 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 [3]
|
Estimate for keccak -- is it per GH or MH?
* values in mBTC/MH/day, per PH for sha256 & GH for scrypt, blake, decred, x11, quark, qubit, kS for equihash
Does "GH" part here need any updating?
ill break it up for you: * values in mBTC/MH/day, per PH for sha256 & GH for scrypt, blake, decred, x11, quark, qubit kS for equihash except that Keccak is GH per day see this tweet https://twitter.com/_zpool_/status/942398598557388800Yup, that's what I'm talking about... Thanks! |
|
|
|
Estimate for keccak -- is it per GH or MH?
* values in mBTC/MH/day, per PH for sha256 & GH for scrypt, blake, decred, x11, quark, qubit, kS for equihash
Does "GH" part here need any updating?
ill break it up for you: * values in mBTC/MH/day, per PH for sha256 & GH for scrypt, blake, decred, x11, quark, qubit kS for equihash I know how to break it up. I just want to be sure that e.g. x17 is per MH, and not something like "x17 is also per GH, because it's a variant of x11, bla, bla..." Also I'd like to be sure about keccak. |
|
|
|
|
Estimate for keccak -- is it per GH or MH?
* values in mBTC/MH/day, per PH for sha256 & GH for scrypt, blake, decred, x11, quark, qubit, kS for equihash
Does "GH" part here need any updating?
|
|
|
|
*** ccminer 2.2.4 for nVidia GPUs by tpruvot@github *** Self-compiled "cuda-9" branch on Linux with GTX 1060 3Gb. I tried "keccak" (Maxcoin) on zpool.ca and noticed that the miner reports something like 400Mh/s, while on pool dashboard it's only about 40Mh/s (i.e. 10 times less). What I'm doing wrong? |
|
|
|
GTX 1060 3Gb on Linux. nsgminer -o stratum+tcp://somepool -u USER -p X -g 1 -w 128 -I 16 The miner (compiled without CPU mining) always put 100% load on one CPU core. Playing around "-w" and "-I" doesn't help. Is 100% load on CPU core normal? Output: [2017-12-16 00:23:53] Started nsgminer 0.9.3
[00:23:53] OpenCL platform 0 vendor: NVIDIA Corporation
[00:23:53] OpenCL platform 0 name: NVIDIA CUDA
[00:23:53] OpenCL platform 0 version: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 9.1.98
[00:23:53] Platform 0 devices: 1
[00:23:53] 0 GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
[00:23:53] Probing for an alive pool
[00:23:53] Testing pool stratum+tcp://neoscrypt.mine.zpool.ca:4233
[00:23:53] HTTP request failed: Protocol "stratum+tcp" not supported or disabled in libcurl
[00:23:56] Stratum authorisation success for pool 0
[00:23:56] Pool 0 stratum+tcp://neoscrypt.mine.zpool.ca:4233 active
[00:23:56] Init GPU thread 0 GPU 0 virtual GPU 0
[00:23:56] OpenCL platform vendor: NVIDIA Corporation
[00:23:56] OpenCL platform name: NVIDIA CUDA
[00:23:56] OpenCL platform version: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 9.1.98
[00:23:56] List of devices:
[00:23:56] 0 GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
[00:23:56] Selected 0: GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
[00:23:56] Activated NVIDIA management for GPU 0
[00:23:56] Selecting the default NeoScrypt kernel
[00:23:56] Initialising kernel neoscrypt.cl without bitalign, 1 vectors and worksize 128
[00:23:56] initCl() finished. Found GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
[00:23:56] 1 GPU mining threads started
[00:23:56] The network difficulty has been set to 1767612
[00:23:56] New block 0x00000000003674C3 diff 1.77M
|
|
|
|
on cards with at least 1Gb memory, and Compute Capability 2 and higher.Linux version seems not working on Quadro 600 (1Gb DDR3, cc 2.1): +-------------------------------------------------+
| EWBF's Zcash CUDA miner. 0.3.4b |
+-------------------------------------------------+
INFO: Current pool: equihash.mine.zpool.ca:2142
INFO: Selected pools: 1
INFO: Solver: Auto.
INFO: Devices: User defined.
INFO: Temperature limit: 90
INFO: Api: Disabled
---------------------------------------------------
INFO: Target: 00007fff80000000...
