 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 »
|
|
Transactions the time and time and time.
A block is discovered, but all transactions lay in the block.
Transactions made on a block is at some times 2000 around.
Problem Nr.1 that you might know the realness of.
When the network is slow. Around 1 hour for next discovered block.
Then transactions is still around 2000.
Nr.2
Now to put you on another test. A block is merely an solution to an unique code.
The code is changed each second to fall in to be a block.
The difficulty of the network changes the block discovery need and it's code.
But a block can also be found when nobody mines, just one person.
The same code at that point already will come in existence.
If the network difficulty changes the block must also be another solution to.
But who many times does network difficulty change? Well on each person starting mining.
Or is the junk they send to your computer really junk? Look at nr. 5.
Nr. 3
Bitcoin and most of these network coins has something in common with the block 5035.
Those who actually are owning the Bitcoin network, can induce new coins.
So called simulated block finding probability.
You can mere just put solve force a block for yourself in the first versions of Bitcoin QT.
Nr. 4
Anyone can create a coin with computed measurements. As told about block 5035. That has same dna structure that many coins have. But most are failing in the work to make a coin be their coin. Most of them who are notorious cheaters has already billions in their banks.
Transactions on these first blocks are made up on transactions to achieve construction of it. But most coins have precomputed transactions, in a specific way.
The same programmed transactions that Bitcoin has. All is based under specific structure of transactions. The list is long especially comparing Bitcoin with different coins.
Nr. 5
What can bitcoin be used to as specific computer technology? To create hacked .iso files or programs with same SHA256 as original "this might not be possible, but quite possible if there already is implemented a system below HEX, where unicode of all HEX codes is it's own code". To use if for government to solve difficult task and problems, that must be solved in major network. For instance CERN. Even with different codes to implement real life measurement for advanced intelligence. Artificial Intelligence has been improved these years. Also the need to compute graphic solutions. There is already a system called Background intelligent Transfer also in Windows Service system, don't be confused. You can only measure a network card in the degrees it actually are transmitting, than rather be able to see all hidden transfers. When a system is running under HEX a code of FF that is capable of having enough space as Bill Gates told was for him enough with 640kb ram.
Nr. 6 extra:
You can sometimes solve private keys or even private phrase.
Ultimately solving all possible private phrases, based on the little of all available words that are available in wallet, just in random solution is easier than finding a block, and rather easier task for having luck to find a wallet with 1000 Bitcoins or more.
|
|
|
|
|
Why not double your own BTC? End of story...
|
|
|
|
This is not a coin that is then centralized, it is run only by blockchain.info. They can at any time block any transactions, or freeze accounts. They also have certain ability to move any coin in any account. Try blockchain.info interactive charts now, they are unavailable...
Can someone please explain this...
I would rather explain the ramblings of Timothy Leary. I rambled with no comfort. But well at any certainty there are some few unknown things about Bitcoin by my interpret. I bow before ya all... |
|
|
|
As you are aware about the future 0.15.1 or 0.15.0 or 0.14.2+ version of bitcoin will have a plot fork, where as we can congratulate the managers of Scamcoin BTC, and their maintainers. You are not aware about the blockchain.info site which is the main server for bitcoin. It announces it's price 2020$ while this site: https://www.worldcoinindex.com/coin/bitcoinannounces 2050$. The price will then fall, and still then fall. To lower than 2020 by worldcoinindex.com in just about 1 hour. This is the main reason why blockchain.info keeps the price at it's own based level, as it manages and regulates the price on how they will on their own. This is not a coin that is then centralized, it is run only by blockchain.info. They can at any time block any transactions, or freeze accounts. They also have certain ability to move any coin in any account. Try blockchain.info interactive charts now, they are unavailable... If you perhaps got a pentium I 60hz an old computer from the past. It would perhaps solve each block for you in ultra speed with it's precision. You might wonder why all computers stopped up on 4ghz. And new cpu's were never made furthermore? It wasn't just by the main reason bitcoin took the main focus away from progression of cpu speed to miner equipment. The lastly thing was that Intel probably had to start again from making new cpu. It's because pentium 60hz was the last processor that did not have any calculation fault. Where as pentium 66hz and higher had. The rest had a software recalculation replacement. For those who like to make a miner software. The simple calculations to find a block height, is probably taken from the actual found block and addition of the hash lenght difference between the last and the before, with addition of the median of last blocks difference to the hash height calculation. Therefore just then validating the hash. And often just starting hash validation of hash that is the median for blocks before. The last block for Bitcoin is probably FFFF. But when half of the blocks are found, calculations to reverse technique is possible to the whole blockchain. So bitcoin will die one day, or just in 2 weeks, as proposed will split up in two coins.... The half of the blocks will be calculated by 1 miner. So what you do around 1. August? Well from my point of view I recommend you to buy so much Bitcoin you ever could for around 100-200$ and then put it into a coinexchange of cryptocurrency and buy so much cryptocoins that you ever wanted, they will be super cheap at some point, but will then raise in price. Try your luck on some as perhaps ETH or Litecoin. But remember that you don't want to sit on Bitcoins, since most exchanges will then end up seizing coins from you or the rest of the bunch of people at a percentage, when coins suddenly start to disappear from many wallets. Do remember to send me some ETH for the tip, if you followed me up on this. Here I have some different sources I found on the internet. The fork plan of Bitcoin is good described: source: http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~stolfi/realwork/EXPORT/projects/bitcoin/posts/2017-03-22-bu-fork-plan.txt# Last edited on 2017-03-24 18:42:33 by stolfilocal
# NOT POSTED YET
See below is a very rough draft of the script for the upcoming bit-coin fork, as proposed by the Field Op managers at today's meeting. All times are UTC of the "flag day" (date still to be defined). Comments and suggestions are welcome.
