Yay, thank you for purchasing UK_Guy! With your bot, do I need to have my web browser open for it to work?
In the video, I intentionally recorded from opening the browser otherway you wouldn't see anything xD. In practice, you don't have to keep it open as it's creating its own instance when the time comes and even then you could completely hide GUI with a setting. @codex, you may wanna add this to the FAQ... |
|
|
|
OK, here's the video as promised.  Please notice, in the video I set the bot to preview instead of post because I recorded more video to have some contents to choose from and didn't want to spam. But it's just backing up the re-usability of this software, isn't it? @codex, you may wanna add this to the thread l8r. |
|
|
|
Video is coming soon so stay updated ^_* Check our group's page often too since we're gonna release more products in the future! |
|
|
|
TeamWe consider a level of transparency very important in this community and a necessary element of fair business so why don't You get to know Us better?PremiumCodeX - Programmer of this autobump-bot. You may turn to Him related software-technical questions. Youresioure - General customer support. If something doesn't work as promised, You may turn to Me for help. UGMZ - Security specialist. You may turn to Him related platform-technical questions.
Mefie - Security and marketing advisor. You may know His name from other forums, He's giving Us advice related marketing here. |
|
|
|
|
I've teamed up with @codex already and you'll recognize soon you could only win with this opportunity. It's not a rip off like, unfortunately too, many other groups. We've programmed a product already and we're gonna release it these days.
|
|
|
|
But Unix didn't die, and its bloodline didn't interrupt anywhere. Therefore, your analogy is not quite correct if you meant that Bitcoin would die one day. There are quite a few Unix flavors still alive today, which are the direct descendants of the original Bell Labs Unix system developed in the early 1970s. Such operating systems like macOS, BSD family, Solaris are true Unices which are in active use nowadays.
But as you're writing, it's the BLOODLINE (descendant systems), not the original Unix. Unlike Unix, BTC cannot be changed that much and technologies that descend from BTC aren't BTC. Ethereum, Monero... They have their blockchains, they wouldn't exist without BTC, but they're not BTC and they could be here even after BTC. Now, I'm not claiming that they'll be active after BTC, but other crypto probably. In the past 20 years, the bloodline of Unix went through MUCH. In the following 20 years, many new coins will come. |
|
|
|
|
Look out, the legendary price's coming and hacking attempts become more serious. Hacking attempt could be insider job, too. I'd say, it's USUALLY an insider job. Not in all cases are the whole Staff with the attackers, but usually there's an inside contact. If a similar case happens at an exchange, I become more curious about the developer team, too. Do you know their names? Are they legit people? Important questions.
|
|
|
|
More than likely it's been picking up on the heuristics of what your code is doing and flagging that as an issue. Several compilers have workarounds to deal with it, as an example Dev-C++ is notorious for setting off AVG. You might want to consider changing your compiler as well to another one, often the signature of open source compilers (if you're using one) might use a consistent cpu flag that AV's are monitoring for. Check the support forums for your compiler and the support forums for your compiler, it's more than likely someone has the same issue as you do too.  Fantastic, Thank You, @coverme! In fact, it was the compiler, which was a free software. Compiling the exactly same code in MS VS 2013 didn't trigger the AV. And I'd expect an open-source compiler to be more "AV friendly", simply because it's source code is known to them. But nah. I think, I'll stay with Visual Studio from now on. |
|
|
|
|
Change usually brings issue. It may worth in the future, but will it worth in the future? If you're the webmaster, the risk management belongs to you. At my sites, we didn't switch to FaucetHub(dot)io even though I cannot really say anything wrong about it, just because of being afraid of the issue that a change could bring.
|
|
|
|
Based on my experience on the script-quality of most casinos, I can tell it's better than they're paying manually  It'd be a neat system to see, but I think it'd need expensive scripts and why would people spend on these scripts when major casinos don't use them either? Maybe a casino developer with much free time and unstoppable motivation could release a proof-of-concept or script, but I haven't seen any of them so far. |
|
|
|
|
You could discuss your idea with someone before asking for a loan, I think. It'll save you a lot of trouble in short and long term as well. From your description, it's more like a few thoughts than a working plan. People who'll loan you usually want to see the plan first. Discussing your thoughts with someone will help you put these thoughts into a plan.
|
|
|
|
|
The issue isn't what or why anymore, but HOW. I believe, everyone's trying to do what you're writing in the thread, still only a few keep their ways 'great'. So, I think it's more like an idea than a way. Do you have anything else to add to it?
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sharing your opinion in this question. There're two groups of black-hat hackers (hackers who are participating in illegal activity e.g.: hacking exchanges). One group's driven by hunger of profit. The other group's driven by desire to prove that they can do it. Hacking exchanges now is VERY profitable and which else date would be more beautiful than hacking an exchange when BTC hits $1000, the legendary price that everyone expected for so long?
|
|
|
|
|
BTC will be taught, but I do not think that it would last for that long. Blockchain technologies, on the other hand, will and people will use blockchain technologies in different projects and BTC will be remembered as the first currency that used blockchain.
|
|
|
|
Many AV's do this..
I never knew how could I fix this.
Althouhg I'm not some of a good coder,just when I do some Visual Basic,it's always like a "virus" or whatever.
Gets annoying.
Yeah, it's so annoying when you're just developing some totally harmless software and the AV pops up saying it's very similar to idk what generic trojan when I'd be the happiest if I knew how to code such a malware. Scan it with virustotal, then report it to the AV's, virustotal shares the files and they get manually checked at some point so it will eventually reduce your false positives.
Thank you! That's actually a very good idea. It makes the report easier too since Virustotal shares it with multiple providers so you don't have to send your file to each provider one by one. |
|
|
|
There should be a way to report it as a false positive to the AV company.
Do they take such reports seriously? How much time could it take for them to fix the false detection since the date of requesting? I'm asking this very important question because it could mean a disadvantage against the concurrent products that don't have this issue. |
|
|
|
|
That's why people are advised not to keep much from their funds at exchanges. Such sites are attacked continually and if there's a single flaw, it'll be exploited against them and their users. I understand the difficulties of keeping an exchange flawless though and I can appreciate their quick reaction and honesty about the situation. I hope, they'll resolve it quickly. But people's funds gonna be safe according to their words, aren't they?
|
|
|
|
|
I've come across this experience a few times, but I've experienced it at other, mainly new executables too. When it happened at me, I usually let the clients do detailed security analysis, for instance with Anubis, on it and uploaded as proof that my executable was legit. But that's an uncomfortable situation to go through. What should I do if one or more AV detects the .exe of my application as suspicious/malware (false positively)?
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion could have a topic of online Bitcoin wallets that aren't indexed. I know about alot of online Bitcoin wallets from a simple Google search, but I'd be excited to see if there're Bitcoin online wallets that aren't indexed by search engine and have some interesting features.
|
|
|
|
|
In 2016, keeping your funds in Bitcoin had better "interest" than any bank I know of. Hopefully, this will continue in 2017 until Bitcoin becomes more stable. I keep its potential Bitcoin's greatest advantage.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
