+5100 cores, fuck yeah ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
timetravel-algo seems to be broken got "booo" (low difficulty share) with palgin`s mod ccminer only ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif)
|
|
|
You're extremely wrong. Do a bit of research before you throw out an opinion you have no clue about.
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.imageup.ru%2Fimg33%2Fthumb%2Fpe13002763056.jpg&t=663&c=lHb2XkDEbRA4Fg) myth is busted ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Do a bit of research did you do that before? ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
Also, you get the best efficiency when using 85-92% of the available watts. A rig that draws 900W on a 1300w supply would be @ 70% and a waste of electricity and extra heat for the conversion. U`re wrong: 50-75% of power ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
Look on BTX (Bitcore) there is nothing to look on - 12-hrs mining to pool and still no coins huge scam i think ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
I was quite busy as I was traveling abroad to visit my family. I finally got a few day window to work on the miner. Let's see what I can do with my father's old computer...
v0.1.3-pre6b - any news?
|
|
|
Aways use dual thread if you want to get ...
unstable system with a lot of MemHWs - yes I know it ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) 0,00 HW-rate of claymore vs 100,000 HW-rate of zawawa - which one should I prefer?
|
|
|
Gigabyte RX480 (Hynix) custom timing-mode @1100/1970 claymore 9.0 - 29.05mh/s -asm 1 -dcri 6zawawa pre6 - 27.60mh/s -Ix 4620 -g 1 +more power/+more system impact& freezes/there are memory HW (due to hwinfo output) there is still a huge room for optimizations ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
[P2P3]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds Any solution?
|
|
|
The miner can easily be built using Mingw32 to create a Windows exe. You`re wrong - github-repo doesn`t contain any makefile ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
I'd be happy to give a few pointers if you ask a bit more politely.
Edit: OK, not that impolite compared to some, so here goes:
This is a rct tx, so the amounts are not visible. I assume you looked at the inputs in your wallet to determine they were 5 and 5 monero, respectively. Monero picks N inputs, totally at least what you want to send plus the fee, and will return the extra as change. Change will be locked for 10 blocks. So if you wanted to send 7, and used 5+5 inputs, you'll get 2.9xxx as change (3, minus the tx fee).
If you sent to Polo and they did not receive it, maybe you did not put your payment id in. In that case, Polo still has the coins, but they don't know who to credit them to, since you didn't tell them by way of that payment id.
payment id has been filled - I don`t know how but gui-wallet doesnt accept it when paying
|
|
|
Hi to all How to move from 0.8.0.5-alpha to latest release correctly? old-wallet doesn`t receive any working connections to esp-net, so I cannot synchronize latest processed block is 1149958
You are on ESP versions 1 chain ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) ESP2 is on block 618190. any way to move coins from ESP1 to ESP2? CryptoCoderzI really need your assistance, help me
|
|
|
Hi to all How to move from 0.8.0.5-alpha to latest release correctly? old-wallet doesn`t receive any working connections to esp-net, so I cannot synchronize latest processed block is 1149958
|
|
|
Question. Here is the strap table for Hynix H5GC4H24AJR (according to amdmeminfo) in stock r9 390: Why does it looks so different from Hynix H5GC4H24AJR in rx 480/470?
It`s because of memory banks has several revisions - 0.2ns/0.25ns/0.28ns/0.3ns/etc. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
If someone has the strap tables handy from a rx480, I'll be happy to re-run the numbers.
Here`re you go 480/8 Samsung K4G80325FB1376-1500 555000000000000022CC1C00AD595B41C0570E14B00B450A0068C70003011420FA8900A00300000 0170E2B34A42A3116 1501-1625 555000000000000022CC1C00CE616C47D0570F15B48C250B006AE7000B031420FA8900A00300000 0190F2F39B22D3517 1626-1750 777000000000000022CC1C00106A6D4DD0571016B90D060C006AE70014051420FA8900A00300000 01B11333DC0303A17 1751-2000 777000000000000022CC1C0031F67E57F05711183FCFB60D006C070124081420FA8900A00300000 01E123A46DB354019
480/4 Hynix H5GC4H24AJR1426-1500 777000000000000022339D00CE516A3D9055111230CB4409004AE600740114206A8900A00200312 0150F292F94273116 1501-1625 999000000000000022559D0010DE7B4480551312B78C450A004C0601750414206A8900A00200312 018112D34A42A3816 1626-1750 999000000000000022559D0031627C489055131339CDD50A004C06017D0514206A8900A00200312 019123037AD2C3A17 1751-2000 BBB000000000000022889D0073EE8D53805515133ECF560C004E26017E0514206A8900A00200312 01C143840C5303F17
480/4 Micron!!! EDW4032BABG Yes, It`s MICRON (not ELPIDA), just read the datasheet ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) 1426-1500 777000000000000022AA1C00315A6B3CA0550F15B68C1506006AE4007C041420CA8980A9020004C 01712262B612B3715 1501-1625 777000000000000022AA1C0073627C41B0551016BA0D9606006C060104061420EA8940AA030004C 01914292E692E3B16 1626-1750 777000000000000022AA1C00B56A7D46C0551017BE8E1607006C07010C081420FA8900AB030004C 01B162C3171313F17 1751-2000 999000000000000022AA1C0018F77E4FD055121946501708006C07011D0C1420FA8980AC030004C 01E19323781364718
480/4 Samsung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
|
|
|
the same issue with nanopool - I think it`s random scam after successful pool-starting lets just take it again: nanopool was never honest - neither for eth nor for pascal
|
|
|
I had a similar problem. I got an email saying one of my rigs is down, I went to check on the rig and it was hashing away.
I think the software is buggy and loses connection and doesn't reconnect but keeps mining wasting away electricity.
I switched between several locations: eu/us/asia - result is the same - accepted but not calculated to my work
|
|
|
this is how nanopool fucks me up with earnings ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.imageup.ru%2Fimg122%2Fthumb%2Fnanopool12668141.jpg&t=663&c=C2fN9fRgR2co1Q) From what i know if you find a block in a pool this still can't be your, you just get a higher share, the rest will be divided among the other miners Hello from Earth to Moon! ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Man, I don`t search for a block, I search for my valid shares(according to miner cmd-stats), which are stolen by nanopool (according to empty pool-stats) as you see, I mined yesterday - and pool was correct...yesterday... ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) I wrote a letter to psc.nanopool@gmail.com - still no answer from scammers ![Angry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/angry.gif)
|
|
|
this is how nanopool fucks me up with earnings ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.imageup.ru%2Fimg122%2Fthumb%2Fnanopool12668141.jpg&t=663&c=C2fN9fRgR2co1Q)
|
|
|
|