lol, ico, this seems ridiculous... a quick money-making scheme.  |
|
|
|
|
When pos will be created?
|
|
|
|
|
Nice name of the coin, do we have an exchange yet?
|
|
|
|
Interesting one with DAG instead of blockchain.  |
|
|
|
|
nothing new in this coin...
|
|
|
|
Fuck you idiot, all up to the community?
Please release that shit so a "dev" that actually will communicate will implement it.
All you did was asked for donations, went quiet on everyone here, it is a two way street guy.
You do not come out with a coin and expect to do nothing more.
If there are less idiots like you, I am sure devs will continue. |
|
|
|
First, what do we need to improve:
- Audit, still a possibility, but we need to FIND THE RIGHT PERSON. (if no POD we at-least need an audit of code, SOMETHING to market besides talk and thin air. If the the technology is proven legit, then it's fair to assume the Dev is as well.
Instead of audit, they could just provide a detailed demonstration. Walk them through it. Prove it works. Screen shot it and blog it. Any of these offers could be turned into demonstrations that could be advertised forever. It needs to be demonstrated and proven in public, repeatedly for anyone who wants to see, if its going to succeed. There are several videos on it, and did you read the white paper at all, there's a detailed work through in the last section with all the detailed screenshots and parameters. Apparently you never read it. This is the problem here. Instead of complaining, you can do something if you want. The feature is released, and everyone can try it. You can try it and do a video for it easily. Why complaining? trustless system is not on the paper, it is in the 3.x wallet released. |
|
|
|
I officially made my PoD.
Yeah, yeah, it's proof of dump.
Im officially out of Supercoin @ approximately 285% loss.
I'm sorry, but for me, game is over.
Whoever bought my coins, enjoy it. They are cheap, or expensive, depends of the point of view.
@RudarSRB @MedaR puko sam ko lajsna na ovome, idemo dalje.
I will come here from time to time, then I will stop comming.
Thank you all for your time, patience, and to some of you - for friendship.
Over and out.
Goodbye friend
 Good luck, I think I got some of yours. 285% loss?? I never heard such things, did you buy SUPER using margin? Is there any altcoin exchange allow you to buy at margin? I can have 100% loss, but not 285%, but I can have 285% gain Things become funny and people think creative ways to boost coins. I have nothing against it. The dev team delivered what they promised. They should possibly layout a future plan. Clearly they don't think POD make any sense (well everyone can keep their own opinions, but they are the ones who decided NOT to do POD). Also from what I read, the trustless system anyone can test since it is already released. But for code reviews, they don't think any amateurs or average devs are qualified to review their code. If some devs with proven track record in alt coins want to seriously review the code, I am pretty sure they will consider it. But certainly they won't waste time to review with someone from Poloniex as most of you know the "review" incident by Poloniex. Also the supercoin whitepaper is the one most detailed I know, with all the detailed algorithms and flows. Reviewing code would just confirm these are implemented. With so much details there in whitepaper, I won't image that they spend so many time to document them without implementing. Though I did not see the code, I am sure all implemented as described in the whitepaper (many details you can't describe without actual implementing them). For me, POD/review are just excuses hoping for the coin to rise in price. I think the community can do it a better way. As someone pointed out that dev team is mainly focused on tech side and they may not be that good on the marketing (otherwise I can't imagine the price is so low comparing to those hype only coins like cloak/XC). Why not some of you step in and take the leadership of marketing and organize the marketing campaigns etc. Supercoin has been around for long time, and it is community-owned. Why not you take the initiative and do promo marketing etc. After all, it is the community who should take care of it, not the devs. |
|
|
|
Does satoshi did POD? Do you think he is stupid?
Lol, you are comparing yourself with Satoshi, He was the one who invented this crypto currency. And there were not scam coins around when BITCOIN was invented, but now 9 out of 10 coin scamming. and on the top market cap list, most are scam coins |
|
|
|
Just out of curiosity did anyone stop to think that an exchange cannot force a dev to stick around? Can you predict the future? Or is this concept too hard to grasp? All I see here is a bunch of people crying over an exchange when it was the dev who ran off... .how the hell do you expect refunds when dev has the money and this is crypto if you want refunds go back to fiat and the trust system you obviously have no place here.