03:00:00 Bit-coin Unhinged (BU) will be activated by the miners we bribed. The coin will then split into BTCC (with 1 MB blocks, 40% of the hashpower) and BTCU (with anyone-guess-the-size blocks, 60%).
03.08:47 Chore-supporting nodes will refuse to propagate the BTCU blockchain. About 8'000 clients who will have upgraded to BU-compliant wallets but will end up connected to Chore nodes only, will be thoroughly confused. As a result, they will lose a few hundred coins in total, as payments will be reissued or sent to receivers who will have opted for BTCC.
03:09:22 The reverse will happen to about 13'000 clients who will still be running Chore-compliant wallets but will be connected to BU nodes only; with the same end result.
03:10:25 Another 25'000 clients will be connected to both BU and BC miners. Their transactions will be confirmed randomly in the BTCU chain only, in the BTCC chain only, or in both chains, depending on how the coins are tainted. Since each of those clients will see only one chain, there will be more confusion and thus more coin loss.
04:12:14 Right after the split, the bitcoin price (assumed to be $1100, just for concreteness) will split neatly between the coins: BTCU will get $400 [Note 0], BTCC will get $200, Ethereum (Classic and Punk) will get $200, and the other $300 will be split chiefly between Dash, Monero, Dogecoin, and PayCoin.
06:30:00 Coinhaze will confiscate all the Unhinged coins that correspond to their clients' BTC holdings (estimated to be about 100 k BTCU). Coinfaze will send those coins to Buttfinex, and exchange them for 50 k BTCC.
07:12:30 Our agents inside Buttfinex will perform another hack, like they did last time. Buttfinex will then shave another 20% off all client accounts -- including Coinhaze's, which will be reduced from 50 k BTCC to 40 k BTCC.
08:55:00 The BTCC chain, with its capacity (block rate) reduced to 40% of the pre-fork level, will develop a huge backlog. The BTCC price will drop to $100. Rush to dump by ancient holders will make the backlog worse.
09:10:00 The 3rd floor manipulators will lift the BTCU price to $500.
10:30:00 Coinfaze clients will threaten to sue the company to get their BTCU out, forcing Coinhaze to buy back the 100 k coins that they just sold. The 40 k BTCC they got from the sale will only buy 8 k BTCU at the current prices, so they will have to spend another 46 million USD or 18.4 k BTCC for that. They will opt for the latter, and announce a 18.4% haircut on all customer BTCC accounts.
11.05:30 A bug in the BU code, triggered by a block that was exactly 1'234'567 bytes long, will cause the BU blockchain to fork repeatedly after every 5 blocks. A patch to fix the bug will be distributed to miners at 12:03:45, and they will again converge on a single chain twelve minutes later. The multiple reorgs will cause another estimated 13'221 clients to lose approximately 2450.00231557 BTCC and 1337.00000001 BTCU.
12:07:05 Seeing that BTCU is not dead yet, Blokestream will put in action the "fire the miners" plan. Namely, they create a new altcoin (that they call "Bitcoin", but everybody else must be carefult to call "GregCoin" or BTCG) whose proof-of-work will be based on an elliptic curve fingerprint, combined with a very hard chess problem and a 10000 x 10000 crossword puzzle.
