 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 »
|
|
I saw to a lot Shitcoins, without good team that did not do and half of what PAC did.
And that attracted a many people, and had a good price, because they had good marketing and advertising.
If PAC have ben a good marketing pack would not fall below 1 cent.
moreover, such coins still appear
good marketing just admit it
marketing pac - bad marketing
marketing pack - Brad Marsh
look at how the GRIN expanded, and their coin has no elementary things. Need tutorial on how to send coins
they had excellent PR
I have often seen their ads
PAC can not afford a marketer to full time?
In the beginning, you need a lot of effort to put a rocket into orbit, then inertia will do everything itself
at first you work for reputation and after reputation works for you.
but only haters are actively working on PAC’s reputation.
you can make the best product in the world, but no one will buy it from you if nobodies don’t know about it
|
|
|
|
|
I support pac team but. Much for listing, promotion and marketing do volunteers. P2PB2B Exchange We have thanks to Drew and Bruce Porter Jr.
Kucoin paid attention to the pac in twitter thanks to the post of investor.
Pac has a very weak marketing and exchange with volume of 400 million, and defense against attack 51%. It means nothing if very few people know about the pac. Brad is lazy and not motivated, he is like the Queen of England, just a face. He personifies bad marketing. He visits the London crypto show 2 times a year? Volunteers did more than him. Brad gets paid in the pac?
Because it seems that he is forced to work on a pac for free. If you remove the volunteers, pac will lose a lot. If you remove the Brad what lose pac? Prove to me that I'm wrong if I'm wrong. PAC needs a strong marketer and crisismanager man and this is not Brad Marsh.
|
|
|
|
|
Stabycroc, as far as I know, the old pac is still on the novaexchange. You can continue to use it. New $pac for the year made more than the old for all its existence.
When mr. Corlles continued to support the old pac and persuaded people not to make an exchange. Why didn't you stay on the old coin?
Old Paccoin had a vulnerability that allowed some people to receive 50% or more of POS instead of 13%. And it happened when announced the redemption of old coins.
It looks like you are one of those who got a lot of coins using vulnerability, and it hurts you that the new PAC team did not allow themselves to cheat.
Come back to the old pac if you believe in it.
You want to show yourself as a fighter for justice, in fact, you will follow the easy money.
I do not have information about the exchange on which you worked. And if she's really cheating, then you worked there. And you knew exactly what she was doing. You will not tell the real reason dismissal.
You say you have done a lot for $PAC, Write what you did.
Or did you want to say that you made a lot of new coins of the old pac, and now you have nowhere to sell them?
Leave the $PAC if you think this is a scam.
|
|
|
|
|
Stabycroc, it is clear why you no work in the exchange now. They need smart people. What are you all trying to prove? $PAC scam ?
Well, go past. I do not believe that you are trying to help someone. You just do not like the $PAC and you want to spoil.
You are pathetic.
The redemption was fair. The team did everything they promised.
|
|
|
|
|
To the $PAC Team, keep up the good work, quality will prove itself the real yardstick of success. You guys will be best.
|
|
|
|
|
Many members of the $PAC team have long been public, and have a good reputation. You need to know more about $PAC from official sources, and then ask. I am sure that you'll get provide the evidence that you require. The team works hard, and in the near future we will see the results of their work.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello SaniaNet, this is your hobby, what answer will satisfy you?
|
|
|
|
SaniaNET is JUDAS
You seem to have read my posts poorly, and you can’t quite distinguish humor. I do not need anyone's coins. The division of coins meant that the distribution of coins from the DAO for stupid things is a waste of investors money, it is like just giving out coins to investors - the effect will be the same. Your messages about your have possession of proof that the $PAC is a fraudulent project, and that you Destroy this coin with the information you have. Is this also humor? As an investor, I am very interested in the availability of the information you provide and its veracity. You need to publish proof or disprove your words. A man is responsible for his actions and words. |
|
|
|
What does the $PAC team have to do with this trading? XPAC/DOGE 644208017 XPAC => 644208.017 $PAC XPAC/MOON 22472439 XPAC => 22472.439 $PAC Total for sale 666 680 000 XPAC which is equal to 666 680 $PAC very little. Can you explain? |
|
|
|
The project team. I ask you to change the moderator of the Russian branch of Discord. He introduced the totalitarian regime and removes all inconvenient messages from the discussion. Most likely they will block me there so that I will not ask unnecessary questions about project.
I ask only one question that interests me there: what goals does the team follow and what tasks does the team solve when developing its own unique blockchain. All these messages are deleted and he threatens to block me for such questions. I believe that in an open project there should not be hidden information on the objectives of the project, at least in all blockchain projects that respect themselves.
SaniaNET is a hater of $PACcoin, he is one of those people who can do nothing but criticize.
SaniaNET has many times offered a proposal to divide and assign between the Russian community the funds allocated to Sergey (RU) for advertising.
