 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 »
|
|
Hi. I have not heard this name but I have lost my money on other sites.
My advice to you is not to put your money in an unknown place and remember that this money is not all the savings of your life that if you lose it, your life will be destroyed.
|
|
|
|
You see, buddy, things aren't going as well as you thought. I gave you some warnings, you remained deaf. After I removed the red tag, in the morning I saw the same plagiarism. But you cleverly deleted that topic along with my post. You probably don't understand the forum correctly. Tell me, who needs to warn you every time when your next mistake occurs? You had several chances to read the rules, and only then run for a promotion in rank. For some reason I have no doubt that you lost this time. If the moderators do not see your mistakes, then morvillz7z has repeatedly pointed out them. Take this into your experience.  I also promised to publish quality articles and you can see it in my new articles. I know I made mistakes in the past and I admit they were wrong. And this morning these articles were deleted. So there is no need to worry anymore. I understand this forum and I wish that the negative points be removed from me. |
|
|
|
You plagiarized plenty of technical analysis and now you have to prove that you are willing to change. The admins haven't banned you (yet) so take that as a good sign. Many users didn't get a second chance, you did. That negative tag could stay with you forever, or be removed if morvillz7z notices an improvement on your end.
I struggled for months and really did not know I had to list the sources. I now have 56Activity and if it reaches 60 I will become a member. I hope he gives me another chance to show myself. Also, with this negative score, my words do not matter on any page. I also deleted the previous posts that were without source. And from now on, I will leave fewer posts with more quality. In the hope of forgiveness |
|
|
|
How about you go through your own posts and correct the ones that you didn't write yourself? You know quite well where you got the information from so add the sources to your posts. If more similar content is found, you could be banned. So go and take care of it.
I will definitely do that. And I am pursuing the removal of unsourced posts. Of course, I hope this negative point will be removed as soon as possible. |
|
|
|
Please ban user F_Societys! Many of their posts are heavily plagiarized, stolen articles misrepresented as their own. Said account is using text-spinning tools to avoid detection! User was first mentioned in this thread: Paraphrased articles, without providing links to originals.A few quick examples: Copy:Ripple's latest trademark is Ripple Impact, which was filed with the USPTO on August 19. The trademark has now been approved by the government and added to the TRAM system on August 22, which hosts all US federal trademarks.
According to the attached documents of this trademark, Ripple Impact is supposed to facilitate the financing of various programs and services in the field of financial innovations in line with the functions of Xpring, Ripple's investment arm:
The Ripple Impact brand is expected to cover the Ripple Foundation's charitable services by carrying out fundraising activities, supplementary financing, capital improvement financing, scholarships and grants for courses and services of other companies in the field of financial technologies. (archive) Original:The latest trademark, "RIPPLE IMPACT™," was filed on Aug. 19. It was accepted by the USPTO and then added to the TRAM system of all active federal trademark registrations on Aug. 22.
According to its description, the initiative will follow in the footsteps of Ripple's investment arm, Xpring, by providing funding to various programs and services in the realm of financial innovations:
RIPPLE IMPACT™ trademark registration is intended to cover the categories of charitable foundation services, namely, providing fundraising activities, supplemental funding, capital improvement funding, scholarships and financial assistance for programs and services of others in the field of financial technology.
Copy:The French branch of Just Eat online food ordering service has started accepting bitcoins for on-demand orders from more than 15,000 French restaurants. As it turns out, Justite uses the services of the Bitpay payment company to activate this feature.
The outbreak of the coronavirus and the requirement of quarantine regulators and social distancing rules have led to a growing wave of demand for online food ordering services. At the same time, the use of cash declined.
In an interview with the media, Gregory Raymond, author of the French publication, said:
Just eat is one of the main players in the food ordering and delivery industry in France, and its action to expand the acceptance of digital currencies can help to learn the use of these emerging currencies among members of society.
( archive) Original:Food delivery service Just Eat France has started accepting Bitcoin payments for orders placed from over 15,000 restaurants in the country. The delivery service is using Bitpay as its Bitcoin payment provider.