12:07:23 Spammers are already scheduled to start issuing several MB of garbage transactions to the BTCG chain at this time, even before the first block is mined. (Someone please remember to have a dozen pizzas delivered to the basement around lunch time.)
12:10:45 Several experts will warn Blokestream that the "fire the miners" move is totally unnecessary, since BTCU, as a hard-forked chain, will be invisible to clients who are still running the Blokestream software -- and there is no sign that the majority will bother to sabotage the BTCC chain. Blokestream will ignore the warnings, saying that the plan must be implemented because it is so clever, and besides the experts are CIA lackeys and their mothers have been seen standing at street corners at night. The experts will then leave the scene, stomping and slamming the door.
12:15:00 BitFurry's CEO, incensed by the "fire the miners" move,
13:54:22 Blokestream will announce that 17 users (mostly their employees) have already downloaded the BTCG version of the Core client, and the first block of the new branch has been mined. It will barely make a dent in the spam backlog. Thus BTCG will start out with a fully operational "fee market", with all its known benesses.
15:18:09 A teenager in North Corea (the country, not the subreddit) will realize that the 21.inc chip on the PiTato, while useless to mine BTCC or BTCU, can be exploited to solve large crossword puzzles incredibly fast. Instead of posting his discovery, he will use his smuggled PiTaro to mine BTCG, and will have 98.5% of the total hashpower active for that chain. After mining 250 blocks, he will have enough BTCG to buy a second PiTato from eBay, or a Mickey Mouse hat. He will choose the hat.
The meeting is still going on, but new minutes may take a while since His Scaliness the Sub-Vice Lizard showed up for a snack and we will have to call in another Secretary.
http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~stolfi/realwork/EXPORT/projects/bitcoin/posts/2016-01-14-bitcoin-is-dead.txt# NOT POSTED
Bitcoin was designed to be a payment system run by miners for their own use. Non-mining users were supposed to pay the miners for their service, at whatever price that the miners found adequate.
Several things did not happen at expected, unfortunately. First, the price rose too much too fast. As a consequence, mining became dominated by industrial enterprises that were interested in the money of the block rewards, rather than using the service themselves. Then mining became centralized in half a dozen companies, instead of the thousands of independent miners-users that Satoshi had assumed.
Objectively, given the last point, one should consider bitcoin dead already. It was created only because Satoshi believed that the world needed a decentralized payment system that did not depend on trusted intermediaries -- which is no longer the case. Bitcoin is no longer a decentralized system, and there is no reason to expect that it will become one again.
As a centralized payment system, bitcoin is absurdly inefficient and inconvenient. It survives only because (1) it got many users who do not give a damn about centralization or efficiency, and use it because it bypasses government controls (so they think); and (2) because it is a great instrument for day trading; and (3) because there are still buyers willing to pay $430 for each coin that the miners mine, hoping to sell it someday for a higher price.
Another consequence of the absurd price level is that miners only really care about (3), because they could never get more than a few percent of their revenue from transaction fees. However, mines must still serve (1), in order to sustain the investors' illusion that bitcoin will one day be very valuable because it will be a competitor to VISA and PayPal. And some of the largest mining companies are also among the largest bitcoin exchanges, so they profit from (2) too.
Yet, none of these three "uses" of bitcoin justify its existence. The world did not need another channel for illegal payments, another penny stock for day traders to gamble with, or another pyramid investment schema. Satoshi would not have bothered to create bitcoin, if he expected it to have only those uses. Also, he would not have bothered to design and buils another *centralized* payment system to compete with VISA.
Apart from mining concetration, there were several other unforeseen and unwelcome developments.
For instance, many bitcoin "believers", old and new, were unable to compete with the industrial miners, but still wished to retain the control that they had as miners. Thus was born the concept of "full but non-mining" (FNM) relay node: a volunteer that intends to sit between the non-mining users and the miners, relaying transactions one way and mined blocks the other way, while checking both for validity against his copy of the blockchain and auxiliary databases.
While FNM nodes may seem a good thing at first sight, they are in fact an Bitcoin was designed to be a payment system run by miners for their own use. Non-mining users were supposed to pay the miners for their service, at whatever price that the miners found adequate.
Several things did not happen at expected, unfortunately. First, the price rose too much too fast. As a consequence, mining became dominated by industrial enterprises that were interested in the money of the block rewards, rather than using the service themselves. Then mining became centralized in half a dozen companies, instead of the thousands of independent miners-users that Satoshi had assumed.
Objectively, given the last point, one should consider bitcoin dead already. It was created only because Satoshi believed that the world needed a decentralized payment system that did not depend on trusted intermediaries -- which is no longer the case. Bitcoin is no longer a decentralized system, and there is no reason to expect that it will become one again.
