[ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com

[element515]

Man, joined this pool when it wasn't even near 1Gh/s... and now it's getting close to the size of Wafflepool. If we can get the rejects to stay down and have more servers. It's going to be great.

[Capttech08]

Oh, and in case anyone finds this kind of stuff interesting - Here is an article discussing the new Nvidia 750 TI and it's hash rate. If you notice, it only uses 60W's @ full load versus the 300W a 290. Yes it is a lower hash rate, but imagine having 6 of these on 1 500W psu. The savings in electricity alone would be nice! Fitting 6 on 1 motherboard to make up for the hash rate difference may not be so nice!

http://www.pcper.com/news/General-Tech/NVIDIA-Coin-Mining-Performance-Increases-Maxwell-and-GTX-750-Ti

[ebliever]

28% rejects in over an hour of running from my location (Illinois). This is ridiculous. 3% all day just before that at Middlecoin. I see the pool rejects are also climbing to over 20% so its not just me.

[byt411]

Anyone else think the advertised BTC per mHash is misrepresented? When you take out the rejected shares (8-10% avg. I personally had more than that), whats the bottom line? So in a way its false advertisement.

NO. It is in no way false, since the rejects are because of technical problems. I expect the rejected % to drop down to about 2% once EU and Asia servers are up.

[Prima Primat]

Besides, any MH/s number displayed on the website is based on accepted shares, as far as I know. So the rejects are already included in the hashrate.

[igroock]

Terk said server problems were solved, no?

[Starscream]

I have to admit that despite the high reject rate I'm getting (15%) my 'Total Expected" for 12hours is pretty good. I went back to MC to see if h2o really did solve his issue but even so, I'll definitely come check this pool once the EU server is released if the 'Total Expected' will actually be what it says it is.

[MozZ]

It is in no way false, since the rejects are because of technical problems. I expect the rejected % to drop down to about 2% once EU and Asia servers are up.

But when approximately EU servers will be released?

[Wipeout2097]

Oh, and in case anyone finds this kind of stuff interesting - Here is an article discussing the new Nvidia 750 TI and it's hash rate. If you notice, it only uses 60W's @ full load versus the 300W a 290. Yes it is a lower hash rate, but imagine having 6 of these on 1 500W psu. The savings in electricity alone would be nice! Fitting 6 on 1 motherboard to make up for the hash rate difference may not be so nice!

http://www.pcper.com/news/General-Tech/NVIDIA-Coin-Mining-Performance-Increases-Maxwell-and-GTX-750-Ti

Not to spam this thread with offtopic, but I just read that review and IMO is pure crap. So a 750Ti overclocked uses the same power as at stock?? Did he actually build the rig? Read the comment section. Also see this review: http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/176785-nvidias-new-maxwell-powered-gtx-750-ti-is-hyper-efficient-quiet-a-serious-threat-to-amd/3

Let's wait for coin miners review and experience with the card, not from PC hardware sites that cater for and make money out of gamers.

[MatimalND]

Can anyone help me move my coins from the below user; I forgot the 1B when I moved to this pool:

http://clevermining.com/users/53D1ghVEwHXrMB1ptjxxoQ7DqrxhfoYz

to

http://clevermining.com/users/1B53D1ghVEwHXrMB1ptjxxoQ7DqrxhfoYz

[Wonder_Angel]

Terk, I have a request regarding the individual user stats page.  Can you please truncate the Recent Payouts list?  After two weeks of being on the server, the list has grown rather long.  Maybe create three tabs: 24 hours, 7 days, 30 days?  Anything past that don't bother keeping as it'll just clog up server space.

I've also taken the time to fine tune all my cards with xintensity and the latest sgminer in order to obtain an optimum balance with the server.  I have my reject ratios nearly inline with the pool's rejects, minus about 2%.  The profits have increased for me by doing that, so I'm happy.

I have noticed one rather strange issue after the last update, however.  I'm seeing "Rejected untracked stratum share from Pool 0" now about every few minutes on every single card.  Any idea why?

Please don't eliminate the long-term pay out history, that would be a big mistake I believe.  However, splitting the payout info over several tabs as suggested here would indeed make sense.

Thanks very much to Terk for all his hard work maintaining and improving this pool.

[tpaclassic]

15% isn't that bad, so long as your reject rate is increasing and dipping along with the pool's rate.  Having said that, I've found the following settings for my 290's to reduce my rates lower than the pool's average and still follow suit too.

For my Sapphire 290's:

-g 1
-w 256
--lookup-gap 2
--xintensity 300
--thread-concurrency 20481
--gpu-engine 1015
--gpu-memclock 1500
--gpu-powertune 22
--auto-fan
--temp-target 80
--gpu-vddc 1.025

For my Asus 290's:

Same as above except xintensity is 124 and thread concurrency is 20996.

Another thing I've noticed with the new sgminer.  If I start the program, allow it to run for a few seconds, close it, then immediately run it again, it evens out the hash and wu quicker as well as keeping the rejects lower.  Not sure why, but it works for me.

Hope all of this helped someone!  

Anyone using R9 290? What setting do you use to get low reject rate? Cause I've been trying this pool all day and my reject rate is floating around 15%~

[tpaclassic]

I guess while I'm at it, here are the settings I've found for my Sapphire 7970's that work well with the pool.  The xintensity setting of 4 is exactly -I 13, so no need to change if using that.  It was the thread, gpu engine and powertune that helped on those cards.  Numbers are 736Kh/s at 715wu, putting them very close to a 1:1 Kh/s and wu ratio, which is what you want.  That and keeping your rejects low.   

