This needs to Stop..

[Joel_Jantsen]

Apologies for my another post in Meta within a span of a week.As discussed before,I have seen Members posting multiple times in the same topic without quoting any significant replies.Maybe there is a possibility they forget they have already posted in the thread but posting over and over simply proves they're sig spamming.YoBit members are exceptional,I have seen a few accounts from Good Signature campaigns like Bit-X doing the same.Here it is :

From the Topic : If gambling never existed, would you be who you are today?

My lifestyle would not be affected at all. I am not much a big spender when it comes to gambling.
Getting entertained is my goal, which means I would have to find another hobby.

I think I would be happy if gambling doesn't exist, because I won't just lose my money for this type of games.
But still is fun and is just nice to gamble if you afford at least.

I think if gambling doesn't exist there is another ways to earn money.

I think most people will not be changed by gambling, although the people that where addicted would be different due to point that they where addicted.
I would be by exact the same person now than if it never existed because I never gambled for the money only for a enjoying part plus I only gambled for something near the 20 times in my whole life.
The people that had a addiction are very different in my opinion because some people lost everything because of it their home/family/friends so they would be a another person after the addiction.

I would not be other than now due the point I never gambled much online or offline in the real world, I think its wasted time because most people will lose more than make profit.
It can be of course enjoyable but the fact that so many people are addicted says already enough that I not even tried to
gamble with the uᴉoɔʇᴉq.
Loving to watch poker games on the television but never tried it myself because I think will get addicted because I''m fast addicted to something.

I would be the same as today, because I never gambled much and it never changed my life, I never won a large amount.
Also did not lose any money because of it maybe a it but that had no influence in my career and life I have now.

I even think gambling is very wrong due to the fact a lot of people get in problems because of it and lose everything.

I think the most people that are addicted or has been addicted has a life that has been changed because of their addiction they have or had.
In my case I never changed because of gambling due to the point I'm not a gambler at all, I almost never gamble online or offline.
Some times its attracting to do but I can control myself to not do it because its just a waste of time if you ask me.

I never really changed because of gambling but some people are due to the fact they where or are addicted to gambling.
For some people it was their life, they lost everything because of it their home,family/friends everything you can come up with.
I never gambled much and I never changed because of it, because gambling is not very interesting in my opinion.

Apart from this,he has 3 quoted posts.There should be a way to filter out such posters.There are more ,I choose the one from Highest paying signature campaign.  It becomes quite difficult to keep a count of such posts since one has go through  20 pages to find the repetitive posters .Any solutions ? I think there should be a life span of such gambling non service related threads.Maybe like a week or something and after they get locked.

[Gaugh]

I am not aware that there is a rule which says that you can not make more than one post in the same topic. And is there is a rule which says you must quote a reply before making a post? I don't quite get it. Thanks.

[Lutpin]

There should be a way to filter out such posters. It becomes quite difficult to keep a count of such posts since one has go through  20 pages to find the repetitive posters .Any solutions ?

Select the "All" option -> ctrl + F -> jt byte

I am not aware that there is a rule which says that you can not make more than one post in the same topic.

Posts have to be constructive (there's a rule against zero value posts).
How constructive do you think it is, saying 10 times the same thing in the same thread?
And that problem only increases, when paid signatures come in.

My lifestyle would not be affected at all.

I think I would be happy if gambling doesn't exist

I think most people will not be changed by gambling

I would not be other than now

I would be the same as today

In my case I never changed because of gambling

I never really changed because of gambling

The user is saying the same in all their posts, only the wordings and some of the formulations change.

There are more

No doubt, there are.

I have seen a few accounts from Good Signature campaigns like Bit-X doing the same.

I choose the one from Highest paying signature campaign.

Also a campaign "managed" by a bot and not closely monitored by the (human) manager.

I have seen Members posting multiple times in the same topic without quoting any significant replies.Maybe there is a possibility they forget they have already posted in the thread but posting over and over simply proves they're sig spamming.

The icon changes once you posted in a thread, also having the thread permanently in your "show new repiles" list should be a strong indication.

[--Encrypted--]

There should be a way to filter out such posters.There are more ,I choose the one from Highest paying signature campaign.  It becomes quite difficult to keep a count of such posts since one has go through  20 pages to find the repetitive posters .Any solutions ?

Select the "All" option -> ctrl + F -> jt byte.

that or use the print page in case of threads with more than 25 pages.
actually the print page is much more lighter because it's on plain text.

[NLNico]

I feel this topic is relevant enough to cross-link this suggestion:

- Bitcointalk is it possible to separate businesses and gambling discussion?

This isn't a real solution to OP (only solution seems actively banning those spammers.) But a separate "Gambling Discussion" forum would seriously improve the quality of the main Gambling forum (that is overcrowded with sig-spammers).


edit: nice find btw, hope the guy gets banned.

[Lutpin]

I feel this topic is relevant enough to cross-link this suggestion:
- Bitcointalk is it possible to separate businesses and gambling discussion?
This isn't a real solution to OP (only solution seems actively banning those spammers.) But a separate "Gambling Discussion" forum would seriously improve the quality of the main Gambling forum (that is overcrowded with sig-spammers).

Although I agree, that it wouldn't be a solution to sig spamming (and the problem pointed out in OP),
let me say, that despite not posting in the topic yet, I support that suggestion.

[btvGainer]

I feel this topic is relevant enough to cross-link this suggestion:
- Bitcointalk is it possible to separate businesses and gambling discussion?
This isn't a real solution to OP (only solution seems actively banning those spammers.) But a separate "Gambling Discussion" forum would seriously improve the quality of the main Gambling forum (that is overcrowded with sig-spammers).

