|
We need a wallet that doesn't HOG resources.... I'm running the new 0.10.6.3 on Linux and it's eating 2.1 GB of memory. 2.1 GB! That's just nuts! I hope the devs address this soon. No wallet using that much memory will ever become mainstream.
|
|
|
|
Make a backup of your wallet dat
Delete COLX and .colx folder
Install wallet again
Sync
Replace your wallet dat in the wallet folder
Ok... started everything from complete scratch. Same error. |
|
|
|
Close your wallet and Browse in your app data folder, COLX and make a backup of your wallet dat (usb stick)
After you rename the COLX golfer in COLX_old
Then you restart your wallet, waiting for full sync and close wallet.
After you copy the backup from your wallet dat in the COLX folder (appdata)
Now it’s working again
Using Linux, so I don't have any folders called COLX. I have one called ColossusCoinXT. Are you saying I need to sync with a new wallet then copy over the backup wallet? |
|
|
|
|
I keep getting the following error:
*** System error while flushing: CDB : Error -30974, can't open database
Have tried to resync twice, always get this error. Can anyone help?
|
|
|
|
|
Trying to run colx-cli and it keeps saying "error: incorrect rpcuser or rpcpassword (authorization failed)". I have the info in ColossusCoinXT.conf, so what gives?
|
|
|
|
|
The memory usage is a real problem... I'm running 10.6.2 Linux version and it is using 2.1 GB of memory. That is just a ridiculous amount of memory to use for a wallet!
|
|
|
|
I've rethunked my initial statement about the new mns requiring more 8bit to run than 112 (which is current amount). I have to say I kind of dig having a lot of mns running at once it makes things interesting... how many will each mn require in new release? If it goes up to 1000 or something I only can run 1 :-S also, Will new 8bitd require 500 mb RAM still :-) ? That would be cool because I'm overflowing with it at this point.
This is still open question (current proposal of collateral is 1024 coins). There are two concurrent objectives: - security: cheap masternode means people will not stake what introduces a security issue for the network - fair distribution: expensive masternodes means only small group of people will collect great rewards However, it can be also balanced using block reward and MN/stake reward ratio (block reward - current proposal 1 coin [current value: 1.2], MN reward - 0.80 [current value: 0.88]). As we can see, inflation will be slightly reduced, though MN will be still much more profitable than staking. This effect is currently mitigated because of no MN payment enforcement, however, with a new code base those payments will be enforced and MN profitability will be stunning. What is not cool from network security perspective. Therefore - I keep this topic open and and I am looking forward for your (not only r8st) feedback. I do like the idea of 1024 coins for a masternode... puts us on par with some of the bigger coins. I am a bit confused though... right now, mn requires 112 coins and I get mn rewards of .88 coins. If the mn increases to 1024 coins, are you saying that i'd just receive .8 coins? Wouldn't this go up with the increase in mn required coins? Now, i'd be able to run about 9 mn's, which means .88 * 9 = 7.92 coins. Am I missing something (probably am)? 8BIT supply is fixed, every block X coins is minted (though we will introduce a halving and a cap to make the coin deflationary). With the MN worth 112 coins there are 300+ MNs, when we will bump the collateral to 1000, then number of all masternodes will be 9x smaller, therefore your income will stay unchanged. This is simplification though, since not all MN owners run 9+ MNs, therefore either they will spend more 8BITs to run one MN or they will be forced to switch into staking (what is good from the network security point of view and bad from new coin allocation & MN services distribution perspectives). TL;DR: if you own 9+ masternodes now, you will have one masternode after the fork while your income will stay the same. Note that this explanation covers MN collateral only, it does not take MN reward change into account. Neither it takes extra income from those who had "cheap" <9 masternodes and will give up collection of more coins to run a single "expensive" masternode. Ok, that makes sense. Thanks for the explanation. |
|
|
|
I've rethunked my initial statement about the new mns requiring more 8bit to run than 112 (which is current amount). I have to say I kind of dig having a lot of mns running at once it makes things interesting... how many will each mn require in new release? If it goes up to 1000 or something I only can run 1 :-S also, Will new 8bitd require 500 mb RAM still :-) ? That would be cool because I'm overflowing with it at this point.