As a centralized payment system, bitcoin is absurdly inefficient and inconvenient. It survives only because (1) it got many users who do not give a damn about centralization or efficiency, and use it because it bypasses government controls (so they think); and (2) because it is a great instrument for day trading; and (3) because there are still buyers willing to pay $430 for each coin that the miners mine, hoping to sell it someday for a higher price.
Another consequence of the absurd price level is that miners only really care about (3), because they could never get more than a few percent of their revenue from transaction fees. However, mines must still serve (1), in order to sustain the investors' illusion that bitcoin will one day be very valuable because it will be a competitor to VISA and PayPal. And some of the largest mining companies are also among the largest bitcoin exchanges, so they profit from (2) too.
Yet, none of these three "uses" of bitcoin justify its existence. The world did not need another channel for illegal payments, another penny stock for day traders to gamble with, or another pyramid investment schema. Satoshi would not have bothered to create bitcoin, if he expected it to have only those uses. Also, he would not have bothered to design and buils another *centralized* payment system to compete with VISA.
Apart from mining concetration, there were several other unforeseen and unwelcome developments.
For instance, many bitcoin "believers", old and new, were unable to compete with the industrial miners, but still wished to retain the control that they had as miners. Thus was born the concept of "full but non-mining" (FNM) relay node: a volunteer that intends to sit between the non-mining users and the miners, relaying transactions one way and mined blocks the other way, while checking both for validity against his copy of the blockchain and auxiliary databases.
While FNM nodes may seem a good thing at first sight, they are in fact an
|
|
|
|
|
I'm still waiting for a clean qt.exe file. I hate installers!
Please make a zip with qt.exe file in it.
My antiviruses go hot at the moment.
|
|
|
|
There are different solutions to run a .bat file Some find it hard using different solutions. I found out that my miners run at certain point on a var diff pool to where it really stops up collecting shares. Restarting the batch seemed to work on another notable way, where also the increase of blocks I could find for a certain pool was at 80 blocks for 2 days. Running 120kh/s when others at that time did run 32000kh/s I collected around 33% of the blocks at the times with that solution when others also mined. https://www.mining-dutch.nl/pools/ufocoin.php?page=statistics&action=blockfinder <-- Here you see 80 blocks collected. 100.000 coins. But my earnings were just 2000 coins, when others just maximized the collection with hash rate. Bad solution for those who are as effective as me for POW pool. So anyway here is something to learn: autostartmining.bat: @echo off
:loop
start ccminer65.exe --algo=neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://mining-dutch.nl:3451 -u x-p x -i 0
:start ccminer65.exe --algo=nist5 -o stratum+tcp://mining-dutch.nl:3497 -u x-p x -i 0
start cpuminer-sse42.exe -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://mining-dutch.nl:3451 -u x -p x
:start cpuminer-sse42.exe -a nist5 -o stratum+tcp://mining-dutch.nl:3497 -u x -p x
timeout /t 280 >null
taskkill /f /im cpuminer-sse42.exe >nul
taskkill /f /im ccminer65.exe >nul
goto loop
When using the mark : before a miner you can turn it off by that meaning. And change just : parameters in your bat to turn off or start The :loop states the starting point for the loop The timout is set in second of 280. You can increase it to your own level. taskkill is of course very needy and should be the same name as the exe you are running or you will end with multiple miners at a very long day. You can put more start features as well as taskkill features. Also you can configure it for mining other coins or other miners after you put timeout like this: @echo off
:loop
start ccminer65.exe --algo=neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://mining-dutch.nl:3451 -u x-p x -i 0
timeout /t 3600 >null
taskkill /f /im ccminer65.exe >nul
start EthDcrMiner64.exe === "The Eth Miner miner"
timeout /t 3600 >null
taskkill /f /im EthDcrMiner64.exe >nul
goto loop
Why my miner is called ccminer65.exe is because if you have Nvidia card you need to compile different ones with Visual Studio using Cudo Toolkit v. 6.5 to maximize hash speed. I'm unsure to what max level Compute is for 6.5, But version 8.0 is lower hash rate for most old cards on ccminer. Also using Cuda Toolkit 6.5 probably also gives you better chances of greater rates of diff. Thus ending up with block finding. This is probably also because of less loss of data and bytes of spill load in compiling CudaMiner with higher Toolkit. Very important in Visual Studio to set maximum level of optimize speed and having big code. Back in the days I mined with the first SHA256 miner with 333kh/s and in 2013 when difficulty was super high enough for most pools to quit. I already earned by 3 days mining 0.019BTC on a diff of 65554. The POW was kind of good result for me. |
|
|
|
|
I recommend you to update to latest windows 10 version. With all updates installed. To the newest Windows 10.
