also you have to keep in mind the 750ti needs to run directly on a 16x slot on the motherboard, making its cost that much higher when you figure in the other hardware you'll need to run a decent quantity of them

I do wish Terk would take down that announcement that the Rejects issue is resolved. It clearly is not! Pool rejects continue to bounce around way over the normal 2-3%. I've had (brief but seemingly valid) periods of almost 0 rejects, but 10-15% is typical and in the last 10 minutes I'm running over 31% rejects! I've tweaked and tweaked settings to no avail, it is jumping around due to something on the server end. It's making me pine for Middlecoin, which is ridiculous... 

Actually there is something stopping me from setting up a coin switching pool in EU. I have no skills in the area first of all. Second of all I don't have time to devote. So asking for someone else to do it as a suggestion (and to a guy that already knows exactly what he's doing..) is just the right way to do it.

you people don't get it.... the rejects are relative to the profitability of the coin mined.

therefore if the coin mined has a higher profitability than litecoin AFTER the rejects are taken into account then we are mining that coin.

what's so hard to understand? As long as we are more profitable than litecoin or dogecoin by itself then where's the problem?

If your looking to compare this site with other switch mining pools such as wafflepool then do your research, Terk has given figures many times that seem to always be on top of all other pools.

I would appreciate it if the pool shows the BTC/MH that includes the rejected shares. This would be more accurate.

Hate to be the necrohippoflogaphiliac here, but I'm still getting really high rejects (even after the tweaks you did), also my hashrate is all over the place when I know my CGRemote is showing a cool 2.0 MHash.

Please take a look http://www.clevermining.com/users/1M6ZozLvZoRhD6NLhtfcVB2aWcgtZhUG8w\

Ideas?  This is a rig I've mined with for months, and I've never had a high reject rate like this.

It's negligible compared to the statistical variance of mining luck over the time period measured. If that difference persisted for months, then for sure not negligible. But over a period of three days it is pure statistical noise and doesn't say anything conclusive one way or another.

Mining for 1 hour, stats -- 829Kh instead of ~2.4Mh.

Difference --> 0.00295 BTC
Not a completely negligible difference.

I actually have my doubts on that with a switching pool.

I agree that IF we mine at a pool that only mines one coin, then the variance will average out and you will see a steady payout after a few hours or 24 hours.

However, at CM we get a lot of stale rejects. And I'm assuming these are not all counting towards our hashrate (correct me if I'm wrong). From my understanding, stale rejects are the ones that's too old because the pool already pointed to the new block. So if someone has a ~10% reject on average, that means ~10% of the time when he finished his share, the pool already moved on and his calculated shares are useless. This is especially a problem for a pool that's hopping around and getting into block times that's less than a minute or even 30 seconds.

So IMO, by lowering the share difficulties, you can shorten individual miner's share round time and minimize the probability of submitting stale shares.

The bitcoin is falling faster then the unexchanged though..!

There's a big drop in the unexchanged but the balance didn't change! whats happening ?