-g 2
-w 256
--lookup-gap 2
--xintensity 4
--thread-concurrency 16384
--gpu-engine 1055
--gpu-memclock 1500
--gpu-powertune 15
--auto-fan
--temp-target 76
--gpu-vddc 1.170 (for some reason, anything lower causes system crashes, no matter what bios I've tried)

[zneww]

Anyone else think the advertised BTC per mHash is misrepresented? When you take out the rejected shares (8-10% avg. I personally had more than that), whats the bottom line? So in a way its false advertisement.

NO. It is in no way false, since the rejects are because of technical problems. I expect the rejected % to drop down to about 2% once EU and Asia servers are up.

ive been saying this since day one. its the only pool that hasnt dipped below 0.01 seemingly

[vm_mpn]

Can anyone help me move my coins from the below user; I forgot the 1B when I moved to this pool:

http://clevermining.com/users/53D1ghVEwHXrMB1ptjxxoQ7DqrxhfoYz

to

http://clevermining.com/users/1B53D1ghVEwHXrMB1ptjxxoQ7DqrxhfoYz

Should you be worrying about this? I do not think 53D is valid BTC address (tesla coin I think starts @5) so chances are those transactions are not going to go through... Not sure if admin can confirm this.

[avidwriter]

Oh, and in case anyone finds this kind of stuff interesting - Here is an article discussing the new Nvidia 750 TI and it's hash rate. If you notice, it only uses 60W's @ full load versus the 300W a 290. Yes it is a lower hash rate, but imagine having 6 of these on 1 500W psu. The savings in electricity alone would be nice! Fitting 6 on 1 motherboard to make up for the hash rate difference may not be so nice!

http://www.pcper.com/news/General-Tech/NVIDIA-Coin-Mining-Performance-Increases-Maxwell-and-GTX-750-Ti

Not to spam this thread with offtopic, but I just read that review and IMO is pure crap. So a 750Ti overclocked uses the same power as at stock?? Did he actually build the rig? Read the comment section. Also see this review: http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/176785-nvidias-new-maxwell-powered-gtx-750-ti-is-hyper-efficient-quiet-a-serious-threat-to-amd/3

Let's wait for coin miners review and experience with the card, not from PC hardware sites that cater for and make money out of gamers.

also you have to keep in mind the 750ti needs to run directly on a 16x slot on the motherboard, making its cost that much higher when you figure in the other hardware you'll need to run a decent quantity of them

[RickJamesBTC]

I've got no interest in building rigs with 6 300kh cards. What a giant waste of space. Electricity isn't a big factor yet, I still cover my electricity bill in a few days, even with everything I have. What I don't have is more time to set up dozens of extra rigs to get the same power as 280x rigs or even 270 rigs.

[_r2h]

Oh, and in case anyone finds this kind of stuff interesting - Here is an article discussing the new Nvidia 750 TI and it's hash rate. If you notice, it only uses 60W's @ full load versus the 300W a 290. Yes it is a lower hash rate, but imagine having 6 of these on 1 500W psu. The savings in electricity alone would be nice! Fitting 6 on 1 motherboard to make up for the hash rate difference may not be so nice!

http://www.pcper.com/news/General-Tech/NVIDIA-Coin-Mining-Performance-Increases-Maxwell-and-GTX-750-Ti

Not to spam this thread with offtopic, but I just read that review and IMO is pure crap. So a 750Ti overclocked uses the same power as at stock?? Did he actually build the rig? Read the comment section. Also see this review: http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/176785-nvidias-new-maxwell-powered-gtx-750-ti-is-hyper-efficient-quiet-a-serious-threat-to-amd/3

Let's wait for coin miners review and experience with the card, not from PC hardware sites that cater for and make money out of gamers.

also you have to keep in mind the 750ti needs to run directly on a 16x slot on the motherboard, making its cost that much higher when you figure in the other hardware you'll need to run a decent quantity of them

Not with usb risers that source all power for molex plugs.

[ebliever]

15% isn't that bad, so long as your reject rate is increasing and dipping along with the pool's rate.  Having said that, I've found the following settings for my 290's to reduce my rates lower than the pool's average and still follow suit too.

For my Sapphire 290's:

-g 1
-w 256
--lookup-gap 2
--xintensity 300
--thread-concurrency 20481
--gpu-engine 1015
--gpu-memclock 1500
--gpu-powertune 22
--auto-fan
--temp-target 80
--gpu-vddc 1.025

For my Asus 290's:

Same as above except xintensity is 124 and thread concurrency is 20996.

Another thing I've noticed with the new sgminer.  If I start the program, allow it to run for a few seconds, close it, then immediately run it again, it evens out the hash and wu quicker as well as keeping the rejects lower.  Not sure why, but it works for me.

Hope all of this helped someone!  

I'm trying to adapt this to my 290X's (Sapphire as well). I had to bump my threads back to 27400 because I was getting scores of hardware errors. May I ask what scantime/queue/expiry settings you would advise?

So far things look hopeful, though I'm not sure why my old settings would be any worse than this. Thanks for taking the time to share this!

[YipYip]

Can we get an ETA on the new servers as my 66m farm is now reporting 50m accepted on your site

Thats a lot of hash being rejected ..the payouts are still good .. but with more horsepower I am sure we could be making more

put the ASIA POP in Australia