 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 »
|
When a person want to build an app using the platform will he/she also be able to use builder care and cloudops or are there fees to these as well?
I asked about this in the telegram and admin said there aren't additional fees to using those services. It depends how extensive you would like your software is. I believe the admin might be talking about actually just using the app, when ordering or building your bespoke software only.  Yeah, I guess it's pretty much like how it works when you're ordering on a website for example, wherein you browse and order what you like, then proceed to check out and pay for everything later.  Precisely correct! Well, at least that's what I think it would be, since it wouldn't make sense being charge using Builder just to find out how much it will cost to make your ideas come to life!  You are probably going to be charged only when you've reached check out, since there'll be a smart contract that you still have to sign and agree with, of course. Also, it's not necessarily chump change that you'll be paying for the use of Builder, in order to create and develop the software that your idea would need. Although Engineer.ai mentioned that you'll stand to save at least approximately 1/3 of the usual cost if you'd rather create your bespoke software from scratch.  So yeah, this is basically the dealmaker here, I guess! |
|
|
|
been reading about neural networks lately and i have been seen there a lot of itthe function of your ASI is like to help process one decision and send to developer how is the AI data set improved on
We have a 4 step QA process which includes two steps by human and two automatic ! 96% of people who build with us move to the recurring platforms. Can someone please explain and elaborate on this, or point me to the right direction instead (a link would suffice).  Thanks. |
|
|
|
will engineer.ai be having their own wallet?
It will launch a wallet as an added feature!  Are they also planning/thinking of creating a mobile app in the coming future? I think the mobile apps are included on their plans. Most people now are using mobile phones. Think so and if there are no important hindrances it would be funny if they don't create it since it's what this platform does. They even offer mobile app deal in their Builder dashboard. See no reason why they can't make one. They ought to have an app already given they're already functioning but if they don't have one yet I suppose they'll developer in no time. Tbh, i don't see a point of developing a mobile app for Builder. Just the web version is fine already, no need to go further than that. I agree too, that there isn't any point in developing a mobile app for Builder, if we're talking about its purpose in response to the needs of the client or idea maker! Nevertheless, here's a reply that I've mentioned previously (see the thread below), just to share my thoughts on the matter on why maybe there's a need to have a lite version perhaps (if Engineer.ai would deem it necessary to target instead), but it is for a different purpose other than what the web version is intended for, of course. I hope there would be a lite version of Builder, a budget version if you will for the rest of us that don't have the budget of SME's.
I'm don't think the builder is gonna cost anything to the client. The concern would be on the price of the features of the project but you will see the price of every feature so you can make it suit your need while keeping the cost in mind. Oh, don't get me wrong. You probably misunderstood what I meant when I mentioned that "I hope there would be a lite version of Builder." Needless to say, I am fully aware (based on the very well-made video advertisement of Engineer.ai of Builder) that you'll be paying only for the features you will use and need to create your bespoke software request, whether it's a unique special request that you need or if the software code is just essential to stitch everything together. Nonetheless, to further explain what I meant when I said "lite version of Builder, a budget version if you will for the rest of us that don't have the budget of SME's," is simply self-explanatory. In other words, "Builder is simply a tool that we need to use that is provided by Builder, of course. But if you're only an individual (a person with an idea) and you are not part of an SME, you generally would not have the budget that's needed to fund the bespoke software idea that you have!  So in essence, it is more of a product category perhaps that I was trying to emphasize earlier, for the lack of a better term or description for it. |
|
|
|
this project looks so prospective, both for bounty and investors. I watched the whitepaper, website, and one-pager. Complete and convincing. Hopefully, the Engineer.ai project is successful ... Good luck I couldn't agree with you more! Nevertheless, after we've read the whitepaper, one-pager, website homepage, including all the other social media links and news links provided about Engineer.ai and Builder, all we're waiting for now is really just the update regarding their ICO token sale info, of course. |
|
|
|
Still about three months before it ends, thanks for sharing. I agree! I also appreciate this information that's shared to all of us here, regarding this ongoing bounty! |
|
|
|
I hope there would be a lite version of Builder, a budget version if you will for the rest of us that don't have the budget of SME's.
I'm don't think the builder is gonna cost anything to the client. The concern would be on the price of the features of the project but you will see the price of every feature so you can make it suit your need while keeping the cost in mind. Oh, don't get me wrong. You probably misunderstood what I meant when I mentioned that "I hope there would be a lite version of Builder." Needless to say, I am fully aware (based on the very well-made video advertisement of Engineer.ai of Builder) that you'll be paying only for the features you will use and need to create your bespoke software request, whether it's a unique special request that you need or if the software code is just essential to stitch everything together. Nonetheless, to further explain what I meant when I said "lite version of Builder, a budget version if you will for the rest of us that don't have the budget of SME's," is simply self-explanatory. In other words, "Builder is simply a tool that we need to use that is provided by Builder, of course. But if you're only an individual (a person with an idea) and you are not part of an SME, you generally would not have the budget that's needed to fund the bespoke software idea that you have! So in essence, it is more of a product category perhaps that I was trying to emphasize earlier, for the lack of a better term or description for it. |
|
|
|
good article but some might have a different view!! AI will assist in operations and man will just have to have some say in it So far I like AI implementation to help to make the process faster and better but there is still a lot of ethical questions about leaving everything to AI. I'm still not comfortable with leaving everything to AI, that might be because of sci-fi movies. (I'm looking at you Skynet and Hal 9000.) If I'm not mistaken, the AI here is actually limited to automation only. So far, that's my observation too! It's not as if when you're being assisted by Builder, everything is going to be done automatically. To the contrary, the automation is only applicable during the order process of Builder. |
|
|
|
AI is really become a thing that might actually replace so many jobs
i believe more automated and speedy response. i see that engineer AI taking advantage of this space
I believe that AI may appear to actually replace traditional human or human-assisted jobs initially. But in truth, it will only open the doors towards a lot of other possibilities instead since evolution plays a larger role in our lives, which even includes AI and it's automated tasks as well.  Basically, AI has many different levels and forms. It isn't really just a one size fits all software that works for everyone's needs. |
|
|
|
|
I hope there would be a lite version of Builder, a budget version if you will for the rest of us that don't have the budget of SME's.
