Hello, what does it mean - MN  | SN ? , MN - masternode? SN - ?

Thanks Astrali for his hard work!

Glad to see some progress here.

and


You're confused about your own words.

Hello. Is it asic resistant or not?

KYC in crypto airdrop...

So,> 50 days thread old, 2 pages, zero info about airdrop, very poor roadmap, no code on github, "token info" button does not work and a huge team is presented on the site=> the question is what they did during this time?

Really friendly and pleasant community (especially in Slack). Do not give up in the development of the project.

And from which number you will consider the coin decentralized? From 2000? 5000?
It is the feeling that you understand the meaning of the word "decentralized currency" in another way. In a crypto community, this is any currency that does not have a beneficiary fully managing the project. Not decentralized of the most popular coins is the Ripple, for example, which is owned by the same company and it is fully controlled.
In all other cases, the currency is decentralized, even if it is distributed among 10 strangers.
The number of coins is limited, so it is impossible to constantly distribute them with the arrival of new participants.
Why the project needs "castes" no one, except you, does not understand, judging from the responses.
What these "castes" will give both the project and the participants themselves? It is also not clear to me. I want to add that the "castes" idea is contrary to the meaning of the crypto community.

I'm pretty sure - by March 31, there may be less than 1,000 real interested users after all the checks, so no additional levels are needed... or you are not talking about holders?

No, It can`t be mined.

I suspect this applies to my post?
You probably have never dealt with real investments if you write such simple things. A real investment is what is required after the project starts and claims to top 100 or now even top 20. Understanding the founder's biography and the main competitive advantages - the basic things that are always asked. As well as technical features of the project.
A strong community of the project means a real interest in his fate, and therefore a detailed study. Usually, those who simply participate wherever there is nothing to lose, getting their share quickly cash out and does not affect the development of the project as a whole. Remember that your time is more expensive than money and you lose it.
A detailed study takes hours and days. I have already spent many hours studying the project, the biography of its author and related things, because I was interested, as I said.
He asked about the skills of those who wants to be a part of the team. So it is ok if he was asked also. Don't see the negativity.

Manual work of this type is always long and requires a lot of effort, no doubt. It was about what the effect of these efforts will be for a short time (then the richer will buy coins from the poorer). And that`s ok, it is our reality, no problem.
Now everything looks honest and selfless. I hope the founder have enough moral and material capacity to bring this project to success. We all have duty and sometimes full time work in an unpaid project may not last long enough.
Despite decentralization, most of the projects we have been associated with their founders as the basis (even if over time they move away).
I hope that the founder's activity on the forum will not decrease and he will not disappear for a couple of years, as it was from August 19, 2015 to August 31, 2017.
if nothing bad happens, I will also try to participate in the discussion of the project, while my thoughts and advice will seem useful to the community.

Thanks for your answers, this is how I understood the project, so I asked these questions to clarify the technological aspects. I realized that it is about the vision, positioning, etc. not about complex mathematical formulas. And competing with others after starting the network will be even harder in order to get to the top 100 as you said (because it will be mainly in positioning and marketing).
I do not deny that there are a lot of talents on the forum, including developers. But why they should choose you from a professional point of view is not specified. Usually developers choose either a more skilled tech leader or a successful businessman / investor.
"I've always been a leader and investor" - if you publish your successes in this direction, I think the team will come together faster.