Also recommend you to have latest Nvidia driver for that windows version.
If you are trying to mine Ethereum. Know that you have to have more than 2gb or 3gb ram on your card.
Also I recommend using Linux as a solution if you seem to have continuing problems and to compile your own miners if that is possible for Ethash.
There might be possible to install Nvidia drivers on Linux as well, using WINE to run windows programs, as of that miner it might be possible to some extent.
But have you considered error finding in each of the Nvidia cards?
It might happen that just one card creates problems across all. That card might also be with wrong manifacture. Since just one transistor error might cause failure. And that often happens to thousand serials.
|
|
|
|
|
Block 5035
The block in which there is based very much information based on the bias I created making many cryptocurrencies quite spectacular with the fraud idea and many of them left the markets just in few weeks after my block 5035 disovery on many of these currencies.
Since I don't believe that Bitcoin is a legal and underlying real currency that should emerge into the knowing rightfulness.
The first thing I would like to pertrain on is the fee you gotta pay each time you transfer Bitcoins.
Each time a person owns a blockchain he can confirm that in his own blockchain is what he wants or not. Depending on how many people actually have downloaded the full blockchain and really can confirm it by them self.
But the thing is a fee of 0.00112 BTC on a transfer of 0.15 BTC is a small fee. But it will anyway be confirmed by 10000 miners in a short time But these miners just work on solving just frames of the block.
AND NOT ALSO SOLVING THE TRANSFER REGISTER and earning the millions of fees by them self, do they? confirmations comes straight to system by millions.
Ok. Here is another clue, you got block 5035. In mostly all cryptocurrencies there is the SAME identity to it all. Like if someone programmed the transfer protocol of chains and addresses derivated especially around block 5035.
Just take in consider these blocks while you check mostly all cryptocurrencies from block 5035's transfers:
728, 1056, 1296, 1454, 1945. 2277, 3645, 4540, 4926 and 5807
If these blocks occur as identity to block 5035 on mostly most cryptocurrencies. I would say we have all time fraud business in the world. And someone is having a load of fun on a rich island.
"I already checked it, now it's your turn, have fun!"
|
|
|
|
|
I have 2 codes which I sell for 0.06BTC each
They are only valid for europe.
Buyer pays first, PM me and leave a message buyed so people know it's sold out, or just message I reserve.
|
|
|
|
This type of thing is always mysterious and possibly exciting but I have no idea what he's talking about. Ask someone else to type it up for you if you're not sure about English. How can you prove there is fraud just from a block?
Look at all other coins especially at Blocks 5035 and the magnitude of coexsisting reasons around especially Block 5035, if you clearly see the typologic thing around the blocks you probably get the grip. As in that fact actuallly 90% of all coins have great earnings from Block 5035 as 5034 and 5036 is typically blocks for wallets with less magnitude. Can u please put forward your concern in 2-3 sentences in a better english ? I have encountered so many too in your 3 paragraphs that I have got confused.