Although I agree, that it wouldn't be a solution to sig spamming (and the problem pointed out in OP),
let me say, that despite not posting in the topic yet, I support that suggestion.

Sometimes we forget if we had already posted in topic and at other times we have something new to add or maybe our views have changed since we last posted.

[Lutpin]

Sometimes we forget if we had already posted in topic

It's easy to check. The icon changes.

and at other times we have something new to add

The user quoted in OP clearly didn't have anything new to add at all.

or maybe our views have changed since we last posted.

Telling 8 times that your life wouldn't change if gambling didn't exist because you don't gamble in the first place is hardly a change of mind, is it?

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Welcome to bitcointalk where you first get a---ly f---ed in the a--, and then you find out the rule.  Oh wait, first you get f---ed and then you find out there's no rule.  And it's not an April fool's joke.

Before this post gets nuked, what I mean is that if you don't want someone posting multiple times in one thread, make a rule about it.  The example posted at least shows some thought put into what was written.  If people don't like sig campaigns, they should be banned.  Or if no rule about that is to be forthcoming, shut the fuck up and mind your own posting.

[suchmoon]

I feel this topic is relevant enough to cross-link this suggestion:
- Bitcointalk is it possible to separate businesses and gambling discussion?
This isn't a real solution to OP (only solution seems actively banning those spammers.) But a separate "Gambling Discussion" forum would seriously improve the quality of the main Gambling forum (that is overcrowded with sig-spammers).

Although I agree, that it wouldn't be a solution to sig spamming (and the problem pointed out in OP),
let me say, that despite not posting in the topic yet, I support that suggestion.

Sometimes we forget if we had already posted in topic and at other times we have something new to add or maybe our views have changed since we last posted.

Oh come on. You and your SpectroCoin sigmates are some of the worst offenders. Your confusing investment advice:

I dont think everyone should know the technical part of uᴉoɔʇᴉq to adopt it.Also uᴉoɔʇᴉq is not an investment instrument like stocks.uᴉoɔʇᴉq is a mode of transferring money

Yes you are right.One can lose one's money if he invested a lot in just one thing.IMO one should only put as much money in uᴉoɔʇᴉq as he can afford to lose.
I am also buying uᴉoɔʇᴉq but is small fractions because I want to be cautious

How safe is it?

Completely safe.uᴉoɔʇᴉq has a bright future and to buy 1 btc today for a long term would be the wisest decision in my opinion.uᴉoɔʇᴉq is $400+ at current rate and if anyone buy it even at this price,he would make huge profit in long term

If uᴉoɔʇᴉq price goes down to $100,uᴉoɔʇᴉq would be dead and its price keep falling so that wouldn't be the right time to buy buy time to sell.Lets wish uᴉoɔʇᴉq never reduce to that level

You colleague with even less comprehensible prose:

Yes , not only they initially pay to the investors, just to build reputation, but when the big investments start flowing in, they stopped paying also they give you return for small investments and eat up the investment of people who invest in bigger amounts.

Woman just need money or i guess everyone need money. So if you give good offer for services in uᴉoɔʇᴉq, then surely
women should be impressed and they will involve more and more in moondollars and its trade also.

[botany]

Welcome to bitcointalk where you first get a---ly f---ed in the a--, and then you find out the rule.  Oh wait, first you get f---ed and then you find out there's no rule.  And it's not an April fool's joke.

Before this post gets nuked, what I mean is that if you don't want someone posting multiple times in one thread, make a rule about it.  The example posted at least shows some thought put into what was written.  If people don't like sig campaigns, they should be banned.  Or if no rule about that is to be forthcoming, shut the fuck up and mind your own posting.

You don't need an explicit rule, when common sense should suffice.
In any case, the no low value post should capture this.

[Joel_Jantsen]

Thanks for all the input .

@btvgainer - So you're telling me your views about a subject change every other day ?


What makes it worse is the fact,this people have no clue what they're talking about .They have no interest in bitcoins ,its just for the signature campaign they're here .

The one way we can fix it by having good Campaign managers.From the previous posts one can easily make out if the poster is actually contributing to the topics or signature spamming.However even the Campaign Managers showing lack of interest in that.(Very Few are serious about it like Lutpin etc)

[Monnt]

I feel this topic is relevant enough to cross-link this suggestion:
- Bitcointalk is it possible to separate businesses and gambling discussion?
This isn't a real solution to OP (only solution seems actively banning those spammers.) But a separate "Gambling Discussion" forum would seriously improve the quality of the main Gambling forum (that is overcrowded with sig-spammers).

Although I agree, that it wouldn't be a solution to sig spamming (and the problem pointed out in OP),
let me say, that despite not posting in the topic yet, I support that suggestion.

Sometimes we forget if we had already posted in topic and at other times we have something new to add or maybe our views have changed since we last posted.

You really don't think that he could forget that he posted in that same thread 7 times before, do you? Ridiculous.

Thanks for all the input .

@btvgainer - So you're telling me your views about a subject change every other day ?


What makes it worse is the fact,this people have no clue what they're talking about .They have no interest in bitcoins ,its just for the signature campaign they're here .

The one way we can fix it by having good Campaign managers.From the previous posts one can easily make out if the poster is actually contributing to the topics or signature spamming.However even the Campaign Managers showing lack of interest in that.(Very Few are serious about it like Lutpin etc)

Very true. But how many good members here have the time and dedication to count hundreds of posts?