I read messages on Russian DISCORD more than 5 months. SaniaNET behaves like a child, he does not want to look at official sources, he requires insider information, and he constantly complains.
SaniaNET just last week found out that the official site has information about the $PAC team.
He wanted to use the $PAC community to vote for some of his coins, of which he is a representative.
From the reports on the work done, it is clear that Sergey (RU)helps development and popularizationof the $PAK, and SaniaNET only wants to harm.
Reading his messages in the Discord, I do not understand why they have not blocked him yet, he is an enemy of the $PAC. He only heitit and criticizes.
SaniaNET also repeatedly mentioned that he would sell his entire $PAC as soon as the price grew a little, after which he promised to publish here information (evidence of fraud $PAC) that would kill the $PAC Coin. According to him, he will do it as soon as he sells all of his $PAC.
SaniaNET is JUDAS |
|
|
|
|
stupidly to blame for being incompetent, $PAC is an excellent coin and it will inevitably fall into the TOP 10
|
|
|
|
|
I believe in a new $PAC. And he again grows up after bitcoin. it is easy to pla :-*y in a growing market, and call yourself an experienced trader. but the depreciation of the course shows their real faces. If you've lost your investment, blame yourself and only. then this is not for you. who followed the posts of developers, he knows that they are protecting their investors, they are informed in time. $PAC is a valuable project and I do not regret that I have invested my funds because I am confident in the growth of the course in the near future
|
|
|
|
I've been following the coin for a long time. The developers have done a great job. And I really believe that she will fall into the top 10 coins.  |
|
|
|
Thanks for the kind words, and I don't have the final say, the exchange has the final say. I don't think the patch solves anything, unless you want to mine paccoins without getting orphans.
See what these people don't understand is the point of proof of stake. (Read Peercoins whitepaper on this.) The idea of proof of stake makes so much sense.
If you own a lot of paccoin, you have a stake in it. If you don't have paccoin not so much.
Another point is Proof of Work PoW networks are subject to 51% attacks. Proof of stake (PoS) aren't. Their idea is to give miners a way to override proof of stake users. So if you implement their code, you can forget ever getting any proof of stake because the miners will overrule you, and you get nothing but orphans. They're turning paccoin on its head.
Another benefit of the current design is there is less incentive to mine paccoin, and more incentive to buy it on the exchanges. This drives up the value.
Their idea is pump and dump.
My idea is buy and HODL.
I'll leave it to the rest of you to decide which is best.
Bill, I on personal experience will help people understand what is best.
When POS coins come, confirmed by the network have more than 600 confirmations at one point become orphans, and this has been going on for a long time.
My opinion is that the code is specially registered so that coins are received by someone one and not by investors. This coin will not give you the opportunity to earn interest on POS because its code is broken and earns only those under whom the code is written.
I'm not talking about investing in a few million, I have more than 11 milliards and even I get only orphans.
And if it were not for a new team, I would not spend a cent on this coin. Proceeding from all told I will translate all in new $ PAC and I will fairly receive the percentages from master-nodes.
And your coin depreciates as it is broken and the price will depend only on the repurchase policy for the new $ PAC, I remind you that this is:
Mar 1st 2018 - Public coin redemption begins 1000: 1 PAC -> $ PAC
June 1st 2018 - 1st redemption window closes 2000: 1 ratio
Sept 1st 2018 - 2nd redemption window closes 4000: 1 ratio
Dec 1st 2018 - 3rd redemption window closes 8000: 1 ratio
photo with screenshots attached   |
|
|
|
I want to ask one question concerning the swap. What ratio will this swap be? Because we have 3.4trillion coin and if swapped 1/100 that will give us 34billion. Now the current price is around 0.00005$ with market cap of about 170million. My question now is "after the swap, assuming it is swapped 1/100 giving us around 34billion, will the price be up to 0.005$/PAC to give us the 170million which is our current market cap?
Lets say I own 10 million PAC and the price of PAC is 1 dollar, this means I own 10 million dollars worth of PAC. After the fork the total supply of PACcoin will be reduced by 1000x this means I only have 10,000 new PACcoins.
THE PRICE OF A COIN = Total market cap / the amount of PACcoins in supply. Therefore assuming that the market cap remains the same at the time of the fork then the price of each PACcoin will increase by 1000x to 1,000 dollars to match the new supply/demand.
I will own the same slice of the pie and even though I have a reduced amount of coins. They hold the same USD value. My 10,000 new PACcoins are still worth 10 million dollars. Did this help? |
|
|
|
I got almost all the information for the swap now. I just have one question: Which is the new wallet? Is mirror #1 the new wallet? Obviously mirror #3 says older version.
The only valid wallet for Paccoin is from the official website at paccoinofficial.com. I don't recommend using third party versions. |
|
|
|
|