Home delivery services have been in high demand during the coronavirus pandemic, as lockdown orders and social distancing regulations have forced customers out of sit-down restaurants. At the same time, the use of cash is declining.
“Just Eat is a major player in the delivery of meals in France; this initiative could help to democratize the use of cryptocurrencies among the general public,” Gregory Raymond, writer for French publication Capital.fr, told Decrypt.
edit; two good reports and still not banned?!  Let me try one more time: Copy:In 2014, Leah McGrath Goodman published a report in Newsweek claiming that Dorian Satoshi Nakamoto, a 64-year-old Japanese-American man from Southern California, was the creator of Bit[Suspicious link removed]dman claims that Doreen Nakamoto "implicitly" identified himself as Satoshi Nakamoto in an interview with Goodman; However, Doreen Nakamoto later vehemently denied any involvement in the creation of bitcoin.
McGrath Goodman is a distinguished reporter who has won awards in his career and has published articles in prestigious publications such as the Wall Street Journal, Fortune and the Guardian. In an interview with Anthony Pompliano, he explained that he now has new information about Nakamoto's identity and intends to write more about it.
( archive) Original:When it was understood that Dorian Satoshi Nakamoto, who was at the top of the agenda with the news he made in 2014, but 64-year-old Dorian Satoshi Nakamoto had nothing to do with Satoshi, the real creator of Bitcoin, a new Satoshi statement came from the journalist who caused an investigation against Newsweek.
As it will be remembered, Dorian Nakamoto, who was heavily influenced by the media due to the name resemblance at that time, stated that he had no contribution in the creation of Bitcoin, although he admitted his identity.
At the time, Leah McGrath Goodman, who made the news and published award-winning news in media outlets such as the Wall Street Journal, Fortune and The Guardian, participated in the podcast of Morgan Creek Digital’s co-founder Anthony Pompliano and explained that she reached more information on the subject: Hi, as I told you in a personal message, these are old articles and I did not know that I should not copy them. And in the conversation I had with lovesmayfamilis, he explained the subject to me. If my previous articles have problems, please let me know so I can delete them. Also in the new article I wrote myself ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5278935.0) As you can see, it is quality and with principles. So please remove the negative score from my page. I need your help, dear ones. If you see an error in my posts, please send me a message first so that I can correct it myself. Give me hope by you dear ones. |
|
|
|
|
Maybe this is a game and he wants to stir up the atmosphere during the elections and use the policy of this work to his advantage.
|
|
|
|
despite what your title says you had zero analysis about any kind of dependence of bitcoin price on gold! which is understanding because there is no dependence at all to analyze. bitcoin history is not a couple of weeks, it is more than 11 years. and in that time it has never had any dependence on any other market including gold.
the reason you are having a tough time understanding why bitcoin price is rising and staying above $10k while other markets such as gold are having trouble and even dumping is that your initial assumption of dependence was wrong.
As I said, this is just a hypothesis, and in some cases they were in the same direction. And maybe it's because of society or something else. The only goal is to come up with a new idea. In 2019, everyone was saying that bitcoin is independent of everything, and as we have seen, the corona virus affected bitcoin as much as it affected gold, cars, oil, stocks, and the dollar. |
|
|
|
First, I'll say also Bitcoin not correlated or dependent with gold. But we can say they are some similar parts or charasteristics. But when we talk about the price of Bitcoin and Gold, it's another part.
As I said in the answer below, this dependence is not yet clear: My opinion is that there is dependency. It may be low, but it exists.
I have looked at the charts of gold and bitcoin over the past few months and found that they are in the same direction in (some) movements.
And this dependence cannot be taken for granted. Perhaps the conditions of society cause both to rise or fall, and we assume that they are interdependent. This is just a guess.
I love your chart especially you using the MACD (which I am not an of it). But what my attention got is the stochastic RSI you made, when you look at the second chart, we still not reached the overbought area which I can say, there's a lot more room for upward prices of Bitcoin.
My main goal was to show that the final price can be higher than the current price, and this opens the way for more purchases. Also thank you for your kindness.  |
|
|
|
I was thinking the same about US elections (Nov) and then some third quarter numbers to spread terror among the ranks (early October) but I wonder why you think the dump only happens to 9k and not much lower? Definitely represents a big fat buy in that's sure to return gains within the end of 2020, but personally feel the real Black Day event wasn't in March.