INFO: Detected new work: b33
CUDA: Device: 0 GeForce GTX 1060 3GB Not selected.
CUDA: Device: 1 Quadro 600, 964 MB i:64
CUDA: Device: 1 solver benchmark error work with default
CUDA: Device: 1 Thread exited with code: 46
INFO: Detected new work: b35
Temp: GPU1: 51C
GPU1: 0 Sol/s
Total speed: 0 Sol/s
^C
The miner is not on card 1 (Quadro) as it should, but on card 0: Fri Dec 15 17:18:43 2017
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| NVIDIA-SMI 387.34 Driver Version: 387.34 |
|-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| GPU Name Persistence-M| Bus-Id Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
| Fan Temp Perf Pwr:Usage/Cap| Memory-Usage | GPU-Util Compute M. |
|===============================+======================+======================|
| 0 GeForce GTX 106... Off | 00000000:01:00.0 On | N/A |
| 0% 45C P8 12W / 90W | 913MiB / 3013MiB | 0% Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| 1 Quadro 600 Off | 00000000:07:00.0 Off | N/A |
| 30% 50C P12 N/A / N/A | 10MiB / 964MiB | 0% Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Processes: GPU Memory |
| GPU PID Type Process name Usage |
|=============================================================================|
| 0 2998 G /usr/bin/X 87MiB |
| 0 3813 G ...-token=4084E484918257981689B9D1A8792435 248MiB |
| 0 17306 C ./miner 565MiB |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
|
|
|
|
Linux 1060 3Gb driver 387.34 -- 100% CPU load on one core, hashrate is like others...
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Does anyone know where to download a Linux CUDA miner (binary, not source) for an old Quadro 600 card (~ GTX 4xx, CUDA compute capability 2.1) ?
(yes, in theory I could compile a one from sources, but in practice it's waaaay too much mess with compilers and toolchains)
|
|
|
|
|
How it is possible to set difficulty for equihash?
zm miner reports something like "server set difficulty to: 0002151c77d7e8f840000000..."
Should it be "--pass d=0002151c77d7e8f840000000..." ??
|
|
|
|
Hi, I am struggling with setting manual start difficulty (on lyra2rev2 algo-switch), I try the following: ccminer -a lyra2v2 -o stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:17018 -u <username.worker> -p d=16 -i 20
But I still get diff 256: Same issue here. Setting difficulty either doesn't work as expected, or we need a more detailed explanation on how to set it up. |
|
|
|
Hi
I'm miningpoolhub op.
Hi, Could you add to auto-switches groups yet another Nvidia group -- with equihash, lyra2re2 and lyra2z together? As far as I can see, for auto algo-switches at the moment it's possible to have either equhash+lyra2re2 or lyra2re2+lyra2z. Looks like you added NVIDIA - Cryptonight, Ethash, Equihash, Groestl, Lyra2RE2, Lyra2z, Myriad-Groestl, NeoScrypt, SkeinThanks! |
|
|
|
Hi
I'm miningpoolhub op.
Hi, Could you add to auto-switches groups yet another Nvidia group -- with equihash, lyra2re2 and lyra2z together? As far as I can see, for auto algo-switches at the moment it's possible to have either equhash+lyra2re2 or lyra2re2+lyra2z. |
|
|
|
|
Is zm miner suitable for miningpoolhub.com's equihash algo?
|
|
|
|
|
Can MPH people give some more detailed info about auto-exchange process?
E.g. does altcoin to altcoin exchange goes through bitcoin (i.e. ALT1->BTC->ALT2)? At what exchanges? How exchange rates are calculated?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Does Miningpoolhub.com have any public API to query current most profitable algo?
|
|
|
|
The latest version on Lin: $ ./zcash-zm.sh
./zm: /usr/lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by ./zm)
./zm: /usr/lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by ./zm)
Could not resolve hostname eu1.zcash-flypool.org
There is no dns entry for 'eu1.zcash-flypool.org' Try 'eu1-zcash.flypool.org' I'm dumb... It works now. Compared to EWFB, your Linux version outputs about 10 sols more on my single 1060 3Gb. Thanks! |
|
|
|
The latest version on Lin: $ ./zcash-zm.sh
./zm: /usr/lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by ./zm)
./zm: /usr/lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by ./zm)
Could not resolve hostname eu1.zcash-flypool.org
|
|
|
|
|
