I have learnt to live with it, as a newbie I've gotten a considerable number of posts deleted that I learnt to play safe and say things that are very related to the topic so the moderator will not term it a being offtopic. I have been able to save my neck a bit.
You made 2 posts before this, 3 in total if we include that. How many posts have you had deleted before? And how bad did they have to be...
|
|
|
I feel this topic is relevant enough to cross-link this suggestion: - Bitcointalk is it possible to separate businesses and gambling discussion?This isn't a real solution to OP (only solution seems actively banning those spammers.) But a separate " Gambling Discussion" forum would seriously improve the quality of the main Gambling forum (that is overcrowded with sig-spammers). Although I agree, that it wouldn't be a solution to sig spamming (and the problem pointed out in OP), let me say, that despite not posting in the topic yet, I support that suggestion.
|
|
|
There should be a way to filter out such posters. It becomes quite difficult to keep a count of such posts since one has go through 20 pages to find the repetitive posters .Any solutions ?
Select the "All" option -> ctrl + F -> jt byte
I am not aware that there is a rule which says that you can not make more than one post in the same topic.
Posts have to be constructive (there's a rule against zero value posts). How constructive do you think it is, saying 10 times the same thing in the same thread? And that problem only increases, when paid signatures come in. My lifestyle would not be affected at all. I think I would be happy if gambling doesn't exist I think most people will not be changed by gambling I would not be other than now I would be the same as today In my case I never changed because of gambling I never really changed because of gambling
The user is saying the same in all their posts, only the wordings and some of the formulations change.
There are more
No doubt, there are. I have seen a few accounts from Good Signature campaigns like Bit-X doing the same. I choose the one from Highest paying signature campaign.
Also a campaign "managed" by a bot and not closely monitored by the (human) manager. I have seen Members posting multiple times in the same topic without quoting any significant replies.Maybe there is a possibility they forget they have already posted in the thread but posting over and over simply proves they're sig spamming.
The icon changes once you posted in a thread, also having the thread permanently in your "show new repiles" list should be a strong indication.
|
|
|
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- This is aardvark15, today is 4/1/16 and this is a test to see if I can sign a message correctly -----BEGIN SIGNATURE----- 166PyGKE6uuwWUVMejLk8h4UcMmQVy7SKW H9PSZEaAovSvrIGQkuCgcILs8811YoZlXp1ChrU6RSYMUSJycxorb6iX5QKuiK1ukpfnst8sPfmr4bmiQ+Fzgl8= -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Was this done correctly? Yes, that's correct. I was abled to verify the message with core 0.12.0 Here's an online verification: ( Brainwallet permalink)
|
|
|
How do you get the code format of the message? Does that have to be done manually?
Yes, you'll be entering the parts of your signed message (message, address and signature) into the blank by hand: -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- <insert message here> -----BEGIN SIGNATURE----- <insert address here> <insert signature here> -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
|
|
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- This is rizzlarolla from Bitcointalk Today is 1/4/2016 -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNITURE----- 183fXv7Dh2LEbg5YrD1yka4DNye9NsBUKq Hwm52XaIdawk63boOmSCelmpV3G42U9vMDszJ4nKh3fLLMkhfcvvSrkrqNaQaAoMcVmVMldomw5cKJ3X+CQELI4= -----END BITCOIN SIGNITURE-----
Is this ok? Yes, it is. After two tries, I was abled to verify it using electrum 2.6.2 and core 0.12.0 ( Brainwallet verification permalink).
|
|
|
Haha lol, you suggest him to join sign campaign when he reach higher rank at least Member, but in other side you are Junior Member and joining a signature campaign now.