Because nothing is clear in the elections and it is like a double-edged sword. Also, everyone said about the corona virus that a sharp drop in prices is on the way, but we saw that it dropped very little and, according to you, compensated us. The same may be true of elections. However, depending on the circumstances, we may see a terrible fall. Bitcoin is not depending on gold, it is not a connection like that and it is funny that people may even consider it that way. Bitcoin and gold is basically the same logic of investment, maybe not the same numbers but they do have resembling charts and the reason why people invest into those is the same thing as gold since people want to keep their purchasing power at the same level when they buy gold and they do the same with bitcoin.
Let's assume you have 100k and there is a car you want to buy which is 100k, next year it will be 105k so if you buy gold or bitcoin you want the value of your 100k investment to them to become 105k and still be able to buy the car, you can't do that with cash and you don't know what happens with the company you buy the stock of so the best method is still bitcoin and gold.
My opinion is that there is dependency. It may be low, but it exists. I have looked at the charts of gold and bitcoin over the past few months and found that they are in the same direction in (some) movements. And this dependence cannot be taken for granted. Perhaps the conditions of society cause both to rise or fall, and we assume that they are interdependent. This is just a guess. |
|
|
|
I see that you have taken your time to do that analysis, but I do not accept the premise that the bitcoin price depends on the price of gold. You say so yourself:
Apparent relationships can be established between almost anything. Yes, sometimes gold price is similar to bitcoin price, and they have similar features but I don't think we are going to go farther than: "sometimes the price behaves similar and sometimes not".
Yes, I spent a few hours writing this article, and also this dependence on gold occurs in many things, and I think bitcoin may have a slight dependence on gold. Gold and the dollar are highly dependent on the market today. The Corona virus has also shown us that bitcoin is not isolated in the world but interacts with other things. I haven't taken a look at the charts since last week so my opinions about bitcoin's price action and movement is a bit outdated. But my mid-term and long term targets haven't changed. It's a bullish bias. If everything goes as planned with no fud to cause a sell-off (covid-19 /Elections, etc) we might see $13K bitcoin before the end of the year. Your prediction is a bit optimistic, but not impossible. If a vaccine is made, I think we will see a drop in prices! In this way, people empty their safes and live without the Corona virus. And this reduction in market size can lead to a sharp drop in prices, and deceive people by creating fear and emotional decisions. The only way in this situation is to make rational decisions. If you've compared both bitcoin, gold and stock charts like that of S&P500 recently, You would've seen that they've all been correlated. Earlier this month, There were covid-19 fud going round and gold dropped. It didn't take long for Bitcoin to join the party taking altcoins along with it. Even though Bitcoin is seen as a "store of value" and doesn't depend on the stocks and currency market, its worth noting that it does correlate from time to time as most people who are invested in cryptos are also stock traders/investors so where's a fud like the one we had in March about covid-19, they usually take out their money from all markets, when a lot of people do same, it causes a panic followed by a sell-of.
If there's one thing I've learned from market, it's the fact that we should always learn to evolve. These dependencies are sometimes strong and sometimes very low, but the dependence on the dollar, bitcoin, gold, oil, and the stock market is undeniable. As you said, they act like a cycle. |
|
|
|
Crypto Trader's the most preferable subjet is the prediction about bitcoin.Many analysts predicted how high and low bitcoin prices could go, similarly, Samson Mow, CSO in Blockstream, which is a leading provider of blockchain technologies and CEO at Pixelmatic, tweeted his opinion on the bitcoin price.What is your opinion?
Bitcoin is unpredictable and we all know that. But my opinion is that we will finish this year with 11,000 and we will probably be around 17,000 for next year. Also, for the next 10 years, Bitcoin is in the range of 25,000 or 30,000, and I do not think that 100,000 will appear any time soon. |
|
|
|
I don't like when something like this accident happens. It harms the Bitcoin reputation. Many people still associate Bitcoin with money laundering and illicit activity.
