You made 2 posts before this, 3 in total if we include that.
How many posts have you had deleted before? And how bad did they have to be...

Although I agree, that it wouldn't be a solution to sig spamming (and the problem pointed out in OP),
let me say, that despite not posting in the topic yet, I support that suggestion.

Select the "All" option -> ctrl + F -> jt byte

---

Posts have to be constructive (there's a rule against zero value posts).
How constructive do you think it is, saying 10 times the same thing in the same thread?
And that problem only increases, when paid signatures come in.

The user is saying the same in all their posts, only the wordings and some of the formulations change.

---

No doubt, there are.

Also a campaign "managed" by a bot and not closely monitored by the (human) manager.

The icon changes once you posted in a thread, also having the thread permanently in your "show new repiles" list should be a strong indication.

Yes, that's correct.
I was abled to verify the message with core 0.12.0
Here's an online verification: (Brainwallet permalink)

Yes, you'll be entering the parts of your signed message (message, address and signature) into the blank by hand:

Yes, it is.
After two tries, I was abled to verify it using electrum 2.6.2 and core 0.12.0 (Brainwallet verification permalink).

To be fair, the user wasn't abled to join any signature campaign as a newbie, they got in as soon as they could.

Increasing the block time would be contraproductive, when trying to get confirmations fast.

Since legendary happens at a random number, you probably mean "very close to the lowest possible legendary activity"

Are you saying this account is on DT2? I highly doubt (even more for that price).
Or did you rather want to say "neutral trust" or "no trust"/"no negative trust"?

Not a bad one, not a bad one indeed.

There never will be "nothing to mine".
Once the block reward reaches 0 sat (as pointed out by dollarneed, in over 100 years,
the miners will solely rely on the transaction fees being paid as rewards.

I didn't read the post in its context and I haven't had a look at the thread, hence I'm not taking out the to comment on whether the one deleting it did a good job or not.

A well-chosen set of moderators should do that job.

You're questioning the integrity of the moderators (or at least of one moderator, which you do not know specifically, hence we're back to all),
which I currently don't see a reason to. At least not for the sake of 1 deleted post.

---

Believe me when I say to you, I've had worse.

That's why you double-posted, right?

---

Quoted for future reference

According to modlog, that's one less problem.

"Autoban user: N/A in topic #0 by member #559533"

---

There's a forum-intern linkfilter, that replaces some links with "[suspicious link removed]".
xetsr was most likely talking about that option, rather than a tag by google/other filters.

I don't think the moderator will and there isn't supposed to be a way to find out which moderator deleted your post.
The reason is simple, it's a way to protect the staff from becoming a target for their moderational work.

Only when initiated by the one accepting your payment, hence if they don't offer you anything like this, there's little hope for you to being abled to convince them.

No, you can't.
Patatas won't be paid for any post made in another signature campaign thread.
How I know? I'm the one paying him.

---

I was just waiting on one of you guys trying to argue that way.

You can't get a confirmation without a block.
The first confirmation is the block your transaction is included.
The chances of your transaction being included in a block are tied to some factors, the most important one is the fee you pay.
After that, every block on top of the block your transaction was included will act as one more confirmation for said transaction.

The fee will have an influence on whether or not your transaction is included in the first block, but it won't make the second and third blocks be discovered any faster,
those factors are out of your power.

You can pay a higher fee, which makes your transaction more likely to be included in the next upcoming block.
After that, there's nothing you can do about the confirmations, as it's going to get one with each new block, and the time between blocks (while being on average 10 minutes) varies.

I think the sum is now fixed, since it's tied to the evil points at the moment the account was created.
However, I'm not sure about that, so if anyone knows better (possibly with a source), feel free to correct me.