Stop spamming this thread with nonsense, you lame constructive way of too create confusion related to that most users are non native English is non-sense way of too just clearify that this thread means something And sgbett just clearly isn't satisfied with my thread. Haters of constructive thread don't try too hide this information, i would rather people not try to write 2 sentence words opposing my 100 words sentences, there is and will always be confusing sentences, but as clearly as I see it just haters try to magnify the way of spam against this thread. THIS POST IS JUST AN STATEMENT TO STOP NONSENSE. |
|
|
|
As we early can see on block 5035 is the enhanched way the early adopters of Bitcoin could easly have found the block through mining, but my doubt is actually in the field of cheatable mining and easy comforting fraud of unknown values. What most people don't see is the everlastig truth written in most blocks 5035 on especially all coins from old too new too even surround this as an specially featured fraud on non unknown values. What I particulary take my own feelings around Bitcoin Block 5035 is the way probably told as Satoshi's wallet but truly the way it was spent to other accounts nevertheless the wallet that actually did make my wonder was this wallet which got 50BTC through mining and one mined wallet transfer: https://blockchain.info/address/12higDjoCCNXSA95xZMWUdPvXNmkAduhWvThis is the Block 5035: https://blockchain.info/block/0000000060aa4dc6fb31c82c978d8a51a1bcf2c77fe174a2e30d5d320fa7fb19Just follow the transfers and you come too the big account. That wallet is connected too transactions from Block 5035 and it's truly real suspicious as we count on it, being the most unknown reasons for multiple transactions going with most of the 150 BTC to another account which sends nearly 1 BTC too 1Derby* accounts and so on it goes with multiple transactions through many accounts in momentarily feature, where the transactions are dated to same suspicious time, wether this was false data that was written into Bitcoin block explorer is still unknown, but I hardly doubt it was an fraud, but just an exptetatious transfer through 100's of accounts at nearly the same timeframe. Even trying to go deeper through the huge amount of accounts you see clearly this as an suspicious transfer. As knowing each transaction should had had seconds in between each transaction. This is this cause address: https://blockchain.info/address/1FrSBjGSmtwrpmqTBZtyzsANaSPbeZjytpKnowing that the closest link too 1Derby* accounts is actually John Thomas through an expectable 1Derby account on twitter, I find it hard to believe he have no connection through all of this, is he the early adopter of Bitcoin?, and why are all 1Derby* accounts still to this day without any transactions?, Even enough search on the internet we clearly can find out John Thomas as an Japenese speakable person, but nearly close connection too Mt.Gox as he has the connection to be an hedge trader whom invests many millions of dollars through New York hedges, we can clearly also see this with his trades on S&P500 which have great interest in the Bitcoin investments. And even Exchanges. Can some people or even investments in Bitcoin be made too cheat the market? And be knowing the most expectable situations too fall easly as to keep eventually fraud as an aspect in all of this? Why I ask this around block 5035 is to clearly not understand the enormous signature that is nearly with all coins ever produced, what we can find out is that information on blocks 5035 is nearly full of accounts with many coins, or even without information cause of too much information (DarkCoin) and while 5035 is resistently an thing that goes around BlackCoin as clearly the wicked thing that happened, even for LTC we clearly see this as an signature placed especially within most coins ever produced. Have you nearly never wondered why most ANN on alternative cryptocurrency is with the same typical theme construction. While people most often aren't able too tell if they mined the coins from early start of most coins? While most coins have signature blocks 5035 as something we really should look into... I actually don't hope people start to Wonder, but it's nearly the truth openwide too even demolish the existance of Bitcoin and force some programmers to actually create an coin from within people are forced too create SHA512 codes on each fraction of a coin and forcing only 1 share discoveries? |
|
|
|
|
But Bitcoin even BlockChain and private keys to wallets it would easly be something to talk about even on the matter of free access to server database and all sort of private keys free of choice and free wallets to abuse?, even hard to know who actually owns Blockchain.info even drastically to suppose us gouvernment or even the people who actually created all 1Derby* accounts probably will come back to empty all those wallets that are in the deepth from transaction of 50 BTC through Block 5035 even hard to believe it would arise another problem for the wallet owners if they accidently created them without the need to even collect the coins out of the transactions?, But how is it actually to manipulate walletaddress creation to consistently make thousand of accounts named 1Derby*?
Why I create the scepsis around this Bitcom coin is actually to find it hard to believe it's not even owned by anyone, even owning Blockchain.info into the thinking reality to be able to manipulate all around the wallets of thousand of bitcoins, even clearly enough to not create an coin that minimilizes the possibility of fraud?, Why one Satoshi still isn't with any data bytes and mainly Blocks have the few bytes long probability even thinking that actions of fraud would multiply in all time forward, not allowing the realness of an actual digital currency to exist for long enough time to be destabilized with the open fraud signature 5035 on all other coins that also uses bitcoin-qt wallet system?
I know this issue is hard for some few people to swallow, but I actually allow anyone welcome to adopt the known information here on this post into massively plan an way around the actual fraud and to reveal the existance of people earning millions of cash through simplicity of cheating with currencies.
As planned I actually haven't posted this topic on bitcoin forum but as I actually could ask if somebody would like to clearly master this post through bringing the total mistery into live without actually accidently as I often try out to explain with words but fail at some point but if somebody would easly explain to others around with this topic the sick system: Mistery Blocks 5035 and the singular fraud through many secret tunnels.
I ask this cause I won't actually try to follow up on other places around this thread but as I know people start to really think and even could end this with beautiness for all human beings so future would exist without even any greed and corruption as we know about. I actually can come back about this matter but clearly feed it with that this was the start from scracth topic just by Dealazer.
|
|
|
|
|
If you actually incorporate one satoshi value to bytes of data then it would be hard to steal someones wallet, if one Satoshi is without value simple tricks can just be reality into owning each of all wallets that you please to say you own to the blockchain would actually be your belongings. So as I can see the Blocks are just the only codes for data, not actually the satoshis?, or even hard to know all the things around this but it's what my common sense believes around this after so many days collecting information around this system Bitcoin.