Crypto doesn't mean a safe sanctuary for scammers.Since crypto is not regulated by any organisation or govt its members, community,pools and exchanges should come forward and devise some guidelines to safeguard the interests of miners and investors. In this case an exchange, a big organised organisation is/was in better position to have some guidelines to safe guard the interest of it's traders.And failing to do so they should take the responsibility of the scam. Absolutely. Why the exchanges have "verification" process? this is to prevent scams. Now C-cex should do something. The ICO is not a bad idea, if all parties are honest, it is a good way to distribute the coins. The scammers should be punished. |
|
|
|
Just out of curiosity did anyone stop to think that an exchange cannot force a dev to stick around? Can you predict the future? Or is this concept too hard to grasp? All I see here is a bunch of people crying over an exchange when it was the dev who ran off... .
this is not the prob of the dev of coin code, but the problem of the cheater who get verified with C-cex and then grab all the coins. Real dev of coin code won't do free work for sure. If it were a partnership with that cheater guy, and the cheater guy took all, I'd do the same as a coin dev. Better force C-cex to make that guy reimburse investors. |
|
|
|
Help please for the last 3 days my wallet stake coins but all not accepted....v2.1.2.0 (with SuperSend)
That happens for me when I'm not on the latest block. Check the explorers in op and see if your wallet is synced. Is the wallet fully sync'ed? If so and you don't receive the pos, then (1) make sure you don't have the same wallet running in another machine (this happened once to me, one machine generated pos and get accepted, the other always get rejected, as the same pos accepted by the 1st machine). (2) you can always consolidate your coins into one wallet address, as the coins in a block below certain amount will not generate pos. To do this, enable coin control, and then create a new address (in "receive coins" table, click on "new address"), in coin control select all coins and then send to the new address you created. Then after 24 hrs the pos should be generated. |
|
|
|
Let me get this straight, Supercoin is a full working trustless + anon coin.
How come we are not at the moon as of now? Are there so many people unaware that there is a coin out there who has accomplish it? Because everybody is saying there isn't a coin that is full working trustless + anon coin as of yet.
What is everybody's thoughts on this?
That is a very fair and good question. If I may give my opinion on this, I see Supercoin as a rough diamond. In order to have its maximum value, it first needs to be cutted into a nice and shiny stone. And even though it's still a rough one at this point, it's still a diamond nonetheless . It won't lose that property. Bitcoin didn't start with a high value either. Remember (one of the) first things bought with bitcoins were 2 pizza's for 10,000 BTC ? That's 5 million dollars as of today. People needed some time to see the potential it had a few years ago, but look at it now. Other altcoins that hold a high value from start is mainly because the coin is being hyped by investors with big money. They pump the price themselves but that creates a bubble that can pop once 1 big investor leaves the coin. Look what happened with Cloak when 1 investor (won't call names) admitted he was responsible for its big price increase and left the community. The big difference here in Super is that it has a genuine increase in price that's actually created by interest of our whole community and other investors that buy the coin for its great features, and not because of investors that are looking to pump it, create a bubble on the market and move on to another coin. I think the promo is the problem. Apparently super does not have a big team. Some other coins used plain tech but have tons people to fud and promo. They describe their own very common tech in a obscure and twisted way, making many non-tech people think they ar from another planet from the galaxy. This is how they promo and then cheat. And i'm glad that's not the road Super is taking. Many other coins use their promo as a cover-up to why the market value of their coin is increasing, while the price is being pumped artificially in reality (and only the down-to-earth investors realize this). This is the way of the game in altcoin market nowadays it seems, and the pumpers aren't even shy of telling this openly anymore lately. I'm glad this is not (yet) happening with Super. Our price will increase slower than these coins, but eventually it will lead to a strong position on the market with a good value. Yes this is the problem. Unfortunately in this market as in other market (such as stock market), promo is always some thing big, it can be deceiving and covering up, but it is what it is. The problem is not all people are intelligent enough to tell the differences. Most people go with trend and visibility blindly. |
|
|
|
I could be a part today of next this time beta test of supercoin trustless multisig anon wallet  It works perectly , transcations again were super fast about 20-40 seconds I can`t still trace my sending address in block explorer For being a node i got also service fee for being a mixer to other people transactions.