|
|
|
|
will engineer.ai be having their own wallet?
It will launch a wallet as an added feature! Are they also planning/thinking of creating a mobile app in the coming future? I think the mobile apps are included on their plans. Most people now are using mobile phones. Think so and if there are no important hindrances it would be funny if they don't create it since it's what this platform does. They even offer mobile app deal in their Builder dashboard. See no reason why they can't make one. Builder by E.ai will make the impossible possible. I wonder what apps they have developed that we might have heard about I'm also curious to know more about this too, in order for us to be able to see what they've done so far already! |
|
|
|
Will the token be traded in exchanges? or is just for payment in the platform ?
I believe that it can be the best of both worlds and it will probably be available for both! |
|
|
|
Does engineer.ai have any competition in this space?
hmm good question, i've never seen anyone doing what they do there are competitors in build on-demand market but like you said they are unique in how the system works. AI and blockchain is only used by this project I think. Indeed, there is a market for bespoke software development and Engineer.ai does have competitors, but probably none yet in the crypto and blockchain industry. |
|
|
|
This asset can change the world and will help all people become more free and more useful. I believe on this and want to be a part of this.
so you propose this is better than what ever will currently have in the market ? dont you think so, with all that have been said it is sure better process and ease reach for software development It might be the best because even with the current company by using the Builder they have managed to complete the most of the projects in the shorter amount of time and for less cost than they have expected. This is not common in the development space. They are using an approach that has been tried and tested. I agree if you're referring to the Builder platform that they've had since 2017. |
|
|
|
What I like about this idea is it tackles the very basic transaction between different merchants and banks . Crypto usage is still a taboo for merchants as volatility sets in but they are really open to the idea of the project of handling the process of conversion.
Yes, volatility remains to be an issue indeed. And until that separate issue gets resolved, we'll eventually find out if engineer.ai's token economics will prove to be a strong reason and indicator for their NAYA token to become relevant in the crypto marketplace, as a means of payment outside engineer.ai's ecosystem. |
|
|
|
This is a great idea, Is the platform open for testing, I would love to work with the API, What are the requirements I need to get started, also is there a bounty program for this plan?
Aside from liking and loving the ICO project - Bounty is life, of course! |
|
|
|
Engineer.Ai create something that would keep customers who will continue to promote them to other people.
I can't argue with you on that and the good thing about Engineer.ai, business of any size will be able to create and own custom software without risking over-budget projects or unexpected failures. Exactly they are always on Budget, Wicked Fast and always there that's the core promises of Enginner AI. That's by no mean an easy goal to achieve. Is there any insurance that the project will deliver it? I believe this was answered already, it was explained extensively in their Whitepaper and it has been summarized on their One Pager too! In a nutshell, the Naya token is A PLATFORM OF TRUST. To further explain, the Naya is an ERC-20 utility token that allows clients to escrow payment based on smart contract managed deliverables and quality verification by independent stakeholders. |
|
|
|
I can’t forecast what will happen with this market, but I know that in next several years they will come much more organized.
Well, it's a no brainer really because that's how things usually work at the beginning and if they aren't regulated yet, of course.  I agree! Nobody can really predict with certainty about what will really happen to the market! And if someone is forecasting or predicting what's going to happen to the market, it's still purely speculation of course. |
|
|
|
I think we should remember that Cryptopia is a very low volume exchange. As well that many traders do not care to participate in the airdrop. So when considering the points above I really look forward to see a higher volume exchange list this token.
They didn't announce any exchange yet, it's not even in the token sale It's ok, some people would always love to speculate. Don't worry about it! |
|
|
|
It looks as if your solution may end up being longer than the time for traditional methods to have achieved same results. Invariably i think we have to wait to see how your platform works before we can judge it!
Hmm... interesting! But why do you think so, that their "solution may end up being longer than the time for traditional methods to have achieved same results?" |
|
|
|
It's nice how they built a platform that uses AI, it takes someones idea and builds half of it automatically, and then we find people to make it unique for you without you having to know how to code!
The idea part is the vision, the builder part is the automation. And I agree, engineer.ai has something special going on by combining them both in their own unique way. Actually, it's quite an ingenious business model they've come up with. Imagine this, if Steve Jobs were to have this option before? |
|
|
|
|