As we actually might see it real simple to steal wallets it has already been done to often to many times, even with hard encryption on wallet passwords or even own computer firewall security.
Did actually Silk Road entusiast Dread Pirate reveal his password to his belonging?, I probably doubt this, you wouldn't even say the secret to the biggest amounts of values if you were in the same situation as Dread Pirate to even start to exchange freedom with the holdings of all Bitcoins for simple freedom?
What we actually know is the suspicious Blocks 5035 soon to vaporate into manipulated secret that never took place? It's this that is my belief all we can do is to hold on the screenshots we take.
Another thing; why is just a code you create when you find a share or even millions of shares, even when you actually cannot collect coins because the blocking of difficulty on each share you collect?, wouldn't it be reasonable to know that the real digital currency would give sense to existance as collecting shares on diff 1 even after this creating each code for each fraction of the coin?
|
|
|
|
leaving the terminator robots aside for the moment ..are you suggesting a relationship between the Block reward and the block size in data that there could be a flaw?
Actually if one satoshi is 0.00000001 fraction of a bitcoin? And aside thinking that each satoshi transaction sends 300 bytes of data or more and needs to be build with bytes of data to exist as an actual data for that to be physical thing to just put into store on an usb that then would be many gigabytes just to send 25 bitcoins of an Block?, also if we actually follow the data sent by the cgminer and bgminer, the data that is transfered out to the internet is actually fractions to big to actually know what really is going on?, Probably it would be reasonable to know that data out needs to be in gigabytes when a Block is found, even tho the data for each satoshi needs to be written that would actually be gigabytes of data that needs transfer. If so 1 Bitcoin is an data of SHA256 but aside how can we split 1 Bitcoin in fractions without even writing the exact data for each Satoshi. So what's the deal? |
|
|
|
Actually all Developers of coins interest me nothing it's clearly for me that they oppose this topic. Even tho Developers are just fraction of what we see clearly as People that consistently are nearly robots or even People paid enormous Money too speak on their matter against ever single truth that comes out.
To people replying to this post i intentionally ask the too not quote and talk about something else around something else and intentionally deepen the topic matter of evidence that stays around the topic, but actually I ask people to try to dig in the enormous masses of evidence related too Block 5035 --> 1Derby Accounts --> John Thomas --> Mad Hedge Trader --> NYSO --> Bitcoin Deposit through Investment by people that mainly invested in Mad Hedge Trader, Bitcoin Logo and John Thomas -> Ecstacy --> Pharmaceutical Companies --> S&P500 --> BTC Exhanges --> New York Wall Street --> Identity of John Thomas --> War Machines and all other possibilities of World Mass Destruction With Chemicals and Pollution Industry -- > Lobotomy of drug abusers --> Production of pharmaceutical too treat lobotomy or just maintain optional possibility too live as destroyed human normally With anti-psychotica and anti-depressiva at nearly high cost for all worlds countries.
Hi Dealazer - what you seem to point out above is a known and understood thing to some intelligent people on earth. so this things matters less, to me , don't get me wrong, i care, its just we can forward project these things and see a predictable outcome. what i want to specifically ask you is this : are you alleging that in normal operation or in a certain 51% attack scenario, that block rewards can be changed retrospectively, while appearing the same on the block chain explorer - on this issue i'd like to specifically ask you.the other issues are still very relevant - although most of Bitcoin talk member are probably employees of in-Q-tel so they see BTC kind of as "their project" now it seems, even a retard can see how the innovation got sucked out of it, the weird "religious" nature and vibe in which many a "BTC supporter" reacts . the 1984 style in which edits and posts were changed. so you see these armchair vikings don't believe in free markets or even in their own constitution, they are simply contractors that work for a "corporation" which ironically is a Fiat Bank. they are not here to help you and don't care about Cryptocurrency in most cases, they have no leaders and thus mostly have no faith or belief structures. such a backwards system is just a few steps away from full communist style police state in which "meta data" and information becomes a "threat", these are all signs of very sick structures, centralized and decayed, but then with this there is also the will to enforce projects onto other people. but unfortunately just as with Communism the results become very predictable - welcome to modern western reality. the Question again : are you alleging that in normal operation or in a certain 51% attack scenario, that block rewards can be changed retrospectively, while appearing the same on the block chain explorer - on this issue i'd like to specifically ask you.I think he's trying tell us something else other than crypto lol , still trying to figure what he's upto though. Let me know if you crack the code.  