[ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com

[konarix]

[18:06:05] New block detected on network before pool notification

Shouldn't the pool notify about block change? maybe that would reduce the rejected ratio a lot more.
Plus, my sgminer is using my failback pool A LOT, really A LOT. Maybe an EU server? (please??)

Yeah, we need EUropean server!

+1

+1

+1

+1

+1

+1

[_r2h]

Nothing is stopping you guys from setting up your own EU coin switching pool.

[SirGeekalot]

Just because you have a low reject, doesn't mean everyone in the EU needs to chill. being in the UK we have a relatively good connection to the rest of the world.

http://maps.level3.com/default/#.UwYJkfl_vbA

I think you missed the point i was trying to make, I was trying to say that once the current server is up and running as it should do then Terk will look at implementing an EU server, at the moment he's trying to make sure the current setup/software can handle things the way they should otherwise there is no point adding another server to a bugged code as this could cause further complications.

Its already on the to do list so consistantly adding these +1 posts is not going to add a lot of value to the thread, But this is the internet and people are just impatient i guess and want things yesterday before things are fully fixed.

Sorry, i did misread. i rather he got the software just right too. he said it would be alot easier to deploy other nodes after that. the improvements made in the last 24-48 hrs speak for themselves.

[sprmacholo]

so, reading the thread some are getting a lot of rejects while some are sub 10 %, I'm always around 15 %+, spiking to 20-25 % at time, any way I can reduce this? Reducing the intensity would reduce the kh/s anyways so would that even matter?

I'm from the EU with a ping of 44 ms to the server

[williamj2543]

Im in Toronto, Canada, and I'm getting a 10% reject rate. I'm not complaining, but thats 10% less profits, and it would be nice, but not necessary to get fixed. Lots of other people are having problems like this also.

[m4ttyd]

you people don't get it.... the rejects are relative to the profitability of the coin mined.

therefore if the coin mined has a higher profitability than litecoin AFTER the rejects are taken into account then we are mining that coin.

what's so hard to understand? As long as we are more profitable than litecoin or dogecoin by itself then where's the problem?

If your looking to compare this site with other switch mining pools such as wafflepool then do your research, Terk has given figures many times that seem to always be on top of all other pools.

[groovy9]

I'm seeing  a lot of this in cgminer for the clevermining pool: "Rejected untracked stratum share from Pool 1"

[_r2h]

you people don't get it.... the rejects are relative to the profitability of the coin mined.

therefore if the coin mined has a higher profitability than litecoin AFTER the rejects are taken into account then we are mining that coin.

what's so hard to understand? As long as we are more profitable than litecoin or dogecoin by itself then where's the problem?

If your looking to compare this site with other switch mining pools such as wafflepool then do your research, Terk has given figures many times that seem to always be on top of all other pools.

Don't bother buddy.  Easier to just troll the tards rather than explain it.  I'm getting ~7.5% rejects, and that is completely normal for a profit switching coin.  I've done worse for longer periods of time on middlecoin in regards to rejects.   

[Deroba]

Been mining for 12 hours now, will update.

[martynw2000]

you people don't get it.... the rejects are relative to the profitability of the coin mined.

therefore if the coin mined has a higher profitability than litecoin AFTER the rejects are taken into account then we are mining that coin.

what's so hard to understand? As long as we are more profitable than litecoin or dogecoin by itself then where's the problem?

If your looking to compare this site with other switch mining pools such as wafflepool then do your research, Terk has given figures many times that seem to always be on top of all other pools.

Add to that, you don't have to spend time transferring micro-amounts of micro-coins to exchanges and stressing over getting a good price on them. Also spending hours and hours of research/setup time to choose which coins to mine, when, and for how long. Throwing a couple of Mh/sec towards a high-profit but very fast coin is also very inefficient. By using the combined power of a pool increases the profit potential of mining them.

All this is done for you.

[_Crash_]

Nothing is stopping you guys from setting up your own EU coin switching pool.

Don't be stupid, be realistic.

[zneww]

Nothing is stopping you guys from setting up your own EU coin switching pool.

Don't be stupid, be realistic.

He is pretty right though....

[xIIImaL]

[18:06:05] New block detected on network before pool notification

Shouldn't the pool notify about block change? maybe that would reduce the rejected ratio a lot more.
Plus, my sgminer is using my failback pool A LOT, really A LOT. Maybe an EU server? (please??)

Yeah, we need EUropean server!

+1

+1

+1

+1

+1

+1

+1

+1

[superman3486]

we need useast server 

[zneww]

troll city

[njaiswal]

My latest payouts are not showing on my Multibit wallet.

In Multibit wallet I can see last pending 0.00000001 transaction since morning, do not know who sent it to me as well, clearly not cleverming.

This transaction cannot be found as well:
http://blockexplorer.com/tx/339eb7f9321952b238427904891f6dfb47c8cadbe0b2404ad6bb8678918d23c6

Is this pending transaction stopping multibit to register my latest payouts from clever mining?
Is this some kind of DOS attack on my wallet?
 

[pindis]

Nothing is stopping you guys from setting up your own EU coin switching pool.

Don't be stupid, be realistic.

He is pretty right though....

Actually there is something stopping me from setting up a coin switching pool in EU. I have no skills in the area first of all. Second of all I don't have time to devote. So asking for someone else to do it as a suggestion (and to a guy that already knows exactly what he's doing..) is just the right way to do it.

[sprmacholo]

you people don't get it.... the rejects are relative to the profitability of the coin mined.

therefore if the coin mined has a higher profitability than litecoin AFTER the rejects are taken into account then we are mining that coin.

what's so hard to understand? As long as we are more profitable than litecoin or dogecoin by itself then where's the problem?

If your looking to compare this site with other switch mining pools such as wafflepool then do your research, Terk has given figures many times that seem to always be on top of all other pools.

Don't bother buddy.  Easier to just troll the tards rather than explain it.  I'm getting ~7.5% rejects, and that is completely normal for a profit switching coin.  I've done worse for longer periods of time on middlecoin in regards to rejects.   

7.5 %? yes

15-25 all the time? not so much

[divxrullz]

any chance for API ?

[Flashpunk]

any chance for API ?

I was actually just going to post this as well. I've been considering building a small web(app) that could be easily viewable on a mobile device.