I'm down, but climbing the ranks. Placing 50% in a stable coin is starting to pay off (again).

I assumed it:
I don't know people who learn Bengali for fun, hence the assumption.

If someone would wrongly accuse me, I'd want to clear my name. Your response makes me think you can't do that.

Judging by the lack of information, I wouldn't be surprised if OP had someone create a watch-only wallet for him.

EU wouldn't be EU if there wouldn't be a gazillion exceptions, leaving it up to the member states.

For many years, I mean decades, there was a strong opposition against nuclear energy. That only changed since they started caring (a lot) about CO₂-emissions.

I doubt nuclear power is cheaper than coal. If "the greens" get their way, we'd be back in the dark ages: no gas, no coal, no nuclear, no wind turbines (because they pollute the horizon and kill birds), and probably no electric cars and solar panels too because they're polluting during production.

It's historically grown this way: France is a nuclear power and has a lot of experience with it. The Netherlands had large natural gas reserves, and Germany has large coal (lignite) deposits that can "easily" be surface mined.

The one thing that's always been lacking in Europe, is giving priority to energy security. "We" became too comfortable for too long, and if shit hits the fan, we can't be on our own.

"Could have"? Why not both? We have no way of checking anyway!

I'd say it's worse than a hot wallet: I use several different hot wallets (for small amounts), and I'd never use Ledger's "pay us to give us your seed phrase" scheme.

I feel like it hasn't been emphasized enough how bad it is to want to restrict other people's free speech and make them bend to your standards. Anyone doing that doesn't realize he can't have free speech without others having it too! If you start limiting free speech, everyone loses!
I strongly hate all the wining about free speech! People who complain about this really don't understand how important it is, and how completely subjective "offensive words" are!
Watch Rowan Atkinson on free speech. He explains it much better than I can.

---

---

This topic reminded me of Poetry, by TMAN. Enjoy!

Yes, governments are deciding far too much for my liking. But no, there's no need to take it out of context. There's no federal government deciding this, it comes from national governments. In the Netherlands shops are nice and cool, in Germany they're very warm.

Germany shuts down nuclear power plants, the Netherlands wants to build new ones. None of this is based on logic.

Nice twist. Maybe I'm just very helpful^*, and you're abusing it for your own agenda. Who knows.

^* It's not the first time you post in the wrong topic.

It will be difficult to verify any data, especially if Paypal is involved.

I've been wondering for a long time: what are the odds so many users who all write on the same local board (Bangladesh) are more or less similar in the way they post? Basically, it makes me feel anyone who earns Merit and uses that board could be an alt account. But since all I had was my gut feeling, I had nothing to go on and didn't really want to Ignore an entire country.

If I check John Abraham's Merit history, I see many WO-posts, Pizza bake-off contest posts and a few rounds of post reviews from The Sceptical Chymist. It could be a real normal user, but it could also be a very familiar pattern of posting for Merits.

I'm not very fond of asking users for private data, but if John Abraham isn't lying, this would be a good start to prove it.

What are the odds, considering there are 169 million people in your country?

Is this why you deleted your only post on the local board?

Is this the first case (okay, technically only an accusation) of linking users through notes?
The lesson is of course: address reuse is terrible for privacy.

Let's not do that. Merit isn't a school project, and it isn't supposed to be a form of payment for doing as I say. Merit is meant for posts that are worth reading, and if someone can do that on his own, Merit will find him.

Given this year's hype, I expect your suggestion to lead to many shitposts created by chatbots.

Why wouldn't it be possible? It would be very inconvenient if you have to wait for your change to confirm before you can send another transaction, and it would be impossible to use CPFP if you couldn't spend unconfirmed inputs.
If I remember correctly, I think you can do this up to 24 25 transactions deep. After that, the default mempool will reject your transaction.

I've deleted your post. This isn't the place to show that you can copy from Twitter.

Prediction 2: $29,543.70 (copied from last month but made $2000 closer to the current price)
bech32 address: bc1qhc24xdzg58m066jc69v7cyg4kp33tlnsed49hk

This is very common for leaked private keys: one or multiple attackers have bots competing against each other to be the fastest to steal any incoming funds.

This is how Bitcoin works: anyone with the private key can move funds. The only thing that's left now is find out how the private key was leaked, and make sure it never happens again in the future. Considering the funds involved are quite significant, they should only have been send to a cold wallet. Hot wallets are inherently risky.

I agree, that part is really unnecessary.

I guess more people finally had enough, the drop from DT Strength (1) to DT Strength (-8) is rare for someone who didn't scam anyone.

If that's the case: why use the name of an existing ponzi?

From what I've seen, anything with "DAO" or "global community" in it is only created to make the creator rich.

It's just another beggar:
I've reported the thread. Update: It's deleted.

A full node starts by downloading ~500 GB. After that, it's ~2 GB per week.

Unconfirmed transactions (AKA the mempool) are small in size compared to the existing blockchain.

Correct. Mining on a computer isn't feasible.