I don't have to crack that code, it was cracked many years ago, and its falling apart in front of you. I'd like to see if he answers my questions however. Actually to says the Word retrospectively causes some problems too me, but as I can think is that even tho we face another convict too Bitcoin ask me this first Block of just bytes are the endless data of millions of satoshis while even a computer cannot actually create 25 coins as of Bitcoin into millions of data that are created in fraction of Seconds, even tho we can actually face an different belief that all data is just squash about just random figures that are based on time on how much processor is working on and figuring out the typical data of the most suspicious workflow of actually to believe in the time where robots might turn into Terminators while we actually reprocess the data so the Terminators actually can create movements and even imaginable data of information to even know how the reality is and move within it. Actually thinking about just how this could had been done is hardly for me, but it's clearly not strings of SHA256 bytes we are creating it's more into this to believe, even tho I don't actually know. What is most reasonable to think is that 10000 coins Block reward has too much bytes to even exist as megabytes in codes like it would be an gigabyte of codes or even more to just transfer the coin. |
|
|
|
|
Actually all Developers of coins interest me nothing it's clearly for me that they oppose this topic. Even tho Developers are just fraction of what we see clearly as People that consistently are nearly robots or even People paid enormous Money too speak on their matter against ever single truth that comes out.
To people replying to this post i intentionally ask the too not quote and talk about something else around something else and intentionally deepen the topic matter of evidence that stays around the topic, but actually I ask people to try to dig in the enormous masses of evidence related too Block 5035 --> 1Derby Accounts --> John Thomas --> Mad Hedge Trader --> NYSO --> Bitcoin Deposit through Investment by people that mainly invested in Mad Hedge Trader, Bitcoin Logo and John Thomas -> Ecstacy --> Pharmaceutical Companies --> S&P500 --> BTC Exhanges --> New York Wall Street --> Identity of John Thomas --> War Machines and all other possibilities of World Mass Destruction With Chemicals and Pollution Industry -- > Lobotomy of drug abusers --> Production of pharmaceutical too treat lobotomy or just maintain optional possibility too live as destroyed human normally With anti-psychotica and anti-depressiva at nearly high cost for all worlds countries.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually I'm not afraid of death, but ever since I started on working on firstly exposing XLB LibertyCoin I feared actually that somebody just ordered assasination on Silk Road on me, paying in Bitcoins
This matter can actually be traced if so on. I'm in Norway in a safe place, and I speak in way of God:
What most interestingly thing will be is the fall of Bitcoin and economic crysis; This will make coins made before 2000 as the main currency of the world; this is the dream of God; as we truly can speak about an economy that will be able to adjust itself into world economy where prices are equally in all countries while each coin value represents it's value of all coins created before year 2000. This will again lead to trade in shops to just adjust itself too accept 0.01 fractions of the coins.
What most interestingly is the manner of what the world has become, it was planned that the end will come and God gracious will win this fight against the most greedy Peoples in the world related to Construction of WARs and even Chemicals to fuck up the world, even in a way nobody would believe, what most think about 1Derby as John Thomas relation, and to know the deepth of 5035 Identity and even be close too start another Era in the world.
What older coins produced before 2000 will do is just to stabilize the economy truly by In God we Trust coins. Where Maximum value coin will be 1000 and there are a lot of Angels that are collectors of Coins and even the Bank system will be corrupt and fall appart even to know that Exchanges with those shops who were collecting coins will arise from dust as most reasonable values of community
|
|
|
|
|
To just take you on Journey on what Block is obvious the deal it's number 5035 not 5032 as all Blocks around 5035 clearly takes you on an Journey too understand this matter more closely.
As with 1Derby Identity on BTC transactions too deeper known we Discover actually the deepth of the fractions of transactions to this Identity as multiple accounts have Identity 1Derby from the transactions of Block 5035
As for sure 1Derby is related to John Thomas whom speaks Japanese and was in Tokyo and are a share trader of S&P500 which is more and more related too Exchanges of BTC that mainly consisting of S&P500.
But what I actually found out is the Close relation too Ecstacy and John Thomas. As i know he probably dumped ecstacy on most countries and then liberately invested in pharmaceutical Companies with S&P500 too literally consist of making drugs that only helps most ecstacy lobotomated pasients into a better life?
Scarry?
I Call this close evidence too Silk Road 1 & even the same layout of Silk Road 2.
|
|
|
|
|
