Please only bump your thread once a day. There's no need to double post as well. Just edit them into one. Thanks.

That's how much it cost to rent the yacht out in the Bahamas for last year's Staff Christmas party.

Please only bump your thread once every 24 hours and remove your previous bump when you make a new one. Thanks.

Please remove your previous bump when you make a new one. Thanks.

Well, the first option would be to create a thread in Other languages/locations (if there isn't one there already?): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=11.0

If it gets popular then maybe then would be the time to discuss creating a specific sub board for it but if it's not lively then there's probably not much need for it.

Yeah, this thread is pretty ironic. Reminded me that I gave him a warning a week ago to stop spam advertising but doesn't look like he learned.

 


 


 


It blows my mind how people like this guy and Ulbricht have the intelligence and vision to set up such sites, yet screw up so royally in the process. Why the hell would this guy register the domain and use a Coinbase account in his own name? These guys should be so paranoid to even go take a shit never mind do all their operations from their own home without making sure they've got every base secured with numerous layers of security nevermind not even using a proxy to log into sites connected to you and using your real name in the process. Bafflles me.


Did you even read the article? The bitcoins he was donated to went to an account registered in his own name. The bitcoin link was just another piece of evidence to connect him to the crime. One more nail in the coffin.


Coinbase is an exchange, one that has to comply with KYC and AML laws and will give up your details when requested to so. Just goes to show bitcoin is only as anonymous as you make it.

You might think it's unfair but notice how nobody else did in the other thread you created? Every single person so far has said your posts are poor one-liners. I'd just swallow your pride and learn from your mistakes, but there is no magic definition of what spam is, but when your entire posting history is one line of half-assed rubbish it's pretty clear what's going on and others as well as Staff are likely going to see you as a spammer. A good poster would have posts ranging from one word to one sentence to a paragraph and more. Why don't you have any posts other than a sentence? I'll tell you why: Your posts aren't one word because you wont get paid for those ones, so you make sure to write a 75+ character sentence to get paid by Bitmixer and to appear constructive, and why would you ever write more than a sentence or a paragraph when you're not going to get paid for the extra effort? You find a thread, write a hollow sentence with the bare amount of effort and that's it. If you want examples of what a good, constructive poster is compare your posts to Shorena or Quickseller's to name a couple. See the difference?

Also, another trait of lazy spammers is creating new threads to ask the same question that has been asked numerous times. You didn't even take the time to search or bother reading because there's already two threads on this very topic on the first page of Meta alone:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1560808.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1559444.0


The ban is your warning.

The ban is your warning. You're lucky it was only a week. You just real off a constant stream of hollow one liners as quickly as possible and move on to the next thread because that's the minimum amount of effort you need to put in to get paid. Others posting one line of shit doesn't make it ok for you to do so either and many others are banned for such behaviour, though most don't have the audacity to publicly complain about being banned for shitposting and just learn from their mistakes.


Ironic, isn't it? I've lost count of how many times I've only seen spammers write more than a sentence or two when they're complaning and arguing about their bans.

Well I don't get to say whether a feature will be ultimately added or not but I think the negatives overshadow any benefits you may think it has. I guess others may disagree but I don't see any real need for this.

You can't think of any way this can be abused by scammers or lead to confusion? People will use it to make it appear like they aren't active any more. If people wan't to hide their activity then just don't log in. Otherwise this info is useful for numerous reasons.

I don't see why this should be implemented. It will just be abused by scammers and lead to confusion.

They will only be created if there's demmand for one. Create a thread in Meta if you would like to further discuss your proposal.

I was referring to BetAdvisor and Erkallys. If they can't seem to comprehend what one bump a day means and when they've been told not to do something several times and they continue to do it and then play victim that's pretty idiotic behaviour in my opinion.

Because these "tipsters" are not immune from the one bump a day rule. You're lucky I'm even allowing your threads to be here in the first place but I'll probably just start trashing them if you're going to be idiots and can't play by the rules.

No, but I've thought about kicking people off for repeatedly asking the same question but it'll likely just cause more hassle and whinging. They won't read it if it's put in the op any way.

Accounts are kicked off daily; I just don't post big lists in here anymore because it's time-consuming and Yobit added a message saying they were removed so it's unnecessary. I've told Yobit to make additional changes like users have to be accepted into the campaign before they can start posting and that would be a good start but I rarely get a response from them.

Seems it was banned automaticaly as a precaution due to possibly being compromised due to you trying to reset the secret question. See below on how to restore it:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=497545.0

Forcing users to pay the little amount a Full Member would cost isn't going to deter many. In fact, it'll likely have the opposite effect. People will probably be more inclined to trust a FM than a newb.

It's not currently possible. Besides, your posts are poor. All pretty much two liners.