This is still open question (current proposal of collateral is 1024 coins). There are two concurrent objectives: - security: cheap masternode means people will not stake what introduces a security issue for the network - fair distribution: expensive masternodes means only small group of people will collect great rewards However, it can be also balanced using block reward and MN/stake reward ratio (block reward - current proposal 1 coin [current value: 1.2], MN reward - 0.80 [current value: 0.88]). As we can see, inflation will be slightly reduced, though MN will be still much more profitable than staking. This effect is currently mitigated because of no MN payment enforcement, however, with a new code base those payments will be enforced and MN profitability will be stunning. What is not cool from network security perspective. Therefore - I keep this topic open and and I am looking forward for your (not only r8st) feedback. I do like the idea of 1024 coins for a masternode... puts us on par with some of the bigger coins. I am a bit confused though... right now, mn requires 112 coins and I get mn rewards of .88 coins. If the mn increases to 1024 coins, are you saying that i'd just receive .8 coins? Wouldn't this go up with the increase in mn required coins? Now, i'd be able to run about 9 mn's, which means .88 * 9 = 7.92 coins. Am I missing something (probably am)? |
|
|
|
MutualCoin Holders POS PoolYearly 5000% | Weekly 95.89% | Daily 13.70% | Fee 0.70% | Daily Stake After Fee 13.00%
Yearly 10000% | Weekly 191.78% | Daily 27.40% | Fee 1.40% | Daily Stake After Fee 26.00% How to join Staking Pool: After your deposit is confirmed you will get @Pool Member rank in Discord, access to private channel and access to Google sheets. 25000 - 50000 Blocks 5000%
Current Block: 48273
50000 - 60000 Blocks 10,000% So are those rewards only for people in the pool, or can you get those rewards in your own wallet? Been staking for over 24 hours, no coins (in my own wallet). |
|
|
|
|
Any plans to get this coin on coinmarketcap.com?
|
|
|
|
|
So... I'm trying to calculate the number of coins per day that a mn should generate. With synx there is a block every 60 seconds and 10 coins per block... masternodes get 50%. So if I assume there are 500 mn's on the network it should be:
(86400 / 60 * 10) / 500 = 28.8.
But it's not right... to make it accurate I have to divide that by 1.7.
Anyone know why that is?
|
|
|
|
|
We need to get the coin on another exchange... something like kucoin.com or mercatox.com would be reasonable to get done. Nova is going away, so even if the wallet were fixed there it's not a good solution.
|
|
|
|
|
There are a number of other exchanges we could get on... but not without an active dev. There are a number of them that don't cost to list, but without the dev we're kind of screwed. Dev needs to show up and become active or admit he's bailed and let community take things over. Then we can at least get on a few exchanges.
|
|
|
|
Thanks... was missing the 'Sha256NmcAuxPowChain' piece. |
|
|
|
Trying to get the api to work... any ideas how to get the api to work to get balance of specific address? |
|
|
|
|
Is there a block explorer with an api for this coin?
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah... we have passed supposed block. Where is the new wallet?
|
|
|
|
I'm running a Linux masternode and the payouts above are about what I'm getting. Should I be getting better results?
If you are talking about this image  then this is about what you should get. Exact transactions will vary as it is dependent on the amount of coin staking but it is random so everything balances out, you might get a little less one week but a few weeks later you will get a little more. And just think, this is before the difficulty fix so, when we get that update rolled out, there will be a lot more staking which means a lot more rewards. Matrix Yeah, basically... my masternode has been up for about 5 days and just checking yesterdays numbers it brought in 1.89 coins. Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
