Anyone saw pirate yet?
His plane is being tracked by all of Bitmanity. It's either about to touchdown or already has. I have seen a pirate and he looks like a pirate. does he wear an eyepatch? If not I am disappoint. |
|
|
|
no you won't loose your initial deposit (ok you may and its not VERY unlikely) Exactly how unlikely? Are there any facts that the supposed (un)likeliness is based upon? bitcoinmax is just a pass through to pirate - which means if pirate defaults bitcoinmax will not pay out anything. Sorry if this is a redundant question, but exactly who or what is "pirate"? I found several topics on this but didn't find any clear explantion or definition? See this thread. |
|
|
|
You have to actually make a deposit, thats the catch.
Secondly, there are no guarantees, its 100% risk. So do I lose the initial deposit and only receive the weekly interest in return? Is this in any way not a pyramid scheme? you do not lose the initial deposit. It gets returned to you whenever you want. Also please take this to other threads, it doesn't belong here at all. |
|
|
|
hasnt gotten back in pm yet to me =/
people have to sleep/work, you know?  |
|
|
|
it seems some competitors are offering 'direct sub-accounts' in bitcoin savings and trust.
i just want to be clear in saying that the *only* reason i haven't offered that yet is because doing so would still be vapour-ware at this point.
once i see the new BST site for myself and have a clear understanding of it's setup, then i will make an announcement regarding direct access between my lenders and BST.
thanks.
Please don't. I love the extra options you're providing. |
|
|
|
It worked  Not here... (at least not yet?) Got it. |
|
|
|
I couldn't get it to work on HTC desire as well. I'm porting it to java though, so it will run natively on android (soon, hopefully).
you're porting electrum to java? Yes. Not exactly, but it uses the same concept (wallets won't be compatible, at least not for now). |
|
|
|
So, why I cant offer this?
Sure you can, we're just trying to explain to you why you won't have any takers. There is no incentive for anyone to invest with you under those terms. You will either have to remove restrictions and offer 7% or offer more than 7% with those restrictions in place. At least in that case I *might* be interested. |
|
|
|
|
Does anyone know how long it takes for bitcoins to appear in the account? It says 3 confirmations, but I'm on 6 9 and they're still not showing up. Thanks in advance.
nevermind
|
|
|
|
|
A big thank you to everyone! I will make sure Bitcoin 100 gets to their donators page asap.
|
|
|
|
Oh well, time to give more of these useless bitcoins and litecoins away...
I will happily take some of those useless bitcoins off you. Address is in my sig. |
|
|
|
|
Thanks so much Bruno (and Rassah)!
|
|
|
|
But as long as there is no mathematical proof that such attack is impossible, I do not feel entirely comfortable with deterministic keys You might have bigger problems then since ecdsa is also only assumed to be secure. |
|
|
|
I would make the price crash to 0.001.
Please do this. That would be so awesome! |
|
|
|
|
Bruno are you still with us? Haven't heard anything from you in a long tine...
In other news we have decided to sell off the entire balance of 1kenyaDrbe2W9KfC7djWAZbAKzSR2aXdX over BitStamp exchange directly to their SEPA account (listed on their site) this friday (one week before the departure).
|
|
|
|
|
Wow what a lousy day. Hope it all works out for you.
|
|
|
|
or if anyone, it ought to honor famous scientists or engineers that brought about fundamental advances in the science of computing. Then it should be Taher Elgamal on whose idea bitcoin security is based on. |
|
|
|
It's not in the transaction list yet, as I'm not fully updated yet.
So there's no faster way to know if I've sent the funds until I'm fully synced?
If it's not in the transaction list then I don't think the transaction was completed. If you know the address you sent to you can check if the transaction appears on blockchain.info. If it's not there then it didn't happen. |
|
|
|
So I tried to send some BTC before my Wallet is fully synced,
I hit send, and then the BTC client froze had to force quit it,
Do I need to send the funds again? or will it automatically resend once I'm up to date?
It will automatically rebroadcast the transaction if it is shown in the transaction list. |
|
|
|
Replied. Basically, it doesn't ever seem like there's a problem to the user.. other than that the coins never show up in the receiving wallet. There are connections, the send process looks to complete just like all the other times, just nothing actually happens. Not a bug with the app, just the stupid transaction fees. Basically, I was attempting to send something like 51 btc from 4 inputs to a single output and it was being rejected because I didn't include a fee. Instead, if I sent each of the input amounts separately, they were relayed successfully. The fees are having the exact opposite of their intended results... a bunch of single, smaller transactions work vs 1 larger transaction that doesn't work. That means the transaction was larger than 10 kB in size? With only 4 inputs I find this a little bit hard to believe... Either that or the following isn't correct (or there is a bug in the software): A transaction can be sent without fees if both of these conditions are met:
- It is smaller than 10 (SI) kilobytes (10.000 bytes).
- All outputs are 0.01 BTC or larger. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