Ok, so, as I promised 10 days ago, and given an adequate response to differing opinions:
What about your background? (especially technical expertise) - as I see your university degree is not about IT. Self-taught? Where can I see the results and experience?
That`s a normal question because you hired people earlier in your previous projects and asked for proof of qualification, but I could not find where the evidence of your qualification is provided.
At least - github profile, moreover: successful projects.
There are two common ways to demonstrate founder's qualification:
1. Demonstration of strong technical skills, especially in mathematics (and this way can be anonymous, given everyone's favorite example: Satoshi.) But your scientific solutions should be at a brilliant level.
2. Full disclosure of your personality and achievements, and example again: Colin LeMahieu which combines the first paragraph with great background (such as LLVM Software Tools Engineer at Qualcomm).
As I can see you are not anonymous for personal reasons because of your photo, phone number, linkedin profile and so on.
But I can`t see neither your code nor your professional background.
I looked at your posts: most about ICO, financial perspectives, skams and like that. I did not find branches with serious technical analysis. And even in this thread the main issue is the distribution of coins, but not the solution of the technical problem for which the project is created (Yes, I've read that you will publish information about it later). In addition to the problem of unfair distribution through existing airdrops, I did not see the main milestones. Moreover, we all understand that with the listing on the exchanges: there will be no equality of holders, so it is a large effort to create the illusion of equality (or equal start) for a short time.
No matter who we list from successful platform founders: utopianfuture and clemahieu or even V. Buterin and Satoshi - they are all technical geniuses that it was clear in their work and vector work (you can see first posts on bitcointalk from NEM and Raiblocks founders - all were about maths and IT solutions). Are you strong enough in these directions?
Frankly speaking, I was surprised by the amount of profanity and in-depth analysis of fraudulent schemes by various strange projects on bitcointalk in your posts.

Also weird moment with the search for Nevra`s developer. Usually people know at least a few developers when working in this field, especially considering that Java is not such a rare programming language. In addition, you have already had past projects, but there is not a single suitable contact. You decide to look for an unfamiliar person but you do not inform in an open form that you can do by yourself.
Almost all serious projects write new code and do not use leftovers from the fork in the end. Can you do it as well?
In addition, a large team of qualified specialists is already working on NEM, for example. Taking into account the financial success of the project for this day.
You plan to improve the existing code during the year by finding a couple of developers on the forum (with a basic level of qualification, according to the requirements that I saw.)
On my view success is possible only if you are extremely gifted specialist.

There are several development trends for this year:
1. Anonymity (yes even more than now), but you said that the existing level in NEM is ok and nothing needs to be changed, so in this direction specialized currencies such as XSPES will be ahead.
2. Solving the problem with transactions and fees (preferably zero fees) and it is not important DAG or not.
3. Unification and harmonization of the various blockchains.
All these questions require infinitely talented developers.

P.S. It was all written because I saw in you something different from the crowd. If initially it seemed the obvious failure, I would not waste time on this post, and would write just well done, I'm in, all the success and so a couple of sentences to get to the list.
Please give truthful answers as possible. I think this will help many people who have questions about the part I mentioned. Thanks in advance.

Hello. No news from dev for 2 months?

It is not easy to do the project alone for 2 years, deserves respect.

Hello. No, TokenGo ICO is gonna be over in April (59 days left). You can see the counter on their official website.

My opinion:
Design, site, thread styling - ok, considering the fact there are just a few people in team - good.
Idea and slogan - very nice, of course, people have been trying to make these three words a reality for years.
Distribution and promotion without selling coins (ICO and so on) - we can XRB`s (NANO) success case. The main question - will the project and it`s founder be able to hold out long enough? (on its own resources and desire). Only time will answer this question.
The ideologist of the project - founer`s account: 4+ years and at first sight tk808 looks like keen man who obviously at this stage does it not for the sake of quick and easy money. History shows us that such people have a better chance of success in this industry. About anonymity - raiblocks`s founder info as well as the whole team was absent on the website almost 3 years, so there are no barriers.
I will watch on this thread closely in the coming weeks (in response to suggestions, changes, etc). And then decide about making my own advice.
P.S. Technical Blockchain Goals - one of the most important components, differences from NEM?
P.P.S. If we take an example of the most successful projects of recent months: Cardano (with the opposite distribution system), NANO - both have a detailed technical description with many formulas that many users may not understand. But the detailed technical description testifies to users and investors about detailed research of the project.

This is my last post in this thread.

You can continue to develop until old age, build cities, spaceships, eternal engines and all that is imaginative.
This coin is out of market because from November when the market is up - Bria is down, when the market is down - Bria is still down. The price has fallen 5 times in 3 months, considering the decreased reward for the block - more x10 falling.
For instance XRB x300 in 3 months at the time of overall growth.

When and if you finish this development - the market will change completely and you will not be needed again.

And just a few broken promises from you:









Bye.