his team since the start, playing a crucial role in the development of a team of high-performing writers. On top of that, Pete's a fantastic writer himself and a great personality to have in the office. He knows how to unite people and challenge them, and his well-rounded skill set would make him an asset to any company."
~Manny Veiga
Writer, Editor, Web Marketer
January 31, 2013, Manny managed Pete directly
"Pete is a goal-oriented editor that's able to consistently deliver results, even when outside the box thinking is necessary. It was a pleasure working with Pete because he was so reliable.
When issues arose or a strategy needed revision Pete always brought creative ideas and a tenacious attitude. He makes things work, even irrational client demands or completely out of left field content ideas."
~drew Wallace
Director of Marketing | Growth + SEO + PPC + Inbound Marketing Expert | HubSpot Alumni
January 11, 2013, drew was senior to Pete but didn’t manage directly That all being said, rest assured that Pete Rizzo nailed it with his recent definitive exposé NOT based on rumors or hearsay that Satoshi Nakamoto WILL be revealed ere long. In the spirits of the late Captain Stubby and Charles Homer Bill, thanks for listening. Bruno PS: If by happenstance my assessment is in error, than rest assured that we're all FUCKED! (read: we're ALL pawns where a queen won't even apologize to us if she inadvertently stepped on our foot as she nails our ass, arriving from across the board with fresh cake frosting evident on her sweet lips)
|
|
|
|
stupidity of Blockstreams puppets is incredible, their dullness is really unlimited. What do you hope to obtain from these filthy insinuations?
see how simple this drama can escalate to meander with simple name calling..
funny part is when someone pokes the bear by making an insinuation. the other side reacts. then the bear poker can play the victim card.
endless kardashian drama.in short no one should care about the name drama. and instead be looking at what CODE decisions were made at the roundtable.
if you cant see that coindesk is causing fake social drama to distract sheep from asking about the code.. with distractions about 'who is satoshi'..
then you wont see what changes to the CODE will be until its too lateAfter a while, you forget to eat and start resembling Lindsay Lohan scouring Bitcointalk for tiny nugget crumbs for a fix to support your crack [up] habit. That said, anybody here a doctor? Note to self: check Wright's countless unverified degrees to see if he practices, else order another pizza so to again play frisbee with the neighbor's dog. Rumor has it that it's gonna teach me how to lick my own balls. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