To be fair, the user wasn't abled to join any signature campaign as a newbie, they got in as soon as they could.
|
|
|
You cant increase the block time lol
Increasing the block time would be contraproductive, when trying to get confirmations fast.
|
|
|
very close to Legendary Member
Since legendary happens at a random number, you probably mean "very close to the lowest possible legendary activity" default trust
Are you saying this account is on DT2? I highly doubt (even more for that price). Or did you rather want to say "neutral trust" or "no trust"/"no negative trust"?
|
|
|
Not a bad one, not a bad one indeed.
|
|
|
I know that confirmation is directly linked to mining and exploring blocks. But what will happen where there won't be anything to mine in the future. There won't be blocks right? How bitcoin network will be confirming transactions then?
There never will be "nothing to mine". Once the block reward reaches 0 sat (as pointed out by dollarneed, in over 100 years, the miners will solely rely on the transaction fees being paid as rewards.
|
|
|
What is your opinion on deleting such a post?
I didn't read the post in its context and I haven't had a look at the thread, hence I'm not taking out the to comment on whether the one deleting it did a good job or not. Is there anything to protect the user from being moderated unfairly?
A well-chosen set of moderators should do that job. What if this moderator is a member, or has an alt account which is a member of the highest paying signature campaign which is for a site that is run unethically?
You're questioning the integrity of the moderators (or at least of one moderator, which you do not know specifically, hence we're back to all), which I currently don't see a reason to. At least not for the sake of 1 deleted post.
Edit: This is in no way meant to come off as an attack on Lupin, but after re-reading it think it may come off that way.
Believe me when I say to you, I've had worse.
|
|
|
I stand beside my contributions to this community, and invite you to publically review the quality of my post via my posting history. You have offended me with this. There are a bunch of shill and spam bastards on this forum; I am plainly not one of them.
That's why you double-posted, right?
For those of you who dont know already imma dickhead
Quoted for future reference ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
According to modlog, that's one less problem. "Autoban user: N/A in topic #0 by member #559533"
Left negative. Not sure why that domain hasn't been banned / filtered yet.
that's not going to happen except you're reporting this domain to google, and atleast it'll be tagged as harm website even only in chrome but it'd help even a bit There's a forum-intern linkfilter, that replaces some links with "[suspicious link removed]". xetsr was most likely talking about that option, rather than a tag by google/other filters.
|
|
|
Please reveal yourself, or if there's a way for me to figure out who it is, someone please let me know.
I don't think the moderator will and there isn't supposed to be a way to find out which moderator deleted your post. The reason is simple, it's a way to protect the staff from becoming a target for their moderational work.
|
|
|
Only when initiated by the one accepting your payment, hence if they don't offer you anything like this, there's little hope for you to being abled to convince them.
|
|
|
lol look at the above 5 posts ,typical YoBit Sig Spamming hierarchy ,even before the campaign is opened ,shit posting is initiated by the YoBit Army.
I can say the same for you posting for the sake do your sig campaign No, you can't. Patatas won't be paid for any post made in another signature campaign thread. How I know? I'm the one paying him. I was just waiting on one of you guys trying to argue that way.
|
|
|
So if i pay higher fee only 1st confirmation will go faster, other 2 will be same?
You can't get a confirmation without a block. The first confirmation is the block your transaction is included. The chances of your transaction being included in a block are tied to some factors, the most important one is the fee you pay. After that, every block on top of the block your transaction was included will act as one more confirmation for said transaction. The fee will have an influence on whether or not your transaction is included in the first block, but it won't make the second and third blocks be discovered any faster, those factors are out of your power.
|
|
|
So is there any way to make it go faster? :c
You can pay a higher fee, which makes your transaction more likely to be included in the next upcoming block. After that, there's nothing you can do about the confirmations, as it's going to get one with each new block, and the time between blocks (while being on average 10 minutes) varies.
|
|
|
I went to the link you suggested and it does mention that the evil points can fade over time. So theoretically, could I just wait it out and the evil points will fade away?
I think the sum is now fixed, since it's tied to the evil points at the moment the account was created. However, I'm not sure about that, so if anyone knows better (possibly with a source), feel free to correct me.
|
|
|
|