It makes sense to consider it relevant. Because it is easier and more interesting for fraudsters to track it down. The solution is to change the way we look and think. And people should not think that bitcoin is just for money laundering. Well I'm not surprised that the authority or someone keep track or trace the transactions made in crypto or bitcoin, it is because as the time goes by I know that the technology is becoming more powerful tool even in internet.
This woman's emotional decision had three consequences: 1- The woman herself is found guilty 2- Injury to the public mind 3- Destroying the face of Bitcoin Of course, bitcoin is not destroyed by these actions, but this news can draw negative views towards bitcoin, and in this case, governments will take strange actions ... |
|
|
|
Hello friends, this analysis is my personal opinion and I am waiting for your guidance. First analysis:
Well, in the image below, you can see that the beginning of the previous wave was bullish.  And the price was trying to break the resistance lines 1 and 2.And if you look at the chart:  Bitcoin was able to cross the resistance line 1, but the divergence in the MACD seems noticeable, the price is currently moving in the tangent of the upper Bollinger Band. It seems that if it does not cross the 10915 resistance, we will see reforms in the coming hours; Expect correction until line 1 support test and 4-hour Pivot 10700 and in case of failure, support 10600. Second analysis:Gold fell sharply until early next month, but at this point we see that bitcoin is moving a little independently and a little bit dependent on gold. Which seems a bit suspicious and it is possible that exchange offices and whales are converting their bitcoins into dollars before the fall. and bitcoin prices will soon enter the 9000 channel.So that they can buy again in that channel. I hope collective wisdom helps us make the best decision ❤ |
|
|
|
|
The function of bitcoin can be explained to the elderly by making educational videos.
Or by inviting people to the big Bitcoin family by illustrating how Bitcoin works and explaining how it works (which should be done by people who specialize in it) as well as raising public awareness.
|
|
|
|
You can use paper wallets or put some coins in a digital wallet. This idea is also very good and can make the culture of using bitcoin more understandable to the community. It also makes the use of bitcoin more understandable to the people of the community that bitcoin can even be used as a birthday present.  |
|
|
|
Sometimes womens have really mad ideas...
These ideas are not for women or men, and sex discrimination cannot be discussed here. People take crazy actions with misconceptions that are sometimes based on the lifestyle and influence of internet networks and movies. Although this article is a small example of this, it was interesting because of the bitcoin debate. |
|
|
|
It is difficult to believe these "stories". Can anyone be so dumb to actually hire a murderer for just $5,000? I still remember the case of Ross William Ulbricht. The FBI wanted to make sure that he remains behind bars for the rest of his life and it is being alleged that they created some fake web chats showing that he hired contract killers to take down his competitors. It is very easy to create fake web chats.
The important thing in this case is the name of Bitcoin. I think governments want to make bitcoin look bad because the whole world depends on cash, and governments know that. Bitcoin will take a lot of power from them. Now, they may want to tarnish the identity of Bitcoin with news or fake deeds and pretend to people that Bitcoin is bad.
I could not believe that really some people can kill other people for bitcoin until I visited the darkweb. If you visit darkweb (I would highly recommend you not to) there are many websites and organizations there you can give them some bitcoins to kill anyone you want in all over the word. I even saw the option where you can could ask them for a body part or ask them to make it looks like and accident. Which really crazy and unbelievable to see some people created a website for it. I think these actions are really damaging the bitcoin reputation in all over the world to see the criminals are using the bitcoins (and recently sometimes monero) as the main currency for their dirty works.
I have seen these sites and I can say that more than 70% of them are either police or spies. These are the only ways to trap criminals. And the other 30 percent who use bitcoin, I think, is normal. In the past, criminals traded in cash, gold, etc. and if Bitcoin can improve itself in terms of good deeds, it can show people what its true power is.
If someone can make use bitcoin to purchase any kind of commodities in some country, i think people can also use bitcoin to hire a killer or spear people life also.
For her to make use of bitcoin to hired that killer to kill for her, it have no effect to bitcoin than to promote bitcoin how important it is a in country.
since the killer said she make use of bitcoin to hired him,very easy to trace if actually the court want to know the truth of the matter whether she make use of bitcoin for the payment to the killer.