The network doesn`t need master nodes it is confirmed !!! Everyone can be a single node it is full decentralized Next for sure is RC version and official release of real and great functioning anon decentralized technology It is unique and will be huge event for sure in crypto world +1 |
|
|
|
Hello Superior Members So cointelegraph are offering to make me a discount from 2,5 btc to 2 btc and finaly for 1,5 btc the full package of adertising such as article pro, trusted coin in telegraph,interview and so on I asked them for paying them in super they said ok Cb we can do that too but if we pay in super we must pay them 2,5 full price without discount if we pay in super. so decide please can we do it As i said, if you would involve the complete Phase 2 community so including Mammoth it would be a lot easier to come up with 1,5 btc what is the donation address? |
|
|
|
I,m quite sure the main reason for the resent drop in the price of Supercoin was directly caused by the thread started labelled -
supercoin is fundamentally broken
Stated in the thread is
"this thread was started because you have idiots in your community that picked a stupid fight against the XC community (which is 10x larger than Super's) and spread FUD about our coin and this thread was more of a retaliation."
When this thread was most active, the price started dropping hard, which shows that some people believed instantly what was said there. Which shows how easily people can be caused to sell off through being scared that something was wrong.
For others it has been a great buying opportunity.
There is no need to be insecure about this coin. Just look at what is being accomplished. And as with any altcoin only put into it what you can afford to lose as all altcoins are a high risk. And with high risk, it can also equal high reward.
Supercoin has much to offer, and like I have said before I expect all this trading to look like a flat line on future exchange graphs.
The anonymous decentralization, and the speed is of great importance, as the tech becomes more understood, and if all goes well as it seems to be then the sky is literally the limit.
I mean this coin is trading for 1 or 2 cents each. Think about it.
XC has a big fud team, they tried nasty ways against supercoin, because someone pointed out their claims of multisig is not true and praised supercoin tech (they actually never saw their own XC multisig address before - see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=742025.0). supercoin dev team is not related to this at all. The unfortunate thing is that the fuds seem working, and many people don't understand the technologies believed their fuds. But truth is truth, people will understand the value and this new multisig technology and how significant it is. When people are weak they have internal tension about saying lies or hiding behind lies. Multisig is not a technology for amateurs. That's why. +1 |
|
|
|
OK, for those from XC who never seen a real XC multisig address, let me show you what it is, and you can tell me if there are any exist today on the blockchain All the one posted in the above links by synechist are regular XC addresses, they are not multisig addresses, why? because XC's multisig address starts with 4, not X. I downloaded XC wallet, and from there in console, I created 2 multisig addresses. I used these 3 private-public key pairs: public key: 033942099d7fb91a51b0e2899040c36cf5337002f43b2e80ec3afe3c81cbb5a3db private key: X35fMeU3c159SX4tWVnA7ZW7DxTyw7BCqEmt92Nw5N87kezytJSZ public key: 02733ae45bf1d7fc5b24dcdbf54c0dd2b106a39233e65cdb47fd0fd925734f4b83 private key: X7oy79myB5WmKXAjey6oZPfo12BHmwRfD9k4rmL2oYUMdjff48NU public key: 02307e5d3924fa8d95093ed61bfa4ecb4bf108196013ee1de466589bcf3fb212b8 private key: X2z4smxErHnkVBZnWzfPMDMNdMvD3mAnB7w7YD1BFeppf3iqUyWJ these pairs are derived from the addresses I have. From there I created 2 addresses: 2-of-3 multisig address and 3-of-3 multisig address (though this one is of no use - just to show): 2-of-3 multisig address: 4ShqMQFoQFLBzhXDs3aJJMnDNLZ9JTrxKH 3-of-3 multisig address: 4XCmiwfQCm6gQNrW6kaXZJawLPekQGQf5o BTW, you can make some deposits to 2-of-3 multisig address, and I can show you how to spend it. I can do a tutorial for you guys who have no ideas on what is a multisig address. wow, thanks some138 to show us what are the real multisig addresses in XC. From what XC's dev's post, and the "multisig" tx and address they provided in the above links, I can say that they did not understand what is a multisig, they mixed multi input/out tx with multisig? Anyway, they did not seem to implement the multisig at all. Looks like they've been cheating all the way along (consciously or unconsciously).Multisig addresses usually start with a different letter than their regular address. For example, Bitcoin's regular address starts with "1", its multisig address starts with "3". Supercoin's regular address starts with "S", its multisig address starts with "C". Mammothcoin's regular address starts with "M", its multisig address starts with "b". etc. For XC, its regular address starts with X and multisig address starts with "4". Everyone can create a multisig address using XC client and verify yourself. XC devs, please explain the facts and stop cheating!! |
|
|
|
this describes well what Super is doing now |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
