hey spiff, good to see ya
still didn't get your real account back???
Thanks ! Still no word from my account. Yefi seemed to fare better. Maybe I should send another PM. |
|
|
|
|
23/10 for the ATH guessing game. Reason: continue superexponential trend (in log charts) towards the bottom of the channel because the old ATH would be resistance.
|
|
|
|
Yeah, it feels like this is the Purging the Newbies - phase. I was buying coins from people with only 1-2 trades in their history.
What platform gives you that info ? Bitcoin.de Thanks |
|
|
|
Yeah, it feels like this is the Purging the Newbies - phase. I was buying coins from people with only 1-2 trades in their history.
What platform gives you that info ? |
|
|
|
The lack of fear here makes me think this has further to go down.
Why should we fear the opportunity to buy more cheap coins? I didn't say you should. |
|
|
|
The lack of fear here makes me think this has further to go down. I am still operating under the assumption that we will see another upleg after this, but the sentiment is starting to make me doubt. But maybe this forum is too "specialized" to get an accurate reading of the sentiment of the new money. EDIT: ^ thanks ghandi for the above post giving me some hope  |
|
|
|
The question is, which will tank the most from China shutting ?
• demand
• supply
In a "bubble" new money is coming in from everywhere, so freezing one area should have a net negative effect. |
|
|
|
It will bottom out in the $2200-$2800 region.
I am looking for the 2900-3300$ region.. |
|
|
|
|
Anyone know of a good place to trade fiat/BTC pairs on margin (besides OKex, Bitfinex and Kraken)?
|
|
|
|
|
Looks poised for another leg up.
|
|
|
|
Greatest country on the fucking planet, It was. Not anymore. Civil war and mass poverty and starvation is coming. My tax plans include planning on living longer than the US exists. Pessimistic about US, optimistic about your life span or both? |
|
|
|
Lisk is currently doing this.....MOONSHOT....would be nice to see BTC keep up ratio wise to that right now Slow and steady wins the race. Digibytes jumped up like Ram Man and look what happened there. I see they got to you too (account hackers). |
|
|
|
If weeks ago or even days ago someone said "put loads of money in monero 2 days before btc segwit activation" I would have said you need to take your medication my friend and maybe go back to your padded room.
Wow wtf? |
|
|
|
|
I might have missed it, but does anyone have an explanation for the price difference between Finex and Stamp (usd)?
|
|
|
|
However it turns out, I think we'll all be worse off than if the forks had been avoided altogether.
Yes, but this is a fallacy. Bitcoin forks can be created by anyone, at any time. Trying to change rules to appease some vocal subset wouldn't stop or block such ability. In fact it is a feature by design. There is no "avoiding it" and there's no one that Bitcoin should have to appease or answer to except for the majority of it users, and to implement/include things that insure it's own long term survival. The existing attributes and rules do just that. They can also be tweaked as time goes on. A 2MB blocksize increase by Core would've preempted any need for Segwit2X. It may have even have avoided the BCC fork. It's healthy for the miners and economic nodes to try to force features into bitcoin. This whole process keeps Core honest, and makes sure bitcoin doesn't just become a technocracy, run by a bunch of computer scientists in an ivory tower. You don't have to give into every whim by the miners, but you need to manage them and give them small concessions (like 2MB blocks, IMO). We'll see how secure Core remains if/when 80%+ hashing power switches to the fork. I'd agree that doesn't seem very economically sustainable ATM, though. I think I agree. It is sometimes hard to judge these situations, but your words mirror some worries/sentiment that I have. |
|
|
|
|
I am also not getting any replies...
|
|
|
|
|
My Account "Spaceman_Spiff" was hacked. I was stupid enough to reuse a weak password (I figured there was no monetary value involved, but now that it happened I am angry I didn't put in a better password anyway). I saw this guy has been posting on the forum, probably trying to scam people.
He changed the password and the associated email adress.
Does anybody know which moderator I should contact to flag this issue? Or is there an email address for support or so? I would prefer it if they could reset the password and change the email adress to mine again, but obviously closing the account is acceptable also, as long as this guy doesn't use my name to scam people.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