Bitcoin will not slip with these actions and these violations. All Bitcoin has to do is stay on track and show the world that it is not just for murder and theft. Instead, Bitcoin is set to change cities and lifestyles. And that only happens over time.
Anyway, this kind of hiring method is pretty old and they can be easily tracked now. Mostly, this kind of thing happened in the dark web because most of the underground transactions such as this are common there. Most of the time people who offer such services are just scammers and fraudsters but there is a tendency that you are talking to real criminals which were happened here in this topic. That's why of all the places on the internet you should avoid going to that place.  https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/reasons-avoid-dark-web/In the past, it was difficult to trace these events. But now, with the advancement of police science, almost all roads are closed and people think that everything is like a movie and they can do anything. Also, when you enter the dark web space, there are thousands of scammers, and if you lose property, nothing can be done. And it is not only bitcoin that is traded on these networks, and today, as in the past, there is a large volume of cash transactions. And this is a complete picture:  [moderator's note: consecutive posts merged] |
|
|
|
I'm not saying you copy-pasted this post, but since it sounds quite as if you did, you should add the source to your article, if not you will be banned for plagiarism.
I have added the source. Sorry you did not read it: According to coindesk Thirty-six-year-old Kristy Lynn Felkins has been summoned to court on charges of paying 12 bitcoins ($ 5,000 at the time) for trying to hire a killer to kill his ex-wife. The case is said to be related to another case involving the recruitment of a killer. It is worth noting that this killer was not hired in the end.Also, I did not copy the text and turned it into an article. And this statement of yours upset me.  he means you should add the source link. https://www.coindesk.com/nevada-woman-charged-in-bitcoin-murder-for-hire-as-a-mystery-hacker-again-turns-tipstershe ordered a hitman(s) in 2016. no wonder she paid 12 bitcoins which worth $5,000 at the time. The essence of the problem is that your original articles are in English of high quality, but your replies are low quality posts in English of moderate quality. That's extremely suspicious. Also, your shitposts get reported by me and deleted by the mods, yet you continue to post the exact same "yes oh my gawd you're so rite" replies to every single person who posts a reply here. If you wish to post such childish stuff, I'd suggest you start your own forum or a blog or whatever, instead of polluting this community which is doing everything every day over and over to keep spammers and shitposters like you out of here. So quit whining about being upset and delete your posts from today voluntarily, instead of letting other people waste their time and energy reporting and deleting them, until eventually you get banned. I will do this soon. Also, during the conversation I had with the director of the association, it was decided that my previous articles, which are not of good quality, would be removed and new, high-quality articles would be replaced. I also have to say about responding to others that I do as you say and spend more on analytical answers.
Why would she even trust hiring a killer without really knowing who's the killer and how she can trust him that she'll get what she paid for. She should've done it herself because she'll just also end up in jail. But kidding aside, some people really think that they can run away with all their wrongdoings using bitcoin... People who think this way is just ruining the image of bitcoin, giving others a misconception about bitcoin that's why some people think bitcoin is something bad.
By doing this, not only will the face of Bitcoin not be tarnished, but it will also make people who have never heard of Bitcoin known to it. This is what makes Bitcoin so popular. At the same time, it should be borne in mind that the ultimate goals of this news are in the hands of the people and they must maintain their awareness. [moderator's note: consecutive posts merged] |
|
|
|
For this woman, making a contract to someone in the darkweb to hire a killer is already a sin. Look she was still hoping that it will go as plan, but look at how the scammers did to her, ask for more money. And then someone leaked the information to the authorities getting here arrested and for sure going to jail for her actions here, very stupid. As far as bitcoin, it's dark market, people only transact their using crypto what do you expect? But it doesn't mean that bitcoin is going to be used for this purposes only, it's just part of the equation.
This woman has been deceived and lost her property. I also agree with you that a lot of crimes are being committed these days and a limited portion belongs to Bitcoin. People are quick to point to this limited area and say bad bitcoin. Yet they forget its goodness. |
|
|
|
Please ban user F_Societys! Many of their posts are heavily plagiarized, stolen articles misrepresented as their own. Said account is using text-spinning tools to avoid detection! User was first mentioned in this thread: Paraphrased articles, without providing links to originals.A few quick examples: Copy:Ripple's latest trademark is Ripple Impact, which was filed with the USPTO on August 19. The trademark has now been approved by the government and added to the TRAM system on August 22, which hosts all US federal trademarks.
According to the attached documents of this trademark, Ripple Impact is supposed to facilitate the financing of various programs and services in the field of financial innovations in line with the functions of Xpring, Ripple's investment arm:
The Ripple Impact brand is expected to cover the Ripple Foundation's charitable services by carrying out fundraising activities, supplementary financing, capital improvement financing, scholarships and grants for courses and services of other companies in the field of financial technologies. (archive) Original:The latest trademark, "RIPPLE IMPACT™," was filed on Aug. 19. It was accepted by the USPTO and then added to the TRAM system of all active federal trademark registrations on Aug. 22.
According to its description, the initiative will follow in the footsteps of Ripple's investment arm, Xpring, by providing funding to various programs and services in the realm of financial innovations:
RIPPLE IMPACT™ trademark registration is intended to cover the categories of charitable foundation services, namely, providing fundraising activities, supplemental funding, capital improvement funding, scholarships and financial assistance for programs and services of others in the field of financial technology.
Copy:The French branch of Just Eat online food ordering service has started accepting bitcoins for on-demand orders from more than 15,000 French restaurants. As it turns out, Justite uses the services of the Bitpay payment company to activate this feature.
The outbreak of the coronavirus and the requirement of quarantine regulators and social distancing rules have led to a growing wave of demand for online food ordering services. At the same time, the use of cash declined.
In an interview with the media, Gregory Raymond, author of the French publication, said:
Just eat is one of the main players in the food ordering and delivery industry in France, and its action to expand the acceptance of digital currencies can help to learn the use of these emerging currencies among members of society.
( archive) Original:Food delivery service Just Eat France has started accepting Bitcoin payments for orders placed from over 15,000 restaurants in the country. The delivery service is using Bitpay as its Bitcoin payment provider.
Home delivery services have been in high demand during the coronavirus pandemic, as lockdown orders and social distancing regulations have forced customers out of sit-down restaurants. At the same time, the use of cash is declining.
“Just Eat is a major player in the delivery of meals in France; this initiative could help to democratize the use of cryptocurrencies among the general public,” Gregory Raymond, writer for French publication Capital.fr, told Decrypt.
edit; two good reports and still not banned?! Let me try one more time: Copy:In 2014, Leah McGrath Goodman published a report in Newsweek claiming that Dorian Satoshi Nakamoto, a 64-year-old Japanese-American man from Southern California, was the creator of Bit[Suspicious link removed]dman claims that Doreen Nakamoto "implicitly" identified himself as Satoshi Nakamoto in an interview with Goodman; However, Doreen Nakamoto later vehemently denied any involvement in the creation of bitcoin.
McGrath Goodman is a distinguished reporter who has won awards in his career and has published articles in prestigious publications such as the Wall Street Journal, Fortune and the Guardian. In an interview with Anthony Pompliano, he explained that he now has new information about Nakamoto's identity and intends to write more about it.
( archive) Original:When it was understood that Dorian Satoshi Nakamoto, who was at the top of the agenda with the news he made in 2014, but 64-year-old Dorian Satoshi Nakamoto had nothing to do with Satoshi, the real creator of Bitcoin, a new Satoshi statement came from the journalist who caused an investigation against Newsweek.
As it will be remembered, Dorian Nakamoto, who was heavily influenced by the media due to the name resemblance at that time, stated that he had no contribution in the creation of Bitcoin, although he admitted his identity.
At the time, Leah McGrath Goodman, who made the news and published award-winning news in media outlets such as the Wall Street Journal, Fortune and The Guardian, participated in the podcast of Morgan Creek Digital’s co-founder Anthony Pompliano and explained that she reached more information on the subject: I try to look better and do the right thing. Please give me another chance and forgive me. I hope this case is closed against me |
|
|
|
|
